Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T21:08:56.695Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

4 - Refuge or Prison? Girls' Experiences of a Home for the ‘Mentally Defective’ in Scotland, 1906–1948

Mary Clare Martin
Affiliation:
University of Greenwich
Jane Hamlett
Affiliation:
Royal Holloway, University of London
Lesley Hoskins
Affiliation:
Queen Mary, University of London
Rebecca Preston
Affiliation:
Royal Holloway, University of London
Get access

Summary

Mental Deficiency and Institutional Care

The Mental Deficiency and Lunacy (England and Scotland) Acts of 1913 provided funding for the institutionalization of those considered to be ‘on the borderland of imbecility’ at a time of neither universal access to healthcare nor entitlement to education beyond elementary schooling. One explanation historians have offered has been the influence of eugenics: contemporary fears that the ‘feeble-minded’ required permanent segregation or they would multiply and become a threat to society. Another is that universal elementary education, which was compulsory in Scotland from 1872, and in England and Wales from 1880, drew attention to those who were considered incapable of being educated in ordinary schools. For Mathew Thomson, a historian specializing in psychology and mental deficiency, the ‘problem’ also concerns the definition of citizenship within new forms of democracy, and new forms of disciplinary medico-legal power.

Despite the potential impact of this legislation on children and adolescents as well as adults, only limited research exists on how these institutions were experienced. Oral history accounts provide mixed responses, though Jane Read has shown how such sources might be problematic. Steve Humphries highlights the opposition of working-class parents to attempts by the authorities to incarcerate disabled children, the grim realities of institutional life and inmates' resistance. Anne Borsay argues that ‘once inside, personal identity was systematically attacked’.

Type
Chapter
Information
Residential Institutions in Britain, 1725–1970
Inmates and Environments
, pp. 65 - 78
Publisher: Pickering & Chatto
First published in: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×