Aegean Sea Continental Shelf, Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1978, 39.Google Scholar

Arrest Warrant of 1 April 2000 (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Belgium), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 2002, p. 3.Google Scholar

Border and Transborder Armed Actions (Nicaragua v. Honduras), Jurisdiction and Admissibility, Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1988, p. 105.Google Scholar

Certain Questions of Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters (Djibouti v. France), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 2008, p. 177.Google Scholar

Colombia v. Peru, Asylum case, I.C.J. Reports 1950, p. 266.Google Scholar

Corfu Channel (United Kingdom v. Albania), Merits, I.C.J. Reports 1949, p. 4.Google Scholar

Land and Maritime Boundary between Cameroon and Nigeria, Preliminary Objections, Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1998, p. 275.Google Scholar

Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reports 2004, p. 136.Google Scholar

Maritime Delimination and Territorial Questions Between Qatar and Bahrain, Jurisdiction and Admissibility, Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1994, p. 122.Google Scholar

North Sea Continental Shelf, Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1969, p. 3.Google Scholar

Nuclear Tests (Australia v. France), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1974, p. 253.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Naser Oric (International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia), Judgment of June 30, 2006, IT-03-68-T.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Zoran Kupreškić, Mirjan Kupreškić, Vlatko Kupreškić, Drago Josipovic, Dragan Papic, Vladimir Santic (International Criminal Tribunal for the Fomer Yugoslavia), Judgment of January 14, 2000, IT-95-16-T.Google Scholar

S.S. Lotus (France v. Turkey), 1927 P.C.I.J. (ser. A) No. 10 (Sept. 7), 44.Google Scholar

S.S. Wimbledon, 1923 P.C.I.J. (ser. A) No. 1, 25.Google Scholar

Territorial and Maritime Dispute (Nicaragua v. Colombia), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 2012, p. 624.Google Scholar

Doswald-Beck, L. (general editor), San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflicts at Sea (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Institut de Droit International, “The Manual on the Laws of War on Land, adopted at Oxford on September 9, 1880” (1881–1882) 5 Annuaire de l’Institut de Droit International.Google Scholar

International Law Association, “Final Report of the Committee: Statement of Principles Applicable to the Formation of General Customary International Law” (2000).Google Scholar

International Law Commission, “Guiding principles applicable to unilateral declarations of States capable of creating legal obligations, with commentaries thereto,” Yearbook of the International Law Commission 2006, vol. II, Part Two.Google Scholar

International Law Commission, “Draft conclusions on identification of customary international law, with commentaries,” Yearbook of the International Law Commission 2018, vol. II, Part Two.Google Scholar

Program on Humanitarian Policy and Conflict Research at Harvard University, HPCR Manual on International Law Applicable to Air and Missile Warfare (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Schmitt, M. (ed.), Tallinn Manual on the International Law Applicable to Cyberwarfare (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Schmitt, M. (ed.), Tallinn Manual on the International Law Applicable to Cyber Operations, 2nd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar

Aalberts, T., and Werner, W., “Mobilizing Uncertainty and the Making of Responsible Sovereigns,” Review of International Studies, 37 (5) (2011), 2183–2200.Google Scholar

Alvarez-Jimenez, A., “Methods for the Identification of Customary International Law in the International Court of Justice’s Jurisprudence: 2000–2009,” International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 60 (3) (2011), 681–712.Google Scholar

D’Amato, A., “The Concept of Human Rights in International Law,” Columbia Law Review, 82 (6) (1982), 1110–1159.Google Scholar

D’Amato, A., “Human Rights as Part of Customary International Law: A Plea for Change of Paradigms,” Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law, 25 (1996), 1–43.Google Scholar

Allee, T., and Elsig, M., “Are the Contents of International Treaties Copied-and-Pasted? Evidence from Preferential Trade Agreements,” NCCR Working Paper No. 8, August, available at: www.boris.unibe.ch/89220/3/Are%20the%20Contents%20of%20International%20Treaties.pdf (accessed January 22, 2019).Google Scholar

Anderson, M. R., et al. (eds.), The International Law Commission and the Future of International Law (British Institute of International and Comparative Law, 1998).Google Scholar

Allen, J., “Thematic Repetition as Rhetorical Technique,” Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 21 (1) (1991), 29–40.Google Scholar

Arendt, H., On Revolution (New York: Penguin Books, 1963).Google Scholar

d’Aspremont, J., “Canonical Cross-Referencing in the Making of the Law of International Responsibility,” in Forlati, S., Mbengue, M. and McGarry, B. (eds.), The Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Judgment and Its Contribution to the Development of International Law (Leiden: Brill/Nijhoff, 2020), 22–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

d’Aspremont, J., Formalism and the Sources of International Law: A Theory of the Ascertainment of Legal Rules (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

d’Aspremont, J. and Besson, S., “Introduction,” in The Oxford Handbook of the Sources of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar

Baker, R., “Customary International Law in the 21st Century: Old Challenges and New Debates,” European Journal of International Law, 21 (1) (2010), 173–204.Google Scholar

Balkin, J., “Being Just with Deconstruction,” Social and Legal Studies, 3 (3) (1994), 393–404.Google Scholar

Barnes, L., “‘The Image of a Quest’: The Visual Archives of Rithy Pahn,” Australian Humanities Review, 59 (2016), 190–208.Google Scholar

Barth, J., Lost in the Funhouse (New York: Doubleday, 1968).Google Scholar

Beard, J. and Pahua, S., “Before the Beginning: A Disclosure of Law’s Foundation,” Australian Feminist Law Journal, 19 (1) (2003), 1–10.Google Scholar

Beckett, S., Waiting for Godot: A Tragicomedy in Two Acts (London: Faber & Faber, Ltd., 2006).Google Scholar

Bentley, E., The Life of Drama (New York: Atheneum, 2008).Google Scholar

Berger, P., and Luckmann, T., The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge (New York: Penguin Books, 1967).Google Scholar

Bianci, A., “Security Council’s Anti-Terror Resolutions and Their Implementation by Member States,” Journal of International Criminal Justice, 4 (5) (2006), 1044–1073.Google Scholar

Boer, L., “Lex Lata comes with a Date; or, What Follows from Referring to the ‘Tallinn Rules,’” AJIL Unbound, 113 (2019), 76–80.Google Scholar

Boer, L., and Stolk, S. (eds.), Backstage Practices of Transnational Law (London and New York: Routledge, 2019).Google Scholar

Boer, L., and Werner, W., “It Could Probably Just as Well be Otherwise: Legal Imageries of Cyberwar,” in Ambrus, M., Rayfuse, R. and Werner, W. (eds.), Risk and the Regulation of Uncertainty in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017), 39–60.Google Scholar

Bos, M., “Recognized Manifestations of International Law,” German Yearbook of International Law, 20 (1977), 11–76.Google Scholar

Boulter, J., Beckett: A Guide for the Perplexed (New York: Continuum, 2008).Google Scholar

Boyle, D., “Shattering Silence: Traumatic Memory and Reenactment in Rithy Pahn’s S-21: The Khmer Rouge Killing Machine,” Framework, 50 (1–2) (2009), 95–106.Google Scholar

Bradley, C. (ed.), Custom’s Future: International Law in a Changing World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016).Google Scholar

Brecht, B., A Short Organum for the Theatre (London: Methuen, 1964 [1948]).Google Scholar

Brierly, J. L., “The ‘Lotus’ Case,” Law Quarterly Review, 44 (1928), 154, 155.Google Scholar

Brown, G. and Poellet, K., “The Customary International Law of Cyberspace,” Strategic Studies Quarterly (2012), 6 (3) 126–145.Google Scholar

Brunschwig, C., Legal Education Films for Law Students, Beck Community, https://community.beck.de/gruppen/forum/audio-visual-law/legal-education-films-for-law-students (accessed November 10, 2020).Google Scholar

Bruster, D. and Weimann, R., Prologues to Shakespeare’s Theatre: Performance and Liminality in Early Modern Drama (Abingdon and New York: Routledge, 2004).Google Scholar

Camhi, L., “The Banal Faces of Khmer Rouge Evil (interview with Rithy Pahn),” New York Times, May 16, 2004.Google Scholar

Camus, A., The Myth of Sisyphus and Other Essays (New York: Vintage Books, 1991, translated by O’Brien, Justin).Google Scholar

Caputo, J., “Kierkegaard, Heidegger and the Foundering of Metaphysics,” in Perkin, R. (ed.), International Kierkegaard Commentary: Fear and Trembling and Repetition (Macon, GA: Mercer University Press, 2014), 201–246.Google Scholar

Cassese, A., International Law, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Cassese, A., “Terrorism is Also Disrupting Some Crucial Legal Categories of International Law,” European Journal of International Law, 12 (5) (2001), 993–1001.Google Scholar

Cheng, B., General Principles of Law as Applied by International Courts and Tribunals (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Choi, S. and Gulati, M., “Customary International Law – How Do Courts Do It?” in Bradley, C. (ed.), Custom’s Future: International Law in a Changing World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016), 117–147.Google Scholar

Corbett, P. E., “The Consent of States and the Sources of the Law of Nations,” British Yearbook of International Law, 20 (1920), 20–30.Google Scholar

Crawford, E., “Levée En Masse: A Nineteenth Century Concept in a Twenty-First Century World,” Sydney Law School Research Paper, 11/31 (2011).Google Scholar

Crawford, J. and Viles, T., “International Law on a Given Day,” in Ginther, K., Hafner, G., Law, W., Neuhold, H. and Sucharipa-Behrmann, L. (eds.), Völkerrecht zwischen normativen Anspruch und politischer Realität. Festschrift für Karl Zemanek zum 65. Geburtstag (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1994), 45–68.Google Scholar

Crites, S., “‘The Blissful Security of the Moment’: Recollection, Repetition and Eternal Recurrence,” in Perkins, R. L. (ed.), International Kierkegaard Commentary: Fear and Trembling and Repetition (Macon, GA: Mercer University Press, 1993), 225–246.Google Scholar

Dalton, S., “Kierkegaard’s Repetition as a Comedy in Two Acts,” Janus Head, 4 (2) (2001), 1–17.Google Scholar

Davison, J., “Rhetoric, Repetition, Reporting and the ‘Dot.com’ Era: Words, Pictures, Intangibles,” Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21 (6) (2008), 791–826.Google Scholar

Deleuze, G., Difference and Repetition (New York: Columbia University Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Derrida, J., Difference in Translation (Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1985, edited with an Introduction by Graham, Jospeh F.).Google Scholar

Derrida, J., Negotiations, Interventions and Interviews, 1971–2001 (Redwood: Stanford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Derrida, J., Writing and Difference (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1978).Google Scholar

Descombes, V., Modern French Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Dinstein, Y., War, Aggression and Self-Defense (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Douglas, L., “Film as Witness: Screening Nazi Concentration Camps Before the Nuremberg Tribunal,” Yale Law Journal, 105 (2) (1995), 449–481.Google Scholar

Durkheim, E., The Division of Labor in Society (New York: The Free Press of Glencoe, 1960).Google Scholar

Dworkin, R., Law’s Empire (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1986).Google Scholar

Eckart, C., Promises of States under International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Effrony, D., and Shany, Y., “A Rule Book on the Shelf? Tallinn Manual 2.0 on Cyberoperations and Subsequent State Practice,” American Journal of International Law, 112 (4) (2018), 583–657.Google Scholar

Ehrlich, E., Fundamental Principles of the Sociology of Law (New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers, 1963).Google Scholar

Eliade, M., Cosmos and History, The Myth of the Eternal Return (New York: Harper & Brothers, 1954).Google Scholar

Eliade, M., Patterns in Comparative Religion (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Eliade, M., The Myth of the Eternal Return, Cosmos and History (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005, [1949] French ed. translated by Trask, Willard R.).Google Scholar

Eliade, M., The Sacred and the Profane, the Nature of Religion (London: Harcourt, 1987).Google Scholar

Elias, N., The Civilizing Process: The History of Manners and State Formation and Civilization (Oxford: Blackwell, 1994).Google Scholar

Elias, O., “The Nature of the Subjective Element in Customary International Law,” International Comparative Law Quarterly, 44 (1995), 501–520.Google Scholar

Elias, O. A., and Lim, C. L., The Problem of Consensualism in International Law (Leiden: Brill, 1998).Google Scholar

Felman, S., The Juridical Unconscious: Trials and Trauma in the Twentieth Century (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Felman, S., “The Return of Voice: Clause Lanzmann’s Shoah,” in Felman, S. and Laub, D., Testimony: Crises of Witnessing in Literature, Psychoanalysis and History (Abingdon: Taylor & Francis Group, 1992).Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, M., “History of Article 38 of the Statute of the International Court of Justice,” in d’Aspremont, J. and Besson, S. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Sources of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017), ch. 8.Google Scholar

Franck, T., Recourse to Force: State Action against Threats and Armed Attacks (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Franck, T., “Word Made Law: The Decision of the ICJ in the Nuclear Test Cases,” American Journal of International Law, 69 (1975), 612–620.Google Scholar

Fraser, N., “The Act of Killing: Don’t Give an Oscar to this Snuff Movie,” The Guardian, 23 February 2013.Google Scholar

Frazer, J., The Golden Bough, A Study of Magic and Religion (London: MacMillan, 1911).Google Scholar

Freistein, K., and Liste, P., “Organisation-im-Kommen: Intertextualer Institutonalismus in der Analyse von Weltorganisation,” in Koch, M. (ed.), Weltorganisationen (Wiesbaden: Springer, 2012), 71–100.Google Scholar

Freud, S., Beyond the Pleasure Principle (New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 1961, edited and translated by Strachey, James).Google Scholar

Gauthier, C., “Temps et eschatologie,” Archives de sciences sociales des religions, 162 (2) (2013), 123–141.Google Scholar

Gendron, S., Repetition, Difference and Knowledge in the Work of Samuel Beckett, Jacques Derrida and Gilles Deleuze (New York: Peter Lang, 2008).Google Scholar

Genette, G., Paratexts, Thresholds of Interpretation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987).Google Scholar

Genette, G., and Maclean, M., “Introduction to the Paratext,” New Literary History, 22 (2) (1991), 261–272.Google Scholar

Gifkins, J., “R2P in the UN Security Council: Darfur, Libya and Beyond,” Cooperation and Conflict, 51 (2) (2016), 148–165.Google Scholar

Gray, C., International Law and the Use of Force (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Greenfield, S., Osborn, G., and Robson, P., Film and the Law, The Cinema of Justice, 2nd ed. (Oxford and Portland: Hart Publishing, 2010).Google Scholar

Grierson, J., “The First Principles of Documentary,” in Forsythe, H. (ed.), Grierson on Documentary (London: Faber & Faber, 1966).Google Scholar

Grotowski, J., Towards a Poor Theatre (London: Methuen, 1969).Google Scholar

Guzman, A., The Consent Problem in International Law (Berkeley: University of California Open Access Publications, 2011).Google Scholar

de Guzman, M., Shocking the Conscience of Humanity: Gravity and Legitimacy of International Criminal Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020).Google Scholar

Hart, H., The Concept of Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1961).Google Scholar

Henriksen, A., International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar

Herman, J., Trauma and Recovery, The Aftermath of Violence – From Domestic Abuse to Political Terror (New York: Basic Books, 2015).Google Scholar

Hernandez, Michael V., “In Defense of Moot Courts: A Response to ‘In Praise of Moot Court – Not!’” The Review of Litigation, 17 (1) (1998), 69–90.Google Scholar

Higgins, R., Problems and Process: International Law and How We Use It (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Holland, P., and Patterson, M., “Eighteenth Century Theatre,” in Brown, J. R., The Oxford Illustrated History of Theatre (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995), 255–561.Google Scholar

Honig, B., “Declarations of Independence: Arendt and Derrida on the Problem of Founding a Republic,” The American Political Science Review, 85 (1) (1991), 97–113.Google Scholar

Howe Hall, F., Good Form for All Occasions – A Manual of Manners, Dress and Entertainment for Both Men and Women (New York: Harper, 1914).Google Scholar

Hughes, J., Deleuze’s “Difference and Repetition”: A Reader’s Guide (New York & London: Continuum, 2009).Google Scholar

Huhndorf, S., “Nanook and His Contemporaries: Imagining Eskimos in American Culture, 1897–1922,” Critical Inquiry, 27 (1) (2000), 122–148.Google Scholar

Kadens, E., “Custom’s Past,” in Bradley, C. (ed.), Custom’s Future: International Law in a Changing World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016), 11–34.Google Scholar

Kammerhofer, J., “Uncertainty in the Formal Sources of International Law,” European Journal of International Law, 15 (3) (2004), 523–553.Google Scholar

Kawin, B., Telling It Again and Again: Repetition in Literature and Film (Chicago: Dalkey Archive Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Kelsen, H., General Theory of Law and State (Clark, NJ: Lawbook Exchange Ltd., 2009, translated by Wedberg, Anders).Google Scholar

Kelsen, H., Society and Nature: A Sociological Inquiry (London: K. Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co., Ltd., 1946).Google Scholar

Kennedy, D., “When Renewal Repeats: Thinking Against the Box,” New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, 32 (2000), 335.Google Scholar

Kermode, F., The Sense of an Ending: Studies in the Theory of Fiction (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Kersten, M., “Challenges and Opportunities: Audio-Visual Evidence in International Criminal Proceedings,” Justice in Conflict, March 4, 2020, https://justiceinconflict.org/2020/03/04/challenges-and-opportunities-audio-visual-evidence-in-international-criminal-proceedings/ (accessed November 4, 2020).Google Scholar

Kierkegaard, S., Fear and Trembling and Repetition (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1983; original work from 1843).Google Scholar

King, H., “Born Free? Repetition and Fantasy in The Act of Killing,” Film Quarterly, 67 (2) (2013), 30–36.Google Scholar

Klabbers, J., International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar

Klabbers, J., “Qatar v. Bahrain: The Concept of ‘Treaty’ in International Law,” Archiv des Völkerrechts, 33 (3) (1995), 361–376.Google Scholar

Klabbers, J., “Treaties and Their Preambles,” in Bowman, M. J. and Kritsiotis, D. (eds.), Conceptual and Contextual Perspectives on the Modern Law of Treaties (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018), 172–200.Google Scholar

Kolasa, J., “The Legal Character of a Unilateral State Act,” at: www.repozytorium.uni.wroc.pl/Content/89554/PDF/01_J_Kolasa_The_legal_character_of_a_unilateral_state_act.pdf (no date) (accessed November 8, 2020).Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M., “Between Impunity and Show Trials,” in Frowein, J. A. and Wolfrum, R. (eds.), Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law, 6 (2002), 1–35.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M., From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M., The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870–1960 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M., “The Preamble of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights,” in Alfreðsson, G. S. and Eide, A. (eds.), Human Rights: A Common Standard of Achievement (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 1999), 27–40.Google Scholar

Kozinski, Alex, “In Praise of Moot Court – Not!” Columbia Law Review, 97 (1) (1997), 178–197.Google Scholar

Krygier, M., “Law as Tradition,” Law and Philosophy, 5 (2) (1986), 237–262.Google Scholar

Kundera, M., The Unbearable Lightness of Being (New York: Harper Perennial, 2009).Google Scholar

Kunz, J., “The Nature of Customary International Law,” American Journal of International Law, 47 (1953), 664.Google Scholar

LaCapra, D., “Lanzmann’s ‘Shoah’: ‘Here There is no Why,’” Critical Inquiry, 23 (2) (1997), 231–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lambert, L., “The Rupture Defense of Jacques Vergès: From Antigone’s Anger to Djamila Bouhired’s Laughter,” The Funambulist (2014), available at: https://thefunambulist.net/history/law-jacques-vergess-rupture-defense-from-antigones-anger-to-djamila-bouhireds-laughter (accessed November 12, 2020).Google Scholar

Lanzmann, C., Chevrie, M., and le Roux, H., “Site and Speech: An Interview with Claude Lanzmann about Shoah,” in Kahana, J. (ed.), The Documentary Reader: History, Theory, Criticism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016), 784–79.Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, H., The Development of International Law by the International Court of Justice (New York: Praeger, 1958).Google Scholar

Leander, N. B., “To Begin with the Beginning: Birth, Origin and Narrative Inception,” in Richardson, B. (ed.), Narrative Beginning: Theories and Practices (Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Lefebvre, A., The Image of Law: Deleuze, Bergson, Spinoza (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Lepard, B., Customary International Law: A New Theory with Practical Applications (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Liebman, S. (ed.), Claude Lanzmann’s ‘Shoah’: Key Essays (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Liu, M. Y., Yau, V., and Xiao, L., A Guide to the Philip C. Jessup International Law Moot Court Competition (Chinese Initiative on International Criminal Justice, 2014).Google Scholar

Luhmann, N., Das Recht der Gesellschaft (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1993).Google Scholar

Marcus, A., “Nanook of the North as Primal Drama,” Visual Anthropology, 19 (3) (2006), 201–222.Google Scholar

Margulis, E., On Repeat: How Music Plays the Mind (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Matzke, A., Arbeit am Theater; eine Diskursgeschichte der Probe (Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag, 2012).Google Scholar

Mead, G. H., Mind, Self and Society (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015; original from 1934).Google Scholar

Meijers, H., “How is International Law Made?” Netherlands Yearbook of International Law (1979), 3–26.Google Scholar

Mendelson, M., “The Subjective Element in Customary International Law,” British Yearbook of International Law, 66 (1) (1996), 177–208.Google Scholar

Mercier, V., “The Uneventful Event,” Irish Times, 18 (6) (1956).Google Scholar

Miller, J. Hillis, Reading Narrative (Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Miller, J. Hillis., “The Problematic of Ending in Narrative,” Nineteenth-Century Fiction, 33 (1) (1978), 3–7.Google Scholar

Moran, D., and Waldron, A., The People in Arms: Military Myth and National Mobilization since the French Revolution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Morris, E., “Play it Again, Sam (Re-enactments, Part One),” The New York Times (opinion pages), April 3, 2008.Google Scholar

Musil, R., Der Mann Ohne Eigenschaften (Lausanne: Ernst Rowohlt, 1943).Google Scholar

Nichols, B., “Documentary Reenactment and the Fantasmatic Subject,” Critical Inquiry, 35 (1) (2008), 72–89.Google Scholar

Nichols, B., Representing Reality: Issues and Concepts in Documentary (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Norindr, P., “The Sounds of Everyday Life in Rithy Panh’s Documentaries,” French Forum, 35 (2–3) (2008), 181–190.Google Scholar

Orford, A., “The Destiny of International Law,” Leiden Journal of International Law, 17 (3) (2004), 441–476.Google Scholar

Oz, A., The Story Begins: Essays on Literature (New York: Harcourt Brace, 1998).Google Scholar

Pahn, R., “The Missing Picture, text of the English voice-over,” reprinted in Cambodia Law & Policy Journal (2) (2014), 85–118.Google Scholar

Paramaditha, I., “Tracing Frictions in The Act of Killing,” Film Quarterly, 67 (2) (2013), 44–49.Google Scholar

Peirce, C. S., “How to Make Our Ideas Clear,” Popular Science Monthly, 12 (1877), 1–15.Google Scholar

Pellet, A., “Article 38,” in Zimmermann, A., Tomuschat, C. and Oelers-Frahm, K. (eds.), The Statute of the International Court of Justice: A Commentary (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), 677–793.Google Scholar

Petrov, A. O., Expert Laws of War: Restating and Making Law in Expert Processes (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2020).Google Scholar

Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, A., “Repetition or the Awnings of Justice,” in Ben-Dor, O. (ed.), Law and Art: Justice, Ethics and Aesthetics (London: Routledge, 2011), 45–58.Google Scholar

Popovski, V., and Fraser, T. (eds.), The Security Council as Global Legislator (London: Routledge, 2014).Google Scholar

Puchta, G. F., Das Gewohnheitsrecht (Erlangen: Palm, 1828).Google Scholar

Puchta, G. F., Lehrbuch der Pandekten (Leipzig: Barth 1838).Google Scholar

Rachid, M., and Knerr, C. R., “Brief History of Moot Court,” Paper for the 2000 Annual Meeting of the Southwestern Political Science Association, available at: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED442343.Google Scholar

Rappaport, R., Religion and Ritual in the Making of Humanity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Rayfield, D., Anton Chekhov: A Life (New York: Henry Holt and Company, 1997).Google Scholar

Reimann, M., “Nineteenth Century German Legal Science,” Boston College Law Review, 31 (4) (1990), 842–897.Google Scholar

Rennie, B. S., Reconstructing Eliade: Making Sense of Religion (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Roberts, A., Is International Law International? (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar

Roberts, A., “Traditional and Modern Approaches to Customary International Law: A Reconciliation,” American Journal of International Law, 95 (2001), 757.Google Scholar

Rodiles, A., Coalitions of the Willing and International Law: The Interplay Between Formality and Informality (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018).Google Scholar

Roele, I., “Disciplinary Power and the UN Security Council Terrorism Commitee,” Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 19 (1) (2014), 49–84.Google Scholar

Roscini, M., Cyber Operations and the Use of Force in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Roth, M., Hoffner, H., and Michalowski, P., Law Collections of Mesopotamia and Asia Minor (Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Russell, P. L., “Trauma, Repetition, and Affect,” Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 42 (4) (2006), 601–620.Google Scholar

Said, E., Beginnings: Intention and Method, 2nd ed. (New York: Columbia University Press, 2012 [1985]).Google Scholar

Sartre, J., Basic Writings (London: Routledge, 2001, edited by Priest, Stephen).Google Scholar

Savigny, von, F. C., Of the Vocation of Our Age for Legislation and Jurisprudence (Clark, NJ: The Lawbook Exchange Ltd., 1831, translated from German by Hayward, Abraham).Google Scholar

Savigny, von, F. C., System des heutigen Römischen Rechts (Berlin: Veit, 1840).Google Scholar

Savigny, von, F. C., Vom Beruf unserer Zeit für Gesetzgebung und Rechtswissenschaft (Heidelberg: Mohr und Zimmer, 1814).Google Scholar

Schabas, W., Unimaginable Atrocities: Justice, Politics and Rights at the War Crimes Tribunals (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Scharf, M., Customary International Law in Times of Fundamental Change: Recognizing Grotian Moments (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Schermers, H., and Blokker, N., International Institutional Law, 6th rev. ed. (Leiden: Brill/Nijhoff, 2018).Google Scholar

Schmitt, C., The Nomos of the Earth in the International Law of the Jus Publicum Europaeum (Candor, NY: Telos Press, 2006, translated by Ulmen, Gary, first published in German in 1950).Google Scholar

Schmitt, M., “International Law in Cyberspace: The Koh Speech and Tallinn Manual Juxtaposed,” Harvard International Law Journal, 54 (2012), 13–37.Google Scholar

Schneider, P., Performing Remains: Art and War in Times of Theatrical Reenactment (London and New York: Routledge, 2011).Google Scholar

Schwarzenberger, G., International Law (London: Stevens, 1957).Google Scholar

Shaw, M., International Law, 6th ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Shaw, M., International Law, 8th ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar

Silverthorne, M. J., “Laws, Preambles and the Legislature in Plato,” in Brooks, R. (ed.), Plato and Modern Law (Farnham: Ashgate Publishing, 2007), 489–501.Google Scholar

Smart, N., The Science of Religion and the Sociology of Knowledge (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1973).Google Scholar

Smith, J., Map is Not Territory: Studies in the History of Religions (Leiden: Brill, 1978).Google Scholar

Spence, L., and Navarro, V., Crafting Truth: Documentary Form and Meaning (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Spiermann, O., “Who Attempts Too Much Does Nothing Well: The 1920 Advisory Committee of Jurists and the Statute of the Permanent Court of International Justice,” British Yearbook of International Law, 73 (1) (2002), 187–260.Google Scholar

Spillane, M., coauthored by the International Bar Association, International Moot Court: An Introduction (Budapest: Central European University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Spiro, J., “Law Students and Audio-Visual Aids,” Journal of Legal Education, 6 (3) (1953–4), 382–385.Google Scholar

Stanislavski, C., An Actor Prepares (New York: Routledge, 1964, translated by Hapgood, Elisabeth Reynolds).Google Scholar

Stern, T., Philosophy and Theatre; An Introduction (London and New York: Routledge, 2014).Google Scholar

Stern, T., Rehearsal from Shakespeare to Sheridan (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000; reprinted 2003).Google Scholar

Stolk, S., and Werner, W., “Moving Images: Modes of Representation and Images of Victimhood in Audio-Visual Productions,” in Heller, K. J., Ohlin, J., Nouwen, S., Mégret, F. and Robinson, D. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Criminal Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019), 583–601.Google Scholar

Stoller, A., Knowing and Learning as Creative Action: A Reexamination of the Epistemological Foundations of Education (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014).Google Scholar

Sullivan, Gavin, The Law of the List: UN Counterterrorism Sanctions and the Politics of Global Security Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020).Google Scholar

Sweetser, C., “Humanity as Alpha & Omega of International Law, Four Replies to Anne Peters,” European Journal of International Law, 20 (3) (2009), 545–567.Google Scholar

Talmon, S., “Determining Customary International Law: The ICJ’s Methodology between Induction, Deduction and Assertion,” European Journal of International Law, 26 (2) (2015), 417–443.Google Scholar

Talmon, S., “The Security Council as World Legislator,” American Journal of International Law, 99 (2005), 175–193.Google Scholar

Thirlway, H., The Sources of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019).Google Scholar

Vaccaro, B., “The Presence of Absence: Our Losses Give Vitality to Our Lives,” American Scholar, March 11, 2014, available at: https://theamericanscholar.org/the-presence-of-absence/#.W8IqYy2YP_R (accessed November 12, 2020).Google Scholar

Vergès, J., De la Stratégie Judiciaire (Paris: Minuit, 1981).Google Scholar

Viebach, J., “The Evidence of What Cannot Be Heard: Reading Trauma into and Testimony against the Witness Stand at the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda,” International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 6 (1) (2017), 51–72.Google Scholar

Voermans, W., Stremler, M., and Cliteur, P., Constitutional Preambles: A Comparative Analysis (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2017).Google Scholar

Walden, R., “The Subjective Element in the Formation of Customary International Law,” Israeli Law Review, 22 (1977), 344–364.Google Scholar

Walker, J., “Referred Pain, The Act of Killing and the Production of a Crime Scene,” Film Quarterly, 67 (2) (2013), 14–20.Google Scholar

Wallace, D., and Reeves, S., “The Law of Armed Conflict’s ‘Wicked’ Problem: Levée en Masse in Cyber Warfare,” International Law Studies, 89 (2013), 646–668.Google Scholar

Walls, J., The Oxford Handbook of Eschatology (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Walters, S., “The Role of the Director,” November 30, 2006, available at: http://theatreideas.blogspot.nl/2006/11/role-of-director.html (accessed November 14, 2020).Google Scholar

Watson, A., The Evolution of Western Private Law, expanded ed. (Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Weckel, U., “Watching the Accused Watch the Nazi Crimes: Observers’ Reports of the Atrocity Film Screenings in Belsen, Nuremberg and Eichmann Trials,” London Review of International Law, 6 (1) (2018), 45–73.Google Scholar

Werner, W., “Justice on Screen: A Study of Four Advocacy Documentaries on the ICC,” Leiden Journal of International Law, 29 (4) (2016), 1034–1060.Google Scholar

Werner, W., “Recall It Again, Sam: Practices of Repetition in the Security Council,” Nordic Journal of International Law, 86 (2) (2017), 151–169.Google Scholar

Werner, W., “The Law at Hand: Paratext in Manuals on International Humanitarian Law,” in Krieger, Heike (ed.), Law-Making and Legitimacy in International Humanitarian Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, forthcoming 2021).Google Scholar

Werner, W., and Wolthuis, B., “World Legislation: Perspectives from International Law, Legal Theory and Political Philosophy,” special issue, International Organization Law Review, 8 (1) (2001).Google Scholar

White, N., “Lawmaking,” in Cogan, J. K., Hurd, I. and Johnstone, I., The Oxford Handbook of International Organizations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016), 1–24.Google Scholar

Wood, M., “The Present Position within the ILC on the Topic ‘Identification of Customary International Law’: In Partial Response to Sienho Yee, ‘Report of the ILC Project on “Identification of Customary International Law,”’” Chinese Journal of International Law, 15 (1) (2016), 3–15.Google Scholar

Wood, M., “The UN International Law Commission and Customary International Law,” Gaetano Morelli Lectures, 4th ed. (2017), 11, available at: www.scienzegiuridiche.uniroma1.it/sites/default/files/varie/GML/2017/GML_2017-Wood (accessed June 12, 2020).Google Scholar

Yee, S., “A Reply to Sir Michael Wood’s Response to AALCOIEG’s Work and My Report on the ILC Project on Identification of Customary International Law,” Chinese Journal of International Law, 15 (1) (2016), 33–40.Google Scholar

Yee, S., “AALCO Informal Expert Group’s Comments on the ILC Project on ‘Identification of Customary International Law’: A Brief Follow-up,” Chinese Journal of International Law, 17 (1) (2018), 187–194.Google Scholar

Yee, S., ‘Report of the ILC Project on “Identification of Customary International Law,”’” Chinese Journal of International Law, 14 (2) (2015), 375–398.Google Scholar