Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T05:29:09.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - The Council for Religious Affairs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 December 2009

Sabrina Petra Ramet
Affiliation:
Norwegian Institute of Technology, Trondheim
Get access

Summary

The beginnings of the present-day authority for the state control and supervision of religious communities reach back to the October Revolution, namely to the commission formed in 1917 by the National Commissariat of Justice, which, under the direction of the well-known lawyer M.A. Rejssner, formulated the edict of 23 January 1918 on the separation of church from state and school from church which is formally still valid today. After completion of that task in April 1918, this commission was continued in an interministerial special commission, also established by the commissary of justice, for the continuing development of cult-legislation. The commission was then integrated in May of 1918 into the Commissariat as the department for administration of the edict of separation. Led by the prominent Bolshevik P.A. Krasikov, its main task consisted in the practical accomplishment of the liquidation of the now secularised church property. Soon it was referred to as the ‘liquidation department’ or, alternatively, the ‘8th department’. In addition, the department had the characteristics of a consulting agency for the central governmental apparatus. In other words, it should provide binding answers to questions from the side of state institutions on the application of the cultlegislation, rule with final authority and precedent-setting influence in eventual disputes, and develop drafts for further cult laws. Furthermore, and this was most unusual for a department of the ministry of justice, it should also observe and co-operate in controlling the political activities of so-called ‘clerical parties’, in other words those powers in the religious communities which stood in opposition to the Soviet state. Thus the religious board of control's double function, valid until recently, emerged at a very early point in time.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×