Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- List of Figures
- List of Tables
- List of Contributors
- Preface
- 1 The Vitalities of Çatalhöyük
- Part I Vital Religion: The Evolutionary Context of Religion at Çatalhöyük
- Part II Vital Materials at Çatalhöyük
- 7 Relational Networks and Religious Sodalities at Çatalhöyük
- 8 Using “Magic” to Think from the Material: Tracing Distributed Agency, Revelation, and Concealment at Çatalhöyük
- 9 “Motherbaby”: A Death in Childbirth at Çatalhöyük
- 10 The Hau of the House
- 11 Material Register, Surface, and Form at Çatalhöyük
- 12 The Use of Spatial Order in Çatalhöyük Material Culture
- Part III Vital Data
- Postscript: On Devotion at Çatalhöyük
- Index
- References
10 - The Hau of the House
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2014
Edited by
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- List of Figures
- List of Tables
- List of Contributors
- Preface
- 1 The Vitalities of Çatalhöyük
- Part I Vital Religion: The Evolutionary Context of Religion at Çatalhöyük
- Part II Vital Materials at Çatalhöyük
- 7 Relational Networks and Religious Sodalities at Çatalhöyük
- 8 Using “Magic” to Think from the Material: Tracing Distributed Agency, Revelation, and Concealment at Çatalhöyük
- 9 “Motherbaby”: A Death in Childbirth at Çatalhöyük
- 10 The Hau of the House
- 11 Material Register, Surface, and Form at Çatalhöyük
- 12 The Use of Spatial Order in Çatalhöyük Material Culture
- Part III Vital Data
- Postscript: On Devotion at Çatalhöyük
- Index
- References
Summary
At the Neolithic site of Çatalhöyük, all architecture is domestic. Earlier sites in the Anatolian region of Turkey, such as the spectacular Göbekli Tepe, boast dramatic public spaces and monumental art. But at Çatalhöyük, despite a very large, very long occupation (perhaps two to eight thousand people from 7400 to 6000 BCE), it appears that no one ever built anything bigger than a house. Maps of the excavations show a mound honeycombed with small rooms, and nothing more (Hodder 2006). This singular fact has inspired lengthy, detailed, insightful studies of the Çatalhöyük house. But even after reading this extensive literature, I still find myself asking a basic question: What – and where – is this house?
The answer is not as obvious as it might seem. Identifying buildings at the site is relatively straightforward, but that does not mean we know the dimensions of “the house” – let alone its ontological status. To begin with, there are several different kinds of houses to be disentangled. Writers on the subject of “the house” tend to erect three different kinds of things on the same semantic terrain – and this is certainly true at Çatalhöyük.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Religion at Work in a Neolithic SocietyVital Matters, pp. 259 - 279Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2014
References
2011. The social life of things. Keynote address presented at The Life of Things Conference, Franke Institute for the Humanities. April 30, 2011.Google Scholar
2010. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
2010. Is there religion at Çatalhöyük...or are there just houses? In Religion in the Emergence of Civilization: Çatalhöyük as a Case Study, ed. . New York: Cambridge University Press, 146–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1997. Marginalia – some additional notes on the gift. In The Logic of the Gift: Toward an Ethic of Generosity, ed. . New York: Routledge, 231–244.Google Scholar
2003. The Berber house. In The Anthropology of Space and Place: Locating Culture, eds. and . Malden, MA: Blackwell, 131–141.Google Scholar
and 2013. Intramural burial practices at Çatalhöyük. In Humans and Landscapes of Çatalhöyük: Reports from the 2000–2008 Seasons, ed. . Los Angeles: Cotsen Institute.Google Scholar
2002. Metamorphoses: Towards a Materialist Theory of Becoming. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
1964. Order in the Atoni house. In Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Lanen Volenkunde, Deel 120, 1ste Afl., Anthropologica VI, 34–68.Google Scholar
and , eds. 2001. Feats: Archaeological and Ethnographic Perspectives on Food, Politics, and Power. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
2002. Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concept of Pollution and Taboo. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
and 2006. Households and Communities in the Central Anatolian Neolithic. Archaeological Dialogues 12(2), 165–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , eds. 1995. Conceiving the New World Order: The Global Politics of Reproduction. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
2003. The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.Google Scholar
2006. The Leopard’s Tale: Revealing the Mysteries of Çatalhöyük. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
2010. Probing religion at Çatalhöyük: an interdisciplinary experiment. In Religion in the Emergence of Civilization: Çatalhöyük as a Case Study, ed. . New York: Cambridge University Press, 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2012. Entangled: An Archaeology of the Relationships between Humans and Things. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ed. 2000. Towards Reflexive Method in Archaeology: the Example at Çatalhöyük: by Members of the Çatalhöyük Teams. Cambridge: McDonald Institute Monographs and the British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara.Google Scholar
, ed. 2010. Religion in the Emergence of Civilization: Çatalhöyük as a Case Study. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2004. Daily Practice and Social Memory at Çatalhöyük. American Antiquity 69(1), 17–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2010. The symbolism of Çatalhöyük in its regional context. In Religion in the Emergence of Civilization: Çatalhöyük as a Case Study, ed. . New York: Cambridge University Press, 32–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2010. History houses: A new interpretation of architectural elaboration at Çatalhöyük. In Religion in the Emergence of Civilization: Çatalhöyük as a Case Study, ed. . New York: Cambridge University Press, 163–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1979. From the Milk River: Spatial and Temporal Processes in Northwest Amazonia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1994. From trust to domination: An alternative history of human-animal relations. In Animals and Human Society: Changing Perspectives, eds. and . London: Routledge, 1–22.Google Scholar
2010. Marked, absent, habitual: Approaches to Neolithic religion at Çatalhöyük. In Religion in the Emergence of Civilization: Çatalhöyük as a Case Study, ed. . New York: Cambridge University Press, 187–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2011. Thinking about the household: Building clusters, history houses, and spatial organization at Çatalhöyük. Presentation. Çatalhöyük, Turkey. July 1, 2011.
2006. Wild killing: Contesting the animal in hunting. In Killing Animals. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 10–29.Google Scholar
1990 [1923]. The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies. Trans. . London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2011. Dirty, pretty things: On archaeology and prehistoric materialities. Paper presented at The Life of Things Conference, Franke Institute for the Humanities. April 30, 2011.
and 2005. Çatalhöyük figurines. In Çatalhöyük: Archive Report, 2005. figurines.stanford.edu/files/Catal_Figurine_Archive_Report_2005.pdf.
, , , and 2008. Figured Lifeworlds and Depositional Practices at Çatalhöyük. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 18(2):139–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2010. Magical deposits at Çatalhöyük: A matter of time and place? In Religion in the Emergence of Civilization: Çatalhöyük as a Case Study, ed. . New York: Cambridge University Press, 300–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2009. Articulate bodies: Forms and figures at Çatalhöyük. In Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 16, 205–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2010. Does ‘the animal’ exist: Toward a theory of social life with animals. In Beastly Natures: Animals, Humans, and the Study of History, ed. . Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 17–37.Google Scholar
2010. Temporalities of ‘religion’ at Çatalhöyük. In Religion in the Emergence of Civilization: Çatalhöyük as a Case Study, ed. . New York: Cambridge University Press, 220–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2011. ‘Official’ and ‘Practical’ Kin: Inferring Social and Community Structure from Dental Phenotype at Neolithic Çatalhöyük, Turkey. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 145(4):519–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2007. Terrorist Assemblages: Homonationalism in Queer Times. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2002. Outside of Houses: The Practices of Everyday Life at Chan Noohol, Belize. Journal of Social Archaeology 2(2), 245–268.Google Scholar
, , and 2009. Building memories: Commemorative deposits at Çatalhöyük. In Zooarchaeology and the Reconstruction of Cultural Systems: Case Studies from the Old World, eds. , , and . Paris: L’Homme et l’Animal, Société de Recherch Interdisciplinaire, 103–128.Google Scholar
2009. The Eight Animals in Shakespeare; or, before the Human. PMLA 124(2), 472–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2010. Taking the Bull by the Horns: Ideology, Masculinity, and Cattle Horns at Çatalhöyük. Paléorient 35(2):19–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1998. Cosmological Deixis and Amerindian Perspectivism. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 4(3):469–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1988. Food, Gender, and Poverty in the Ecuadorian Andes. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.Google Scholar
1995. Making Kin: Kinship Theory and Zumbagua Adoptions. American Ethnologist 22(4), 685–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2002. Embarrassment of Riches. Review of Feasts: Archaeological and Ethnographic Perspectives on Food, Politics and Power, eds. and . Current Anthropology 44, 141–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2004. Moche Sex Pots: Reproduction and Temporality in Ancient South America. American Anthropologist 106(3), 495–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 1
- Cited by