Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T10:01:59.194Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Social Reproduction and Religious Stratification

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2014

Ralph E. Pyle
Affiliation:
Michigan State University
James D. Davidson
Affiliation:
Purdue UniversityPurdue University
Lisa A. Keister
Affiliation:
Duke University, North Carolina
Darren E. Sherkat
Affiliation:
Southern Illinois University, Carbondale
Get access

Summary

Most sociologists agree that religious stratification was a prominent feature of the religious landscape in the thirteen original colonies. Although most also acknowledge that some religious groups still rank higher than others in socioeconomic status, they argue that these differences are smaller than they used to be and are getting smaller all the time (Park and Reimer 2002; Wuthnow 1988).

To be sure, there are theoretical and conceptual differences between these writers. Some assume that past advantages based on one's religious background are being eliminated, resulting in a blurring of religious group status distinctions and a decline in the importance of denominational identity (Wuthnow 1988). Others stress the connections between educational and economic gains among conservative Protestants, sect-to-church transitions, and a weakening of social class differences among the major religious traditions (Park and Reimer 2002).

However, in broader terms, these claims are consistent with a status convergence account of modernization’s effects on social inequality. This account suggests that, as part of society’s march toward universalistic processes of social assignment, there has been a decline in ascriptive stratification; an erosion of status boundaries based on race, ethnicity, religion, and class; and a general trend toward convergence on all of these dimensions of stratification (Parsons 1951, 1971; Turner 1993). The gradual elimination of older practices of religious discrimination in educational and occupational spheres means that religious groups are increasingly on an equal footing in their pursuit of economic and social rewards. Society is seen as more open than closed to long-distance mobility, and the upper stratum is viewed as more inclusive than exclusive.

Type
Chapter
Information
Religion and Inequality in America
Research and Theory on Religion's Role in Stratification
, pp. 195 - 218
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abel, Richard L. 1989. American Lawyers. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aguirre, Adalberto, and Turner, Jonathan H.. 2011. American Ethnicity (7th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Albanese, Catherine L. 2007. America: Religions and Religion (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson.Google Scholar
Aschaffenburg, Karen, and Maas, Ineke. 1997. “Cultural and Educational Careers: The Dynamics of Social Reproduction.” American Sociological Review 62:573–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baltzell, E. Digby. 1964. The Protestant Establishment. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Barrett, Brian 2010. “Religion and Habitus: Exploring the Relationship between Religious Involvement and Educational Outcomes among Urban African American Students.” Urban Education 45:448–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beyerlein, Keith. 2004. “Specifying the Impact of Conservative Protestantism on Educational Attainment.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 43:505–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977a. “Cultural Reproduction and Social Reproduction” (pp. 487–510). In Karabel, J. and Halsey, A. H. (eds.), Power and Ideology in Education. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977b. Outline of a Theory of Practice. London: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, and Passeron, Jean-Claude. 1977. Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Brooks, David. 2011. The Paradise Suite. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Burstein, Paul. 2007. “Jewish Educational and Economic Success in the United States: A Search for Explanations.” Sociological Perspectives 50:209–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaves, Mark. 2004. Congregations in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Christiano, Kevin J., Swatos, Jr. William H., and Kivisto, Peter. 2008. Sociology of Religion: Contemporary Developments (2nd ed.). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Coe, Deborah, and Davidson, James D.. 2011. “The Social Origins of Legacy Admissions.” Review of Religious Research 52:233–47.Google Scholar
Collins, James. 2009. “Social Reproduction in Classrooms and Schools.” Annual Review of Anthropology 38:33–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coreno, Thaddeus. 2002. “Fundamentalism as a Class Culture.” Sociology of Religion 63:335–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darnell, Alfred, and Sherkat, Darren E.. 1997. “The Impact of Protestant Fundamentalism on Educational Attainment.” American Sociological Review 62:306–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, James D., Kraus, Rachel, and Morrissey, Scott. 2005. “Presidential Appointments, and Religious Stratification in the United States, 1789–2003.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 44:485–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, James D. and Pyle, Ralph E.. 2012. “Religious Stratification in America” (pp. 3–25). In Keister, Lisa A., McCarthy, John, and Finke, Roger (eds.), Religion, Work, and Inequality. Research in the Sociology of Work (Vol. 23). Binkley, UK: Emerald Group.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, James D. and Pyle, Ralph E.. 2011. Ranking Faiths: Religious Stratification in America. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, Paul J. 1982. “Cultural Capital and Social Success: The Impact of Status Culture Participation on the Grades of High School Students.” American Sociological Review 47:189–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiMaggio, Paul J.. 2005. “Cultural Capital” (pp. 167–70). In Ritzer, George (ed.), Encyclopedia of Social Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, Paul and Mukhtar, Toqir. 2004. “Arts Participation as Cultural Capital in the United States, 1982–2002: Signs of Decline?Poetics 32:169–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dovidio, John F., Gaertner, Samuel L., and Saguy, Tamar. 2009. “Commonality and the Complexity of ‘We’: Social Attitudes and Social Change.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 13:3–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dumais, Susan A. 2002. “Cultural Capital, Gender, and School Success: The Role of Habitus.” Sociology of Education 75:44–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farkas, George. 2003. “Cognitive Skills and Noncognitive Traits and Behaviors in Stratification Processes.” Annual Review of Sociology 29:541–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Albert I. 1970. “Jews in the Legal Profession: A Case of Adjustment to Discrimination.” Jewish Social Studies 32 (April): 148–61.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Amir. 2011. “Mapping Shared Understandings Using Relational Class Analysis: The Case of the Cultural Omnivore Reexamined.” American Journal of Sociology 116 (5):1397–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golden, Daniel. 2002. “Colleges Court Jewish Students in Effort to Boost Rankings.” Wall Street Journal, April 29, p. 1.Google Scholar
Golden, Daniel. 2010. “An Analytic Survey of Legacy Preferences” (pp. 71–99). In Kahlenberg, Richard D. (ed.), Affirmative Action for the Rich. New York: Century Foundation Press.Google Scholar
Hauser, Robert M., and Hsiung Huang, Min. 1997. “Verbal Ability and Socioeconomic Success: A Trend Analysis.” Social Science Research 26:331–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaeger, Mads Meier. 2009. “Equal Access but Unequal Outcomes: Cultural Capital and Educational Choice in a Meritocratic Society.” Social Forces 87 (4):1943–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jansen, Jim. 2011. “The Civic and Community Engagement of Religiously Active Americans.” Pew Research Center's Internet and American Life Project. . Accessed August 19, 2012.
Johnson, Heather Beth. 2006. The American Dream and the Power of Wealth. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jonsson, Jan O., Grusky, David B., Carlo, Matthew Di, Pollak, Reinhard, and Brinton, Mary C.. 2009. “Microclass Mobility: Social Reproduction in Four Countries.” American Journal of Sociology 114:977–1036.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karabel, Jerome. 2005. The Chosen: The Hidden History of Admission and Exclusion at Harvard, Yale and Princeton. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Katz-Gerro, Tally. 2002. “Highbrow Cultural Consumption and Class Distinction in Italy, Israel, West Germany, Sweden, and the United States.” Social Forces 81:207–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendall, Diana. 2002. The Power of Good Deeds. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Little-field.Google Scholar
Klausner, Samuel K. 1989. “Jews in the Executive Suite” (pp. 147–79). In Bershady, H. J. (ed.), Social Class and Democratic Leadership. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Korman, Abraham K. 1988. The Outsiders: Jews and Corporate America. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Lamont, M., and Molnar, V.. 2002. “The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences.” Annual Review of Sociology 28:167–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lareau, Annette, and Weininger, Elliot B.. 2003. “Cultural Capital in Educational Research: A Critical Assessment.” Theory and Society 32:567–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehman, Chris. 2011. “Pennies from Heaven: How Mormon Economics Shape the G.O.P.” Harpers (October). . Accessed October 6, 2012.
Lindsay, D. Michael. 2008. “Evangelicals in the Power Elite: Elite Cohesion Advancing a Movement.” American Sociological Review 73:60–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLeod, Jay. 2009. Ain't No Makin’ It (3rd ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Marsden, George. 2006. Fundamentalism and American Culture. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Miner, J. B. 1957. Intelligence in the United States: A Survey. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Mintz, Beth. 1975. “The President's Cabinet, 1897–1972: A Contribution to the Power Structure Debate.” Insurgent Sociologist 5 (Spring): 131–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, Jerry Z., and Reimer, S. H.. 2002. “Revisiting the Social Sources of American Christianity 1972–1988.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 41:733–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, Talcott. 1951. The Social System. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott. 1971. The System of Modern Societies. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Peterson, Richard A., and Kern, Roger M.. 1996. “Changing Highbrow Taste: From Snob to Omnivore.” American Sociological Review 61 (5):900–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life. 2008. “Appendix 3: Classification of Protestant Denominations.” The U.S. Religious Landscape Survey. . Accessed March 12, 2012.
Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life. 2009. “A Portrait of Mormons in the U.S.” . Accessed October 6, 2012.
Putnam, Robert D., and Campbell, David E.. 2010. American Grace. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Pyle, Ralph E. 1996. Persistence and Change in the Protestant Establishment. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Pyle, Ralph E.. 2006. “Trends in Religious Stratification: Have Religious Group Socioeconomic Distinctions Declined in Recent Decades?Sociology of Religion 67:61–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivera, Lauren A. 2012. “Hiring as Cultural Matching: The Case of Elite Professional Service Firms.” American Sociological Review 77 (6):999–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roof, Wade Clark, and McKinney, William. 1987. American Mainline Religion. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Rey, Terry. 2007. Bourdieu on Religion. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Seidman, Steven. 2008. Contested Knowledge (4th ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sherkat, Darren E. 2010. “Religion and Verbal Ability.” Social Science Research 39:2–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherkat, Darren E.. 2011. “Religion and Scientific Literacy in the United States.” Social Science Quarterly 92:1134–50.Google Scholar
Smith, Tom W. 1990. “Classifying Protestant Denominations.” Review of Religious Research 31:225–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Tom W., Marsden, Peter V., Hout, Michael, and Kim, Jibum. 2011. General Social Surveys, 1972–2010 [machine-readable data file]. Principal Investigator, Tom W. Smith; Co-Principal Investigators, Peter V. Marsden and Michael Hout. Sponsored by National Science Foundation. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center (producer); Storrs, CT: The Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, University of Connecticut (distributor).Google Scholar
Stark, Rodney. 1972. “The Economics of Piety: Religious Commitment and Social Class” (pp. 483–503). In Thielbar, Gerald W. and Feldman, Saul D. (eds.), Issues in Social Inequality. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Steensland, Brian, Park, Jerry Z., Regnerus, Mark D., Robinson, Lynn D., Bradford Wilcox, W., and Woodberry, Robert D.. 2000. “The Measure of American Religion: Toward Improving the State of the Art.” Social Forces 79(1):291–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinback, Kevin, Tomaskovic-Devey, Donald, and Skaggs, Sheryl. 2010. “Organizational Approaches to Inequality: Inertia, Relative Power, and Environments.” Annual Review of Sociology 36:225–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stroope, Samuel. 2011. “Education and Religion: Individual, Congregational, and Cross-Level Interaction Effects on Biblical Literalism.” Social Science Research 40:1478–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swartz, David. 1996. “Bridging the Study of Culture and Religion: Pierre Bourdieu's Political Economy of Symbolic Power.” Sociology of Religion 57:71–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Synnott, Marcia Graham. 1979. The Half-Opened Door. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Thorndike, R. L. 1942. “Two Screening Tests of Verbal Intelligence.” Journal of Applied Psychology 26:128–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turmo, Are. 2004. “Scientific Literacy and Socio-economic Background among 15-Year Olds – A Nordic Perspective.” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 48:287–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, Bryan S. 1993. “Talcott Parsons, Universalism, and the Educational Revolution: Democracy versus Professionalism.” British Journal of Sociology 44:1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verter, Bradford. 2003. “Spiritual Capital: Theorizing Religion with Bourdieu against Bourdieu.” Sociological Theory 21:150–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Max. 1946a. “The Social Psychology of the World Religions” (pp. 267–301). In Gerth, H. H. and Mills, C. W. (eds.), From Max Weber. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1946b. “Class, Status, Party” (pp. 180–95). In Gerth, H. H. and Mills, C. W. (eds.), From Max Weber. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wuthnow, Robert. 1988. The Restructuring of American Religion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Zigerell, L. J. 2012. “Science Knowledge and Biblical Literalism.” Public Understanding of Science 21(3):314–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zweigenhaft, Richard L., and William Domhoff, G.. 2006. Diversity in the Power Elite. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×