Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 1
  • Print publication year: 2014
  • Online publication date: August 2014

10 - Frozen symbols of relatedness

from Part II - Experiencing relatedness

References

Bahadur, G., Morrison, M. and Machin, L. (2010). ‘Beyond the “embryo question”: human embryonic stem cell ethics in the context of biomaterial donation in the UK’. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 21, 868–74.
Bankowski, B.J., Lyerly, A.D., Faden, R.R. and Wallach, E.E. (2005). ‘The social implications of embryo cryopreservation’. Fertility and Sterility, 84, 823–32.
Corrigan, O. (2003). ‘Empty ethics: the problem with informed consent’. Sociology of Health and Illness, 25, 768–92.
De Lacey, S. (2005). ‘Parent identity and “virtual” children: why patients discard rather than donate unused embryos’. Human Reproduction, 20, 1661–9.
De Lacey, S. (2007). ‘Decisions for the fate of frozen embryos: fresh insights into patients’ thinking and their rationales for donating or discarding embryos’. Human Reproduction, 22, 1751–8.
Fuscaldo, G., Russell, S. and Gillam, L. (2007). ‘How to facilitate decisions about surplus embryos: patients’ views’. Human Reproduction, 22, 3129–38.
Hedgecoe, A.M. (2004). ‘Critical bioethics: beyond the social science critique of applied ethics’. Bioethics, 18, 120–43.
Hershberger, P.E. and Pierce, P.F. (2010). ‘Conceptualizing couples’ decision making in PGD: emerging cognitive, emotional, and moral dimensions’. Patient Education and Counseling, 81, 53–62.
Hoeyer, K. (2003). ‘“Science is really needed – that’s all I know”: informed consent and the non-verbal practices of collecting blood for genetic research in northern Sweden’. New Genetics and Society, 22, 229–44.
Laruelle, C. and Englert, Y. (1995). ‘Psychological study of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer participants’ attitudes toward the destiny of their supernumerary embryos’. Fertility and Sterility, 63, 1047–50.
Lyerly, A.D., Steinhauser, K., Namey, E., Tulsky, J.A. et al. (2006). ‘Factors that affect infertility patients’ decisions about disposition of frozen embryos’. Fertility and Sterility, 85, 1623–30.
McMahon, C., Gibson, F., Cohen, J., Leslie, G. et al. (2000). ‘Mothers conceiving through in vitro fertilization: siblings, setbacks, and embryo dilemmas after five years’. Reproductive Technologies, 10, 131–5.
Nachtigall, R.D., Becker, G., Friese, C., Butler, A. et al. (2005). ‘Parents’ conceptualization of their frozen embryos complicates the disposition decision’. Fertility and Sterility, 84, 431–4.
Parry, S. (2006). ‘(Re)constructing embryos in stem cell research: exploring the meaning of embryos for people involved in fertility treatments’. Social Science and Medicine, 62, 2349–59.
Provoost, V., Pennings, G., De Sutter, P., Gerris, J. et al. (2009). ‘Infertility patients’ beliefs about their embryos and their disposition preferences’. Human Reproduction, 24, 896–905.
Provoost, V., Pennings, G., De Sutter, P., Gerris, J. et al. (2010). ‘Patients’ conceptualization of cryopreserved embryos used in their fertility treatment’. Human Reproduction, 25, 705–13.
Provoost, V., Pennings, G., De Sutter, P. and Dhont, M. (2011a). ‘The frozen embryo and its nonresponding parents’. Fertility and Sterility, 95, 1980–4.
Provoost, V., Pennings, G., De Sutter, P., Gerris, J. et al. (2011b). ‘To continue or discontinue storage of cryopreserved embryos? Patients’ decisions in view of their child wish’. Human Reproduction, 26, 861–72.
Provoost, V., Pennings, G., De Sutter, P. and Dhont, M. (2012a). ‘“Something of the two of us”. The emotionally loaded embryo disposition decision making of patients who view their embryo as a symbol of their relationship’. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 33, 45–52.
Provoost, V., Pennings, G., De Sutter, P., Van De Velde, A. et al. (2012b). ‘Trends in embryo disposition decisions: patients’ responses to a 15-year mailing program’. Human Reproduction, 27, 506–14.