Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-24hb2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-19T03:30:40.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Thoughts and feelings about the donor

A family perspective

from Part IV - Information about donors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2016

Susan Golombok
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Rosamund Scott
Affiliation:
King's College London
John B. Appleby
Affiliation:
King's College London
Martin Richards
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Stephen Wilkinson
Affiliation:
Lancaster University
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Beeson, D. R., Jennings, P. K. and Kramer, W. (2011). ‘Offspring searching for their sperm donors: how family type shapes the process’. Human Reproduction, 26, 2415–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blake, L., Casey, P., Jadva, V. and Golombok, S. (2013a). ‘“I Was Quite Amazed”: donor conception and parent–child relationships from the child's perspective’. Children and Society, 28, 425–37.Google Scholar
Blake, L., Casey, P., Readings, J., Jadva, V. et al. (2010). ‘“Daddy ran out of tadpoles”: how parents tell their children that they are donor conceived, and what their 7-year-olds understand’. Human Reproduction, 25, 2527–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blake, L., Zadeh, S., Statham, H. and Freeman, T. (2013b). ‘Families created by assisted reproduction: children's perspectives’, in Freeman, T., Graham, S., Ebtehaj, F. and Richards, M. (eds.), Relatedness in Assisted Reproduction: Families, Origins and Identities. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blyth, E., Crawshaw, M., Frith, L. and Jones, C. (2012). ‘Donor-conceived people’ s views and experiences of their genetic origins: A critical analysis of the research evidence’. Journal of Law and Medicine, 19, 769–89.Google ScholarPubMed
Cook, R., Golombok, S., Bish, A. and Murray, C. (1995). ‘Disclosure of donor insemination: parental attitudes’. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 65, 549–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Donor Sibling Registry (2014). ‘The Donor Sibling Registry. Educating, connecting and supporting donor families’. Available at www.donorsiblingregistry.com/index.php. Accessed 20 February 2014.Google Scholar
Franz, S. and Allen, D. (eds.) (2001). The Offspring Speak: An International Conference of Donor Offspring. A Report to Health Canada. Toronto: Infertility Network.Google Scholar
Freeman, T., Jadva, V., Kramer, W. and Golombok, S. (2009). ‘Gamete donation: parents’ experiences of searching for their child's donor siblings and donor’. Human Reproduction, 24, 505–16.Google ScholarPubMed
Freeman, F., Graham, S., Ebtehaj, F. and Richards, M. (eds.) (2014). Relatedness in Assisted Reproduction: Families, Origins and Identities. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golombok, S., Brewaeys, A., Cook, R., Giavazzi, M. T. et al. (1996). ‘The European study of assisted reproduction families: Family functioning and child development’. Human Reproduction, 11, 2324–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Golombok, S., Murray, C., Jadva, V., Lycett, E. et al. (2006). ‘Non-genetic and non-gestational parenthood: consequences for parent–child relationships and the psychological well-being of mothers, fathers and children at age 3’. Human Reproduction, 21, 1918–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Golombok, S., Readings, J., Blake, L., Casey, P. et al. (2011). ‘Children conceived by gamete donation: psychological adjustment and mother–child relationships at age 7’. Journal of Family Psychology, 25, 230–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grace, V. M., Daniels, K. and Gillett, W. (2008). ‘The donor, the father, and the imaginary constitution of the family: parents’ constructions in the case of donor insemination’. Social Science and Medicine, 66, 301–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grotevant, H. D. (1999). ‘Adoptive identity development: New kinship patterns, new issues’, in Rygvold, A. L., Dalen, M. M. and Saetersdal, B. (eds.), Mine–Yours–Ours- and Theirs: Adoption, Changing Kinship, and Family Patterns. University of Oslo Press.Google Scholar
Grotevant, H. D. (2007). ‘Openness in adoption: Re-thinking “family” in the US’, in Inhorn, M. C. (ed.), Reproductive Techniques: Gender, Technology, and Biopolitics in the New Millennium. New York: Bergshaw Books.Google Scholar
Grotevant, H. D. and McRoy, R. G. (1998). Openness in Adoption. Exploring Family Connections. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Grotevant, H. D., Wrobel, G. M., Von Korff, L., Skinner, B. et al. (2007). ‘Many faces of openness in adoption: perspectives of adopted adolescents and their parents’. Adoption Quarterly, 10, 79101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hertz, R. (2002). ‘The father as an idea: a challenge to kinship boundaries by single mothers.’ Symbolic Interaction, 25, 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hertz, R. and Ferguson, F. I. T. (1997). ‘Kinship strategies and self-sufficiency among single mothers by choice: Post modern family ties’. Qualitative Sociology, 20, 187209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewitt, G. (2002). ‘Missing links: identity issues of donor conceived people’. Journal of Fertility Counselling, 9, 1420.Google Scholar
Human Fertilisationand Embryology Authority website (HFEA) (2009). Code of Practice, 8th edn. London, England. Available at www.hfea.gov.uk/docs/Code_of_Practice_8_-_October_2013.PDF. Accessed 26 February 2014.Google Scholar
Jadva, V., Casey, P., Readings, J., Blake, L. et al. (2011). ‘A longitudinal study of recipients’ views and experiences of intra-family egg donation’. Human Reproduction, 26, 2777–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jadva, V., Freeman, T., Kramer, W. and Golombok, S. (2010). ‘Experiences of offspring searching for and contacting their donor siblings and donor’. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 20, 523–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirkman, M. (2004). ‘Saviours and satyrs: ambivalence in narrative meanings of sperm provision’. Culture, Health and Sexuality, 6, 319–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laruelle, C., Place, I., Demeestere, I., Englert, Y. et al. (2011). ‘Anonymity and secrecy options of recipient couples and donors, and ethnic origin influence in three types of oocyte donation’. Human Reproduction, 26, 382–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Linblad, F., Gottleib, C. and Lalos, O. (2000). ‘To tell or not to tell – what parents think about telling their children that they were born following donor insemination’. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology, 21, 193203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorbach, C. (2003). Experiences of Donor Conception: Parents Offspring and Donors Through the Years. London: Jessica Kingsley Publisher.Google Scholar
Lycett, E., Daniels, K., Curson, R., Chir, B. et al. (2004). ‘Offspring created as a result of donor insemaintion: a study of family relationships, child adjustment, and disclosure.’ Fertility and Sterility, 82, 172–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mac Dougall, K., Becker, G., Scheib, J. and Nachtigall, R. (2007). ‘Strategies for disclosure: how parents approach telling their children that they were conceived with donor gametes’. Fertility and Sterility, 87, 524–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Motluk, A. (2005). ‘Anonymous sperm donor traced on internet’. New Scientist. Available at www.newscientist.com/article/mg18825244.200-anonymous-sperm-donor-traced-on-internet.html. Accessed 21 October 2013.Google Scholar
Muller, U. and Perry, B. (2001). ‘Adopted persons’ search for and contact with their birth parents: Who searches and why?Adoption Quarterly, 4, 537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordqvist, P. (2011). ‘“Dealing with sperm”: comparing lesbians’ clinical and non-clinical donor conception processes’. Sociology of Health and Illness, 33, 114–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nuffield Council on Bioethics (2013). Donor Conception: Ethical Aspects of Information Sharing. London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics.Google Scholar
Prideangel (2014). Prideangel. Available at www.prideangel.com/. Accessed 26 February 2014.Google Scholar
Readings, J., Blake, L., Casey, P., Jadva, V. et al. (2011). ‘Secrecy, disclosure and everything in-between: decisions of parents of children conceived by donor insemination, egg donation and surrogacy’. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 22, 485–95.Google ScholarPubMed
Richards, M. (1996). ‘Families, kinship and genetics’, in Richards, M. and Marteau, T. (eds.), The Troubled Helix. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Richards, M., Pennings, G. and Appleby, J. B. (2012). ‘Introduction’, in Reproductive Donation: Practice, Policy and Bioethics. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rumball, A. and Adair, V. (1999). ‘Telling the story: parents’ scripts for donor offspring’. Human Reproduction, 14, 1392–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rushbrooke, R. and Whipp, C. (2000). ‘Speaking for Ourselves. Report from ‘What About Me?’ The Child of ART. In Comment on Reproductive Ethics (CORE). Royal Society, London.Google Scholar
Scheib, J. E. (2003). ‘Choosing identity-release sperm donors: the parents’ perspective 13–18 years later’. Human Reproduction, 18, 1115–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scheib, J. E. and Cushing, R. A. (2007). ‘Open-identity donor insemination in the United States: is it on the rise?Fertility and Sterility, 88, 231–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scheib, J. E., Riordan, M. and Rubin, S. (2005). ‘Adolescents with open-identity sperm donors: reports from 12–17 year olds’. Human Reproduction, 20, 239–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheib, J. E. and Ruby, A. (2008). ‘Contact among families who share the same sperm donor’. Fertility and Sterility, 90, 3343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shelton, K. H., Boivin, J., Hay, D., van Den Bree, M. B. M. et al. (2009). ‘Examining differences in psychological adjustment problems among children conceived by assisted reproductive technologies’. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 33, 385–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smart, C. and Nordqvist, P. (2013). ‘Relative Strangers: Key messages’. Available at www.manchester.ac.uk/morgancentre/research/relative-strangers. Accessed 26 February 2013.Google Scholar
Tieman, W., van Der Ende, J. and Verhulst, F. C. (2008). ‘Young adult international adoptees’ search for birth parents’. Journal of Family Psychology, 22, 678–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turner, A. J. and Coyle, A. (2000). ‘What does it mean to be a donor offspring? The identity experiences of adults conceived by donor insemination and the implications for counselling and therapy’. Human Reproduction, 15, 2041–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vanfraussen, K. (2001). ‘An attempt to reconstruct children's donor concept: a comparison between children's and lesbian parents' attitudes towards donor anonymity’. Human Reproduction, 16, 2019–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vanfraussen, K., Ponjaert-Kristoffersen, I. and Brewaeys, A. (2003). ‘Family functioning in lesbian families created by donor insemination’. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 73, 7890.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vayena, E. and Golombok, S. (2012). ‘Challenges in intra-family donation’, in Richards, M., Pennings, G. and Appleby, J. B. (eds.), Reproductive Donation: Practice, Policy and Bioethics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wrobel, G. M., Grotevant, H. D. and McRoy, R. G. (2004). ‘Adolescent search for birthparents: who moves forward?Journal of Adolescent Research, 19, 132–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wrobel, G. M., Grotevant, H. D., Samek, D. R. and Korff, L. V. (2013). ‘Adoptees’ curiosity and information-seeking about birth parents in emerging adulthood: Context, motivation, and behavior’. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 37, 441–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wyverkens, E., Ravelingien, A., H, V. P., Provoost, V., Raes, I. et al. (2013). ‘Adolescent Search for Birthparents: Who Moves Forward?Journal of Adolescent Research, 19, 132–51.Google Scholar

UK legislation

The Human Fertilisationand Embryology Act (2004) (Disclosure of Donor Insemination Regulations).Google Scholar
The Human Fertilisationand Embryology Act (1990), as amended (2008).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×