Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2013
  • Online publication date: June 2014

10 - Stability and national development: the Brezhnev years, 1964–1982

Summary

The Brezhnev era (1964–1982) has been characterised as one of stagnation, and with some obvious justification: during the eighteen years when Leonid Brezhnev was general secretary of the CPSU, only sixteen new appointments were made to full membership of the highest decision-making body, the Politburo of the Central Committee of the CPSU. This does not, however, do justice to the many changes that were going on below the level of the top leadership, where society was developing in ways which eventually outstripped the comfortable complacency of the ageing leadership. This was also an active time in Soviet foreign policy, with the Cold War reaching new heights but also going through periods of calm, and the leadership often preoccupied with events in Eastern Europe, culminating in the Prague Spring of 1968. But the regime generally eschewed major policy upheavals. Many of Khrushchev’s innovations reached fulfilment in the years after his ouster, while others were quickly dropped. In the latter category, and of particular concern for the non-Russian nationalities, were the sovnarkhoz reform of 1957, abandoned in 1965, and the education reform of 1958–1959, which was quietly allowed to recede into irrelevance. Instances of large-scale unrest were rare, with the economy maintaining (by global standards) reasonable but not spectacular growth rates until the late 1980s. Although economic growth eventually lagged behind that of the major western economies and the limitations of the planned economy were already apparent, technological improvements and rising oil prices allowed for a greater emphasis on consumer goods, with many families now able to own refrigerators and televisions for the first time. Improved consumption levels (though low by western standards) did much to account for the stability of the time. Social stability was also underlined by the urbanisation of most of the country and universally high levels of education.

Goryachev, Yu. V., Tsentral’nyi komitet KPSS, VKP(b), RKP(b), RSDRP(b): istoriko-biograficheskiy spravochnik (Moscow: Parad, 2005), 442–7.
Kreindler, Isabelle, ‘The Changing Status of Russian in the Soviet Union’, International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 33 (1982), 17.
Mitrokhin, Nikolai, Russkaya partiya: dvizhenie russkikh natsionalistov v SSSR 1953–1985 gody (Moscow: Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie, 2003)
Cosgrove, Simon, Russian Nationalism and the Politics of Soviet Literature: The Case of Nash Sovremmenik, 1981–1991 (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2004).
Alexeyeva, Ludmilla, Soviet Dissent: Contemporary Movements for National, Religious, and Human Rights (Middletown, CI: Wesleyan University Press, 1985), 31–2.
Wilson, Andrew, Ukrainian Nationalism in the 1990s: A Minority Faith (Cambridge University Press, 1997), 54–5.
King, Charles, The Ghost of Freedom: A History of the Caucasus (Oxford University Press, 2008), 207–11.
Cummings, Sally N., ‘Soviet Rule, Nation and Film: The Kyrgyz “Wonder” Years’, Nations and Nationalism, 15, 4 (October 2009), 636–57.
Kurki, Tuulikki, ‘The Modern Soviet Man Looks Back: Images and Narratives of Soviet Karelia’, in Suutari, Pekka and Shikalov, Yury (eds.), Karelia Written and Sung: Representations of Locality in Soviet and Russian Contexts (Helsinki: Kikimora Publications, 2010), 100.
Forsyth, James, A History of the Peoples of Siberia: Russia’s North Asian Colony 1581–1990 (Cambridge University Press, 1992), 377–80.
Grant, Bruce, In the Soviet House of Culture: A Century of Perestroikas (Princeton University Press, 1995), 117.
Shnirelman, Victor A., The Value of the Past: Myths, Identity and Politics in Transcaucasia (Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology, 2001)
Bourdeaux, Michael, Land of Crosses (Chulmleigh: Augustine Publishing Co., 1979)
Payaslian, Simon, The History of Armenia (Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007), 185–6.
Kowalewski, David, ‘National Rights Protest in the Brezhnev Era: Some Determinants of Success’, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 4, 2 (April 1981), 175–88.
Fowkes, Ben, ‘The National Question in the Soviet Union under Leonid Brezhnev: Policy and Response’, in Bacon, Edwin and Sandle, Mark (eds.), Brezhnev Reconsidered (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002), 69.
Raun, Toivo U., Estonia and the Estonians (Stanford: Hoover Institution Press, 1987), 192
Pennar, Jaan, ‘Soviet Nationality Policy and the Estonian Communist Elite’, in Parming, Tonu and Jarveson, Elmar (eds.), A Case Study of a Soviet Republic: The Estonian SSR (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1978), 123.
Minassian, Taline Ter, Erevan, la construction d’une capitale à l’époque soviétique (Presses Universitaires de Rennes, 2007).
Alpatov, V., 150 iazykov i politika 1917–1997 (Moscow: Institut Vostokovedeniia RAN, 1997), 111.
Lipset, Harry, ‘The Status of National Minority Languages in Soviet Education’, Soviet Studies, 19, 2, 1967, 183–4
Grant, Nigel, ‘Linguistic and Ethnic Minorities in the USSR: Educational Policies and Developments’, in Tomiak, J. J. (ed.), Soviet Education in the 1980s (London: Croom Helm, 1983), 28.
Kirkwood, Michael, ‘Glasnost’, “the National Question” and Soviet Language Policy’, Soviet Studies (1991), 43, 1, 67.
Lewis, Robert A., Rowland, Richard H. and Clem, Ralph S., Nationality and Population Change in Russia and the USSR: An Evaluation of Census Data, 1897–1970 (New York: Praeger Publishers, 1976), 116–22.
d’Encausse, Hélène Carrère, L’empire éclatè (Paris: Flammarion, 1978).