Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 9
  • Print publication year: 2012
  • Online publication date: June 2012

14 - Important next steps in phronetic social science

Summary

Applied phronesis

The term ‘phronetic social science’ was coined in Making Social Science Matter (Flyvbjerg 2001). However, as pointed out in that volume and by Schram (2006), phronetic social science existed well before this particular articulation of the concept, but it was just not organized, recognized or named as such. Rather, it occurred here and there as scholars had adopted phronesis-like methods for their own purposes. The present title is the first organized volume of empirical–practical work in phronetic social science. Before Making Social Science Matter, phronesis, as a critical term of Aristotelian philosophy, had been theorized and its continuing importance as a key concept in Western thought had been convincingly argued by distinguished philosophers like Hans Georg Gadamer, Hannah Arendt, Alasdair MacIntyre and Richard J. Bernstein, among others. But no one had developed the theory and philosophy of phronesis into a practical methodology that could be applied by researchers interested in actually practising a phronetic social science. Making Social Science Matter developed such a methodology. Its implications were discussed and developed further in Making Political Science Matter (Schram and Caterino 2006). After these two theoretical–methodological contributions, it was evident that an important next step in demonstrating the usefulness of phronetic social science would be to illustrate, with concrete examples, how applied phronesis works in practical, empirical social science research. The contributions on applied phronesis contained in the present volume make clear that this next step has now been taken.

References
Flyvbjerg, Bent 1996 The Dark Side of Planning: Rationality and Mandelbaum, S.Mazza, L.Burchell, R.Explorations in Planning TheoryNew Brunswick, NJCenter for Urban Policy Research Press,383
Flyvbjerg, Bent 1998 Rationality and Power: Democracy in PracticeUniversity of Chicago Press
Flyvbjerg, Bent 2001 Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How it can Succeed AgainCambridge University Press
Flyvbjerg, Bent 2006 56
Landman, ToddSimmons, Paul W.Smith, Rhona 2010 Human Rights in Our Time: Multidisciplinary PerspectivesBeijingChina Legal Publishing House
Lerise, Fred S. 2005 Politics in Land and Water Use Management: Study in Kilimanjaro, TanzaniaDar es SalaamMkuki na Nyota Publishers
Linstead, Stephen A.Maréchal, GaranceGriffin, Ricky W.
Luke, Timothy W. 2006 252
Miller, James 1993 The Passion of Michel FoucaultNew YorkSimon & Schuster
Nnkya, Tumsifu J. 2008 Why Planning Does Not Work: Land-use Planning and Residents Rights in TanzaniaDar es SalaamMkuki na Nyota Publishers
Schatzki, Theodore 2006 117
Schram, Sanford F. 1995 Words of Welfare: The Poverty of Social Science and the Social Science of PovertyMinneapolis, MNUniversity of Minnesota Press
Schram, Sanford F. 2006 17
Schram, Sanford F.Caterino, Brian 2006 Making Political Science Matter: Debating Knowledge, Research, and MethodNew York University Press
Scott, James C. 1998 Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have FailedNew Haven, CTYale University Press
Taleb, Nassim Nicholas 2010 The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly ImprobableLondonPenguin
Yiftachel, Oren 1998 Planning and Social Control: Exploring the Dark SideJournal of Planning Literature 12 395