Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-27gpq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-19T04:24:36.727Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - Delayed debriefing: after a disaster

from Part III - Adaptations of debriefing models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2010

Beverley Raphael
Affiliation:
New South Wales Health Department, Sydney
John Wilson
Affiliation:
Cleveland State University
Get access

Summary

EDITORIAL COMMENTS

This chapter challenges the conventions of psychological debriefing as an intervention that is only applicable in the earliest period post disaster. After dissecting debriefing as a trauma prevention strategy, Chemtob highlights the need to examine the traditional elements that have been seen to potentially prevent morbid outcomes. These include prevention aims, supporting processing of the emotions, dealing with the cognitive distortion produced by the event, providing systematic information about the course of recovery over time so as to counter perceptions generated by cognitive disturbances, social support, public health screening and monitoring function. Three additional ‘propositions’ are added to this list as a result of the author's clinical observations and research: adaptation to the cultural environment, debriefing specific to the psychological tasks of the particular phase of recovery, taking into account individually specific ways of responding to life events. The last of these the author has described further in terms of ‘survival-mode’ psychological distortions that people use for necessary adaptation. He considers that understanding of these through education is likely to assist the recovery process.

Chemtob makes a strong case for the ‘clear specification of procedural steps’ involved in debriefing before it can be appropriately evaluated for intervention integrity and Wdelity and for effectiveness as a preventive approach to post-trauma morbidity. debriefing research is limited and findings difficult to appraise because procedures and aims have seldom been defined or measured.

Type
Chapter
Information
Psychological Debriefing
Theory, Practice and Evidence
, pp. 227 - 240
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×