Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T17:58:51.889Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

20 - Debriefing health care staff after assaults by patients

from Part III - Adaptations of debriefing models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2010

Beverley Raphael
Affiliation:
New South Wales Health Department, Sydney
John Wilson
Affiliation:
Cleveland State University
Get access

Summary

EDITORIAL COMMENTS

This chapter reports an interesting and reportedly effective programme used to lessen the stressor impact of assaults by patients on staff in psychiatric inpatient settings. The programme is structured in an organizational health and safety approach and is associated with a positive framework of peer support, i.e. it emphasizes positive coping and outcomes, including reinforcing attachments. The peer support team members who respond immediately are backed by supervisors and a team leader.

The model provides for direct support to the assaulted staff member in this way, while at the same time, if the event is very severe or involves others, critical incident stress debriefing is provided. Follow-up occurs to check whether the individual needs referral for more specialized care. This model has been widely tested and found to be effective in returning staff to functioning, lessening staff loss and decreasing assaults in the hospitals where it has been implemented. Flannery also reports significant cost savings.

Although this is not reported as a controlled trial, the replication of this intervention appears to support its effectiveness. As an intervention, it Wts in the broader context of stress management, particularly Critical Incident Stress Management. The incidents, while disturbing, have a relatively low prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) associated with them. It appears that the intervention is helpful in the ways claimed, and does not claim to prevent PTSD in this population, although it appears to be associated with lessening distress.

Type
Chapter
Information
Psychological Debriefing
Theory, Practice and Evidence
, pp. 281 - 289
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×