Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-995ml Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T08:49:14.260Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A German Perspective on the Waning Procedural Autonomy in Civil Matters: Who is Afraid of European Civil Procedure?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 April 2020

Get access

Summary

STARTING POINT: PROCEDURAL AUTONOMY AS A MATTER OF HIERARCHY OF RULES

According to Article 81 TFEU, the EU is competent to harmonise procedural rules for judicial cooperation in civil matters with cross-border implications. This explicitly includes the elimination of obstacles to the proper functioning of civil proceedings, if necessary, by promoting the compatibility of the rules on civil procedure applicable in the Member States (Article 81(2)(f )). In contrast, the legislative competence of the EU to harmonise or at least approximate civil procedure is much more limited as regards mere domestic disputes, because, in this respect, the TFEU contains no general legal base equivalent to Article 81. On the other side of that coin is what is often referred to as ‘procedural autonomy of the Member States’ (in German, usually referred to as ‘Verfahrensautonomie der Mitgliedstaaten’): in principle, it is for each national legal system to designate which court has jurisdiction and to determine the procedural conditions governing actions at law to ensure the protection of rights of individuals.

Below the line, however, procedural autonomy is limited and increasingly waning, if not eroding. Firstly, national procedural rules are only applicable in so far as they are consistent with higher-ranking principles:

In accordance with the principle of sincere cooperation enshrined in Article 4(3) TEU, the detailed procedural rules governing actions for safeguarding an individual's rights under EU law must be no less favourable than those governing similar domestic actions (principle of equivalence) and must not render impossible in practice or excessively difficult the exercise of rights conferred by EU law (principle of effectiveness).

Secondly, several provisions of the TFEU (such as Articles 114, 115 and 169) allow for the adoption of measures for the approximation of the laws of the Member States. While such rules primarily aim at the harmonisation of substantive law in a number of areas of private law (for example, consumer protection, anti-discrimination, insurance law, labour law, company law and competition law), it is generally recognised that they can also serve as a legal basis for uniform procedural rules or standards even in purely domestic civil cases. In this context, it should be noted that such EU requirements can go far beyond the simple effectiveness test normally applied in the context of procedural autonomy.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Intersentia
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×