Swain, J. and Lagunov, A. IVF incubator handling, in Standard Operational Procedures in Reproductive Medicine Laboratory and Clinical Practice, ed. Rizk, B. and Montag, M.. (Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, in press).Google Scholar

Swain, J. E. Optimizing the culture environment in the IVF laboratory: impact of pH and buffer capacity on gamete and embryo quality. Reprod Biomed Online 2010; 21(1):6–16.Google Scholar

Swain, J. E. Is there an optimal pH for culture media used in clinical IVF? Hum Reprod Update 2012; 18(3):333–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hall, J., et al. The origin, effects and control of air pollution in laboratories used for human embryo culture. Hum Reprod 1998; 13(Suppl. 4):146–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Schimmel, T., et al. Removal of volatile organic compounds from incbuators used for gamete and embryo culture. Fertil Steril 1997; 68(Suppl. 1):S165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morbeck, D. E. Air quality in the assisted reproduction laboratory: a mini-review. J Assist Reprod Genet 2015; 32(7):1019–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Heitmann, R. J., et al. Live births achieved via IVF are increased by improvements in air quality and laboratory environment. Reprod Biomed Online, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA). Code of Practice, 8th edn. (London: HFEA, 2009, revised 2015).Google Scholar

Commission Directive 2006/17/EC of 8 February 2006 Implementing Directive 2004/23/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as Regards Certain Technical Requirements for the Donation, Procurement and Testing of Human Tissues and Cells.Google Scholar

Khoudja, R. Y., Xu, Y., Li, T. and Zhou, C. Better IVF outcomes following improvements in laboratory air quality. J Assist Reprod Genet 2013; 30(1):69–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Toft, B. Independent Review of the Circumstances Surrounding Four Adverse Events That Occurred in the Reproductive Medicine Units at The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, West Yorkshire, Department of Health 40216 1P 0.4k Jun 4 (CWP).Google Scholar

Toft, B. and Mascie-Taylor, H. Involuntary automaticity: a work-system induced risk to safe health care. Health Services Manage Res 2005; 18(4):211–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

ASRM Practice Committee. Recommended practices for the management of embryology, andrology, and endocrinology laboratories: a committee opinion. American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Birmingham, AL, 2014.Google Scholar

Centers for Medical and Medicaid Services. What do I need to do to assess personnel competency? Available at www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Legislation/CLIA/Downloads/CLIA_CompBrochure_508.pdf (accessed 30 September, 2015).Google Scholar

Johansson, L. Handling gametes and embryos: oocyte collection and embryo culture. In A Practical Guide to Selecting Gametes and Embryos, ed. Montag, M. (Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Swain, J. E. Optimizing the culture environment in the IVF laboratory: impact of pH and buffer capacity on gamete and embryo quality. Reprod Biomed Online 2010; 18(6):799–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pasqualini, R. S. and Quintans, C. J. Clinical practice of embryo transfer. Reprod Biomed Online 2002; 4(1):83–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Eytan, O., Elad, D. and Jaffa, A. J. Bioengineering studies of the embryo transfer procedure. Ann NY Acad Sci 2007; 1101:21–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Derks, R. S., Farquhar, C., Mol, B. W., Buckingham, K. and Heineman, M. J. Techniques for preparation prior to embryo transfer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; (4):CD007682.Google Scholar

Abou-Setta, A. M. Air-fluid versus fluid-only models of embryo catheter loading: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online 2007; 14(1):80–4.Google ScholarPubMed

Halvaei, I., Khalili, M. A., Razi, M. H., Agha-Rahimi, A. and Nottola, S. A. Impact of different embryo loading techniques on pregnancy rates in in vitro fertlization/embryo transfer cycles. J Hum Reprod Sci 2013; 6(1):65–9.Google Scholar

de los Santos, M. J. and Ruiz, A. Protocols for tracking and witnessing samples and patients in assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril 2013; 100(6):1499–502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Schoolcraft, W. B., Surrey, E.S. and Gardner, D. K. Embryo transfer: techniques and variables affecting success. Fertil Steril 2001; 76(5):863–70 (Epub 2001/11/13).Google Scholar

Lopez, M. J., Garcia, D., Rodriguez, A., Colodron, M., Vassena, R. et al. Individualized embryo transfer training: timing and performance. Hum Reprod 2014; 29(7):1432–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gianaroli, L., Plachot, M., van Kooij, R., Al-Hasani, S., Dawson, K. et al. ESHRE guidelines for good practice in IVF laboratories. Committee of the Special Interest Group on Embryology of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. Hum Reprod 2000; 15(10):2241–6.Google Scholar

Keck, C., Fischer, R., Baukloh, V. and Alper, M. Staff management in the in vitro fertilization laboratory. Fertil Steril 2005; 84(6):1786–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Katz, E., Watts, L. D., Wright, K. E., Bennett, F. C., Litz, J. L. et al. Effect of incremental time experience on the results of in vitro fertilisation with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). J Assist Reprod Genet 1996; 13(6):501–4.Google Scholar

Ebner, T., Yaman, C., Moser, M., Sommergruber, M., Jesacher, K. et al. A prospective study on oocyte survival rate after ICSI: influence of injection technique and morphological features. J Assist Reprod Genet 2001; 18(12):623–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Daniel, C. E., Hickman, C., Wilkinson, T., Oliana, O. Gwinnett, D. et al. Maximising success rates by improving ICSI technique: which factors affect outcome? Fertility and Sterility 2015; 104(3):e95–6.Google Scholar

Dumoulin, J. M., Coonen, E., Bras, M., Bergers-Janssen, J. M., Ignoul-Vanvuchelen, R. C. et al. Embryo development and chromosomal anomalies after ICSI: effect of the injection procedure. Hum Reprod 2001; 16(2):306–12.Google Scholar

Tsai, M. Y., Huang, F. J., Kung, F. T., Lin, Y. C., Chang, S. Y. et al. Influence of polyvinylpyrrolidone on the outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection. J Reprod Med 2000; 45(2):115–20.Google ScholarPubMed

Nagy, Z. P., Liu, J., Joris, H., Bocken, G., Desmet, B. et al. The influence of the site of sperm deposition and mode of oolemma breakage at intracytoplasmic sperm injection on fertilization and embryo development rates. Hum Reprod 1995; 10(12):3171–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rubino, P., Viganò, P., Luddi, A. and Piomboni, P. The ICSI procedure from past to future: a systematic review of the more controversial aspects. Hum Reprod Update 2016; 22(2):194–227.Google ScholarPubMed

Flaherty, S. P., Payne, D., Swann, N. J. and Mattews, C. D. Aetiology of failed and abnormal fertilization after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 1995; 10(10):2623–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Blake, M., Garrisi, J., Tomkin, G. and Cohen, J. Sperm deposition site during ICSI affects fertilization and development. Fertil Steril 2000; 73(1):31–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Nagy, Z. P., Oliveira, S. A., Abdelmassih, V. and Abdelmassih, R. Novel use of laser to assist ICSI for patients with fragile oocytes: a case report. Reprod Biomed Online 2002; 4(1):27–31.Google Scholar

McLaren, A. Can mouse blastocysts stimulate a uterine response before losing the zona pellucida? J Reprod Fertil 1969; 19:199–201.Google Scholar

Gonzales, D. S. and Bavister, B. D. Zona pellucida escape by hamster blastocysts in vitro is delayed and morphologically different compared with zona escape in vivo. Biol Reprod 1995; 52(2):470–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Montag, M., Koll, B., Holmes, P. and van der Ven, H. Significance of the number of embryonic cells and the state of the zona pellucida for hatching of mouse blastocysts in vitro versus in vivo. Biol Reprod 2000; 62(6):1738–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Malter, H. E. and Cohen, J. Blastocyst formation and hatching in vitro following zona drilling of mouse and human embryos. Gamete Res 1989; 24:67–80.Google Scholar

Cohen, J., Alikani, M., Trowbridge, J. and Rosenwaks, Z. Implantation enhancement by selective assisted hatching using zona drilling of human embryos with poor prognosis. Hum Reprod 1992; 7:685–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cohen, J. Assisted hatching: indications and techniques. Acta Eur Fertil 1993; 24:215–19.Google ScholarPubMed

Schimmel, T., Cohen, J., Saunders, H. and Alikani, M. Laser-assisted zona pellucida thinning does not facilitate hatching and may disrupt the in vitro hatching process: a morphokinetic study in the mouse. Hum Reprod 2014; 29:2670–9.Google Scholar

Cohen, J. and Feldberg, D. Effects of the size and number of zona pellucida openings on hatching and trophoblast outgrowth in the mouse embryo. Mol Reprod Dev 1991; 30:70–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Carney, S. K., Das, S., Blake, D., Farquhar, C., Seif, M. M. et al. Assisted hatching on assisted conception (in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 12:CD001894.Google ScholarPubMed

Martins, W. P., Rocha, I. A., Ferriani, R. A. and Nastri, C. O. Assisted hatching of human embryos: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Hum Reprod Update 2011; 17:438–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Role of assisted hatching in in vitro fertilization: a guideline. Fertil Steril 2014; 102:348–51.Google Scholar

Singh, H., Nardo, L., Kimber, S. J. and Aplin, J. D. Early stages of implantation as revealed by an in vitro model. Reproduction 2010; 139:905–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Vajta, G., Rienzi, L. and Bavister, B. D. Zona-free embryo culture: is it a viable option to improve pregnancy rates? Reprod Biomed Online 2010; 21(1):17–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ge, H. S., Zhou, W., Zhang, W. and Lin, J. J. Impact of assisted hatching on fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles: a prospective, randomized study. Reprod Biomed Online 2008; 16:589–96.Google Scholar

Cohen, J. and Alikani, M. Evidence-based medicine and its application in clinical preimplantation embryology. Reprod Biomed Online 2013; 27:547–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chailert, C., Sanmee, U., Piromlertamorn, W., Samchimchom, S. and Vutyavanich, T. Effects of partial or complete laser-assisted hatching on the hatching of mouse blastocysts and their cell numbers. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2013; 11:21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Douglas-Hamilton, D. H. and Conia, J. Thermal effects in laser-assisted pre-embryo zona drilling. J Biomed Opt 2001; 6(2):205–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gardner, D. K. and Schoolcraft, W. B. In vitro culture of human blastocysts. In Toward Reproductive Certainty: Fertility and Genetics Beyond, ed. Jansen, R. and Mortimer, D. (pp. 378–88) (Carnforth, UK: Parthenon, 1999).Google Scholar

Capalbo, A., Ubaldi, F. M., Cimadomo, D., Maggiulli, R., Patassini, C. et al. Consistent and reproducible outcomes of blastocyst biopsy and aneuploidy screening across different biopsy practitioners: a multicentre study involving 2,586 embryo biopsies. Hum Reprod 2016; 31(1):199–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kort, J. D., Lathi, R. B., Brookfield, K., Baker, V. L., Zhao, Q. et al. Aneuploidy rates and blastocyst formation after biopsy of morulae and early blastocysts on day 5. J Assist Reprod Genet 2015; 32(6):925–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Vajta, G. Vitrification in human and domestic animal embryology: work in progress. Reprod Fertil Dev 2013; 25(5):719–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cobo, A. and Diaz, C. Clinical application of oocyte vitrification: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Fertil Steril 2011; 96(2):277–85.Google Scholar

Fahy, G. M., Levy, D. L. and Ali, S. E. Some emerging principles underlying the physical properties, biological actions and utility of vitrification solutions. Cryobiology 1987; 24:196–213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rall, W. F. Factors affecting the survival of mouse embryos cryopreserved by vitrification. Cryobiology 1987; 24:387–402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kuleshova, L., Gianaroli, L., Magli, C. Ferraretti, T. and Trounson, A. Birth following vitrification of a small number of human oocytes: case report. Hum Reprod 1999; 14:3077–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kuwayama, M. Highly efficient vitrification for cryopreservation of human oocytes and embryos: the Cryotop method. Theriogenology 2007; 67:73–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chian, R. C., Huang, J. Y., Gilbert, L., Son, W. Y, Holzer, H. et al. Obstetric outcomes following vitrification of in vitro and in vivo matured oocytes. Fertil Steril 2009; 91:2391–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cobo, A., Remohi, J., Chang, C. C. and Nagy, Z. P. Oocyte cryopreservation for donor egg banking. Reprod Biomed Online 2011; 23:341–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fahy, G. M. and Wowk, B. Principles of cryopreservation by vitrification. In Cryopreservation and Freeze-Drying Protocols, Methods in Molecular Biology, ed. W. F. Wolkers and H. Oldenhof (pp. 21–62). 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pegg, David E. Principles of Cryopreservation. In Cryopreservation and Freeze-Drying Protocols, ed. Day, J. G. and Stacey, G. N. (pp. 39–57) (Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, 2007), doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-362-2_3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leibo, S. P. and Pool, T. B. The principal variables of cryopreservation: solutions, temperatures, and rate changes, Fertility and Sterility, 2011;96(2):269–276.Google Scholar

Bavister, B. D. Culture of preimplantation embryos: facts and artifacts.Hum Reprod Update 1995; 1(2):91–148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Leese, H. J. Metabolic control during preimplantation mammalian development. Human Reproduction Update 1995; 1:63–72.Google Scholar

Punt–van der Zalm, J. P. E. M., Hendriks, J. C. M., Westphal, J. R., Kremer, J. A. M., Teerenstra, S. et al. Toxicity testing of human assisted reproduction devices using the mouse embryo assay. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2009; 18(4):529–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bavister, B. and Andrews, J. C. A rapid sperm motility bioassay procedure for quality control testing of water and culture media. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf 1988; 5:67–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Critchlow, J. D., Matson, P. L., Newman, M. C. et al. Quality control in an in-vitro fertilization laboratory: use of human sperm survival studies. Hum Reprod 1989; 4:545–9.Google Scholar

Stovall, D. W., Guzick, D. S., Berga, S. L. et al. Sperm recovery and survival: two tests that predict in vitro fertilization outcome. Fertil Steril 1994; 62:1244–9.Google Scholar

Alvarez, J. G. and Storey, B. T. Spontaneous lipid peroxidation in rabbit and mouse epididymal spermatozoa: dependence of rate on temperature and oxygen concentration. Biol Reprod 1985; 32:342–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Claassens, O. E., Wehr, J. B. and Harrison, K. L. Optimizing sensitivity of the human sperm motility assay for embryo toxicity testing. Hum Reprod 2000; 15:1586–91.Google Scholar

Lane, M. and Gardner, DK. Differential regulation of mouse embryo development and viability by amino acids. J Reprod Fertil 1997; 109:153–64.Google Scholar

Davidson, A., Vermesh, M., Lobo, R. and Paulson, R. Mouse embryo culture as quality control for human in vitro fertilization: the one-cell versus the two-cell model. Fertil Steril 1988; 49:516–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scott, L. F., Sundaram, S. G. and Smith, S. The relevance and use of mouse embryo bioassays for quality control in an assisted reproductive technology program. Fertil Steril 1993; 60:559–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hughes, P. M., Morbeck, D. E., Hudson, S., Fredrickson, J., Walker, D. L. et al. Peroxides in mineral oil used for in vitro fertilization: defining limits of standard quality control assays. J Assist Reprod Genet 2010; 27:87–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Morbeck, D.E., Khan, Z., Barnidge, D. R. and Walker, D. L. Washing mineral oil reduces contaminants and embryotoxicity. Fertil Steril 2010; 94:2747–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Suzuki, O., Asano, T., Yamamoto, Y., Takano, K. and Koura, M. Development in vitro of preimplantation embryos from 55 mouse strains. Reprod Fertil Dev 1996; 8:975–80.Google Scholar

Khan, Z., Morbeck, D. E., Walker, D. L. et al. Mouse embryos and in vitro stress: does mouse strain matter? Fertil Steril 2010; 94:S58.Google Scholar

Gardner, D. K., Reed, L., Linck, D., Sheehan, C. and Lane, M. Quality control in human in vitro fertilization. Semin Reprod Med 2005; 23(4):319–24.Google Scholar

Wolff, H. S., Fredrickson, J. R., Walker, D. L. and Morbeck, D. E. Advances in quality control: mouse embryo morphokinetics are sensitive markers of in vitro stress. Hum Reprod 2013; 28(7):1776–82.Google Scholar

Carrell, D. T. and Cartmill, D. A brief review of current and proposed federal government regulation of assisted reproduction laboratories in the United States. J Androl 2002; 23:611–17.Google Scholar

Gorrill, M. J., Rinehart, J. S., Tamhane, A. C. and Gerrity, M. Comparison of the hamster sperm motility assay to the mouse one-cell and two-cell embryo bioassays as quality control tests for in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1991; 55(2):345–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

de Jonge, C. J., Centola, G. M. Reed, M. L., Shabanowitz, R. B., Simon, S. D. et al. Andrology lab corner: human sperm survival assay as a bioassay for the assisted reproductive technologies laboratory. J Androl 2003; 24:16–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bavister, B. and Andrews, J. C. A rapid sperm motility bioassay procedure for quality control testing of water and culture media. J In Vitro Fertil Embryo Trans 1988; 5(2):67–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rinehart, J. S., Bavister, B. D. and Gerrity, M. Quality control in the in vitro fertilization laboratory: comparison of bioassay systems for water quality. J In Vitro Fertil Embryo Trans 1988; 5(6):335–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Davidson, A., Vermesh, M., Lobo, R. A. and Paulson, R. J. Mouse embryo culture as a quality control for human in vitro fertilization: the one-cell versus the two-cell model. Fertil Steril 1988; 49:516–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Claasens, O. E., Wehr, J. B. and Harrison, K. L. Optimizing sensitivity of the human sperm motility assay for embryo toxicity testing. Hum Reprod 2000; 15(7):1586–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Critchlow, J. D., Matson, P. L., Newman, M. C., Horne, G., Troup, S. A. et al. Quality control in an in vitro fertilization laboratory: use of human sperm survival studies. Hum Reprod 1989; 4(5):545–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar