Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • This chapter is unavailable for purchase
  • Print publication year: 2012
  • Online publication date: June 2012

12 - Waste

from Part II - Principles and rules establishing standards

Summary

INTRODUCTION

This chapter describes the rules of international law relating to the management of waste, including: prevention and treatment; disposal; recycling and re-use; and international movement (including trade). Liability for environmental damage caused by wastes is addressed in Chapter 17, and there is an emerging case law at the European Court of Human Rights linking waste with the protection of fundamental human rights. Except for rules on international trade in wastes, this remains a developing area of international law. Other than the particular rules applicable in the Antarctic and the EU, there is no regional or global legal framework for a waste management strategy. Rather, waste has traditionally been regulated incidentally to the attainment of other objectives. Among the relevant international legal measures are those regulating the disposal of wastes at sea; limiting atmospheric emissions of gaseous wastes; and preventing the disposal of wastes in rivers and other freshwaters. This approach does not address the source of the problem by preventing waste generation; it merely shifts the disposal problem to another environmental medium.

In the context of the massive increase in the generation of all types of waste resulting from industrial activity, this is a major shortcoming in the rules of international environmental law. Part of the problem is institutional: at the global level, no UN or other body has overall responsibility for waste, and this has led to a fragmented, ad hoc and piecemeal international response. The Stockholm Conference did not focus on the issue of waste as such: without specifically mentioning waste, Principle 6 of the 1972 Stockholm Declaration called for the discharge of toxic or other substances to be halted. The 1982 World Charter for Nature called for ‘special precautions’ to be taken to prevent discharge of radioactive or toxic wastes, but did not encourage minimisation of the generation of such wastes. At UNCED, the issue of waste was addressed in some detail and in a more concerted fashion in Agenda 21 with the development of proposals, including targets and timetables, for the management of hazardous wastes, solid wastes (including sewage) and radioactive wastes. Nonetheless, Principle 14 of the Rio Declaration limited itself to calling for effective co-operation to ‘discourage or prevent the relocation or transfer to other states of any activities and substances that cause severe environmental degradation or are found to be harmful to human health’.

UN-HabitatSolid Waste Management in the World's Cities: Water and Sanitation in the World's Cities 2010 2010 94
UN-HabitatSolid Waste Management in the World's Cities: Water and Sanitation in the World's Cities 2010 2010 94 108
UNEPGlobal Environment Outlook GEO4: Environment for Development 2007 76
UN-HabitatSolid Waste Management in the World's Cities: Water and Sanitation in the World's Cities 2010 2010 94
Smets, H.‘Transfrontier Movements of Hazardous Wastes: An Examination of the Council Decision and Recommendation’Environmental Policy and Law 16 1985
Moisé, E.‘La Convention de Bâle sur les Mouvements Transfrontières de Déchets Dangereux’Revue Générale de Droit International Public 899 1989
Kiss, A.‘The International Control of Transboundary Movement of Hazardous Waste’Texas International Law Journal 521 1991
Kitt, J.‘Waste Exports to the Developing World: A Global Response’Georgetown International Environmental Law Review 485 1995
Desai, B.‘Regulating Transboundary Movement of Hazardous Waste’Indian Journal of International Law 43 1997
Scovazzi, T.‘The Transboundary Movement of Hazardous Waste in the Mediterranean Regional Context’UCLA Journal of Environmental Law and Policy 231 2001
Lipman, Z.‘Economic Growth and Ecological Integrity – The Impact of the Hazardous Waste Trade on the Economy and Environment of Developing Countries’Environmental Law and Management 252 2006
Hackett, D. P.‘An Assessment of the Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and Their Disposal’American University Journal of International Law and Policy 295 1990
Shearer, C.‘Comparative Analysis of the Basel and Bamako Conventions on Hazardous Waste’Environmental Law 141 1993
Sanders, A.Bowal, P.‘International Trade in Hazardous Wastes and the Basel Convention’Journal of Environmental Law and Practice 143 2001
Kummer, K.‘The International Regulation of Transboundary Traffic in Hazardous Wastes: The 1989 Basel Convention’International and Comparative Law Quarterly 530 1992
Crawford, J.Sands, P.The Availability of Article 11 Agreements in the Context of the Basel Convention's Export Ban on RecyclablesInternational Council on Metals and the Environment 1997
de la Fayette, L.‘Legal and Practical Implications of the Ban Amendment to the Basel Convention’Yearbook of International Environmental Law 703 1995
Crawford, J.Sands, P.The Availability of Article 11 Agreements in the Context of the Basel Convention's Export Ban on RecyclablesInternational Council on Metals and the Environment 1997
Daniel, A.‘Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Waste’Yearbook of International Environmental Law 258 2007
Daniel, A.‘Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Waste’Yearbook of International Environmental Law 358 2006
Donald, S. W.‘The Bamako Convention as a Solution to the Problem of Hazardous Waste Exports to Less Developed Countries’Columbia Journal of Environmental Law 419 1992
Ouguergouz, F.‘La Convention de Bamako sur l'Interdiction d'Importer en Afrique des Déchets Dangereux et sur le Contrôle des Mouvements Transfrontières et la Gestion des Déchets Dangereux Produits en Afrique’Annuaire Français de Droit International 871 1992
Tladi, D.‘The Quest to Ban Hazardous Waste Import into Africa: First Bamako and Now Basel’Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa 210 2000
van Hoogstraten, D.Lawrence, P.‘Protecting the South Pacific from Hazardous and Nuclear Waste Dumping: the Waigani Convention’Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 268 1998
Murphy, S.‘South Pacific Regional Environmental Programme's (SREP) Aptitude in Managing Marine Pollution in the South Pacific’Australian and New Zealand Maritime Law Journal 107 2004
Rose, E. C.‘Transboundary Harm: Hazardous Waste Management Problems and Mexico's Maquiladoras’International Law 223 1989
Moskonite, A.‘Criminal Environmental Law: Stopping the Flow of Hazardous Waste to Mexico’California Western International Law Journal 159 1991
Engfer, V. L.Partida, G. A.Vernon, T. C.Toulet, A.Renas, D. A.‘By-Products of Prosperity: Transboundary Hazardous Waste Issues Confronting the Maquiladora Industry’San Diego Law Review 819 1991
Currie, D.van Dyke, J.‘The Shipment of Ultrahazardous Nuclear Materials in International Law’Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 113 1999
Kus, S.‘Nuclear Waste Management’Yearbook of International Environmental Law 321 2009