Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T23:19:42.316Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Interactions between tourists and white-faced monkeys (Cebus capucinus) at Manuel Antonio National Park, Quepos, Costa Rica

from Part IV - Neotropical primates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2014

Laurie Kauffman
Affiliation:
Oklahoma City University
Anne E. Russon
Affiliation:
Glendon College, York University
Janette Wallis
Affiliation:
University of Oklahoma
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Tourism, particularly wildlife-based tourism, is one of the fastest growing industries in the world. Tourism currently accounts for 10.8% of the global gross domestic product and it is expected to grow by 4.6% annually over the next ten years (World Travel and Tourism Council, 2005). Twenty to forty percent of international tourists are interested in wildlife-based experiences and this high market share results in fierce competition among tour operators to provide more wildlife tourism opportunities (Reynolds & Braithwaite, 2001). Many countries and organizations are counting on this demand to grow local economies sustainably while protecting the environment. However, more and more research is finding that wildlife-based tourism is not a panacea for habitat loss. In promoting nature as a tourist attraction, natural surroundings can be negatively affected (Knight & Cole, 1995; Ziffer, 1989). Introducing people into an environment will have some effect, be it production of litter, construction of trails and buildings, changes in the local culture, or changes in the behavior of the wildlife. Effects of tourism on wildlife can vary from feeding and activity budget changes (Ikiara & Okech, 2002) to reproductive changes (Jacobson & Lopez, 1994), ranging changes (Fairbanks & Tullous, 2002), and deaths of individual animals (Mathieson & Wall, 1982; Roe et al., 1997). Indeed, one review found that 81% of studies investigating the effects of wildlife tourism on animals classified tourism impacts as harmful (Knight & Cole, 1995).

Successful sustainable tourism must strike a balance between preserving the environment, enriching local communities, and providing memorable experiences to tourists. These disparate goals may not always be compatible. Research results demonstrate that tourist satisfaction increases as tourists are allowed more control over their encounters with wildlife (Reynolds & Braithwaite, 2001; Sparks, 1994) and closer contact with wildlife (Farber & Hall, 2007; Fredrickson & Anderson, 1999; Valentine et al., 2004). Tourists also prefer experiences during biologically active times, such as birth or breeding seasons (Reynolds & Braithwaite, 2001). These close encounters can result in danger for the tourists, such as being bitten by the animals (Albert & Bowyer, 1991; Brennan et al., 1985; Fairbanks & Tullous, 2002), and danger for the animals in the form of increased chances of disease transmission from human to animal (Kaur & Singh, 2008; Köndgen et al., 2008; Wallis & Lee, 1999).

Type
Chapter
Information
Primate Tourism
A Tool for Conservation?
, pp. 230 - 244
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albert, D. and Bowyer, R. (1991). Factors related to grizzly bear-human interactions in Denali National Park. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 19: 339–349.Google Scholar
Altmann, J. (1974). Observational study of behavior. Behaviour, 48: 1–41.Google Scholar
Altmann, J. and Muruthi, P. (1988). Differences in daily life between semiprovisioned and wild-feeding baboons. American Journal of Primatology, 15: 213–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, C. P. (2007). Moon Costa Rica. Emeryville, CA: Avalon Travel Publishing.Google Scholar
Berman, C. M., Li, J. H., Ogawa, H., et al. (2007). Primate tourism, range restriction, and infant risk among Macaca thibetana at Mt. Huangshan, China. International Journal of Primatology, 28: 1123–1141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernard, H. R. (1995). Research Methods in Anthropology: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. New York: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
Blom, A., Cipolletta, C., Brunsting, A. M. H., and Prins, H. H. T. (2004). Behavioral responses of gorillas to habituation in the Dzanga-Ndoki National Park, Central African Republic. International Journal of Primatology, 25: 179–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boza, M. A. (1993). Conservation in action: past, present, and future of the National Park system of Costa Rica. Conservation Biology, 7: 239–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, E. J., Else, J. G., and Altmann, J. (1985). Ecology and behaviour of a pest primate: vervet monkeys in a tourist-lodge habitat. African Journal of Ecology, 23: 35–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campos, F. A., Bergstrom, M. L., Childers, A., et al. (2014). Drivers of home range characteristics across spatiotemporal scales in a Neotropical primate, Cebus capucinus. Animal Behaviour, 91: 93–109.Google Scholar
Chapman, C. (1988). Patterns of foraging and range use by three species of Neotropical primates. Primates, 29: 177–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, C. A. and Fedigan, L. M. (1990). Dietary differences between neighboring Cebus capucinus groups: local traditions, food availability or responses to food profitability. Folia Primatologica, 54: 177–186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Custance, D. M., Whiten, A., and Fredman, T. (2002). Social learning and primate reintroduction. International Journal of Primatology, 23: 479–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairbanks, W. S. and Tullous, R. (2002). Distribution of pronghorn (Antilocapra americana Ord) on Antelope Island State Park, Utah, USA, before and after establishment of recreational trails. Natural Areas Journal, 22: 277–282.Google Scholar
Farber, M. E. and Hall, T. E. (2007). Emotion and environment: visitors’ extraordinary experiences along the Dalton Highway in Alaska. Journal of Leisure Research, 39: 248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fragaszy, D. M. and Bard, K. (1997). Comparison of development and life history in Pan and Cebus. International Journal of Primatology, 18: 683–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fragaszy, D. M., Visalberghi, E., and Fedigan, L. M. (2004). The Complete Capuchin: The Biology of the Genus Cebus. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fredrickson, L. M. and Anderson, D. H. (1999). A qualitative exploration of the wilderness experience as a source of spiritual inspiration. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19: 21–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freese, C. H. (1983). Cebus capucinus (Mono cara blanca, white-faced capuchin). In: Janzen, D. H. (ed.), Costa Rican Natural History. University of Chicago Press, pp. 458–460.Google Scholar
Grossberg, R., Treves, A., and Naughton-Treves, L. (2003). The incidental ecotourist: measuring visitor impacts on endangered howler monkeys at a Belizean archaeological site. Environmental Conservation, 30: 40–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hakeem, A., Sandoval, G. R., Jones, M., and Allman, J. (1996). Brain and life span in primates. In: Birren, J. and Schaie, K. (eds.), Handbook of the Psychology of Aging 4th edn. San Diego: Academic Press, pp. 78–104.Google Scholar
Hill, D. A. (1999). Effects of provisioning on the social behaviour of Japanese and rhesus macaques: implications for socioecology. Primates, 40: 187–198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Honey, M. (2003). Giving a grade to Costa Rica’s green tourism. Calificando el turismo verde de Costa Rica. NACLA Report on the Americas, 36: 39–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ICT. (2002). Costa Rican Institute of Tourism: Annual Report of Statistics, 2001. San Jose, Costa Rica: Costa Rican Institute of Tourism.Google Scholar
Ikiara, M. and Okech, C. (2002). Impact of tourism on environment in Kenya: status and policy. Kenya Institute for Public Policy Research and Analysis.Google Scholar
Jacobson, S. K. and Lopez, A. F. (1994). Biological impacts of ecotourism: tourists and nesting turtles in Tortuguero National Park, Costa Rica. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 22: 414–419.Google Scholar
Johns, B. G. (1996). Responses of chimpanzees to habituation and tourism in the Kibale Forest, Uganda. Biological Conservation, 78: 257–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaimowitz, D. and Segura, O. (1996). The political dimension of implementing environmental reform: lessons from Costa Rica. In: Costanza, R., Segura, O., and Matinez-Alier, J. (eds.), Getting Down to Earth: Practical Applications of Ecological Economics. Washington, DC: Island Press, pp. 439–453.Google Scholar
Kaur, T. and Singh, J. (2008). Up close and personal with Mahale chimpanzees – a path forward. American Journal of Primatology, 70: 729–733.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kinnaird, M. F. and O’Brien, T. G. (1996). Ecotourism in the Tangkoko Dua Saudara Nature Reserve: opening Pandora’s box?Oryx, 30: 65–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, R. L. and Cole, D. N. (1995). Wildlife responses to recreationists. In: Knight, R. L. and Gutzwiller, K. J. (eds.), Wildlife and Recreationists, Washington, DC: Island Press, pp. 51–70.Google Scholar
Koganezawa, M. and Imaki, H. (1999). The effects of food sources on Japanese monkey home range size and location, and population dynamics. Primates, 40: 177–185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Köndgen, S., Kühl, H., N’Goran, , et al. (2008). Pandemic human viruses cause decline of endangered great apes. Current Biology, 18: 260–264.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Litvak, M. (1987). Home Range, Habitat Usage, Troop Movement, Activity Patterns and Food Habits of White-Faced Monkeys (Cebus capucinus) in Manuel Antonio National Park. San Jose: Associated Colleges of the Midwest Field Research Program.Google Scholar
Lumsdon, L. M. and Swift, J. S. (1998). Ecotourism at a crossroads: the case of Costa Rica. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 6: 155–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathieson, A. and Wall, G. (1982). Tourism: Economic, Physical and Social Impacts. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
McNeilage, A. (1996). Ecotourism and mountain gorillas in the Virunga Volcanoes. In: Taylor, V. J. and Dunstone, N. (eds.), The Exploitation of Mammal Populations. London: Chapman and Hall, pp. 334–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moscow, D. and Vaughan-Dickhaut, C. (1987). Troop movement and food habits of white-faced monkeys in a tropical-dry forest. Movimiento de la tropa y hábitos alimentarios de los monos carablanca en un bosque tropical seco. Revista de Biología Tropical, 35: 287–297.Google Scholar
Oates, J. F. (1987). Food distribution and foraging behavior. In: Smuts, B., Cheney, D. L., Seyfarth, R. M., et al. (eds.), Primate Societies. University of Chicago Press, pp. 197–209.Google Scholar
Oppenheimer, J. R. (1982). Cebus capucinus: Home range, population dynamics, and interspecific relationships. In Leigh, E., Rand, A., and Windsor, D. (eds.), The Ecology of a Tropical Forest: Seasonal Rhythms and Long Term Changes. Washington, DC: Smithsonian, pp. 253–272.Google Scholar
Perry, S. (2011). Social traditions and social learning in capuchin monkeys (Cebus). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 366: 988–996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rachowiecki, R. (1997). Costa Rica. London: Lonely Planet.
Reynolds, P. C and Braithwaite, D. (2001). Towards a conceptual framework for wildlife tourism. Tourism Management, 22: 31–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roe, D., Leader-Williams, N., and Dalal-Clayton, D. B. (1997). Take only Photographs, Leave only Footprints: The Environmental Impacts of Wildlife Tourism. London: International Institute for Environment and Development.Google Scholar
Saj, T., Sicotte, P., and Paterson, J. D. (1999). Influence of human food consumption on the time budget of vervets. International Journal of Primatology, 20: 977–994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sparks, B. (1994). Communicative aspects of the service encounter. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 17: 39.Google Scholar
Tosi, J. A. (1969). Mapa ecologico de Costa Rica. San José.Google Scholar
Valentine, P. S., Birtles, A., Curnock, M., et al. (2004). Getting closer to whales – passenger expectations and experiences, and the management of swim with dwarf minke whale interactions in the Great Barrier Reef. Tourism Management, 25: 647–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallis, J. and Lee, D. (1999). Primate conservation: the prevention of disease transmission. International Journal of Primatology, 20: 803–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, B. C., Sork, V. L., Leong, M. T., and Smith, T. B. (2007). Hunting of mammals reduces seed removal and dispersal of the Afrotropical tree. Antrocaryon klaineanum (Anacardiaceae). Biotropica, 39: 340–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wehncke, E. V., Hubbell, S. P., Foster, R. B., and Dalling, J. W. (2003). Seed dispersal patterns produced by white-faced monkeys: implications for the dispersal limitation of Neotropical tree species. Journal of Ecology, 91: 677–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, R. S. (1995). Learning from Strangers: The Art and Method of Qualitative Interview Studies. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
World Conservation Union, UNEP-World Conservation Monitoring Centre (2009). World Database on Protected Areas. Cambridge, UK: WCMC.Google Scholar
World Travel and Tourism Council. (2005). World Travel and Tourism: Sowing the Seeds of Growth. London: World Travel and Tourism Council.Google Scholar
Wright, S. J., Zeballos, H., Dominguez, I., et al. (2000). Poachers alter mammal abundance, seed dispersal, and seed predation in a Neotropical forest. Conservation Biology, 14: 227–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziffer, K. (1989). Ecotourism: The Uneasy Alliance. Washington, DC: Conservation International.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×