Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T19:27:13.646Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Preliminary objections: legitimate issues and illegitimate tactics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

Jo M. Pasqualucci
Affiliation:
University of South Dakota
Get access

Summary

[A State] has the right to resort to every legitimate judicial remedy and procedure to defend itself against charges that it has violated the treaty. What it may not do is interpose manifestly ill-founded and trivial motions whose sole purpose can only be to disrupt and delay the orderly and timely completion of the proceedings.

Preliminary objections: an overview

A preliminary objection is an objection to a tribunal's consideration of a case. When a party submits a case to a tribunal, the respondent may make legal objections to the Court's authority to act. The respondent may object that the case was initially inadmissible, that the enforcement organs did not have jurisdiction, or that the enforcement organs did not follow all the procedural or technical requirements of the treaty. As articulated by the International Court of Justice, ‘the object of a preliminary objection is to avoid not merely a decision on, but even any discussion of the merits’. Before an international tribunal can consider whether the State has violated substantive provisions it must first rule on any preliminary objections. If certain of these objections are admitted by the Court, it may result in the dismissal of an otherwise factually verifiable case. Rosenne lamented the English use of the term ‘preliminary objection’ rather than ‘preliminary question’ because he believed that it resulted in unnecessary difficulties:

It is to be regretted that the English language has to use the word ‘objection’ and not ‘question’; it incorporates misleading overtones absent from the corresponding French term exception, redolent of the exceptiones of Roman law. […]

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×