Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T20:18:21.364Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 5 - Management of the Second Stage of Labor

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 September 2018

Shad Deering
Affiliation:
Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Maryland
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aasheim, V, Nilsen, ABV, Reinar, LM, Lukasse, M (2017). Perineal techniques during the second stage of labour for reducing perineal trauma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (6): CD006672.Google Scholar
ACOG (2009). Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: nomenclature, interpretation, and general management principles. ACOG Practice Bulletin #106, July 2009, reaffirmed 2017.Google Scholar
ACOG (2014). Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. ACOG Obstetric Care Consensus #1, March 2014, reaffirmed 2016.Google Scholar
ACOG (2017a). Delayed umbilical cord clamping after birth. ACOG Committee Opinion #684, January 2017.Google Scholar
ACOG (2017b). Approaches to limit intervention during labor and birth. ACOG Committee Opinion #687, February 2017.Google Scholar
ACOG (2017c). Delivery of a newborn with meconium-stained amniotic fluid. ACOG Committee Opinion #689, March 2017.Google Scholar
Anim-Somuah, M, Smyth, RM, Jones, L (2011). Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (12): CD000331.Google Scholar
Dhar, KK, Ray, SN, Dhall, GI (1995). Significance of nuchal cord. J Indian Med Assoc 93: 451–3.Google ScholarPubMed
Fausett, M, Staat, B, Crosiar, J, Deering, S (2017). SAFE PASSAGES implementation reduces perineal trauma. Am J Obstet Gynecol 216 (1 Suppl.): S39.Google Scholar
Fraser, WD, Marcoux, S, Krauss, I, et al. (2000). Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of delayed pushing for nulliparous women in the second stage of labor with continuous epidural analgesia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 182: 1165–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friedman, A, Ananth, C, Prendergast, E, D’Alton, M, Wright, J (2015). Variation in and factors associated with use of episiotomy. JAMA 313: 197–9.Google Scholar
Hansen, SL, Clark, SL, Foster, JC (2002). Active pushing versus passive fetal descent in the second stage of labor: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 99: 2934.Google Scholar
Lemos, A, Amorium, MM, Dornelas de Andrade, A, et al. (2017). Pushing/bearing down methods for the second stage of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (3): CD009124.Google Scholar
McDonald, SJ, Middleton, P, Dowswell, T, Morris, PS (2013). Effect of timing of umbilical cord clamping of term infants on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (7): CD004074.Google Scholar
Rabe, H, Diaz-Rossello, JL, Duley, L, Dowswell, T (2012). Effect of timing of umbilical cord clamping and other strategies to influence placental transfusion at preterm birth on maternal and infant outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (8): CD003248.Google ScholarPubMed
Herbst, MA (2005). Treatment of suspected fetal macrosomia: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193: 1035–9.Google Scholar
Spong, CY, Berghella, V, Wenstrom, KD, Mercer, BM, Saade, GR (2012). Preventing the first cesarean delivery: summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal–Fetal Medicine, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologist Workshop. Obstet Gynecol 120: 1181–93.Google Scholar
Vitner, D, Paltieli, Y, Haberman, S, et al. (2015). Prospective multicenter study of ultrasound-based measurements of fetal head station and position throughout labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 465: 611–15.Google Scholar
Zhang, J, Landy, HJ, Branch, DW, et al. (2010). Contemporary patterns of spontaneous labor with normal neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 116: 1281–7.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×