Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T09:57:15.445Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Decomposing Income Inequality: People's Republic of China, 1990–2005

from Part C - Country Studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2012

Tun Lin
Affiliation:
University of Hong Kong
Juzhong Zhuang
Affiliation:
Assistant Chief Economist, ERD
Damaris Yarcia
Affiliation:
Consultant, ADB
Fen Lin
Affiliation:
University of Hong Kong
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Rapid growth in the People's Republic of China (PRC), which began as it embarked on economic reforms in the late 1970s, has been accompanied by rising income inequality. During 1985–2006, the country's real per capita gross domestic product grew at an annual average rate of 8.5%. Such strong growth led to an unprecedented reduction in the incidence of poverty, from 32.5% in 1990 to 7.1% in 2005, measured by the $1-a-day international poverty line (Ali and Zhuang 2007). However, the Gini coefficient of per capita income also increased, from about 0.30 in the early 1980s to about 0.45 in 2001 at the national level (Ravallion and Chen 2007).

The literature on income inequality in the PRC is extensive. Researchers have used three types of data: unit-level household survey data, aggregate income data, and grouped household survey data. Due to the absence of consistent data covering the entire PRC, studies based on unit-level data often focus on a particular segment of the population, such as urban households (Cao and Nee 2005, Meng 2004) or rural households (Gustafsson and Li 2002), for isolated years. Aggregate data, often at the provincial level, have been used to investigate the spatial dimension of inequality (Hussain and Zhuang 1994, Kanbur and Zhang 2005).

More recently, attempts have been made to study the PRC's income inequality by extrapolating unit-level data from grouped household income data. Notable examples are Ravallion and Chen (2007) and Chotikapanich et al. (2007).

Type
Chapter
Information
Poverty, Inequality, and Inclusive Growth in Asia
Measurement, Policy Issues, and Country Studies
, pp. 367 - 386
Publisher: Anthem Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×