Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T09:08:01.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Allozyme diversity in the grasses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 September 2009

G. P. Cheplick
Affiliation:
City University of New York
Get access

Summary

Since Lewontin & Hubby (1966) and Harris (1966) independently discovered allozyme polymorphisms within populations of Drosophila and humans, allozymes have provided the most widely used descriptors of genetic diversity in natural plant and animal populations. Their usefulness can be ascribed to several features, including codominant expression, apparent neutrality, and ease and cost of detection. Today allozymes are utilized in studies of plant populations to determine breeding systems, describe mating systems, determine paternity, estimate gene flow via seed and pollen, examine clonal structure, and determine systematic relationships (Soltis & Soltis, 1989). In conservation biology and crop science, the description of genetic structure provides sampling guidelines for the ex situ and in situ preservation of genetic diversity (e.g. Marshall & Brown, 1975; Brown & Briggs, 1991; Godt, Hamrick & Bratton, 1995; Swenson et al., 1995; Godt & Hamrick, 1996). Furthermore, allozymes have been utilized to study the evolution of crop species and to identify cultivars (Doebley, 1989; Torres, 1989).

Although allozyme diversity does not necessarily reflect variation in quantitative traits, it provides a handy yardstick for comparisons of diversity within populations and across species. Over 1000 published studies report allozyme variation in seed plants. These represent a wide crosssection of the plant world, although commercially valuable species (i.e. trees and crops) and temperate species have received the most attention. As the number of allozyme studies has grown, several reviewers have described patterns in allozyme diversity and its distribution (Gottlieb, 1977; Brown, 1979; Hamrick, Linhart & Mitton, 1979; Crawford, 1983; Hamrick & Godt, 1989).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×