Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • This chapter is unavailable for purchase
  • Print publication year: 2009
  • Online publication date: June 2012

8 - Civil and Political Rights in an Age of Terror

Summary

Liberal democracies hold individual lives as ends in themselves with all people equally entitled to protection and preservation. These liberal-democratic rights and protections were fought for with much blood and toil over many centuries in order to control and limit the use of violence occurring horizontally between citizens and vertically between citizens and the state. The history of liberal democracy has been a protracted and concerted effort to dissolve political absolutism and establish in its place limited government and rule of law through an elaborate system of checks and balances. Such checks and balances not only protect citizens from arbitrary interference but also ensure open and accountable government. And yet, despite the prolonged and hard-won provenance of this fragile system, in times of perceived emergency, liberal-democratic majorities have generally proved to be less concerned with abridgements of rights (perhaps because they cause more harm to minorities) than with their own security. As a consequence, liberal-democratic states have tended to overreact and curtail freedoms too hastily (Ignatieff 2004, ix). Australia is no exception and might even be described as an emblematic case.

Among lawyers and academics, the dominant view is that the federal laws enacted to fight the war on terror, so-called, have significantly damaged Australian democracy. A common presumption is that our precious and hard-won liberal-democratic rights should, as a matter of course, trump the collective need for security (hereafter conceived of as the ‘liberal-democratic soul-protection position’, the soul of liberal-democracy being not only the rights and freedoms embodied in liberal-democratic norms, practices and laws, but also an enduring collective commitment to their defence).

References
Ackland, Richard, 2004. ‘Tolerating Shackles to Our Freedom.’ Sydney Morning Herald, 26 March.
,Attorney-General's Department, 2008. ‘Australian Government response to Clarke Inquiry into the Case of Dr Mohamed Haneef.’ December. Accessed online at www.ag.gov.au/www/agd/ag.nsf/Page/Puglications_AustralianGovernmentrespon-setoClarkeInquiryintotheCaseofDrMohamedHaneef-December2008, 8 February 2009.
Burnside, Julian, 2007. Watching Brief: Reflections on human rights, law and justice. Melbourne: Scribe.
Bush, George W., 2002. Press release, 17 September. Accessed online at www.whitehouse.gov/nsc/nss/2002/nssintro.html, 14 May 2008.
Carne, Greg, 2004. ‘Detaining Questions or Compromising Constitutionality?: The ASIO Legislation Amendment (Terrorism) Act 2003 (Cth).’ University of New South Wales Law Journal, 27: 524–78.
Chalk, Peter, 1998. ‘The Response to Terrorism as a Threat to Liberal Democracy.’ Australian Journal of Politics and History, 44(3): 373–88.
Debelle, Penelope and Nicholson, Brendan, 2006. ‘Hicks turns up heat on PM.’ Age, 12 May.
Dodd, Vikram and McMahon, Barbara, 2007. ‘Australian police hit back over arrest of bomb plot suspect.’ Guardian, 30 July.
Dowdell, Andrew, 2008. ‘David Hicks Control Order Relaxed.’ Herald Sun, 20 February.
,Economist, 2008. ‘Down but not out: The Lords deal[s] a blow to the government's anti-terrorist plans’. 16 October edition. Accessed online at www.economist.com/world/britain/displaystory.cfm?story_id=12429644, 17 October 2008.
Elliot, Geoff, 2008. ‘Hicks case pushed to suit Howard agenda.’ Australian, 25 February.
Gearty, Conor, 2007. ‘Terrorism and Human Rights’. Government and Opposition, 42: 340–62.
Golder, Ben and Williams, George, 2004. ‘What is “Terrorism”? Problems of Legal Definition.’ University of New South Wales Law Journal, 27: 270–95.
Golder, Ben and Williams, George 2006. ‘Balancing National Security and Human Rights: Assessing the Legal Response of Common Law Nations to the Threat of Terrorism.’ Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 8: 43–62.
Goodin, Robert E., 2006. What's Wrong with Terrorism?. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Grattan, Michelle and Nicholson, Brendan, 2008. ‘Andrews spared worst in Haneef inquiry.’ Age. Accessed online at www.theage.com.au/national/andrews-spared-worst-in-haneef-inquiry-20081222-73pf.html?page=-1, 8 February 2009.
Gross, Oren, 2003. ‘Chaos and Rules: Should Responses to Violent Crises Always be Constitutional?Yale Law Journal, 112(5): 1011–34.
Healey, Justine (ed.), 2004. Terrorism, Thirroul: The Spinney Press.
Hocking, Jenny, 2004. ‘Protecting Democracy by Preserving Justice: “Even for the Feared and Hated”.’ University of New South Wales Law Journal, 27(2): 319–38.
Hocking, Jenny 2004a. Terror Laws: ASIO, Counter-terrorism and the Threat to Democracy. Sydney: UNSW Press.
,House of Commons, 2008. Explanatory Note Counter-terrorism Bill. European Convention on Human Rights. Accessed online at www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200708/cmbills/063/en/08063x-d.htm#index_link_100, 14 July 2008.
Howard, J., 2006. ‘A Sense of Balance: The Australian Achievement in 2006.’ Transcript of address to the National Press Club by Prime Minister the Hon. John Howard, MP, Great Hall, Parliament House. Accessed online at www.pm.gov.au/news/speeches/speech1754.html, 6 February 2007.
Ignatieff, Michael, 2004. The Lesser Evil: Political Ethics in an Age of Terror. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
,International Commission of Jurists Eminent Jurists Panel, 2006. Sydney Public Hearings 14–15 March, 2006. Summary presented by New South Wales Council for Civil Liberties. Accessed online at www.nswccl.org.au/docs/pdf/ICJ%20submission.pdf, 15 May 2008.
,International Committee of the Red Cross, 2007. Washington Regional Delegate Report. Accessed online at http://icrc.org/web/eng/siteeng0.nsf/htmlall/738dx5/$file/icrc_ar_06_washington.pdf?openelement, 8 July 2008.
Joseph, Sarah, 2004. ‘Australian Counter-Terrorism Legislation and the International Human Rights Framework.’ University of New South Wales Law Journal, 27: 428–53.
Kirby, Michael J., 2005. ‘Terrorism and the Democratic Response 2005.’ University of New South Wales Law Journal, 28(1): 221–44.
Kirk, Alexandra, 2004. ‘Government Argues Against Increased Terror Threat’. The World Today, 16 March.
Lasry, Lex, 2007. ‘The United States V. David Matthew Hicks.’ Final report of the Independent Observer for the Law Council of Australia. Accessed online at www.lawcouncil.asn.au/hicksjustice.html, 9 July 2008.
,Law Council of Australia, 2007. ‘Jurists Conclude that Hicks’ Charge is Retrospective.' Media release. 8 March. Accessed online at www.lawcouncil.asn.au/read/2007/2435666831.html, 9 July 2008.
,Law Institute of Victoria (Geoffrey Purvis, President), 2007. Letter to the Hon. Philip Ruddock, Attorney-General, 3 May 2007. Accessed online at www.liv.asn.au/members/sections/submissions/20070503_40/20070503_UNSpecRapp_Counter_Terror_Submission.pdf, 13 May 2008.
Lynch, Andrew, 2009. ‘Learning from Haneef.’ Inside Story: Current Affairs and Culture. Accessed online at www.inside.org.au/learning-from-haneef/, 9 February.
Lynch, Andrew and Williams, George, 2006. What Price Security? Taking Stock of Australia's Anti-Terror Laws. Sydney: UNSW Press.
Lynch, Andrew, McGarrity, Nicola and Williams, George, 2008. Submission to the Clarke Inquiry. Accessed online at www.gtcentre.unsw.edu.au/news/docs/Clark_Inquiry_Haneef.pdf, 8 June 2008.
MacDonald, Edwina and Williams, George, 2007. ‘Combating Terrorism: Australia's Criminal Code Since September 11, 2001.’ Griffith Law Review, 16: 27–54.
Mark, David, 2005. ‘Ruddock Denies Anti-terrorism Law Breaches Human Rights’. The World Today, 4 November.
McDonald, Matt, 2005. ‘Be Alarmed? Australia's anti-terrorism kit and the politics of security.’ Global Change, Peace and Security, 17(2): 117–89.
McSherry, Bernadette, 2004. ‘Terrorism Offences in the Criminal Code: Broadening the Boundaries of Australian Criminal Laws.’ University of New South Wales Law Journal, 27: 354–72.
Michaelsen, Christopher, 2003. ‘International Human Rights on trial – The United Kingdom's and Australia's Legal Response to 9/11.’ Sydney Law Review, 25: 275–305.
Michaelsen, Christopher 2005. ‘Hardline Security is not a Human Right’, Civil Liberty: Journal of the New South Wales Council for Civil Liberties Inc. 23–4 September. Accessed online at www.nswccl.org.au/docs/pdf/(2005)%20202%20Civil%20Liberty.pdf, 7 May 2008.
Michaelsen, Christopher 2005a. ‘Anti-terrorism Legislation in Australia: A Proportionate Response to the Terrorist Threat?Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 28: 321–39.
,Ministerial Council on Drug Strategy, 2006. National Alcohol Strategy 2006–2009, Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia. Accessed online at www.alcohol.gov.au/internet/alcohol/publishing.nsf/Content/B83AD1F91AA632ADCA25718E0081F1C3/$File/nas-06-09.pdf, July 15 2008.
Mitchell, Selina, 2003. ‘Journalists Face Jail Under New ASIO Law.’ Australian, 11 December.
,New South Wales Chief Health Officer, 2006. Report of the New South Wales Chief Health Officer: Injury and poisoning. Alcohol related Injuries. Accessed online at www.health.nsw.gov.au/public-health/chorep/inj/inj_alaf_dthhos.htm, 5 May 2008.
Paris, Roland, 2001. ‘Human Security: Paradigm Shift or Hot Air?International Security, 26(2): 87–102.
Rix, Mark, 2007. Australia and the ‘War Against Terrorism’: Terrorism, National Security and Human Rights. Wollongong: University of Wollongong. Accessed online at http://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1009&context=gsbpapers, 13 May 2008.
Robertson, Geoffrey, 2006. ‘In thrall to the Bush lawyers’. Age, 17 August.
Rosenberg, Carol, 2008. ‘Seven worst of the worst: Guantanamo captives back home.’ Miami Herald.
Ruddock, Philip, 2003. ‘Opening Address to 12th Annual Conference of the Australian Institute of Professional Intelligence Officers.’ Canberra, 22 October.
Ruddock, Philip 2004. ‘ASIO Legislation Supports Ammonium Nitrate Regulation.’ News release, 17 November. Accessed online at http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:77UyIQ1K_5gJ:www.dme.qld.gov.au/zone_files/explosives_pdf/asio_legislation.pdf+www.law.gov.au/ag+AND+ruddock&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=7&gl=au&client=firefox-a, 16 May 2008.
Ruddock, Philip 2005a. ‘No Better Friend.’ Speech delivered to the American–Australian Association. New York, 26 July. Accessed online at http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:swp3Bd1KMqUJ:www.nswccl.org.au/docs/pdf/Ruddock%2520speech20050726.pdf, 16 May 2008.
Ruddock, Philip 2005b. ‘Australia's Legislative Response to the Ongoing Threat of Terrorism’. University of New South Wales Law Journal, 27(2): 254–61.
,Senate Legal and Constitutional Legislation Committee, 2002a. Provisions of the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Legislation Amendment (Terrorism) Bill 2002. Accessed online at www.aph.gov.au/Senate/committee/legcon_ctte/completed_inquiries/2002-04/asio/report/report.pdf, 13 May 2008.
,Senate Legal and Constitutional Legislation Committee 2002b. [Inquiry into the] Security Legislation Amendment (Terrorism) Bill 2002 [No. 2] [and Related Bills]. Accessed online at www.aph.gov.au/Senate/committee/legcon_ctte/completed_inquiries/2002-04/terrorism/report/report.pdf, 13 May 2008.
Sherlock, Stephen, 2002. ‘The Bali Bombings: Looking for explanations.’ E-Brief. Issued 14 October. Analysis and Policy Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Group. Canberra: Parliamentary Library. Accessed online at www.aph.gov.au/library/intguide/FAD/bali.htm, 26 May 2008.
Smith, Adam, 1979 [1776]. An Inquiry Into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Campbell, R. H. and Skinner, A. S. eds. Reprint. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Tham, Joo-Cheong, 2004a. ‘Casualties of the Domestic “War on Terror”: A review of recent counter-terrorism laws.’ Melbourne University Law Review, 28(2): 512–31.
Tham, Joo-Cheong 2004b. ‘Possible Constitutional Objections to the Powers to Ban “Terrorist” Organisations.’ University of New South Wales Law Journal, 27: 482–523.
Tham, Joo-Cheong and Ewing, K. D., 2007. ‘Limitations of a Charter of Rights in the Age of Counter-Terrorism.’ Melbourne University Law Review, 31: 465–502.
Tigar, Michael E., 2007. ‘A New Form of State: War and Criminal Law: A system of wholesale denial of rights.’ Monthly Review, 59(4): 1–11.
Townsend, Charles, 2002. Terrorism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Uhr, John, 2004. ‘Terra Infirma? Parliament's Uncertain Role in the “War on Terror”.’ University of New South Wales Law Journal, 27: 339–53.
,United Nations (UN), 2007. Australia: Study on Human Rights Compliance While Countering Terrorism (Special Rapporteur's Report). Submitted to the UN Human Rights Council for consideration at the Council's fourth session in March.
,United Nations Development Program, 1994. Human Development Report. New York: Oxford University Press.
Walters, Brian and McAteer, Neil, 2007. ‘A Note on International Human Rights Law for Counsel for David Hicks.’ Accessed online at www.hrlrc.org.au/files/LXBD5QJXZ9/Note%20on%20International%20Human%20Rights%20for%20McLeod%20and%20Detmold.pdf, 8 July 2008.
Walton, Michael, 2005. ‘Two Attorneys-General, Counter-terrorism and Liberty.’ Sydney: New South Wales Council for Civil Liberties. Accessed online at www.nswccl.org.au/stories/story2005-05.php, 15 May 2008.
Watt, Nicholas, 2008. ‘Impractical and Wrong in Principle: Former MI5 chief's verdict on Brown's 42-day plan.’ Guardian, 9 July.
White, Peter, 2007. ‘Assistant Secretary, Character Assessment and War Crimes Screening.’ ed. Immigration Minister Kevin Andrews. Re: Dr Haneef, Mohammed edn. Sydney: Department of Immigration and Citizenship.
Williams, George, 2003. ‘National Security, Terrorism and Bills of Rights.’ Australian Journal of Human Rights, 9: 2–7.
Williams, George 2004. The Case for an Australian Bill of Rights: Freedom in the war on terror. Sydney: UNSW Press.
Williams, George 2006. ‘At Last, Sedition May be Consigned to History.’ Australian Policy Online. Accessed online at www.apo.org.au/webboard/results.chtml?filename_num=80505, 19 June 2008.
Williams, George 2007. ‘Dodgy Outcome Demands Review.’ Australian, 1 August.
Williams, George and MacDonald, Edwina, 2007. ‘No excuse for not bringing Hicks home.’ Age, 5 March.
Wood, Leonie, 2007. ‘Haneef, Hicks and justice pay price: Law Council.’ Age, 25 July.