Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2006
  • Online publication date: July 2010

11 - Representation

Summary

‘Political theory’ is a wide and diverse body of work; in this book's title, it comes across as inert, the receptor, the thing that is acted upon. The active ingredient, the ‘challenge’, is ecological. There is, of course, no given, bounded body of political theory to be acted upon, but rather a shifting set of arguments and assumptions. And the ecological challenge is in fact many challenges – to conventional views of the state, social justice, democracy, progress, individualism and more. Which of a range of possibilities to pick when it comes to ‘representation’? How to represent the problem of representation?

Political representation is normally discussed in terms of how accurately elected representatives reflect the interests of voters. In this chapter, I argue that representation happens in many more places than just elected legislatures, and in many more ways than the accurate capturing of human interests. I start from the view that representative claims are made by a great variety of political actors, and that representation involves the active portrayal of constituencies rather than simple reflection of them. From that base, it quickly becomes clear that adding some ‘proxy’ representatives of nature into conventional legislatures (Dobson 1996), for example, is just one part of the ecological challenge, and probably not the most important part.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
References
Alcoff, L. (1991). ‘The Problem of Speaking for Others’, Cultural Critique (Winter): 5–32.
Ankersmit, F. R. (1996). Aesthetic Politics. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
Ankersmit, F. R. (2002). Political Representation. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
Barry, J. (1999). Rethinking Green Politics. London: Sage.
Becker, H. S. (1986). ‘Telling About Society’, in Doing Things Together. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power, trans. Thompson, J. B.. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Cohen, J. (1968). ‘Commentary: Representation and the Problem of Identity’, in Pennock, J. R. and Chapman, J. W. (eds.), Nomos X: Representation. New York: Atherton Press.
Demeritt, D. (2002). ‘What Is the “Social Construction of Nature”? A Typology and Sympathetic Critique’, Progress in Human Geography 26: 766–89.
Derrida, J. (1982). ‘Sending: On Representation’, Social Research 49. 2 (Summer): 294–326.
Dobson, A. (1996). ‘Representative Democracy and the Environment’, in Lafferty, W. M. and Meadowcroft, J. (eds.), Democracy and the Environment. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Dryzek, J. S. (2000). Deliberative Democracy and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Eckersley, R. (2000). ‘Deliberative Democracy, Representation and Risk’, in Saward, M. (ed.), Democratic Innovation. London: Routledge.
Eckersley, R. (2003). ‘Ecocentric Discourses: Problems and Future Prospects for Nature Advocacy’, paper presented to the Second Tamkang International Conference on Ecological Discourse, Tamsui, Taiwan.
Goodin, R. E. (1996). ‘Enfranchising the Earth, and Its Alternatives’, Political Studies 44: 835–49.
Goodin, R. E. (2003). ‘Democratic Deliberation Within’, in Fishkin, J. S. and Laslett, P. (eds.), Debating Deliberative Democracy. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hall, S. (1997). ‘The Work of Representation’, in Hall, S. (ed.), Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices. London: Sage and The Open University.
Hinchliffe, S., Kearnes, M. B., Degen, M., and Whatmore, S. (2004). ‘Urban Wild Things: A Cosmopolitical Experiment’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 23. 5 (October): 643–58.
Latour, B. (2003). ‘What if We Talked Politics a Little?’, Contemporary Political Theory 2. 2 (July): 143–64.
Mansbridge, J. (2003). ‘Rethinking Representation’, American Political Science Review 97. 4: 515–28.
Marin, L. (2001). On Representation, trans. Porter, C.. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
Meisner, M. (1992). ‘Metaphors of Nature: Old Vinegar in New Bottles?’, http://trumpeter.athabascau.ca/content/v9.4/meisner.html (accessed 11 December 2003).
Mills, W. J. (1982). ‘Metaphorical Vision: Changes in Western Attitudes to the Environment’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers 72: 237–53.
Pitkin, H. F. (1967). The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Przeworski, A., Stokes, S. C., and Manin, B. (1999). Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Saward, M. (1998). The Terms of Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Saward, M. (2003). ‘Enacting Democracy’, Political Studies 51: 161–79.
Seitz, B. (1995). The Trace of Political Representation. New York: State University of New York Press.
Soper, K. (1996). ‘Nature/“nature”’, in Robertson, G. et al. (eds.), FutureNatural. London: Routledge.
Spivak, G. C. (1988). ‘Can the Subaltern Speak?’, in Nelson, C. and Grossberg, L. (eds.), Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture. London: Macmillan.
Thompson, D. (1988). ‘Representatives in the Welfare State’, in Gutmann, A. (ed.), Democracy in the Welfare State. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Young, I. M. (2000). Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.