Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T13:18:08.880Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

17 - Phylogenetic futures after the latest mass extinction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 December 2009

Sean Nee
Affiliation:
Institute of Cell, Animal and Population Biology, University of Edinburgh, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, UK
Andrew Purvis
Affiliation:
Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London
John L. Gittleman
Affiliation:
University of Virginia
Thomas Brooks
Affiliation:
Conservation International, Washington DC
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The Journal of Ecology and the Journal of Animal Ecology are two of the journals published by the British Ecological Society. In fact, the first is really a journal of plant ecology: it has the more general name simply because it came first and, at the time, most ecologists studied plants. Similarly, the general word biology typically only refers to the study of macroscopic plants and animals, whereas microbiology is the study of microscopic organisms. In fact, of course, it would be more appropriate to call these studies macrobiology and biology, respectively.

This is simply because, as is well known, most of life is microscopic. This is true in terms of both biomass and biodiversity. Macroscopic life jumps around and makes a lot of noise but, apart from morphological diversity, represents very little diversity in broader senses. This is visually evident from inspection of phylogenetic trees of life constructed from studies of small subunit (SSU) RNA genes, such as the one in Fig. 17.1, where macroscopic life only appears in a couple of tips. (I ignore fungi in this chapter.) Even in classification systems that give animals a special place, such as the Five Kingdoms (Margulis & Schwartz 1988) microscopic life still abounds: of the 33 animal phyla recognised by Margulis, 12 have microscopic members. A new animal phylum, Cycliophora, discovered more recently, is also microscopic (Funch & Kristensen 1995).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alroy, J. 2001 A multi-species overkill simulation of the end-Pleistocene mass extinction. Science 292, 1893–986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Begon, M., Harper, J. L. & Townsend, C. R. 1996 Ecology. Oxford: Blackwell ScienceGoogle Scholar
Boucher, Y. & Doolittle, Ford W. 2002 Something new under the sea. Nature 417, 27–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, T. & Balmford, A. 1996 Atlantic forest extinctionsNature 380, 115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruns, M. A., Stephen, J. R., Kowalchuk, G. A., Prosser, J. I. & Paul, E. A. 1999 Comparative diversity of ammonia oxidizer 16S rRNA gene sequences in native, tilled and successional soils. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 65, 2994–3000Google ScholarPubMed
Chapelle, F. H., O'Neill, K., Bradley, P. M.et al. 2002 A hydrogen-based subsurface microbial community dominated by methanogens. Nature 415, 312–15CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cowen, J. P., Giovannoni, S. J., Kenig, F.et al 2003 Fluids from aging ocean crust that support microbial life. Nature 299, 120–3Google ScholarPubMed
Cowen, R. 2000 History of Life. Oxford: Blackwell ScienceGoogle Scholar
Curtis, T. P., Sloan, W. T. & Scannell, J. W. 2002 Estimating prokaryotic diversity and its limitsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 99, 10494–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Erwin, D. 1998 The end and the beginning: recoveries from mass extinctions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13, 344–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Erwin, T. L. 1991 An evolutionary basis for conservation strategies. Science 253, 750–2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Faith, D. P. 1994 Genetic diversity and taxonomic priorities for conservation. Biological Conservation 68(1), 69–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finlay, B. J. 2002 Global dispersal of free-living microbial eukaryote species. Science 296, 1061–3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Floyd, R., Abebe, E., Papert, A. & Blaxter, M. 2002 Molecular barcodes for soil nematode identification. Molecular Ecology and Evolution 11, 839–50CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Funch, P. & Kristensen, R. M. 1995 Cycliophora is a new phylum with affinities to Entoprocta and Ectoprocta. Nature 378, 711–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubbell, S. P. 2001 The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Jablonski, D. 2001 Lessons from the past: evolutionary impacts of mass extinctions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 98, 5393–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keeling, P. J., Liuker, M. A. & Palmer, J. D. 2000 Evidence from beta-tubulin phylogeny that microsporidia evolved from within the fungi. Molecular Biology and Evolution 17, 23–31CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keeling, P. J. & McFadden, G. I. 1998 Origins of microsporidia. Trends in Microbiology 6, 19–23CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lopez-Garcia, P., Rodriguez-Valera, F., Pedros-Alio, C. & Moreira, D. 2001 Unexpected diversity of small eukaryotes in deep-sea Antarctic plankton. Nature 409, 603–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lyons, S. K., Smith, F. A. & Brown, J. H. 2004. Of mice, mastodons and men: human caused extinctions on four continents. Evolutionary Ecological Research 6, 339–58Google Scholar
Margulis, L. & Schwartz, K. V. 1988 Five Kingdoms. New York: W. H. FreemanGoogle Scholar
May, R. M., Lawton, J. H. & Stork, N. E. 1995 Assessing extinction rates. In Extinction Rates (ed. Lawton, J. H. & May, R. M.), pp. 1–27. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Moon-van der Staay, S. Y., Wachter, R. & Vaulot, D. 2001 Oceanic 18S rDNA sequences from picoplankton reveal unsuspected eukaryotic diversity. Nature 409, 607–10CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moreira, D. & Lopez-Garcia, P. 2002 The molecular ecology of microbial eukaryotes unveils a hidden world. Trends in Microbiology 10(1), 31–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nee, S. & May, R. M. 1997 Extinction and the loss of evolutionary history. Science 278, 692–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Owens, I. P. F. & Bennett, P. M. 2002 Evolutionary Ecology of Birds. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Phillipe, H. 2000 Long branch attraction and protist phylogeny. Protist 151, 307–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pimm, S. L. & Raven, P. 2000 Biodiversity: extinction by numbers. Nature 403, 843–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pimm, S. L., Russell, G. J., Gittleman, J. L. & Brooks, T. M. 1995 The future of biodiversity. Science 269, 347–50CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Purvis, A., Agapow, P. M., Gittleman, J. L. & Mace, G. M. 2000 Nonrandom extinction and the loss of evolutionary history. Science 288, 328–30CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raup, D. M. 1993 Extinction: Bad Genes or Bad Luck?Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, B., Sibthorpe, D., Rambaut, A.et al. 2002 The flight of the dodo. Science 295, 1683CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Siddall, M. E., Reece, K. S., Nerad, T. A. & Burreson, E. M. 2001 Molecular determination of the phylogenetic position of a species in the genus Colpodella (Alveolata). American Museum Novitates 3314, 1–102.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, F. D. M., May, R. M., Pellow, R., Johnson, T. H. & Walker, K. S. 1993 Estimating extinction rates. Nature 364, 494–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilman, D., May, R. M., Lehman, C. L. & Nowak, M. A. 1994 Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature 371, 65–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torsvik, V., Ovreas, L. & Thingstad, T. F. 2002 Prokaryotic diversity – magnitude, dynamics and controlling factors. Science 296, 1064–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Euler, F. 2001 Selective extinction and rapid loss of evolutionary history in the bird fauna. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B268, 127–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watterson, G. A. 1984 Lines of descent and the coalescent. Theoretical Population Biology 26, 77–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellsbury, P., Goodman, K., Barth, T.et al. 1997 Deep marine biosphere fuelled by increasing organic matter availability during burial and heating. Nature 388, 573–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, E. O. 1992 The Diversity of Life. London: PenguinGoogle Scholar
Wilson, E. O. 2003 The encyclopedia of life. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18, 77–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zettler, L. A. A., Gomez, F., Zettler, E.et al. 2002 Eukaryotic diversity in Spain's River of Fire – This ancient and hostile ecosystem hosts a surprising variety of microbial organisms. Nature 417, 137CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×