Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T07:05:22.951Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - The Domain of Cosmology and the Testing of Cosmological Theories

from Part I - Issues in the Philosophy of Cosmology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 April 2017

By
George F. R. Ellis
Edited by
Khalil Chamcham ,
Joseph Silk ,
John D. Barrow  and
Simon Saunders
George F. R. Ellis
Affiliation:
University of Cape Town, South Africa
Khalil Chamcham
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Joseph Silk
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
John D. Barrow
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Simon Saunders
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

This chapter is about foundational themes underlying the scientific study of cosmology:

  1. • What issues will a theory of cosmology deal with?

  2. • What kinds of causation will be taken into account as we consider the relation between chance and necessity in cosmology?

  3. • What kinds of data and arguments will we use to test theories, when they stretch beyond the bounds of observational probing?

  4. • Should we weaken the need for testing and move to a post-empirical phase, as some have suggested?

These are philosophical issues at the foundation of the cosmological enterprise. The answer may be obvious or taken for granted by scientists in many cases, and so seem hardly worth mentioning; but that has demonstrably led to some questionable statements about what is reliably known about cosmology, particularly in popular books and public statements. The premise of this chapter is that it is better to carefully think these issues through and make them explicit, rather than having unexamined assumed views about them shaping cosmological theories and their public presentation. Thus, as in other subjects, being philosophical about what is being undertaken will help clarify practice in the area.

The basic enterprise of cosmology is to use tested physical theories to understand major aspects of the universe in which we live, as observed by telescopes of all kinds. The foundational issue arising is the uniqueness of the universe [66, 27, 28]. Standard methods of scientific theory testing rely on comparing similar objects to determine regularities, so they cannot easily be applied in the cosmological context, where there is no other similar object to use in any comparison. We have to extrapolate from aspects of the universe to hypotheses about the seen and unseen universe as a whole. Furthermore, physical explanations of developments in the very early universe depend on extrapolating physical theories beyond the bounds where they can be tested in a laboratory or particle collider. Hence philosophical issues of necessity arise as we push the theory beyond its testable limits. Making them explicit clarifies what is being done and illuminates issues that need careful attention.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Philosophy of Cosmology , pp. 3 - 39
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] P. R., Ade et al., (Planck Collaboration) (2015) Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters. arXiv:1502.01589v2.
[2] A., Aguirre, (2007) Eternal Inflation, past and future. arXiv:0712.0571.
[3] A., Aguirre and M. C., Johnson, A status report on the observability of cosmic bubble collisions. Reports on Progress in Physics. 74 (2011), 074901.
[4] D., Albert, On the Origin of Everything: A Universe From Nothing, by Lawrence M., Krauss, New York Times book review, March 23, 2012. [http://www.nytimes.com /2012/03/25/books/review/a-universe-from-nothing-by-lawrence-m-krauss.html].
[5] R. A., Alpher and R. C., Herman, On the Relative Abundance of the Elements. Physical Review. 74 (1948), 1737–42.Google Scholar
[6] E., Alvarez, (2012) The weight of matter. arXiv:1204.6162.
[7] T., Banks, (2012) The Top 10500 Reasons Not to Believe in the Landscape. arXiv:1208.5715.
[8] D. J., Bohm and B. J., Hiley, The de Broglie pilot wave theory and the further development of new insights arising out of it. Foundations of Physics. 12 (1982), 1001–16.1Google Scholar
[9] R., Bond and G., Efstathiou, Cosmic background radiation anisotropies in universes dominated by nonbaryonic dark matter. Astrophysical Journal. 285 (1984), L45–8.Google Scholar
[10] H., Bondi, Spherically symmetrical models in general relativity. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 107 (1947), 410–25.Google Scholar
[11] H., Bondi, Cosmology. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1961).
[12] P., Canate, P., Pearle and D., Sudarsky, (2012) CSL Wave Function Collapse Model as a Mechanism for the Emergence of Cosmological Asymmetries in Inflation. arXiv:1211.3463.
[13] B. J., Carr, Ed. Universe or Multiverse?.(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).
[14] S., Carroll, (2014) “Falsifiability” Edge Essay 2014: What Scientific Idea Is Ready For Retirement? [https://edge.org/response-detail/25322].
[15] B., Carter, Large Number Coincidences and the Anthropic Principle in Cosmology. IAU Symposium 63: Confrontation of Cosmological Theories with Observational Data.(1974), pp. 291–8 (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1974).
[16] M.-N., Celerier, The Accelerated Expansion of the Universe Challenged by an Effect of the Inhomogeneities. A Review. New Advances in Physics. 1 (2007), 29. [arXiv:astro-ph/0702416].Google Scholar
[17] J.-P., Changeux and A., Connes, Conversations on Mind, Matter, and Mathematics. (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998).
[18] P., Churchland, Plato's camera: How the physical brain captures a landscape of abstract universals. (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2012).
[19] C., Clarkson, B., Bassett and T. H. C., Lu, A general test of the Copernican Principle. Physical Review Letters. 101 (2008), 011301 [arXiv: 0712.3457].Google Scholar
[20] T., Clifton and P. G., Ferreira, Archipelagian cosmology: Dynamics and observables in a universe with discretized matter content Physics Review. D 80 (2009), 103503; Erratum Physical Review, D 84 (2011), 109902 [arXiv:0907.4109].Google Scholar
[21] N. J., Cornish, D. N., Spergel and G. D., Starkmann, Circles in the sky: Finding topology with the microwave background radiation. Classical and Quantum Gravity. 15 (1998), 2657–70 [arXiv:gr-qc/9602039].
[22] R., Dawid, String Theory and the Scientific Method,. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).
[23] S., Del Campo, E. I., Guendelman, R., Herrera and P., Labrana, (2015) Classically and Quantum stable Emergent Universe from Conservation Laws. arXiv:1508.03330.
[24] S., Dodelson, Modern Cosmology. (Elsevier, 2003).
[25] R., Durrer, The Cosmic Microwave Background. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008).
[26] G. F. R., Ellis, General relativity and cosmology. In General Relativity and Cosmology. Varenna Course No. XLVII, ed. R. K., Sachs (Academic, New York, 1971). Reprinted as Golden Oldie, General Relativity and Gravitation, 41 2009, 581–660.
[27] G. F. R., Ellis, Issues in the Philosophy of Cosmology. In Handbook in Philosophy of Physics. ed. J, Butterfield and J, Earman (Elsevier, 2006). [arXiv:astro-ph/0602280].
[28] G. F. R., Ellis, On the Philosophy of Cosmology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics. 46 (2013), 5–23.Google Scholar
[29] G. F. R., Ellis, The Trace-Free Einstein Equations and inflation. General Relativity and Gravitation. 46 (2014), 1619. [arXiv:1306.3021].Google Scholar
[30] G. F. R., Ellis and R., Maartens, The Emergent Universe: inflationary cosmology with no singularity? Classical and Quantum Gravity. 21 (2004), 223–32. [arXiv:grqc/ 0211082].Google Scholar
[31] G. F. R., Ellis, R, Maartens and M. A. H., Maccallum, Relativistic Cosmology. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).
[32] G. F. R., Ellis and G., Schreiber, Observational and dynamical properties of small universes. Physics Letters. A 115 (1986), 97–107.Google Scholar
[33] G. F. R., Ellis and J., Silk, Scientific Method: Defend the Integrity of Physics. Nature. 516 (2014), 321–3.Google Scholar
[34] G. F. R., Ellis and W. R., Stoeger, A Note on Infinities in Eternal Inflation. General Relativity and Gravitation. 41 (2009), 1475–84. [arXiv:1001.4590].Google Scholar
[35] G., Ellis and J. P., Uzan, Inflation and the Higgs particle. Astronomy and Geophysics. 55 (2014), 1.19–1.20.1.Google Scholar
[36] G. F. R., Ellis, H., van Elst, J., Murugan and J.-P., Uzan, On the trace-free Einstein equations as a viable alternative to general relativity. Classical and Quantum Gravity. 28 (2011), 225007. [arXiv:1008.1196].Google Scholar
[37] R. P., Feynman, The Feynman Lectures on Physics. Vol. 1.(Reading, MA: Addison- Wesley, 1963), Chapter 46.
[38] R. P., Feynman and A. R., Hibbs, Quantum Mechanics and Path Integrals. ed. D F, Styer, (Mineola, New York: Dover, 1965).
[39] D. J., Fixsen, The Temperature of the Cosmic Microwave Background. The Astrophysical Journal. 707 (2009), 916–20. [arXiv:0911.1955].Google Scholar
[40] B., Freivogel, M., Kleban, M. R., Martinez and L., Susskind, Observational consequences of a landscape. Journal of High Energy Physics. 0603 (2006), 039. [arXiv:hep-th/0505232].Google Scholar
[41] A., Friedmann, Über die Krümung des Raumes. Zs f Phys10 (1922), 377–86. Reprinted as a Golden Oldie: General Relativity and Gravitation. 31 (1999), 1991.Google Scholar
[42] J. R., Gair, M., Vallisner, S. L., Larson and J. G., Baker, Testing General Relativity with Low-Frequency, Space-Based Gravitational-Wave Detectors. Living Reviews in Relativity. 16 (2013), 7 [www.livingreviews.org/lrr-2013-7].Google Scholar
[43] J., Garriga, A. H., Guth and A., Vilenkin, Eternal inflation, bubble collisions, and the persistence of memory. Physical Review. D76 (2007), 123512. [arXiv:hepth/ 0612242].Google Scholar
[44] G. W., Gibbons and N., Turok, Measure problem in cosmology. Physical Review. D77 (2008), 063516.Google Scholar
[45] B., Greene, The Hidden Reality: Parallel Universes and the Deep Laws of the Cosmos. (New York: Knopf, 2007).
[46] A., Guth, Eternal inflation and its implications. Journal of Physics. A 40 (2007), 6811–26. [arXiv:hep-th/0702178].Google Scholar
[47] A. H., Guth and V., Vanchurin, (2012) Eternal inflation, global time cutoff measures, and a probability paradox. [arXiv1211.1347].
[48] J. B., Hartle, Theories of Everything and Hawking's Wave Function of the Universe. In The Future of Theoretical Physics and Cosmology. ed. G. W., Gibons, E. P. S., Shellard and S. J., Rankin (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003). [arXiv:grqc/ 0209047].
[49] J. B., Hartle and S.W., Hawking, Wave function of the Universe. Physics Review. D 28 (1983), 2960.Google Scholar
[50] L. H., Hartwell, J. J., Hopfield, S., Leibler and A. W., Murray, From molecular to modular cell biology. Nature. 402 (1999), C47.Google Scholar
[51] S. W., Hawking and G. F. R., Ellis, The Large Scale Structure of Space-time..(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973).
[52] S., Hawking and L., Mlodinow, The Grand Design. (London: Bantam, 2011).
[53] D., Hilbert, On the Infinite. In Philosophy of Mathematics. ed. P, Benacerraf and H, Putnam, (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1964) pp. 134-51.
[54] E., Hubble, A relation between distance and radial velocity among extra-galactic nebulae. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 15 (1929), 168–73.Google Scholar
[55] C. J., Isham, Lectures on Quantum Theory: Mathematical and Structural Foundations. (London: Imperial College Press, 1929).
[56] H., Kragh, (2012) Criteria of Science, Cosmology, and Lessons of History. arXiv:1208.5215.
[57] L., Krauss, A Universe From Nothing: Why There Is Something Rather Than Nothing. (New York: Free Press, 2012).
[58] J., Kristian and R. K., Sachs, Observations in Cosmology Astrophysical Journal. 143 (1966), 379–99. Reprinted as GRG Golden Oldie: General Relativity and Gravitation, 43 (2011), 337–58.Google Scholar
[59] M., Lachieze-Rey and J. P., Luminet, Cosmic Topology. Physics Reports. 254 (1995), 135–214. [arXiv:gr-qc/9605010].Google Scholar
[60] D., Larson, J. L., Weiland, G., Hinshaw and C. L., Bennett, Comparing Planck and WMAP: Maps, Spectra, and Parameters. The Astrophysical Journal. 801 (2015), 9. [arXiv:1409.7718].Google Scholar
[61] G., Lemaitre, A Homogeneous Universe of Constant Mass and Increasing Radius Accounting for the Radial Velocity of Extra-Galactic Nebulae. Annales de la Société Scientifique de Bruxelles. A47 (1927), 49–59. Published in translation in MNRAS 91 (1931), 483–90, and republished as GRG Golden Oldie: General Relativity and Gravitation, 45 (2013), 1635–46.Google Scholar
[62] A. D., Linde, Eternal chaotic inflation. Modern Physics Letters. A01 (1986), 81.Google Scholar
[63] A., Linde and M., Noorbala, Measure problem for eternal and non-eternal inflation. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2010 (2010), 008.
[64] R., Maartens, Is the Universe homogeneous? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. A 369 (2011), 5115–37.Google Scholar
[65] J., Martin, C., Ringeval and V., Vennin, Encyclopaedia Inflationaris. arXiv:1303.3787.s.
[66] W. H., McCrea, Cosmology. Reports on Progress in Physics. 16 (1953), 321.Google Scholar
[67] J., Murugan, A., Weltman and G. F. R., Ellis, Foundations of Space and Time: Reflections on Quantum Gravity. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).
[68] N., Mustapha, C. W., Hellaby and G. F. R., Ellis, Large Scale Inhomogeneity Versus Source Evolution – Can We Distinguish Them Observationally? Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 292 (1999), 817-830 [gr-qc/9808079].Google Scholar
[69] V., Mukhanov, Physical Foundations of Cosmology. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).
[70] K. A., Olive, M., Peloso and J.-P., Uzan, The wall of fundamental constants. Physical Review. D83 (2011), 043509. [arXiv:1011.1504].Google Scholar
[71] P. J. E., Peebles, Primordial Helium Abundance and the Primordial Fireball. II. Astrophysical Journal. 146 (1966), 542–52.Google Scholar
[72] P. J. E., Peebles, The Large-Scale Structure of the Universe. (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1980).
[73] P. J. E., Peebles and J. T., Yu, Primeval Adiabatic Perturbation in an Expanding Universe. Astrophysical Journal. 162 (1970), 815–36.Google Scholar
[74] R., Penrose, Difficulties with inflationary cosmology. In E. J., Fergus (ed.). 14th Texas Symposium Relativistic Astrophysics, Proceedings of the New York Academy of Science. New York, 1989.
[75] R., Penrose, The Large, the Small, and the Human Mind. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).
[76] R., Penrose, The Road to Reality: A complete guide to the Laws of the Universe. (London: Jonathan Cape, 2004).
[77] R., Penrose, Cycles of time: An extraordinary new view of the universe. (New York: Knopf, 2011).
[78] W. J., Percival, L., Samushia, A. J., Ross, C., Shapiro and A., Raccanelli, Redshift-space distortions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A. 369 (2011), 5058–67.Google Scholar
[79] A., Perez, H., Sahlmann and D., Sudarsky, On the quantum origin of the seeds of cosmic structure. Classical and Quantum Gravity. 23 (2006), 2317–54. [arXiv:grqc/ 0508100].Google Scholar
[80] M. E., Peskin and D. V., Schroeder, An Introduction To Quantum Field Theory. (New York: Westview Press, 1995).
[81] P., Peter and J.-P., Uzan, Primordial Cosmology. (Oxford: Oxford Graduate Texts, 2013).
[82] M. J., Rees, Our cosmic habitat. (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001).
[83] W., Rindler, Visual Horizons in World Models. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 116 (1956), 662–77. Reprinted: General Relativity and Gravitation, 34 (2002), 133.Google Scholar
[84] H. P., Robertson, Relativistic Cosmology. Review of Modern Physics. 5 (1933), 62–90. Reprinted as: Golden Oldie: General Relativity and Gravitation, 44 (2012), 2115–44.Google Scholar
[85] A., Rothman and G. F. R., Ellis, Can inflation occur in anisotropic cosmologies? Physics Letters. B180 (1986), 19–24.Google Scholar
[86] R. K., Sachs and A. M., Wolfe, Perturbations of a Cosmological Model and Angular Variations of the Microwave Background. Astrophysical Journal. 147 (1967), 73–89. [Reprinted as Golden Oldie: General Relativity and Gravitation, 39 (2007), 1944].Google Scholar
[87] A., Sandage, The Ability of the 200-Inch Telescope to Discriminate Between Selected World Models. Astrophysical Journal. 133 (1961), 355–92.Google Scholar
[88] J., Silk, A Short History of the Universe. (New York: Scientific American Library, 1997).
[89] G., Steigman, Primordial Nucleosynthesis: Successes And Challenges. International Journal of Modern Physics. E15 (2005), 1–36. [arXiv:astro-ph/0511534].Google Scholar
[90] W., Stoeger, R., Maartens and G. F. R., Ellis, Proving almost-homogeneity of the universe: an almost-Ehlers, Geren and Sachs theorem. Astrophysical Journal. 443 (1995), 1–5.
[91] D., Sudarsky, Shortcomings in the understanding of why cosmological perturbations look classical. International Journal of Modern Physics. D20 (2011), 509–52. [arXiv:0906.0315v3].Google Scholar
[92] L., Susskind, The Cosmic Landscape: String Theory and the Illusion of Intelligent Design. (New York: Little, Brown, and Co., 2006).
[93] M., Tegmark, Is ‘the theory of everything’ merely the ultimate ensemble theory? Annals of Physics. 270 (2006), 1–51.Google Scholar
[94] M., Tegmark, Parallel universes. In J. D., Barrow (ed.), Science and ultimatereality: From quantum to cosmos..(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004). [astroph/ 0302131].
[95] M., Tegmark, Our Mathematical Universe: My Quest for the Ultimate Nature of Reality. (Knopf: Doubleday Publishing Group, 2014).
[96] J.-P., Uzan, Varying constants, gravitation and cosmology. Living Reviews in Relativity. 14 (2010), 2. (arXiv:10095514).Google Scholar
[97] J.-P., Uzan, C., Clarkson and G. F. R., Ellis, Time drift of cosmological redshifts as a test of the Copernican principle. Physical Review Letters. 100 (2008), 191303. [arXiv 0801.0068].Google Scholar
[98] A., Vilenkin, Creation of universes from nothing. Physics Letters. B117 (1982), 25.Google Scholar
[99] A., Vilenkin, The Principle of Mediocrity. arXiv:1108.4990.
[100] A., Vilenkin, Global structure of the multiverse and the measure problem, AIP Conference Proceedings. 1514 (2013), 7.Google Scholar
[101] A., Wagner, Arrival of the fittest. (London: Penguin, Random House, 2014).
[102] R. V., Wagoner, W. A., Fowler and F., Hoyle, On the Synthesis of Elements at Very High Temperatures. Astrophysical Journal. 148 (1967), 3–49.Google Scholar
[103] J., Wainwright and G. F. R., Ellis, (Ed) Dynamical systems in cosmology. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).
[104] J., Wambsganss, Gravitational Lensing in Astronomy. Living Reviews in Relativity. 1 (1998), 12. [www.livingreviews.org/lrr-1998-12].Google Scholar
[105] S., Weinberg, Anthropic Bound on the Cosmological Constant. Physics Review Letters. 59 (1987), 2607–10.Google Scholar
[106] S., Weinberg, The cosmological constant problem. Reviews in Modern Physics. 61 (1989), 1–23.Google Scholar
[107] S., Weinberg, Living in the multiverse. In B., Carr (ed.) Universe or Multiverse?.(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007). [arXiv:hep-th/0511037].
[108] N., Zettili, Quantum Mechanics: Concepts and Applications. (Chichester: JohnWiley, 2001).
[109] P., Zhang and M. C., Johnson, Testing eternal inflation with the kinetic Sunyaev Zel'dovich effect. arXiv:1501.00511.
[110] P., Zhang and A., Stebbins, Confirmation of the Copernican principle through the anisotropic kinetic Sunyaev Zel'dovich effect. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. A 369 (2011), 5138–45.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×