Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-fqc5m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-27T13:44:15.067Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Economics and Environmental Law Scholarship

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2018

Ole W. Pedersen
Affiliation:
Newcastle University
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Perspectives on Environmental Law Scholarship
Essays on Purpose, Shape and Direction
, pp. 96 - 120
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackerman, Bruce & Hassler, William, Clean Coal/Dirty Air: or How the Clean Air Act Became a Multibillion-Dollar Bail-Out for High-Sulfur Coal Producers (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Ackerman, Frank & Heinzerling, Lisa, Priceless: On Knowing the Price of Everything and the Value of Nothing (New York: The New Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Adler, Matthew, Well-Being and Fair Distribution: Beyond Cost-Benefit Analysis (New York: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Adler, Matthew & Posner, Eric, New Foundations of Cost-Benefit Analysis (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Alvarado-Quesada, Irene, Hein, Lars, & Weikard, Hans Peter, ‘Market-Based Mechanisms for Biodiversity Conservation: A Review of Existing Schemes and an Outline for a Global Mechanism’ (2014) 23 Biodiversity & Conservationism 121.Google Scholar
Anderson, Elizabeth, Values in Ethics and Economics (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Angrist, Joshua & Pischke, Jörn-Steffen, ‘The Credibility Revolution in Empirical Economics: How Better Research Design Is Taking the Con out of Econometrics’ (2010) 24 Journal of Economic Perspectives 330.Google Scholar
Anthoff, David & Tol, Richard, ‘The Uncertainty About the Social Cost of Carbon: A Decomposition Analysis Using FUND’ (2013) 117 Climatic Change 515530.Google Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth et al., ‘Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation’ (1993) 58 Federal Register 46014614.Google Scholar
Bockstael, Nancy, ‘Travel Cost Methods’, in Bromley, Daniel (ed.), The Handbook of Environmental Economics (Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1996).Google Scholar
Breggin, Linda et al., ‘Trends in Environmental Law Scholarship 2008-2015’ (2016) 46 Environmental Law Reporter News & Analysis 10647.Google Scholar
Brown, T., Bergstrom, J., & Loomis, B., ‘Defining, Valuing and Providing Ecosystem Goods and Services’ (2007) 47(2) Natural Resources Journal 329376.Google Scholar
Camerer, Colin & Mobbs, Dean, ‘Differences in Behavior and Brain Activity During Hypothetical and Real Choices’ (2017) 21 Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4556.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chang, Howard & Sigman, Hilary, ‘An Empirical Analysis of Cost Recovery in Superfund Cases: Implications for Brownfields and Joint and Several Liability’ (2014)11 Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 477504.Google Scholar
Chay, Kenneth, Dobkin, Carlos, & Greenstone, Michael, ‘The Clean Air Act of 1970 and Adult Mortality’ (2003) 27 Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 279300.Google Scholar
Coglianese, Cary & Courcy, Catherine, ‘Environmental Regulation’, in The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Cole, Daniel & Grossman, Peter, ‘When Is Command-and-Control Efficient? Institutions, Technology, and the Comparative Efficiency of Alternative Regulatory Regimes for Environmental Protection’ (1999) Wisconsin Law Review 887938.Google Scholar
Currie, Janet et al., ‘Does Pollution Increase School Absences?’ (2009) 91 Review of Economics and Statistics 682694.Google Scholar
Dickie, Mark & Gerking, Shelby, ‘Willingness to Pay for Ozone Control: Inferences from the Demand for Medical Care’ (1991) 21 Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 116.Google Scholar
Driesen, David, ‘Distributing the Costs of Environmental, Health, and Safety Protection: The Feasibility Principle, Cost-Benefit Analysis, and Regulatory Reform’ (2005) 32 Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review 195.Google Scholar
Ehrenfeld, D., The Arrogance of Humanism (London: Oxford University Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Farber, Daniel, ‘Pollution Markets and Social Equity: Analyzing the Fairness of Cap and Trade’ (2012) 39 Ecology Law Quarterly 156.Google Scholar
Fowlie, Meredith, Holland, Stephen, & Mansur, Erin, ‘What Do Emissions Markets Deliver and to Whom? Evidence from Southern California’s NOx Trading Program’ (2012) 102 American Economic Review 965993.Google Scholar
Gayer, Ted & Viscusi, W. Kip, ‘Determining the Proper Scope of Climate Change Policy Benefits in U.S. Regulatory Analyses: Domestic versus Global Approaches’ (2016) 10 Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 119.Google Scholar
Gollier, Christian & Weitzman, Martin, ‘How Should the Distant Future Be Discounted When Discount Rates Are Uncertain?’ (2009) 107 Economics Letters 350353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goulder, Lawrence & Schein, Andrew, ‘Carbon Taxes Versus Cap and Trade: A Critical Review’ (2013) 4 Climate Change Economics 13500101350048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenstone, Michael & Gallagher, Justin, ‘Does Hazardous Waste Matter? Evidence from the Housing Market and the Superfund Program’ (2008) 123 Quarterly Journal of Economics 9511003.Google Scholar
Hanson, John & Kysar, Douglas, ‘Taking Behavioralism Seriously: The Problem of Market Manipulation’ (1999) 74 New York University Law Review 630745.Google Scholar
Helfand, Gloria, ‘Standards versus Standards: The Effects of Different Pollution Restrictions’ (1991) 81 American Economic Review 622634.Google Scholar
Hope, Chris, ‘Critical issues for the Calculation of the Social Cost of CO2: Why the Estimates from PAGE09 Are Higher Than Those from PAGE2002’ (2013) 117 Climatic Change 531543.Google Scholar
Howard, Peter & Livermore, Michael, ‘Sociopolitical Feedbacks and Climate Change’ Harvard Environmental Law Review (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Howard, Peter & Schwartz, Jason, ‘Think Global: International Reciprocity as Justification for a Global Social Cost of Carbon’ (2017) 42 Columbia Journal of Environmental Law 203295.Google Scholar
Howard, Peter & Sylvan, Derek, ‘The Economic Climate: Establishing Expert Consensus on the Economics of Climate Change’, Institute of Policy Integrity, December 2015.Google Scholar
Johnson, Stephen, ‘Economics v. Equity: Do Market-Based Environmental Reforms Exacerbate Environmental Injustice?’ (1999) 56 Washington & Lee Law Review 111118.Google Scholar
Kahan, Dan et al., ‘Cultural Cognition of Scientific Consensus’ (2011) 14 Journal of Risk Research 147174.Google Scholar
Kaswan, Alice, ‘Decentralizing Cap-and-Trade? State Controls Within a Federal Greenhouse Gas Cap-and-Trade Program’ (2010) 28 Virginal Environmental Law Journal 343410.Google Scholar
Kaswan, Alice, ‘Climate Change, the Clean Air Act, and Industrial Pollution’ (2012) 30 University of California, Los Angeles Journal of Environmental Law & Policy 51119.Google Scholar
Keeler, B. et al., ‘Linking Water Quality and Well-Being for Improved Assessment and Valuation of Ecosystem Services’ (2012) 109(45) Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1861918624.Google Scholar
Kelman, Steven, What Price Incentives?: Economists and the Environment (Toronto: Praeger Publishing, 1981).Google Scholar
Keohane, Nathaniel, Revesz, Richard, & Stavins, Robert, ‘The Choice of Regulatory Instruments in Environmental Policy’ (1998) 22 Harvard Environmental Law Review 313367.Google Scholar
Khaw, Mel et al., ‘The Measurement of Subjective Value and Its Relationship to Contingent Valuation of Environmental Public Goods’ (2015)10 PLoS ONE 119.Google Scholar
Kysar, Douglas, ‘It Might Have Been: Risk, Precaution and Opportunity Costs’ (2006) 22 Journal of Land Use & Environmental Law 134.Google Scholar
Livermore, Michael, ‘Setting the Social Cost of Carbon, in Farber, Daniel A. and Peeters, Marjan (eds), Climate Change Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2016).Google Scholar
Livermore, Michael, ‘The Perils of Experimentation’ (2017) 126 Yale Law Journal 636708.Google Scholar
Livermore, Michael & Revesz, Richard, ‘Interest Groups and Environmental Policy: Inconsistent Positions and Missed Opportunities’ (2015) 45 Environmental Law 119.Google Scholar
Livermore, Michael & Revesz, Richard, Environmental Law and Economics’, in Parisi, Francesco (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Law and Economics: Private and Commercial Law (New York: Oxford University Press, 2017), vol. 2, p. 509.Google Scholar
Livermore, Michael & Rockmore, Daniel, ‘Law as Data: Computation, Text, and the Future of Legal Analysis (Santa Fe, AZ: Santa Fe Institute Press, in press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Robert & Carson, Richard, Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method (Washington, DC: Resources for the Future, 1989).Google Scholar
Moyer, Elisabeth et al., ‘Climate Impacts on Economic Growth as Drivers of Uncertainty in the Social Cost of Carbon’ (2014) 43 Journal of Legal Studies 401425.Google Scholar
Neumayer, Eric, ‘Are Left-Wing Party Strength and Corporatism Good for the Environment? Evidence from Panel Analysis of Air Pollution in OECD Countries’ (2003) 45 Ecological Economics 203220.Google Scholar
Nordhaus, William & Sztorc, Paul, DICE 2013 R: Introduction and User’s Manual (New Haven: Cowles Foundation, 2013).Google Scholar
Oates, Wallace, Portney, Paul, & McGartland, Albert, ‘The Net Benefits of Incentive-Based Regulation: A Case Study of Environmental Standard Setting’ (1989) 79 American Economic Review 12331242.Google Scholar
Pashigian, Peter, ‘Environmental Regulation: Whose Self-Interests Are Being Protected?’ (1985) 23 Economic Inquiry 511584.Google Scholar
Phaneuf, Daniel & Smith, V. Kerry, ‘Recreation Demand Models’, in Mäler, Karl-Gran & Vincent, Jeffrey (eds), Handbook of Environmental Economics (Amsterdam: North Holland/Elsevier Science, 2005), pp. 671761.Google Scholar
Pindyck, Robert, ‘Climate Change Policy: What Do the Models Tell Us?’ (2013) 51 Journal of Economic Literature 860872.Google Scholar
Radin, Mary Jane, Contested Commodities (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Revesz, Richard, ‘Markets and Geography: Designing Marketable Permit Schemes to Control Local and Regional Pollutants’ (2001) 28 Ecology Law Quarterly 569672.Google Scholar
Revesz, Richard et al., ‘Best Cost Estimate of Greenhouse Gases’ (2017) 357 Science 655.Google Scholar
Revesz, Richard & Livermore, Michael, Retaking Rationality: How Cost-Benefit Analysis Can Better Protect the Environment and Our Health (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Revesz, Richard & Stavins, Robert, ‘Environmental Law and Policy’, in Mitchell Polinsky, A. & Shavell, Steven (eds), Handbook of Law and Economics (Amsterdam: North-Holland/Elsevier Science, 2007), pp. 499589.Google Scholar
Rolston, Holmes, III., ‘Duties to Endangered Species’ (1985) 35(11) BioScience 718726.Google Scholar
Rosen, Sherwin, ‘Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition’ (1974) 82 Journal of Political Economy 3435.Google Scholar
Ruhl, J. B., ‘Complexity Theory as a Paradigm for the Dynamical Law-and-Society System: A Wake-Up Call for Legal Reductionism and the Modern Administrative State’ (1996) 45 Duke Law Journal 849928.Google Scholar
Sagoff, Mark, ‘On Preserving the Natural Environment’ (1974) 84 Yale Law Journal 224225.Google Scholar
Singer, Peter, Animal Liberation: A New Ethics for Our Treatment of Animals (New York: HarperCollins, 1975).Google Scholar
Steinzor, Rena, ‘Devolution and the Public Health’ (2000) 24 Harvard Environmental Law Review 366369.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass, ‘Cost-Benefit Analysis and Arbitrariness Review’ (2017) 41 Harvard Environmental Law Review 141.Google Scholar
Tietenberg, Thomas, ‘Tradable Permits for Pollution Control When Emission Location Matters: What Have We Learned?’ (1995) 5 Environmental and Resource Economics 95113.Google Scholar
US Environmental Protection Agency, ‘Guidelines for Preparing Economic Analyses’, December 17, 2010.Google Scholar
Viscusi, W. Kip, ‘The Value of Life: Estimates with Risks by Occupation and Industry’ (2004) 42 Economic Inquiry 2948.Google Scholar
Weitzman, Mark, ‘Fat-Tailed Uncertainty in the Economics of Catastrophic Climate Change’ (2011) 5 Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 275292.Google Scholar
Weitzman, Martin, ‘Prices vs. Quantities’ (1974) 41 Review of Economic Studies 477491.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×