Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T19:20:01.466Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Idea of “Law” in China: An Overview

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2019

Luigi Moccia
Affiliation:
Professor of Comparative Law and Jean Monnet Chair holder in EU Law.
Get access

Summary

LI AND FA, AND THE “THEORY OF LAW” IN TRADITIONAL CHINA

China, with its millenarian empire ranging from the first Qin dynasty (221 – 206 BCE) to the threshold of last century (1911), has known one of the longest and greatest political-institutional structures that ever existed. The country was managed by a powerful and learned literary bureaucracy, against the background of a highly civilized society, which lasted for a long time as one of the most advanced in the field of letters (books), politics (government), economics (agricultural production), technical development and arts. From the fifth century BCE, “Chinese philosophers were debating the nature and purpose of law ”. Furthermore, an “unparalleled continuity of Chinese legal thought and institutions “has been documented since then. It is also notable that” the only other legal sphere outside China that has an equally long history is that of Roman Law and its various modern adaptations. ”

However, according to a still widespread opinion, China has not experienced a development of the idea (and ideal) of “law”,'that is to say a ”legal tradition” comparable to the Western one. To be sure, such opinion reflects a dominant political-philosophical dimension of the Chinese traditional culture as resistant to the very notion of law, and has a strong hold among sinologists themselves. Indeed, it is usually thought that in classic China of ancient and modern times, notwithstanding a massive law-making consisting in the almost continuous series of so called imperial or dynastic codes, such an idea (and ideal) never ripened enough to affirm its conceptual and professional autonomy. It always had a rather instrumental and subordinate position with respect to politics, on the one hand, and to moral, religious, conventional, in short, “not legal” norms on the other. The notion of law was thus conceived either as solely bound with the sovereign (state) interest to guarantee order and social stability, and therefore reduced to a governmental (bureaucratic) function, or confused with social morality embedded into ritual manners and behavioral patterns that affect the lives of individuals, both in private and in public, in order to assure natural harmony in the relations among people.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Intersentia
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×