Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T11:23:34.865Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

21 - Obstacles to corporate restructuring: observations from a European and German perspective

from PART 1 - Perspectives in company law, SECTION 3: Takeover law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2010

Michel Tison
Affiliation:
Universiteit Gent, Belgium
Hans De Wulf
Affiliation:
Universiteit Gent, Belgium
Christoph Van der Elst
Affiliation:
Universiteit Gent, Belgium
Reinhard Steennot
Affiliation:
Universiteit Gent, Belgium
Get access

Summary

In Europe there are still many obstacles to corporate restructuring, even beyond the takeover context. The experience with the implementation of the 13th Directive on Takeovers is sobering indeed. The number of Member States implementing the directive in a seemingly protectionist way is unexpectedly large. This is in line with a growing popular fear of globalization and definite trends toward political protectionism regarding foreign investments in various Member States. Germany is not an exception, as the Risk Limitation Act of July 2008 and the ongoing discussion on further restrictions illustrate. The declaration by Commissioner mccreevy of 3 October 2007 that there will be no European action on the issue of one-share/one-vote should not mean the end of the discussion. The report of the European Corporate Governance Forum Working Group on Proportionality of June 2007 is right in pleading for an enhanced disclosure regime concerning control-enhancing mechanisms. In any case, there is a definite need for more data and further analysis.

Introduction

The topic of this chapter is ‘Obstacles to Corporate Restructuring’, with an emphasis on takeover rules and the market of corporate control. There are two underlying implications to this choice: first, that takeovers play or can play an important role in corporate restructuring; and second, that there are other important parameters for corporate restructuring beyond takeovers. Let me make two preliminary remarks on this.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bayer, W. and Schmidt, J., ‘Der Schutz der grenzüberschreitenden Verschmelzung durch die Niederlassungsfreiheit’, Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht (ZIP) (2006), 210Google Scholar
Teichmann, C., ‘Binnenmarktmobilität von Gesellschaften nach “Sevic”’, Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht (2006), 355.Google Scholar
Ferrarini, G., Hopt, K. J., Winter, J., Wymeersch, E. (eds.), Reforming Company and Takeover Law in Europe (Oxford University Press, 2004), Annex 2, 825–924
Davies, P. and Hopt, K. J., ‘Chapter on Control Transactions’, in Kraakman, R. R., Davies, P., Hansmann, H., Hertig, G., Hopt, K. J., Kanda, H., Rock, E. (eds.), The Anatomy of Corporate Law, A Comparative and Functional Approach (Oxford University Press, 2004); the revised and enlarged 2nd edition is to appear in winter 2008/09.Google Scholar
Armour, J. and Skeel, D. A., ‘Who Writes the Rules for Hostile Takeovers and Why? – The Peculiar Divergence of U.S. and U.K. Takeover Regulation’, Georgetown Law Journal, 95 (2007), 1728–94.Google Scholar
Hopt, K. J., ‘Konzernrecht: Die Europäische Perspektive’, Zeitschrift für das gesamte Handelsrecht und Wirtschaftsrecht, 171 (2007), 199–240.Google Scholar
Lamandini, M., ‘Takeover Bids and ‘Italian’ Law Reciprocity, European Company Law 5 (April 2008) issue 2, 56–7.Google Scholar
Hopt, K. J., ‘Editorial, Feindliche Übernahmen, Protektionismus, One share one vote?’, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht, (2007), 257.Google Scholar
Hopt, K. J., Kantzenbach, E., Straubhaar, T. (eds.), Herausforderungen der Globalisierung (Göttingen: Vandenhoek & Rupprecht, 2003)
Linzbach, C.et al. (eds.), Globalisierung und Europäisches Sozialmodell (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2007)CrossRef
Howse, R., ‘The End of the Globalization Debate: A Review Essay’, Harvard Law Review 121 (2008), 1528.Google Scholar
Rosen, R., ‘Die Umsetzung der EU-Übernahmerichtlinie in Europa, Eine erste Bilanz’, Management Zeitschrift für Corporate Governance, 6 (2007), 241, 243 et seq.Google Scholar
Skog, R., ‘The Takeover Directive: An Endless Saga?’, European Business Law Review, 13 (2002), 301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopt, K. J., ‘La treizième directive sur les OPA-OPE et le droit allemand’, in Aspects actuels du droit des affaires, Mélanges en l'honneur de Yves Guyon (Paris: Dalloz, 2003), 529, 537 et seq.Google Scholar
Bekkum, J., Kloosterman, J., Winter, J., ‘Golden Shares and European Company Law: the Implications of Volkswagen’, European Company Law, 5 (2008) issue 1, 6–12Google Scholar
Möslein, F., ‘Aufsichtsratsverfassung und Kapitalverkehrsfreiheit’, Der Aufsichtsrat (2008), 72–73Google Scholar
Käseberg, T. and Möslein, F., ‘Auch die Mitbestimmungsregeln im VW-Gesetz sind fragwürdig’, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, (12 March 2008), No. 61, 23.Google Scholar
White, G. H., Konevsky, A. W. and Anglette, B., ‘The battle for ABN AMRO and certain aspects of cross-border takeovers’, Butterworths Journal of International Banking and Financial Law (April 2008), 171–176.Google Scholar
Baums, T., Keinath, A. and Gajek, D., ‘Fortschritte bei Klagen gegen Hauptversammlungsbeschlüsse? Eine empirische Studie’, Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht, (2007), 1629Google Scholar
Baums, T. and Drinhausen, F., ‘Weitere Reform des Rechts der Anfechtung von Hauptversammlungsbeschlüssen’, Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht, (2008), 145.Google Scholar
Nobbe, G., ‘Der Verkauf von Krediten’, Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht, (2008), 97.Google Scholar
Raloff, A., Acting in Concert (Gottmadingen: Jenaer Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft, 2007).Google Scholar
Stürner, R., Markt und Wettbewerb über alles? Gesellschaft und Recht im Fokus neoliberaler Marktideologie (Munich: C. H. Beck, 2007).Google Scholar
Siebert, H., Jenseits des sozialen Marktes, Eine notwendige Neuorientierung der deutschen Politik (Munich: Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt, 2005)Google Scholar
Sinn, H.-W., Ist Deutschland noch zu retten?, 3rd edition, (Munich: Econ, 2003); Empter, S. and Vehrkamp, R. B. (eds.), Soziale Gerechtigkeit – eine Bestandaufnahme (Gütersloh: Bertelsmann, 2007).Google Scholar
Fleischer, H., ‘Finanzinvestoren im ordnungspolitischen Gesamtgefüge von Aktien-, Bankaufsichts- und Kapitalmarktrecht’, Zeitschrift für Unternehmens- und Gesellschaftsrecht, 2–3 (2008), 185.Google Scholar
Spindler, G., ‘Acting in Concert – Begrenzung der Risiken durch Finanzinvestoren?’, Wertpapier-Mitteilungen, (2007), 2357.Google Scholar
Hopt, K. J., ‘Viel zu defensiv’, Handelsblatt, (30 January 2008), No. 21, 19.Google Scholar
Schmidtbleicher, R., ‘Das „neue” acting in concert – ein Fall für den EuGH?’, Die Aktiengesellschaft, (2008), 73.Google Scholar
Butt, S., Shivdasani, A., Stendevad, C. and Wyman, A., ‘Sovereign Wealth Funds: A Growing Global Force in Corporate Finance’, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 19 (2007), 73–83.Google Scholar
Bayer, W. and Ohler, C., ‘Staatsfonds ante portas’, Zeitschrift für Gesellschaftsrecht (ZGR), (2008), 12–31Google Scholar
Donges, J. B. et al. (Kronberger Kreis), Staatsfonds: Muss Deutschland sich schützen? (Berlin 2008).Google Scholar
Wiede, T., ‘Russland verschärft die Regeln für Investoren’, Handelsblatt (26 March 2008), No. 58, 6.Google Scholar
,Hedge Fund Working Group (HFWG), Hedge Fund Standards: Final Report (Large Report), London (January 2008)Google Scholar
Kahan, M. and Rock, E. B., ‘Hedge Funds in Corporate Governance and Corporate Control’, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 155 (2007), 1021–93Google Scholar
Eidenmüller, H., ‘Regulierung von Finanzinvestoren’, Deutsches Steuerrecht, (2007), 2116Google Scholar
Eidenmüller, H., ‘Private Equity, Leverage und die Effizienz des Gläubigerschutzrechts’, Zeitschrift für das gesamte Handelsrecht und Wirtschaftsrecht 171 (2007), 644Google Scholar
Kumpan, C., ‘Private Equity und der Schutz deutscher Unternehmen’, Die Aktiengesellschaft, (2007), 461Google Scholar
Kumpan, C., DAJV Newsletter (2007), 166
Spindler, G., ‘Die Regulierung von Hedge-Fonds im Kapitalmarkt- und Gesellschaftsrecht’, Wertpapier-Mitteilungen, (2006), 553Google Scholar
Graef, A., Aufsicht über Hedgefonds im deutschen und amerikanischen Recht (Berlin 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Athanassiou, , ‘Towards Pan-European Hedge Fund Regulation? State of the Debate’, Legal Issues of Economic Integration, 35 (2008) 1, 1–41.Google Scholar
Burkhart, M., Lee, S., ‘One Share – One Vote: The Theory’, Review of Finance, 12 (2008), 1–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, R., Ferreira, D., ‘One Share – One Vote: The Empirical Evidence’, Review of Finance, 12 (2008), 51–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, H.T.C. and Black, B., ‘Equity and Debt Decoupling and Empty Voting II: Importance and Extension’, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 156 (2008), 625–739.Google Scholar
Pacces, A. M., Featuring Control Power (Rotterdam Institute of Law and Economics, 2007).Google Scholar
Grundmann, S. and Möslein, F., European Company Law, Organization, Finance and Capital Markets (Antwerpen/Oxford: Intersentia, 2007)Google Scholar
Merkt, H., Unternehmenspublizität (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2001).Google Scholar
,Forum Europaeum Group Law, ‘Corporate Group Law for Europe’, European Business Organization Law Review, 1 (2000), 165–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×