Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T23:22:40.838Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2014

Ken Kollman
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Perils of Centralization
Lessons from Church, State, and Corporation
, pp. 173 - 194
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abernathy, William. 1978. The Productivity Dilemma: Roadblock to Innovation in the Automobile Industry. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Admati, Anat R., Pfleiderer, Paul, and Zechner, Josef. 1994. “Large Shareholder Activism, Risk Sharing, and Financial Market Equilibrium.” Journal of Political Economy 102: 1097–1130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aghion, Philippe and Tirole, Jean. 1997. “Formal and Real Authority in Organizations.” Journal of Political Economy 105(Feb): 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, John. 1995. Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Party Politics in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, Alberto and Enrico Spolaore. 1997. “On the Number and Size of Nations.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 112: 1027–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alter, Karen. 2001. Establishing the Supremacy of European Law: The Making of an International Rule of Law in Europe. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ammon, Harry. 1990. James Monroe: The Quest for National Identity. 2nd ed. Charlotteville: University Press of Virginia.Google Scholar
Anton, Thomas. 1984. “Intergovernmental Change in the United States: An Assessment of the Literature.” In Public Sector Performance, ed. Miller, Trudi. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Arnold, Peri. 1998. Making the Managerial Presidency. 2nd ed. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Associated Press. 2012. “Oregon: Vatican Is Not Employer of Abusive Priests, Judge Says,” August 20. Available at:
Austen-Smith, David and Banks, Jeffrey. 1999. Positive Political Theory I. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austen-Smith, David and Banks, Jeffrey 2005. Positive Political Theory II. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azfar, Omar, Kähkönen, Satu, and Meagher, Patrick. 2001. “Conditions for Effective Decentralized Governance: A Synthesis of Research Findings.” IRIS Center, University of Maryland.
Azumi, Koya and Hage, Jerald. 1972. Organizational Systems. Lexington, MA: DC Heath.Google Scholar
Baack, Bennett and Ray, Edward John. 1985a. “Special Interests and the Adoption of the Income Tax in the United States.” Journal of Economic History 45(3): 607–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baack, Bennett and Ray, Edward John 1985b. “The Political Economy of the Origins of the Military-Industrial Complex in the United States.” The Journal of Economic History 45(2): 369–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bachrach, Samuel and Lawler, Edward. 1980. Power and Politics in Organizations. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Bardhan, Pranab. 2002. “Decentralization of Governance and Development.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 16(4): 185–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron, David and Ferejohn, John. 1989. “Bargaining in Legislatures.” American Political Science Review 83: 1181–206.CrossRef
Bartolini, Stefano. 2005. Restructuring Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgartner, Frederic. 2003. Behind Closed Doors: A History of the Papal Elections. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becht, Marco, Bolton, Patrick, and Roell, Alisa. 2002. “Corporate Governance and Control.” Working paper 9371. National Bureau of Economic Research. Available at:
Bednar, Jenna. 2008. The Robust Federation. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bednar, Jenna, Page, Scott, and Toole, Jameson. 2012. “Revised Path Dependence.” Political Analysis 20(2): 146–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bednar, Jenna, Eskridge, William, Jr., and Ferejohn, John. 2001. “A Political Theory of Federalism.” In Constitutional Culture and Democratic Rule, eds. Ferejohn, John, Riley, Jonathan, and Rakove, Jack. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Beer, Samuel. 1977. “A Political Scientist’s View of Fiscal Federalism.” In The Political Economy of Fiscal Federalism, ed. Oates, Wallace. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Beer, Samuel 1993. To Make a Nation: The Rediscovery of American Federalism. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Bellitto, Christopher. 2002. The General Councils: A History of the Twenty-One Church Councils from Nicaea to Vatican II. Mahwah, NJ: Paulist Press.Google Scholar
Benoit, Kenneth and Laver, Michael. 2006. Party Policy in Modern Democracies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Berle, A. A. 1931. “Corporate Powers as Powers in Trust.” Harvard Law Review 44: 1049–1074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besley, Timothy and Coate, Stephen. 2003. “Centralized versus Decentralized Provision of Local Public Goods: A Political Economy Approach.” Journal of Public Economics 87(12): 2611–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bibby, J. F. 1998. “Party Organization, 1946–1996.” In Partisan Approaches to Postwar American Politics, ed. Shafer, Bryon E.. New York: Chatham House, pp. 142–85.Google Scholar
Birch, A. H. 1955. Federalism, Finance, and Social Legislation in Canada, Australia, and the United States. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Boadway, Robin and Shah, Anwar. 2009. Fiscal Federalism: Principles and Practice of Multiorder Government. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boissier, Peter. 1963. History of the International Committee of the Red Cross: From Solferino to Tsushima. Geneva: Henry Dunant Institute.Google Scholar
Bolton, Patrick and Roland, Gerard. 1997. “The Break-Up of Nations: A Political Economy Analysis.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 112:1057–90.CrossRef
Bolton, Patrick and Farrell, Joseph. 1990. “Decentralization, Duplication, and Delay.” Journal of Political Economy 98(4): 803–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Book of the States. Various years from 1935 onward. Lexington, KY: Council of State Governments.
Brady, David. 1985. “A Reevaluation of Realignments in American Politics: Evidence from the House of Representatives.” The American Political Science Review 79(Mar): 28–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, David 1988. Critical Elections and Public Policy Making. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Brady, David and Grofman, Bernard. 1991. “Sectional Differences in Partisan Bias and Electoral Responsiveness in US House Elections, 1850–1980.” British Journal of Political Science 21(Apr): 247–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brancati, Dawn. 2006. “Decentralization: Fueling the Fire or Dampening the Flames of Ethnic Conflict and Secessionism?International Organization 60: 651–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brancati, Dawn 2007. “The Origins and Strength of Regional Parties.” British Journal of Political Science 38: 135–59.Google Scholar
Bromwich, Leo. 1959. Union Constitutions. New York: The Fund for the Republic.Google Scholar
Brown, F. Donaldson. 1927. “Centralized Control with Decentralized Responsibilities.” American Management Association, Annual Convention Series 57: 3–24.Google Scholar
Brown, Norris. 1910. “Shall the Income Tax Be Ratified.” Document 705, 61st Congress, United States Senate, December 14.
Brownlee, Elliot W. 2000. “The Public Sector.” In The Cambridge Economic History of the United States Vol 3: The Twentieth Century, eds. Engerman, Stanley L. and Gallman, Robert E.. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brutus. [1787–88] (1981). The Anti-Federalist Papers. In The Complete Anti-Federalist Papers, 1–7, eds. Storing, Herbert and Dry, Murray. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bryce, James. 1888. The American Commonwealth. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Buenker, John. 1985. The Income Tax and the Progressive Era. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce and Stokman, Frans, eds. 1994. European Community Decisionmaking. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bulman, Raymond and Parrella, Frederick, eds. 2006. From Trent to Vatican II. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, Michael. 1993. “Federalism and Federation: A Reappraisal.” In Comparative Federalism and Federation: Competing Traditions and Future Directions, eds. Burgess, Michael and Gagnon, Alain-G.. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Burke-Young, Francis A. 1999. Passing the Keys: Modern Cardinals, Conclaves and the Election of the Next Pope. Lanham, MD: Madison Books.Google Scholar
Burkhard, John. 1998. “The Interpretation and Application of Subsidiarity in Ecclesiology.” The Jurist 58: 279–342.Google Scholar
Burnham, Walter Dean. 1970. Critical Elections and the Mainsprings of American Politics. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Burns, Nancy and Gamm, Gerald. 2000. “Creatures of the State: State Politics and Local Government, 1871–1921.” Urban Affairs Review (September): 33: 59–96.Google Scholar
Burrows, Bernard and Denton, Geoffrey. 1980. Devolution or Federalism?London: MacMillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrnes, Timothy. 1991. Catholic Bishops in American Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E.. 1960. The American Voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, James. 1997. The Presidential Pulse of Congressional Elections. Lexington, University of Kentucky Press.Google Scholar
Canon Law: Letter & Spirit. 1995. Prepared by the Canon Law Society of Great Britain and Ireland. London: Geoffrey Chapman.
Caramani, Daniele. 2004. The Nationalization of Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, Paul H. 1998. The Plains Indians. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.Google Scholar
Carmines, Edward and Stimson, James. 1989. Issue Evolution: Race and the Transformation of American Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Carpenter, Daniel. 2001. The Forging of Bureaucratic Autonomy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Carubba, Clifford, Gabel, Matthew, Murrah, Lacey, Clough, Ryan, Montgomery, Elizabeth, and Schambach, Rebecca. 2006. “Off the Record: Unrecorded Legislative Votes, Selection Bias, and Roll Call Votes Analysis,” British Journal of Political Science 36(4): 691–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casti Connubii. 1930. Encyclical from Pius XI, December 31. Available at:
Cataldo, Anthony and Savage, Arline. 2001. U.S. Individual Federal Income Taxation: Historical, Contemporary, and Prospective Policy Issues. Oxford: Emerald Group Publishers.Google Scholar
Catechism of the Catholic Church. 1995. New York: Doubleday.
Chambers, William Nisbett. 1974. “Party Development and Party Action.” In American Political Behavior: Historical Essays and Readings, eds. Benson, Lee, Bogue, Allan, Hollingsworth, J. Rogers, Pressly, Thomas, and Silbey, Joel. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Chandler, Alfred. 1977. The Visible Hand. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Charles, Joseph. 1956. The Origins of the American Party System. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Cheema, Shabbir and Rondinelli, Dennis A., eds. 2007. Decentralizing Governance: Emerging Concepts and Practices. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institutions Press.Google Scholar
Cheetham, Nicolas. 1982. Keepers of the Keys: A History of the Popes from St. Peter to John Paul II. London: MacDonald & Co.Google Scholar
Chhibber, Pradeep and Kollman, Ken. 1998. “Party Aggregation and the Number of Parties in India and the United States.” The American Political Science Review 92: 329–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chhibber, Pradeep and Kollman, Ken 2004. The Formation of National Party Systems. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schiltz, Patrick. 2003. “The Impact of Clergy Sexual Misconduct Litigation on Religious Liberty.” Boston College Law Review 44: 949–75.Google Scholar
Claggett, William, Flanigan, William, and Zingale, Nancy. 1984. “Nationalization of the American Electorate.” The American Political Science Review 78(Mar): 77–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clemens, Elizabeth and Cook, James. 1999. “Politics and Institutionalism: Explaining Durability and Change.” Annual Review of Sociology 25: 441–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, William, ed. 1984. The New Deal: Fifty Years After. Austin, TX: Lyndon Baines Johnson Foundation.Google Scholar
Coleman, John J. 1996. Party Decline in America: Policy, Politics, and the Fiscal State. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Colley, John L. Jr., Doyle, Jacqueline L., Logan, George W., and Stettinius, Wallace. 2003. Corporate Governance. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Collins, Paul. 1997. Papal Power: A Proposal for Change in Catholicism’s Third Millennium. London: Fount.Google Scholar
Collins, Roger. 2009. Keeper of the Keys of Heaven. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
Coman, E. E. 2009. “Reassessing the Influence of Party Groups on Individual Members of the European Parliament.” West European Politics 32(6): 1099–1117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comstock, Alzada. 1929. Taxation in the Modern State. New York: Longmans, Green, and Co.Google Scholar
Conable, Barber and Singleton, A. L.. 1989. Congress and the Income Tax. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Conglianese, Gary and Nicolaidis, Kalypso. 2001. “Securing Subsidiarity: The Institutional Design of Federalism in the United States and Europe.” In The Federal Vision, eds. Kalypso, Nicolaidis and Howse, Robert. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Conlan, Timothy. 1998. From New Federalism to Devolution: Twenty-Five Years of Intergovernmental Reform. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
Converse, Philip E. 1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” In Ideology and Discontent, ed. Apter, David E.. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Cooley, Alexander. 2005. Logics of Hierarchy: The Organization of States, Empires, and Military Occupations. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Coppa, Frank J. 1998. The Modern Papacy since 1789. Singapore: Addison Welsley Longman.Google Scholar
Costigan, Richard. 2005. The Consensus of the Church and Papal Infallibility: A Study in the Background of Vatican I. Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Cotter, Cornelius P., Gibson, James L., Bibby, John F., and Huckshorn, Robert J.. 1984. Party Organizations in American Politics. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Cotter, Cornelius P. and Bibby, John F.. 1980. “Institutional Development of Parties and the Thesis of Party Decline.” Political Science Quarterly 95: 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Couch, Jim F. and Shughart, William. 1998. The Political Economy of the New Deal. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary. 1987. The Efficient Secret. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, Neta. 1994. “A Security Regime among Democracies: Cooperation among Iroquois Nations.” International Organization 48(3): 345–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cray, Ed. 1980. Chrome Colossus: General Motors and Its Times. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Cremer, Jacques and Palfrey, Thomas. 1996. “In or Out? Centralization by Majority Vote.” European Economic Review 40: 43–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cremer, Jacques and Palfrey, Thomas 1999. “Political Confederation.” American Political Science Review 93(1): 69–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crombez, Christophe. 2001. “Institutional Reform and Co-Decision in the European Union.” Constitutional Political Economy 11(1): 41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daft, Richard. 1992. Organizational Design and Theory. 4th ed. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert. 1961. Who Governs?New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert “Federalism and the Democratic Process.” In Democracy, Identity, and Equality, ed. Dahl, Robert. Oslo: Norwegian University Press.
Dalton, Russell J. 1984. “Cognitive Mobilization and Partisan Dealignment in Advanced Industrial Democracies.” Journal of Politics 46: 264–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalton, Russell J. and Wattenberg, MartinP.. 2000. Parties without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Gerald, Diekmann, Kristina, and Tinsley, Catherine. 1994. “The Decline and Fall of the Conglomerate Firm in the 1980s.” American Sociological Review 59: 540–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Rufus. 1967. “The ‘Federal Principle’ Reconsidered.” In American Federalism in Perspective, ed. Wildavsky, Aaron. Boston: Little, Brown, and Company.Google Scholar
de Figueiredo, Rui and Weingast, Barry. 2005. “Self-enforcing Federalism.” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 21(1): 103–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de La Bedoyere, Quentin. 2002. Autonomy and Obedience in the Catholic Church. London: T&T Clark.Google Scholar
Democratic Party of the United States. 1956. 1956 Party Platform. ()
Derthick, Martha, ed. 1999. Dilemmas of Scale in America’s Federal Democracy. Washington, D.C.: Woodrow Wilson Center Press and Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
De Thomasis, Louis. 1984. My Father’s Business. Westminster, MD: Christian Classics.Google Scholar
De Vries, Michiel. 2000. “The Rise and Fall of Decentralization.” European Journal of Political Research 38: 193–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diaz-Cayeros, Alberto. 2006. Federalism, Fiscal Authority, and Centralization in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diermeier, Daniel and Krehbiel, Keith. 2003. “Institutionalism as a Methodology.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 15(2): 201–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiIulio, John Jr. and Kettl, Donald. 1995. Fine Print: The Contract with America, Devolution, and the Administrative Realities of American Federalism. Washington, D.C.: Brooking Institution’s Center for Public Management.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, Paul. 1998. “The Relevance of Organizational Theory to the Study of Religion.” In Sacred Companies, eds. Demerath, Nicholas, Hall, Peter, Williams, Rhys, and Schmidt, Terry. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dinan, Desmond. 2005. Ever Closer Union. 3rd ed. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Dinan, Desmond 2010. Ever Closer Union. 4th ed. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinkin, Robert J. 1977. Voting in Provincial America: A Study of Elections in the Thirteen Colonies, 1689–1776. Westport, CT.: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Dinkin, Robert. 1982. Voting in Revolutionary America. Westport, CT.: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Dion, Stephen. 1996. “Why is Secession Difficult in Well-Established Democracies? Lessons from Quebec.” British Journal of Political Science 26: 269–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixit, Avinash and Londregan, John. 1998. “Fiscal Federalism and Redistributive Politics.” Journal of Public Economics 68: 153–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodd, M. 1932. “For Whom are Corporate Managers Trustees?Harvard Law Review 45: 1145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donahue, John. 1997a. Disunited States. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Donahue, John. 1997b. “Tiebout? Or Not Tiebout? The Market Metaphor and America’s Devolution Debate.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 11(4): 73–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donahue, John and Pollack, Mark. 2001. “Centralization and Its Discontents: The Rhythms of Federalism in the United States and the European Union.” In The Federal Vision, eds. Kalypso, Nicolaidis and Howse, Robert. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dowd, Gregory Evans. 1991. A Spirited Resistance: The North American Struggle for Indian Unity 1745–1815. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Drane, James. 1969. Authority and Institution: A Study in Church Crisis. Milwaukee, WI: Bruce Publishing.Google Scholar
Drucker, Peter. 1946. The Concept of the Corporation. New York: John Day.Google Scholar
Drucker, Peter 1972. The Concept of the Corporation. New York: John Day.Google Scholar
Duchacek, I. D. 1970. Comparative Federalism. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
Duffy, Eamon. 2002. Saints and Sinners: A History of the Popes. 2nd ed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dulles, Foster Rhea and Dubofsky, Melvyn. 1984. Labor in America: A History. 4th ed. Arlington Heights, IL: Harlan Davidson.Google Scholar
Dunlop, John T. 1990. The Management of Labor Unions: Decision Making with Historical Constraints. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Durand, Andre. [1978] 1984. History of the International Committee of the Red Cross: From Sarajevo to Hiroshima. Geneva: Henry Dunant Institute.Google Scholar
Duverger, Maurice. 1954. Political Parties. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Ebel, Robert and Yilmaz, Serdar. 2002. “On the Measurement and Impact of Fiscal Decentralization.” World Bank Institute, Policy Research Working Paper No. 2809.CrossRef
Edelstein, J. David and Ruppel, Howard J., Jr. 1970. “Convention Frequency and Oligarchic Degeneration in British and American Unions.” Administrative Science Quarterly 15(1): 47–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elazar, Daniel. 1972. American Federalism: A View from the States. New York: Crowell.Google Scholar
Elazar, Daniel 1987. Exploring Federalism. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Elazar, Daniel 2001. “The United States and the European Union: Models for their Epochs.” In The Federal Vision, eds. Kalypso, Nicolaidis and Howse, Robert. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Elazar, Daniel J. 1969. “The Meaning of American Federalism.” In The Politics of American Federalism, ed. Elazar, Daniel J.. Lexington, MA: Raytheon Education Company.Google Scholar
Eldersveld, Samuel J. 1964. Political Parties: A Behavioral Analysis. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Eldersveld, Samuel J. 1982. Political Parties in American Society. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Eldersveld, Samuel J. and Walton, Hanes. 2000. Political Parties in American Society. 2nd. ed. New York: St. Martin’s.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Joseph. 2008. American Creation. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Ellis, Richard. 1987. The Union at Risk. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. 1995. “Equal of Proportional: Arguing and Bargaining over the Senate at the Federal Convention.” In Explaining Social Institutions, eds. Knight, Jack and Sened, Itai. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Engerman, Stanley L. 2000. “Introduction.” In The Cambridge Economic History of the United State Volume III: The Twentieth Century, ed. Engerman, Stanley L. and Gallman, Robert. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 483–542.Google Scholar
Engstrom, Erik and Kernell, Samuel. 2005. “Manufactured Responsiveness: State Electoral Laws and the Impact of Presidential Elections on Party Control of the House of Representatives, 1840–1940.” American Journal of Political Science 49(3): 531–49.CrossRef
Epstein, L. 1986. Political Parties in the American Mold. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Erie, Steven. 1988. Rainbow’s End. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Eskridge, William and Ferejohn, John. 1994. “The Elastic Commerce Clause: A Political Theory of American Federalism.” Vanderbilt Law Review 47: 1355–1400.Google Scholar
Etzioni, A. 1965. Political Unification. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
Europa.eu. 2012a. “On public opinion and enlargement.” Available at:
Europa.eu 2012b. Text of the Lisbon Treaty. Available at:
European Court of Justice 1964. Costa v. ENEL. Available at:
Evans, R. and Thomas, T., eds. 1991. Crown, Church, and Estates: Central European Politics in the Sixteenth Century. New York: St. Martin’s.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenton, William N. 1998. The Great Law and the Longhouse: A Political History of the Iroquois Confederacy. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Ferejohn, John and Weingast, Barry, eds. 1997. The New Federalism: Can the States be Trusted?Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.Google Scholar
Ferrara, Christopher and Woods, Thomas. 2002. The Great Façade: Vatican II and the Regime of Novelty in the Roman Catholic Church. Wyoming, MN: Remnant Press.Google Scholar
Filippov, Mikhail, Ordershook, Peter, and Shvetsova, Olga. 2004. Designing Federalism: A Theory of Self-Sustainable Federal Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finegold, Kenneth and Skocpol, Theda. 1995. State and Party in America’s New Deal. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, David Hackett. 1974. “The Creation of the Federal Party.” In American Political Behavior: Historical Essays and Readings, eds. Benson, Lee, Bogue, Allan, Rogers Hollingsworth, J., Pressly, Thomas, and Silbey, Joel. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Fligstein, Neil. 1990. The Transformation of Corporate Control. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fligstein, Neil 1996. “Markets and Politics.” American Sociological Review 61: 656–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fogarty, Gerald. 2004. “Episcopal Governance in the American Church.” In Governance, Accountability, and the Future of the Catholic Church, eds. Oakley, Francis and Russett, Bruce. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Foner, Eric. 2002. Reconstruction: America’s Unfinished Revolution, 1863–1877. 1st Perennial Classics ed. New York: Perennial Press.Google Scholar
Forsyth, Murray. 1981. Unions of States: The Theory and Practice of Confederation. New York: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
Forsythe, David. 2005. The Humanitarians: The International Committee of the Red Cross. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fort, John Franklin. 1910. Message of the Governor of New Jersey. Document 365, 61st Congress, United States Senate. February 16.
Fowler, Linda and McClure, Robert. 1989. Political Ambition: Who Decides to Run for Congress. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Franchino, Fabio. 2007. Powers of the Union: Delegation in the EU. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franzese, Robert and Hays, Jude. 2006. “Strategic Interaction among EU Governments in Active Labor Market Policy-Making: Subsidiarity and Policy Coordination under European Employment Strategy.” European Union Politics 7(2): 167–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Steven. 1991. Labor Will Rule: Sidney Hillman and the Rise of American Labor. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Freeland, Robert. 2001. Struggle for Control of the Modern Corporation. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Frendreis, John, Gibson, James, and Vertz, Laura. 1990. “Electoral Relevance of Local Party Organizations.” The American Political Science Review 48(Mar): 225–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freyer, Tony A. 2000. “Business Law and American Economic History.” In The Cambridge Economic History of the United States: Volume II: The Long Nineteenth Century, eds. Engerman, Stanley L. and Gallman, Robert E. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gabel, Matthew. 1998. Interests and Integration. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gagnon, Alain-G. 1993. “Political Uses of Federalism.” In Burgess, Michael, and Gagnon, Alain-G., eds. Comparative Federalism and Federation: Competing Traditions and Future Directions. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Galenson, Walter. 1996. The American Labor Movement, 1955–1995. Westport CN: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Gamm, Sara. 1979. “The Election Base of National Union Executive Boards.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review. Vol. 32, No. 3. 295–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaudium et Spes. 1965. Document from the Second Vatican Council. Available at:
Gel’man, Vladimir and Evans, A., eds. 2004. The Politics of Local Government in Russia. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2004.Google Scholar
Gel’man, Vladimir and Ross, Cameron, eds. 2010. The Politics of Sub-National Authoritarianism in Russia. London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Gel’man, Vladimir and Marganiya, O., eds. 2010. Resource Curse and Post-Soviet Eurasia: Oil, Gas, and Modernization. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
General Motors Corporation. 1922, 1923, 1924, 1925, 1926, 1927, 1928, 1929, 1937, 1940, 1942, 1943, 1944, 1945, 1946, 1947, 1948, 1949, 1950, 1951, 1952, 1953, 1957, 1961, 1966, 1970, 1973, 1974, 1975, 1976, 1977, 1978, 1985, 1986, 1987. Annual Report. Detroit: Department of Public Relations.
General Motors Corporation 1949. The Organization of General Motors. Detroit: Department of Public Relations.
General Motors Corporation 1957. Annual Meetings of the Stockholders. Detroit: Department of Public Relations.
General Motors Corporation 1966. Organizational Chart. Detroit: Department of Public Relations.
General Motors Corporation 2000. General Motors in the 20th Century. Southfield, MI: Ward’s Communications.Google Scholar
Gerber, Elisabeth and Kollman, Ken. 2004. “Authority Migration.” PS: Political Science and Politics 37(July): 397–401.Google Scholar
Gienapp, William E. 1987. The Origins of the Republican Party, 1852–1856. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gimpel, James. 1996. National Elections and the Autonomy of American State Party Systems. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Goldstein, L. 2001. Constituting Federal Sovereignty: The European Union in Comparative Context. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Goldwin, Robert, ed. 1963. A Nation of States. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Goldwin, Robert and Schambra, William, eds. 1987. How Federal is the Constitution?Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
Gordon, Roger. 1983. “An Optimal Taxation Approach to Fiscal Federalism.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 98(4): 567–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greeley, Andrew. 2004. The Catholic Revolution. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenhouse, Steven. 2005. “Five Unions to Create a Coalition on Growth.” New York Times. June 13.Google Scholar
Greenwood, J. and Aspinwall, M., eds. 1998. Collective Action in the European Union. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Greer, Scott. 2009. The Politics of European Union Health Policy. Philadelphia: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Greer, Scott and Rauscher, Simone. “Destabilization Rights and Restabilization Politics: Policy and Political Reactions to European Union Health Care Services Law.” Journal of European Public Policy 18(2011): 220–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grodzins, Morton. 1961. “Centralization and Decentralization in the American Federal System.” In A Nation of States, ed. Robert Goldwin. Chicago: Rand McNally & Co.
Gustin, Lawrence. 1973. Billy Durant: Creator of General Motors. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Hage, Jerald and Aiken, Michael. 1967. “Relationship of Centralization to Other Structural Properties.” Administrative Science Quarterly 12(1): 72–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halberstam, Daniel. 2001. “Comparative Federalism and the Issue of Commandeering.” In The Federal Vision, eds. Kalypso, Nicolaidis and Howse, RobertNew York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Halberstam, Daniel, Reimann, Mathias, and Sanchez-Cordero, Jorge. 2012. Federalism and Legal Unification: A Comparative Empirical Investigation of Twenty Systems. Paris: International Academy of Comparative Law.Google Scholar
Hannaway, Jane. 1993. “Political Pressure and Decentralization in Institutional Organizations: The Case of School Districts.” Sociology of Education 66(3): 147–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henn, William. 2000. The Honor of My Brothers: A Brief History of the Relationship between the Pope and the Bishops. New York: Crossroad Publishing.Google Scholar
Hewitt, J. N. B. [1920] 2001. “A Constitutional League of Peace in the Stone Age of America: The Language of the Iroquois and Its Constitution.” In An Iroquois Sourcebook, eds. Kalypso, Nicolaidis and Howse, Robert. Vol. 1. New York: Garland Publishing.Google Scholar
Higgens-Evenson, Rudy. 2003. The Price of Progress: Public Services, Taxation, and the American Corporate State. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Higgs, Robert. 1987. Crisis and Leviathan. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Higgs, Robert 2004. Against Leviathan. Oakland, CA: Independent Institute.Google Scholar
Higgs, Robert 2007. Neither Liberty nor Safety. Oakland, CA: Independent Institute.Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert. 1970. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hitchcock, William. 2002. The Struggle for Europe. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Hix, Simon. 2005. The Political System of the European Union. 2nd ed. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Hix, Simon 2008. What’s Wrong with the European Union and How to Fix It. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Hix, Simon and Noury, Abdul. 2009. “After Enlargement: Voting Patterns in the Sixth European Parliament.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 32(2): 159–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hix, Simon, Noury, Abdul G., and Roland, Gerard. 2007. Democratic Politics in the European Parliament. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt, Michael. 1999. The Rise and Decline of the American Whig Party: Jacksonian Politics and the Onset of the Civil War. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hooghe, Liesbet. 2001. The European Commission and the Integration of Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hooghe, Liesbet and Marks, Gary. 2001. Multi-level Governance and European Integration. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Hooghe, Liesbet, Marks, Gary, and Schakel, Arjan. 2010. The Rise Of Regional Authority : A Comparative Study Of 42 Democracies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Howe, Daniel Walker. 2007. What Hath God Wrought: The Transformation of America, 1815–1848. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Howell, William. 2003. Power without Persuasion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hueglin, Thomas and Fenna, Alan. 2006. Comparative Federalism. Petersborough, ON: Broadview Press.Google Scholar
Hug, Simon. 2002. Voices of Europe. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Humanae Vitae. 1968. Encyclical from Paul VI, July 25. Available at:
Huther, J. and Shah, A.. 1998. “Applying a Simple Measure of Good Governance to the Debate on Fiscal Decentralisation.” World Bank Institute, Policy Research Working Paper No. 1894.
Ickes, Harold. 1941. “Who Killed the Progressive Party?The American Historical Review 46: 306–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inman, Robert. 2008. “Federalism’s Values and the Value of Federalism.” National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 13735. Available at:
Inman, Robert and Rubinfeld, Daniel. 1997. “Rethinking Federalism.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 11(4): 43–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaffee, David. 2001. Organization Theory: Tension and Change. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
James, Scott C. 2000. Presidents, Parties, and the State: A Party System Perspective on Democratic Regulatory Choice, 1884–1936. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarley, Paul, Fiorito, Jack, and Dewey, John Thomas. 1997. “A Structural Contingency Approach to Bureaucracy and Democracy in U.S. National Unions.” The Academy of Management Journal 40(4): 831–61.Google Scholar
Jennergren, Peter. 1981. “Decentralization in Organizations.” In Handbook of Organizational Design, eds. Nystrom, Paul and Starbuck, William. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jensen, Thomas and Winzen, Thomas. 2012. “Legislative Negotiations in the European Parliament.” European Union Politics 13(1): 118–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, John. 1990. “Subsidiarity and the Synod of Bishops.” The Jurist 50: 488–523.Google Scholar
Joseph, Richard. 2004. Origins of the American Income Tax: The Revenue Act of 1894 and Its Aftermath. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
Katz, Richard and Mair, Peter. 1994. How Parties Organize: Change and Adaptation in Party Organizations in Western Democracies. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Franz-Xavier. 1988. “The Principle of Subsidiarity Viewed by the Sociology of Organizations.” The Jurist 48: 275–91.Google Scholar
Kawato, Sudafumi. 1987. “Nationalization and Partisan Realignment in Congressional Elections.” The American Political Science Review 81(Dec): 1235–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, Maryann. 1989. Rude Awakening: The Rise, Fall, and Struggle for Recovery of General Motors. New York: Morrow.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert and Martin, L. L.. 1995. “The Promise of Institutionalist Theory.” International Security 20(1): 39–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keohane, Robert and Hoffman, Stanley, eds. 1991. The New European Community. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Key, V. O. 1949. Southern Politics. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Kim, Joon Suk. 2005. “Making States Federatively: Alternative Routes of State Formation in Late Medieval and Early Modern Europe.” PhD Dissertation. Department of Political Science, University of Chicago.
King, Preston. 1982. Federalism and Federation. London and Canberra:Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Kleppner, Paul. 1987. Continuity and Change in Electoral Politics, 1893–1928. New York: Greenwood.Google Scholar
Knight, Jack and Sened, Itai, eds. 1995. Explaining Social Institutions. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Kollman, Ken. 2003. “The Rotating Presidency of the European Council as a Search for Good Policies.” European Union Politics 4(Mar): 51–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kollman, Ken 2006. “Authority Migration in Federations.” Working Paper Manuscript, Department of Political Science, University of Michigan.
Kollman, Ken 2011. The American Political System. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Kollman, Ken, Miller, John H., and Page, Scott E.. 1997. “Political Institutions and Sorting in a Tiebout Model.” American Economic Review 87: 977–92.Google Scholar
Kollman, Ken, Miller, John H., and Page, Scott E. 2000a. “Decentralization and the Search for Policy Solutions.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organizations 16 (April):102–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kollman, Ken, Miller, John H., and Page, Scott E. 2000b. “Consequences of Nonlinear Preferences in a Federal Political System.” In Political Complexity: Nonlinear Models of Politics, ed. Richards, Diana. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Koremenos, Barbara, Lipson, C., and Snidal, Duncan. 2001. “The Rational Design of International Institutions.” International Organization 55(4): 761–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, Larry. 1994. “Understanding Federalism.” Vanderbilt Law Review 47:1485–561.Google Scholar
Kreppel, Amie. 2002. The European Parliament and Supranational Party System. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kulish, Nicholas and Ewing, Jack. 2012. “Europe’s Banking Chief Wields New Power in Crisis.” New York Times. July 3. Available at: Google Scholar
Kung, Hans. 1981. How the Pope Became Infallible. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Lake, David. 2009. Hierarchy in International Relations: Authority, Sovereignty, and the New Structure of World Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, Sanford. 1994. “Between Either/Or and More or Less: Sovereignty Versus Autonomy Under Federalism.”Publius 24(Winter): 63–78.Google Scholar
Lamberson, P. J. and Page, Scott E.. 2012. “Tipping Points.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 7(2): 175–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levi, Margaret. 1988. Of Rule and Revenue. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Linder, Wolf. 1994. Swiss Democracy: Possible Solutions to Conflict in Multicultural Societies. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Linder, Wolf 2010. Swiss Democracy: Possible Solutions to Conflict in Multicultural Societies. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Link, Arthur. 1959. “What Happened to the Progressive Movement in the 1920s?The American Historical Review 64: 833–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipset, Seymour M. and Rokkan, Stein. 1967. “Cleavage Structures, Party Systems, and Voter Alignments: An Introduction.” In Party Systems and Voter Alignments, eds. Lipset, Seymour M. and Rokkan, Stein. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Locke, John. [1690] 1952. The Second Treatise of Government. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Lockwood, Ben. 2002. “Distributive Politics and the Costs of Centralization.” Review of Economic Studies 69: 313–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lukes, Stephen. 1974. Power: A Radical View. New York: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lumen Gentium. 1964. Document from the Second Vatican Council. Available at:
Lutz, Donald S. 1998. “The Iroquois Constitution: An Analysis.” Publius. 28(2): 99–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madison, James, Hamilton, Alexander, and Jay, John. [1887–88] 2003. Federalist Papers. New York: Bantam Classic.Google Scholar
Mahony, James and Thelen, Kathleen. 2010. Explaining Institutional Change. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Main, Jackson T. 1973. Political Parties before the Constitution. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Majone, Giandomenico. 2002. “The European Commission: The Limits of Centralization and the Perils of Parliamentarization.” Governance 15(3): 375–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maltzman, Forrest, Schwartzberg, Melissa, and Sigelman, Lee. 2006. “Vox Pouli, Vox Dei, Vox Sagittae.” PSOnline. April. Available at:
March, James and Simon, Herbert. 1993. Organizations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Marks, Gary. 1989. Unions in Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Marks, Gary, Wilson, Carole, and Ray, Leonard. 2002. “National Political Parties and European Integration.” American Journal of Political Science 30(3): 433–59.Google Scholar
Martin, Andrew and Quinn, Kevin. 2013. Quinn-Martin Scores. Available at:
Mattli, Walter. 1999. The Logic of Regional Integration. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McBrien, Richard. 1997. Lives of the Popes. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
McBrien, Richard 2008. The Church: The Evolution of Catholicism. New York: HarperOne.Google Scholar
McClory, Robert. 1995. Turning Point: The Inside Story of the Papal Birth Control Commission, and How Humanae Vitae Changed the Life of Patty Crowley and the Future of the Church. New York: Crossroad.Google Scholar
McClory, Robert 1997. Power and the Papacy: The People and Politics behind the Doctrine of Infallibility. Liguori, MO: Triumph.Google Scholar
McCormick, Richard P. 1975. “Political Development and the Second American party System.” In The American Party Systems, 2nd ed., eds. Chambers, William N. and Burnham, Walter Dean. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McElroy, Gail and Benoit, Kenneth. 2012. “Policy Positioning in the European Parliament.” European Union Politics 13(1): 150–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGucken, John Anthony. 2011a. Encyclopedia of Eastern Orthodox Christianity. Vols. 1, 2. Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGucken, John Anthony 2011b. The Orthodox Church. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
McKay, David. 2001. Designing Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPherson, James. 1988. Battle Cry of Freedom. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mello, L. and Barenstein, M.. 2001. “Fiscal Decentralization and Governance: A Cross-Country Approach.” International Monetary Fund, Working Paper 01/71.
Meyendorff, John. 1960. The Orthodox Church. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Meyer, J. and Rowan, B.. 1977. “Institutional Organizations.” American Journal of Sociology 83: 340–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michels, Roberto. [1911] 1962. Political Parties. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Mileti, Dennis S., Timmer, Doug A., and Gillespie, David F.. 1982. “Intra and Interorganizational Determinants of Decentralization.” The Pacific Sociological Review 25(2): 163–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milkis, Sidney. 1993. The President and the Parties: The Transformation of the American Party System since the New Deal. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, Gary. 1992. Managerial Dilemmas: The Political Economy of Hierarchy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Trudi, ed. 1984. Public Sector Performance: A Conceptual Turning Point. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Mizruchi, Mark. 1983. “Who Controls Whom? An Examination of the Relation between Management and Boards of Directors in Large American Corporations.” Academy of Management Review 8: 426–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moe, Terry. 2005. “Power and Political Institutions.” Perspectives on Politics 3(2): 215–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohr, Lawrence. 1982. Explaining Organizational Behavior. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Monks, Robert and Minow, Nell. 2007. “GM Corporate Governance Case Study.” Corporate Governance. 4th ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Monnet, Jean. 1978. Memoirs. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Montinola, Gabriella, Yingyi, Qian, and Weingast, Barry R.. “Federalism, Chinese Style: The Political Basis for Economic Success in China.” World Politics 48: 50–81.CrossRef
Moravcsik, Andrew. 1998. The Choice for Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Morris, Edmund. 2001a. Theodore Rex. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Morris, Edmund 2001b. The Rise of Theodore Roosevelt. Rev. ed. New York: Modern Library.Google Scholar
Morrow, James. 1994. Game Theory for Political Scientists. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mott, Charles. 1924. “Organizing a Great Industrial Corporation: Tuning up General Motors – V.” Management and Administration 7(5): 3–7.Google Scholar
Motu Proprio, Apostolica Sollicitudo. 1965. Papal encyclical issued September 15.
Mousley, Edward. 1940. “The Meaning of Federalism.” In Federal Union: A Symposium, ed. Chaning-Pearce, M.. London: Jonathan Cape Ltd.Google Scholar
Mueller, Dennis, ed. 1997. Perspectives on Public Choice: A Handbook. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Muller, Wolfgang. 1993. “The Relevance of the State for Party System Change.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 5: 419–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musgrave, Richard. 1997. “Devolution, Grants, and Fiscal Competition.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 11: 65–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myerson, Roger. 2006. “Federalism and Incentives for Success of Democracy.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 1(1): 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nardulli, Peter. 1995. “The Concept of a Critical Realignment, Electoral Behavior, and Political Change.” The American Political Science Review 89: 10–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Negandhi, Anant. 1972. Conflict and Power in Complex Organizations. Kent, OH: Kent State University, Comparative Administrative Research Institute, College of Business Administration.Google Scholar
Neudstadt, Richard. 1980. Presidential Power. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Newsweek Magazine. 1963. “How ‘The System’ Works at GM.” February 25.
New York (State of) Assembly. Various years since 1855. Albany: State of New York.
Nice, David and Fredericksen, Patricia. 1995. The Politics of Intergovernmental Relations. 2nd ed. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
Nicodemus, Donald. 1969. The Democratic Church. Milwaukee, WI: Bruce Publishing.Google Scholar
Nicolaidis, Kalypso and Howse, Robert, eds. 2001. The Federal Vision. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nugent, Neill, ed. 2004. European Union Enlargement. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nystrom, Paul and Starbuck, William, eds. 1981. Handbook of Organizational Design. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Oakley, Francis. 1969. Council over Pope?New York: Herder and Herder.Google Scholar
Oakley, Francis 2003. The Conciliarist Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Oates, Wallace. 1972. Fiscal Federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Oates, Wallace 1977. “An Economist’s Perspective on Fiscal Federalism.” In The Political Economy of Fiscal Federalism, ed. Oates, Wallace. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Oberholzer-Gee, Felix and Strumpf, Koleman S.. 2002. “Endogeneous Policy Decen-tralization: Testing the Central Tenet of Economic Federalism.” Journal of Political Economy 110: 1–36.Google Scholar
O’Malley, John. 2008. What Happened at Vatican II. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
O’Malley, John 2010. A History of the Popes. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Onuf, Peter. 1983. The Origins of the Federal Republic. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Onuf, Peter and Matson, Cathy. 1990. A Union of Interests. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Onuf, Peter and Onuf, Nicholas. 1994. Federal Union, Modern World: The Law of Nations in an Age of Revolutions, 1776–1814. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Ordeshook, Peter and Niou, Emerson. 1998. “Alliance versus Federations: An Extension of Riker’s Analysis of Federal Formation.” Constitutional Political Economy 9:271–88.Google Scholar
Osborne, David. 1988. Laboratories of Democracy. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Ostrogorski, M. 1902. Democracy and the Organization of Political Parties, Vol. 1. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Vincent. 1991. The Meaning of American Federalism: Constituting a Self-Governing Society. San Francisco: Institute for Contemporary Studies.Google Scholar
Ottosen, Garry. 1992. Making American Government Work: A Proposal to Reinvigorate Federalism. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Pahre, Robert. 2005. “Formal Theory and Case Study Methods in EU Studies.” European Union Politics 6: 113–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panizza, Ugo. 1999. “On the Determinants of Fiscal Centralization: Theory and Evidence.” Journal of Public Economics 74(1): 97–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, Arthur C. [1916] 1991. “The Constitution of the Five Nations.” New York State Museum Bulletin No. 184.
Paterson, T. T. 1969. Management Theory. London: Business Publications.Google Scholar
Patterson, James. 1967. Congressional Conservatism and the New Deal. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press.Google Scholar
Patterson, James 1969. The New Deal and the States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul VI. 1965. Apostolic Letter for Establishing the Synod of Bishops for the Universal Church. Delivered September 15. Available at: (
Pelfrey, William. 2006. Billy, Alfred, and General Motors. New York: Amacom.Google Scholar
Peltason, J. W. 1986. Understanding the Constitution. 12th ed. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Penalver, Eduardo. 2005. “Promoting Democracy in the Church.” National Catholic Reporter May 27, p. 19.Google Scholar
Persson, Torsten and Tabellini, Guido. 1994. “Does Centralization Increase the Size of Government?European Economic Review 38: 765–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Persson, Torsten and Tabellini, Guido 2003. Economic Effects of Constitutions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Peters, Tom. 1988. Thriving on Chaos: Handbook for the Management Revolution. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Peterson, Paul. 1995. The Price of Federalism. Washington, DC: Brookings.Google Scholar
Peterson, Paul, Rabe, Barry, and Wong, Kenneth. 1986. When Federalism Works. Washington, DC: Brookings.Google Scholar
Petrocik, J. 1981. Party Coalitions: Realignments and the Decline of the New Deal Party System. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pfeffer, Jeffery. 1997. New Directions for Organization Theory: Problems and Prospects. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 1996. “The Path to European Integration – A Historical Institutionalist Analysis.” Comparative Political Studies 29(2): 123–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, Paul 2004. Politics in Time. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pius XI. 1931. Quadragesimo Anno. Delivered May 15. Available at:
Pollard, John F. 2005. Money and the Rise of the Modern Papacy: Financing the Vatican, 1850–1950. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Polsby, Nelson. 1968. “The Institutionalization of the U.S. House of Representatives.” American Political Science Review. 62(1): 144–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polsby, Nelson 1980. Community Power and Political Theory. 2nd ed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Posner, Eric and Vermeule, Adrian. 2011. The Executive Unbound. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potter, David and Fehrenbacher, Don. 1976. The Impending Crisis, 1848–1861. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Pound, Arthur. 1934. Turning the Wheel: The Story of General Motors through Twenty-Five Years, 1908–1933. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, Doran.Google Scholar
Qian, Yingyi and Weingast, Barry. 1997. “Federalism as a Commitment to Preserving Market Incentives.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 11(4): 83–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rakove, Jack. 1997. Original Meanings. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Ratner, Sidney. 1942. American Taxation: Its History as a Social Force in Democracy. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
Rauch, Basil. 1963. History of the New Deal, 1933–1938. New York: Capricorn Books.Google Scholar
Rector, Chad. 2009. Federations: The Political Dynamics of Cooperation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Reese, Thomas. 1989. Archbishop. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Reese, Thomas S. J. 1996. Inside the Vatican: The Politics and Organization of the Catholic Church. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Remini, Robert. 1988. The Life of Andrew Jackson. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Republican Party of the United States. 1956 Party Platform.
Rhode Island Manual. Various editions starting in 1889. Providence, RI: E. L. Freeman.
Richter, Daniel K. 1992. The Ordeal of the Longhouse: The People of the Iroquois League in the Era of European Colonization. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Riker, William. 1964. Federalism. Boston, MA: Little and Brown.Google Scholar
Riker, William 1980. “Implications from the Disequilibrium of Majority Rule for the Study of Institutions.” American Political Science Review. 74: 432–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riker, William H. 1987. The Development of American Federalism. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robbins, Stephen P. 1990. Organization Theory: Structure, Design and Applications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Rodden, Jonathan. 2004. “Comparative Federalism and Decentralization: On Meaning and Measurement.” Comparative Politics. July: 481–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodden, Jonathan 2006. Hamilton’s Paradox: The Promise and Peril of Fiscal Federalism. New York: Cambridge Press.Google Scholar
Roland, Gerard and Qian, Y.. 1998. “Federalism and the Soft Budget Constraint.” American Economic Review 88(5): 1143–62.Google Scholar
Root, Elihu. 1910. Letter to the Editor of the New York Times. March 1.
Rosen, Frederick. 1992. The Great Depression and the New Deal. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Co.Google Scholar
Rosenstone, Steven J., Lazarus, Edward H., and Behr, Roy L.. 1994. Third Parties in America: Citizen Response to Major Party Failure. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. [1762] 1978. On the Social Contract. New York: St. Martin’s.Google Scholar
Rubin, Edward and Feeley, Malcolm. 1994. “Federalism: Some Notes on a National Neurosis.” UCLA Law Review 41: 903–52.Google Scholar
Rubinstein, Saul and Kochan, Thomas. 2001. Learning from Saturn. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Russell, Peter, Knopff, Rainer, and Morton, Ted. 1989. Federalism and the Charter. Ottawa: Carleton University Press.Google Scholar
Safire, William, 2000. “Federalism: The Political Word that Means Its Opposite.” New York Times Magazine. January 30, p. 20.Google Scholar
Samuels, David. 2002. “Presidentialized Parties: The Separation of Powers and Party Organization and Behavior.” Comparative Political Studies 35: 461–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuels, David and Shugart, Matthew. 2010. Parties, Presidents, and Prime Ministers: How Separation of Powers Affects Party Organization and Behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawer, Geoffrey. 1969. Modern Federalism. London: C. A. Watts & Co. Ltd.Google Scholar
Scharfstein, David. 1988. “The Disciplinary Role of Takeovers.” Review of Economic Studies 55: 185–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharpf, Fritz. 1999. Governing in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schattschneider, E. E. [1960] 1975. The Semisovereign People. Hinsdale, IL: Dryden Press.Google Scholar
Scheiber, Harry. 1980. “Federalism and Legal Process.” Law & Society Review 14: 663–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheiber, Harry 1989. “Constitutional Structure and the Protection of Rights: Federalism and the Separation of Powers.” In Power Divided: Essays in the History and Practice of Federalism, eds. Scheiber, Harry and Feeley, Malcolm. Berkeley, CA: Institute for Governmental Studies.Google Scholar
Schelling, Thomas. 1978. Micromotives and Macrobehavior. New York: NortonGoogle Scholar
Schlesinger, Joseph. 1991. Political Parties and the Winning of Office. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Susanne. 2000. “Only an Agenda Setter? The European Commission’s Power over the Council of Ministers.”European Union Politics 1(1): 37–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, Arthur R. and Hoyman, Michele M.. 1984The Changing of the Guard: The New American Labor Leader.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 1(473): 64–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seabright, Paul. 1996. “Accountability and Decentralization in Government: An Incomplete Contracts Model.” European Economic Review 40:1161–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, G. W. 1974. The Counter Reformation. London: University of London Press.Google Scholar
Sewell, William H. Jr. 1996. “Three Temporalities: Toward an ‘Eventful’ Sociology.” In The Historical Turn in the Human Sciences, ed. McDonald, Terrence J.. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Sewell, William H. Jr. 2005. Logics of History: Social Theory and Social Transformation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shafer, Byron and Badger, Anthony, eds. 2001. Contesting Democracy: Substance and Structure in American Political History, 1775–2000. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Shafritz, Jay M. and Steven Ott, J.. 2001. Classics of Organization Theory. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Publishers.Google Scholar
Shapiro, David. 1995. Federalism: A Dialogue. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Sheehan, Robert. 1958. “G. M.’s Remodeled Management.” Fortune. November.
Shefter, Martin. 1994. Political Parties and the State: The American Historical Experience. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Shipan, Charles and Volden, Craig. 2006. “Bottom-up Federalism: The Diffusion of Antismoking Policies from U.S. Cities to States.” American Journal of Political Science 50(4): 825–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shipan, Charles and Volden, Craig 2008. “The Mechanisms of Policy Diffusion.” American Journal of Political Science 52(4): 840–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shugart, Matthew and Carey, John. 1992. Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siedentop, Larry. 2001. Democracy in Europe. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert. 1960. The New Science of Management Decision-Making. New York: Harper.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 1992. Protecting Soldiers and Mothers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda 1995. Social Policy in the United States: Future Possibilities in Historical Perspective. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda, Ganz, Marshall, and Munson, Ziad. 2000. “A Nation of Organizations.” The American Political Science Review 94(3): 527–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skowronek, Stephen. 1982. Building a New American State: The Expansion of National Administrative Capacities. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skowronek, Stephen 1997. Politics Presidents Make. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sloan, Alfred. 1964. My Years with General Motors. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Smiley, Donald V. 1988. “Public Sector Politics, Modernization and Federalism: The Canadian and American Experiences.” In Canadian Federalism: From Crisis to Constitution, eds. Waller, Harold, Sabetti, Filippo, and Elazar, Daniel. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Smith, Graham. 1995. “Mapping the Federal Condition: Ideology, Political Practice and Social Justice.” In Federalism: The Multiethnic Challenge, ed. Smith, Graham. London and New York: Longman Group Limited.Google Scholar
Spruyt, H. 1994. The Sovereign State and Its Competitors. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stanley, Robert. 1993. Dimensions of Law in the Service of Order: Origins of the Federal Income Tax. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Steinfels, Peter. 2003. A People Adrift: The Crisis of the Roman Catholic Church in America. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Stepan, A. 1999. “Federalism and Democracy: Beyond the U.S. Model.” Journal of Democracy 10(4): 19–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stepan, Alfred. 2001. “A New Comparative Politics of Federalism.” In Arguing Comparative Politics, ed. Stepan, Alfred. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, Joseph E. and Sah, Raaj K.. 1991. “The Quality of Managers in Centralized vs. Decentralized Organizations.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 106(1): 289–95.Google Scholar
Stone-Sweet, Alex and Sandholtz, W.. 1997. “European Integration and Supranational Governance.” Journal of European Public Policy 4(3): 297–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storey, R. 1959. “Diocesan Administration in the Fifteenth Century.” In Borthwick Papers 1959–62. London: St. Anthony’s Press, 16: 3–26.Google Scholar
Strumpf, Koleman and Oberholzer-Gee, Felix. 2002. “Endogenous Policy Decentralization: Testing the Central Tenet of Economic Federalism.” Journal of Political Economy 110: 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundquist, James. 1973. Dynamics of The Party System: Alignment and Realignment of Political Parties in the United States. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Sundquist, James 1983. Dynamics of the Party System: Alignment and Realignment of Political Parties in the United States, rev. ed. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Swindler, Leonard. 1996. Toward a Catholic Constitution. New York: Crossroad Publishing.Google Scholar
Sylla, Richard. 2000. “Experimental Federalism: The Economics of American Government, 1789–1914.” In The Cambridge Economic History of the United States: Volume II The Long Nineteenth Century, eds. Engerman, Stanley L. and Gallman, Robert E. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Alex, Erdman, Andrew, Martin, Justin, and Welsh, Tricia. 1992. “U.S. Cars Come Back.” Fortune, November 16.
Teaford, Jon C. 2002. The Rise of the States: Evolution of American State Government. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen. 2004. How Institutions Evolve: The Political Economy of Skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thatcher, Margaret. 1993. The Downing Street Years. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Tierney, Brian. 1955. Foundations of the Conciliar Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tillman, Erik. 2012. “Support for the Euro, Political Knowledge, and Voting Behavior in the 2001 and 2005 UK General Elections.” European Union Politics 13: 367–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 1990. Coercion, Capital, and European States, AD 990–1990. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tobin, Greg. 2003. Selecting the Pope. New York: Sterling.Google Scholar
Tommasi, Mariano. 2006. “Federalism in Argentina and the Reforms of the 1990s.” In Federalism and Economic Reform: International Perspectives, eds. Srinivasan, T.N. and Wallak, Jessica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tooker, Elisabeth, ed. 2001. An Iroquois Sourcebook. Vol 1. New York: Garland Publishing.Google Scholar
Triesman, Daniel. 1999. “Political Decentralization and Economic Reform: A Game Theoretic Analysis.” American Journal of Political Science 43(2): 488–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Triesman, Daniel 2006. “Explaining Fiscal Decentralization: Geography, Colonial History, Economic Development, and Political Institutions.” Journal of Commonwealth and Comparative Politics 44(3): 289–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Triesman, Daniel 2007. The Architecture of Government: Rethinking Political Decentralization. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsebelis, George. 2002. Veto Players. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsebelis, George and Garrett, Geoffrey. 2001. “The Institutional Foundations of Intergovernmentalism and Supranationalism in the European Union.” International Organization 55: 357–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsebelis, George and Money, Jeanette. 1997. Bicameralism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tullock, Gordon. 1994. The New Federalist. Vancouver: Fraser Institute.Google Scholar
United States Department of Labor. 1965. Union Constitutions and the Elections of Local Union Officers. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor.Google Scholar
United States Senate. 1913. “The Income Tax: Opinions of Hon. John K. Shields, Hon. Cordell Hull, and Thurlow Gordon.” Document 171, 63rd Congress, United States Senate. August 26.
Van Kersberen, K. and Verbeek, B.. 2004. “Subsidiarity as a Principle of Governance in the European Union.” Comparative European Politics 2(2): 142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Kersberen, K. and Verbeek, B. 2007. “The Politics of International Norms: Subsidiarity and the Imperfect Competence Regime of the European Union.” European Journal of International Relations 13(2): 217–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verdun, Amy. 2000. European Responses to Globalization and Financial Market Integration. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vietor, Richard. H. K. 2000. “Government Regulation of Business.” In The Cambridge Economic History of the United States: Volume III The Twentieth Century, eds. Engerman, Stanley L. and Gallman, Robert E. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Votewatch.eu. 2012. Publicly available European Parliament and European Council of Minister roll calls. Available at:
Wagner, A. 1958. “Three Extracts on Public Finance.” In Classics in the Theory of Public Finance, eds. Musgrave, R. A. and Peacock, A. P.. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Wallace, Helen and Wallace, William. 2000. Policy-Making in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wallis, John. 1991. “The Political Economy of New Deal Fiscal Federalism.” Economic Inquiry 29 (July): 510–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waltman, Jerold. 1985. Political Origins of the U.S. Income Tax. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi.Google Scholar
Ware, Alan. 1987. Citizens, Parties and the State. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Ware, Alan 1996. Political Parties and Party Systems. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wattenberg, M. P. 1991. The Rise of Candidate-Centered Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weingast, Barry. 1995. “The Economic Role of Political Institutions: Market-Preserving Federalism and Economic Growth. “ Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 11: 1–31.Google Scholar
Weingast, Barry 1998. “Political Stability and Civil War.” In Analytical Narratives, eds. Bates, Robert, Greif, Avner, Levi, Margaret, Rosenthal, Jean-Laurent, and Weingast, Barry, eds. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Weisman, Steven. 2002. The Great Tax Wars: Lincoln to Wilson. New York : Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alex. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheare, K. C. 1964. Federal Government. 4th ed. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Whitaker, R. 1992. A Sovereign Idea: Essays on Canada as a Democratic Community. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
White, G. Edward. 2000. The Constitution and the New Deal. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Whitman, Marina. 1999. New World, New Rules. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Wibbels, Erik. 2005a. “Decentralized Governance, Constitution Formation, and Redistribution.” Constitutional Political Economy 16: 161–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wibbels, Erik 2005b. Federalism and the Market. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wibbels, Erik 2006. “Madison in Baghdad? Decentralization and Federalism in Comparative Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science 9: 165–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilbourn, Beth. 1996. “Suffer the Children: Catholic Church Liability for the Sexual Abuse Acts of Priests.” The Review of Litigation 15: 251.Google Scholar
Wilde, Melissa. 2007. Vatican II: A Sociological Analysis of Religious Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, Oliver. 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, Richard. 1990. Reagan’s Federalism: His Efforts to Decentralize Government. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Witte, John. 1985. The Politics and Development of the Federal Income Tax. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Wittman, Donald. 1991. “Nations and States – Mergers and Acquisitions – Dissolutions and Divorce.” American Economic Review 81(2): 126–29.Google Scholar
Wood, Gordon. 1969. Creation of the American Republic. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Yanik, Anthony. 2009. Maxwell Motor and the Making of the Chrysler Corporation. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
Zald, Mayer, ed. 1970. Power in Organizations. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar
Zernov, Nicolas. 1961. Eastern Christendom. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
Ziblatt, Daniel. 2006. Structuring the State: The Formation of Germany and Italy and the Puzzle of Federalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zieger, Robert H. and Gall, Gilbert J.. 2002. American Workers, American Unions: The Twentieth Century. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Ken Kollman, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • Book: Perils of Centralization
  • Online publication: 05 June 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107337060.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Ken Kollman, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • Book: Perils of Centralization
  • Online publication: 05 June 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107337060.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Ken Kollman, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • Book: Perils of Centralization
  • Online publication: 05 June 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107337060.008
Available formats
×