Abel, R. (1974). “A Comparative Theory of Dispute Institutions in Society.” Law and Society Review 8(2): 217.
Abel, R. (ed.) (1982). “The Contradictions of Informal Justice,” in The Politics of Informal Justice: The American Experience, Vol. 1. New York, Academic Press, pp. 267–320.
Abel, R. (ed.) (1995). “What We Talk about When We Talk about Law,” in The Law & Society Reader. New York, London, New York University Press, pp. 1–12.
Abel, R. (2005). Comments on manuscript. Unpublished. On file with author.
,ADR-Chambers (1998a). ADR Chambers. http://www.adrchambers.com (last viewed August 8, 2008).
,ADR-Chambers (1998b). ADR Chambers: Mediation. Canada, ADR Chambers. http://www.adrchambers.com/mediationintro.htm (last viewed August 8, 2008).
Alberstein, M. (2002). Pragmatism and the Law: From Philosophy to Dispute Resolution. Aldershot, Ashgate.
Alexander, N. (2002). “Global Trends in Mediation.” World Arbitration and Mediation Report 13: 272.
Alfieri, A. (1991). “Reconstructive Poverty Law Practice: Learning Lessons of Client Narrative.” The Yale Law Journal 100: 2107.
Anderson, V. A. (2003) “Alternative Dispute Resolution and Professional Responsibility in South Carolina: A Changing Landscape.” South Carolina Law Review 55: 191.
,Attorney-General-of-Ontario (1999). Regulation to Amend Regulation 194 of the Revised Regulations of Ontario 1990 Made under the Courts of Justice Act. Ministry of the Attorney General of Ontario. http://www.attorneygeneral. jus.gov.on.ca/english/courts/manmed/notice.asp (last viewed August 8, 2008).
Auerbach, J. (1983). Justice without Law?New York, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Babcock, L. and Laschever, S. (2003). Women Don't Ask: Negotiation and the Gender Divide. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.
Baldwin, J. (1997). Monitoring the Rise of the Small Claims Limit: Litigants' Experiences of Different Forms of Adjudication. Oxford, Clarendon Press.
Bales, R. F. (1951). Interaction Process Analysis. Cambridge, MA, Addison-Wesley Press, Inc.
Banakar, R. (2003). Merging Law and Sociology. Glienicke, Berlin, Madison, WI, Galda+Wilch Verlag.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, London, Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. and Walters, R. (1963). Social Learning and Personality Development. New York, Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Barrett-Howard, E. and Tyler, T. (1986). “Procedural Justice as a Criterion in Allocation Decisions.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50: 296.
Bartlett, K. T. (1990). “Feminist Legal Methods.” Harvard Law Review 103: 829.
Barton, T. D. (1999). “Therapeutic Jurisprudence, Preventive Law, and Creative Problem Solving: An Essay on Harnessing Emotion and Human Connection.” Psychology, Public Policy and Law 5: 921.
Baruch Bush, R. (1997). “What Do We Need a Mediator For?: Mediation's ‘Value-Added’ for Negotiators.” Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 12: 1.
Burns, T. (1992). Erving Goffman. London. Routeledge.
Bush, R. B. and Folger, J. (1994). The Promise of Mediation: Responding to Conflict through Empowerment and Recognition. San Francisco, CA, Jossey-Bass.
Bell, S. and Richard, L. (1992). “Anatomy of a Lawyer: Personality and Long-Term Career Satisfaction,” in Full Disclosure: Do You Really Want to Be a Lawyer?Princeton, NJ, Peterson's Guides, pp. 150–62.
Bentham, J. (1843). “Scottish Reform,” in The Works of Jeremy Bentham (Bowring, S. J., ed.) Vol. 5. Edinburgh, William Tate, pp. 1–54.
Bernstein, B. (1971). Class, Codes and Control. London, Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Bethel, , , C. A. and Singer, L. R. (1982). “Mediation: A New Remedy for Cases of Domestic Violence.” Vermont Law Review 7: 15.
Bibas, S. and Bierschbach, R. A. (2004). “Integrating Remorse and Apology into Criminal Procedure.” Yale Law Journal 114(October): 85.
Binder, D., Bergman, P. and Price, S. (1991). Lawyers as Counselors: A Client-Centered Approach. St. Paul, West Coast Publishing Company.
Binder, D. and Price, S. (1977). Legal Interviewing and Counseling: A Client Centered Approach. St. Paul, MN, West Publishing Company.
Bingham, L., Kim, K. and Raines, S. S. (2002). “Exploring the Role of Representation in Employment Mediation at the USPS.” Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 17: 341.
Birke, R. (2000). “Evaluation and Facilitation: Moving Past Either/Or.” Journal of Dispute Resolution 2000: 309.
Bloch, M. (1974). “Symbols, Song, Dance and Features of Articulation: Is Religion an Extreme Form of Traditional Authority?” European Archives of Sociology 15: 55.
Boettger, U. (2004). “Efficiency Versus Party Empowerment – Against a Good-Faith Requirement in Mandatory Mediation.” Review of Litigation 23: 1.
Bogoch, B. (1997). “Gendered Lawyering: Difference and Dominance in Lawyer-Client Interaction.” Law and Society Review 31: 677.
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1990). The Logic of Practice. Cambridge, Polity.
Bowman, C. (1999). “Women and the Legal Profession.” American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy and Law 7: 149.
Brest, P. (2000). “Skeptical Thoughts: Integrating Problem Solving into Legal Curriculum Faces Uphill Climb.” A. B. A. Dispute Resolution Magazine 20(Summer): 20.
Brinig, M. (1995). “Does Mediation Systematically Disadvantage Women?” William & Mary Journal of Women & the Law 2(Fall): 1.
Brown, H. and Simanowitz, A. (1995). “Alternative Dispute Resolution and Mediation.” Quality in Health Care 4(2): 151.
Brown, W. (1996). “Constitutions and ‘Survivor Stories': In the ‘Folds of Our Own Discourse’ the Pleasures and Freedoms of Silence.” University of Chicago Law School Roundtable 3: 185.
Bruner, J. (1992). “A Psychologist and the Law.” New York Law School Law Review 37: 173.
Bryan, P. (1992). “Killing Us Softly: Divorce Mediation and the Politics of Power.” Buffalo Law Review 40: 441.
Bush, R. A. B. and Folger, J. P. (1994). The Promise of Mediation: Responding to Conflict through Empowerment and Recognition. San Francisco, CA, Jossey-Bass.
Bush, R. B. (1997). “What Do We Need a Mediator For?: Mediation's ‘Value-Added’ for Negotiators.” Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 12: 1.
Cahn, N. R. (1992). “Theoretics of Practice: The Integration of Progressive Thought and Action: Styles of Lawyering.” Hastings Law Journal 43: 1039, 1050–54.
Caldon, D. T. (1999). Medical Malpractice Disputes in the Age of Managed Care. Malibu, CA, Strauss Institute for Dispute Resolution, Mediation Information and Resource Center (MIRC). www.mediate.com/articles/caldon.cfm?plain=t (last viewed August 9, 1999).
Cameron, J. (1999). “Adjusting the Scales of Justice.” Canadian Insurance June 18, 1999.
Campbell, C. (1976). “Lawyers and Their Public,” in Lawyers in Their Social Setting (MacCormick, D., ed.). Edinburgh, Green & Son Ltd., p. 209.
Casper, J. (1978). “Having Their Day in Court: Defendant Evaluations of the Fairness of Their Treatment.” Law and Society Review 12: 237.
Casper, J. E. A. (1988). “Procedural Justice in Felony Cases.” Law and Society Review 22: 483.
Christiansen, V. (1997). “The Role of Reconciliation in the Mediation Process: Lessons from a Traditional Chinese Village.” Dispute Resolution Journal 52(Fall): 66.
Clement, , , J. A. and Schwebel, A. I. (1993). “A Research Agenda for Divorce Mediation: The Creation of Second Order Knowledge to Inform Legal Policy.” Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 9: 95.
,= Canadian Medical Protection Association (1999). What Is the CMPA? The Canadian Medical Protection Association. www.cmpa.org/english/whatis-e.cfm (last viewed August 12, 1999).
Cobb, S. (1997). “The Domestication of Violence in Mediation.” Law and Society Review 31(3): 397.
Cohen, A. (2003). “Gender: An (Un)Useful Category of Prescriptive Negotiation Analysis?”Texas Journal of Women and the Law 13: 169.
Comaroff, J. L. (1975). “Talking Politics: Oratory and Authority in a Tswana Chiefdom,” in Political Language and Oratory in Traditional Society (Bloch, M., ed.). London and New York, Academic Press, pp. 141–61.
Comaroff, J. L. and Roberts, S. (1981). Rules and Processes: The Cultural Logic of Dispute in an African Context. Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press.
Conley, J. and O'Barr, W. (1988). “Hearing the Hidden Agenda: The Ethnographic Investigation of Procedure.” Law and Contemporary Problems 51(4): 181.
Conley, J. and O'Barr, W. (1990). Rules Versus Relationships: The Ethnography of Legal Discourse. Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press.
,CPSO (1999a). General College Information. The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario. http://www.cpso.on.ca/about_the_college/geninfo.htm (last viewed August 8, 2008).
,CPSO (1999b). Complaints Against Md's. The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario. http://www.cpso.on.ca/Info_Public/factcomp.htm (last viewed on August 8, 2008).
Craver, C. B. and Barnes, D. W. (1999). “Gender, Risk Taking and Negotiation Performance.” Michigan Journal of Gender and Law 5: 299.
Crawford, M. (1996). “Rent-a-Judge Business Taking Flight in Ontario.” The Financial Post, Toronto, 8.
Cunningham, C. (1989). A Tale of Two Clients: Thinking about Law as Language. Michigan Law Review, 87: 2459.
Cunningham, C. (1992). “The Lawyer as Translator, Representation as Text: Towards an Ethnography of Legal Discourse.” Cornell Law Review 77: 1298.
Currie, C. (1998). “Mediation and Medical Practice Disputes.” Mediation Quarterly 15(3): 215.
Daicoff, S. (1997). “Lawyer, Know Thyself: A Review of Empirical Research on Attorney Attributes Bearing on Professionalism.” American University Law Review 46: 1337.
Daicoff, S. (1998). “Asking Leopards to Change Their Spots: Should Lawyers Change? A Critique of Solutions to Problems with Professionalism by Reference to Empirically-Derived Attorney Personality Attributes.” The Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics 11: 547.
Damaska, M. (1986). The Faces of Justice and State Authority: A Comparative Approach to the Legal Process. New Haven, CT, Yale University Press.
Daniel, A. E., Burn, R. J. and Horarik, S. (1999). “Patients' Complaints about Medical Practice.” Medical Journal of Australia 170: 598–602.
Dauer, E. and Marcus, L. (1997). “Adapting Mediation to Link Resolution of Medical Malpractice Disputes with Health Care Quality Improvement.” Law and Contemporary Problems 60(1–2): 185.
Davis, P. (1991). “Contextual Legal Criticism: A Demonstration Exploring Hierarchy and ‘Feminine’ Style.” New York University Law Review 66: 1635.
Deason, E. (2001). “Reply: The Quest for Uniformity in Mediation Confidentiality: Foolish Consistency or Crucial Predictability?”Marquette Law Review 85(Fall): 79.
Delgado, R., Dunn, C. and Hubbert, D. (1985). “Fairness and Formality: Minimizing the Risk of Prejudice in Alternative Dispute Resolution.” Wisconsin Law Review 6: 1359–404.
Des Rosiers, N., Feldthusen, B. and Hankivsky, O. (1998). “Legal Compensation for Sexual Violence: Therapeutic Consequences and Consequences for the Judicial System.” Psychology, Public Policy and Law 4(1–2): 433.
Dingwall, R., Greatbatch, D. and Ruggerone, L. (1998). “Gender and Interaction in Divorce Mediation.” Mediation Quarterly 15(4): 277.
Dingwall, R. (1988). “Empowerment or Enforcement? Some Questions about Power and Control in Divorce Mediation,” in Divorce, Mediation and the Legal Process (Dingwall, R. and Eekelaar, J. M., eds.). Oxford, UK, Clarendon, pp. 150–67.
,Dispute-Resolution (1999). Dispute Resolution Home Page. www.dispres.com (last viewed September 17, 1999).
DuBois, E. C., Dunlap, M. C., Gilligan, C. J. and Menkel-Meadow, C. J. (1985). “Feminist Discourse, Moral Values, and the Law – A Conversation.” Buffalo Law Review 34(1): 11.
Dubow, F. L. and McEwen, C. (1993). “Community Boards: An Analytic Profile,” in The Possibility of Popular Justice: A Case Study of Community Mediation in the United States (Merry, S. and Milner, N., eds.). Ann Arbor, MI, University of Michigan Press, pp. 125–68.
Duryee, M. (1992a). “Mandatory Mediation: Myth and Reality.” Family and Conciliation Courts Review 30: 507.
Duryee, M. (1992b). “Mandatory Court Mediation: Demographic Summary and Consumer Evaluation of One Court Service.” Family and Conciliaiton Courts Review 30: 260.
Easterbrook, J. (1996). “Resolving Health Care Disputes.” Solicitors Journal 140(16): 410.
Edwards, H. T. (1986). “Commentary: Alternative Dispute Resolution: Panacea or Anathema?” Harvard Law Review 99: 668.
Eichner, M. (2001). “On Postmodern Feminist Legal Theory.” Harvard Civil Rights – Civil Liberties Law Review 36(Winter): 1.
Ellman, S. (1993). “The Ethic of Care as an Ethic for Lawyers.” Georgetown Law Journal 81(August): 2665.
Engel, D. (1984). “The Oven Bird's Song: Insiders, Outsiders and Personal Injuries in an American Community.” Law and Society Review 18(4): 551.
Epstein, C. F. (1988). Deceptive Distinctions: Sex, Gender, and the Social Order. New Haven, CT, Yale University Press.
Evans, M. (2001). “Women and Mediation: Toward a Formulation of an Interdisciplinary Empirical Model to Determine Equity in Dispute Resolution.” Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 17(1): 145.
Ewick, P. and Silbey, S. (1998). The Common Place of Law. Chicago, IL, Chicago University Press.
Eyster, M. J. (1996). “Clinical Teaching, Ethical Negotiation, and Moral Judgment.” Nebraska Law Review 75: 752.
Farber, H. S. and White, M. J. (1994). “A Comparison of Formal and Informal Dispute Resolution in Medical Malpractice.” Journal of Legal Studies 23(2): 777.
Farber, S. R. and Rickenberg, M. (1999). “Under-Confident Women and Over-Confident Men: Gender and Sense of Competence in a Simulated Negotiation.” Yale Journal of Law and Feminism 11: 271.
Fassnacht, G. (1982). Theory and Practice of Observing Behavior. London, Academic Press.
Felstiner, W., Abel, R. and Sarat, A. (1980–81). “The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming Claiming.” Law and Society Review 15(3–4): 631.
Felstiner, W. and Sarat, A. (1992). “Enactments of Power: Negotiating Reality and Responsibility in Lawyer-Client Interactions.” Cornell Law Review 77: 1447.
Ferris, L. (2004). “Using Therapeutic Jurisprudence and Preventive Law to Examine Disputants' Best Interests in Mediating Cases About Physicians' Practices: A Guide for Medical Regulators.” Medicine and Law 23: 183.
Fineman, M. (1988). “Dominant Discourse, Professional Language, and Legal Change in Child Custody Decisionmaking.” Harvard Law Review 101: 727.
Fiss, O. (1964). “Against Settlement.” Yale Law Journal 93: 1073.
Flick, U. (1992). “Triangulation Revisited – Strategy of Validation or Alternative?” Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior 22(2): 175.
Folberg, J., Golann, D., Kloppenberg, L. and Stipanowich, T. (2005). Resolving Disputes: Theory, Practice, and Law. New York, Aspen Publishers.
Folberg, J. and Taylor, A. (1984). Mediation: A Comprehensive Guide to Resolving Conflicts without Litigation. San Francisco, CA, Jossey-Bass.
Folger, J. P. and Bush, R. A. B. (1996). “Transformative Mediation and Third-Party Intervention: Ten Hallmarks of a Transformative Approach to Practice.” Mediation Quarterly 13: 263.
Forehand, S. (1999). “Note & Comment: Helping the Medicine Go Down: How a Spoonful of Mediation Can Alleviate the Problems of Medical Malpractice Litigation.” Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 14: 907.
Foucault, M. (1981). The History of Sexuality. Harmondsworth, Penguin Books.
Fuller, L. L. (1971). “Mediation: Its Forms and Functions.” South California Law Review 44: 305.
Fuller, L. L. (1978). “The Forms and Limits of Adjudication.” Harvard Law Review 92: 353.
Galanter, M. (1974). “Why the ‘Haves' Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change.” Law and Society Review 9: 95.
Galanter, M. (1986). “The Day after the Litigation Explosion.” Maryland Law Review 46: 3.
Galanter, M. and Cahill, M. (1994). “‘Most Cases Settle’: Judicial Promotion and Regulation of Settlements.” Stanford Law Review 46(6): 1339.
Galton, E. (1994). Representing Clients in Mediation. Dallas, TX, American Lawyer Media.
Garfinkel, H. (1984). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge, Polity.
Gaskell, G. and Bauer, M. (2000). Social Research Design Course – Mi421. London, London School of Economics Methodology Institute. Unpublished lecture series.
Gatter, R. (2004). “Institutionally Sponsored Mediation and the Emerging Medical Trust Movement in the U.S.” Medicine and Law 23: 201.
Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures. New York, Basic Books.
Genn, H. (1995). “Access to Just Settlements: The Case of Medical Negligence,” in Reform of Civil Procedure: Essays on “Access to Justice” (Zuckerman, A. and Cranston, R., eds.). New York, Oxford, Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press, pp. 393–412.
Genn, H. (1999). Paths to Justice: What People Do and Think about Going to Law. Oxford, Hart.
Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge, Polity Press.
Gilkerson, C. (1992). “Poverty Law Narratives: The Critical Practice and Theory of Receiving and Translating Client Stories.” Hastings Law Journal 43: 861.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.
Gitchell, R. L. and Plattner, A. (1999). “Mediation: A Viable Alternative to Litigation for Medical Malpractice Cases.” Depaul Journal of Health Care Law 2(3): 421.
Glasser, C. and Roberts, S. (1993). “Dispute Resolution: Civil Justice and Its Alternatives: Introduction.” Modern Law Review 56(3): 277.
Goffman, E. (1961a). Asylums. Harmondsworth, Penguin.
Goffman, E. (1961b). Encounters: Two Studies in the Sociology of Interaction. Indianapolis, IN, Bobbs-Merill.
Goffman, E. (1971). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Harmondsworth, Penguin.
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York, Harper and Row.
Golann, D. (2000). “Variations in Mediation: How – and Why – Legal Mediators Change Styles in the Course of a Case.” Journal of Dispute Resolution 2000: 41.
Golann, D. (2002). “Is Legal Mediation a Process of Repair – or Separation? An Empirical Study, and Its Implications.” Harvard Negotiation Law Review 7(Spring): 301.
Gold, N. (1991). “Considering Dispute Resolution: A Research Prospectus,” in A Handbook of Dispute Resolution: ADR in Action (Mackie, K., ed.). London, New York, Routeledge and Sweet& Maxwell, pp. 267–77.
Goldberg, S. B., Sander, F. E. A. and Rogers, N. H. (1999). Dispute Resolution: Negotiation, Mediation and Other Processes. Gaithersburg, MD, Aspen Law & Business.
Goldberg, S., Sander, F. and Rogers, N. (eds.) (1992). Dispute Resolution Negotiation, Mediation, and Other Processes. Boston, Little Brown and Company.
Gordon, E. (2000). “Attorneys' Negotiation Strategies in Mediation: Business as Usual?” Mediation Quarterly 17(4): 377.
Gordon, E. E. (1999). “Why Attorneys Support Mandatory Mediation.” Judicature 82: 224.
Griffiths, J. (1986). “What Do Dutch Lawyers Actually Do in Divorce Cases?” Law and Society Review 20: 135.
Grillo, T. (1991). “The Mediation Alternative: Process Dangers for Women.” Yale Law Journal 100(6): 1545.
Gulliver, P. (1979). Disputes and Negotiations: A Cross-Cultural Perspective. London, Academic Press.
Guthrie, C. (2001). “The Lawyer's Philosophical Map and the Disputant's Perceptual Map: Impediments to Facilitative Mediation and Lawyering.” Harvard Negotiation Law Review 6(Spring): 145.
Guthrie, C. (2002). “Symposium: Procedural Justice Research and the Paucity of Trials.” Journal of Dispute Resolution 2002: 127.
Habermas, J. (1981). The Theory of Communicative Action. Boston, Beacon, Cambridge, Polity.
Hafner, J. and Fakouri, M. E. (1984). “Early Recollections of Individuals Preparing for Careers in Clinical Psychology, Dentistry, and Law.” Journal of Vocational Behavior 24: 236.
Hampshire, S. (1999). Justice Is Conflict. London, Duckworth.
Harnick, C. (1997). Improving Access to Our Courts: Notes for Remarks by Attorney General Charles Harnick. Canadian Bar Association – Ontario. Stitt Feld Handy Houston. http://www.adr.ca/news/harnick013197.asp (last viewed August 13, 1999).
Hart, H. M., Jr. and Sacks, A. (1994). The Legal Process: Basic Problems in the Making and Application of Law. Westbury, NY, Foundation Press.
Hensler, D. (1999). “A Research Agenda: What We Need to Know about Court-Connected ADR.” Dispute Resolution Magazine 6(1): 15.
Hensler, D. (2003). “Our Courts, Ourselves: How the Alternative Dispute Resolution Movement Is Re-Shaping Our Legal System.” Penn State Law Review 108(Summer): 165.
Hickson, G., Clayton, E., Githens, P. and Sloan, F. (1992). “Factors That Prompted Families to File Medical Malpractice Claims Following Perinatal Injuries.” JAMA 267(10): 1359.
Hill, E. (1990). “Alternative Dispute Resolution in a Feminist Voice.” Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 5: 337.
Hinshaw, L. and Forbes, G. (1993). “Attitudes toward Women and Approaches to Conflict Resolution in College Students in Spain and the United States.” Journal of Social Psychology 133: 865.
Hobbs, T. and Gable, G. (1998). Coping with Litigation Stress. Physician's News Digest. http://192.41.26.254/law/198.html (last viewed August 20, 1999).
Hosticka, C. (1979). “We Don't Care about What Happened, We Only Care about What Is Going to Happen: Lawyer–Client Negotiations of Reality.” Social Problems 265: 599.
Hughes, S. H. (1998). “A Closer Look: The Case for a Mediation Privilege Has Not Been Made.” Dispute Resolution Magazine 5(Winter): 14.
Hunting, R. and Neuwirth, G. (1962). Who Sues in New York City?New York, Columbia University Press.
Janoff, S. (1991). “The Influence of Legal Education on Moral Reasoning.” Minnesota Law Review 76: 193.
Johnson, S. M. (1997). “A Medical Malpractice Litigator Proposes Mediation.” Dispute Resolution Journal 52(2): 42.
Jones, G. T. (2003). “Fighting Capitulation: A Research Agenda for the Future of Dispute Resolution.” Penn State Law Review 108(Summer): 277.
Kandel, R. (1994). “Power Plays: A Sociolinguistic Study of Inequality in Child Custody Mediation and a Hearsay Analog Solution.” Arizona Law Review 36: 879.
Kelly, J. and Duyree, M. (1995). “Women's and Men's Views of Mediation in Voluntary and Mandatory Mediation Settings.” Family and Conciliation Courts Review 30(1): 35.
Kelly, J. B. (1989). “Mediated and Adversarial Divorce: Respondents' Perceptions of Their Processes and Outcomes.” Mediation Quarterly 24(December): 71–87.
King, C. (1994). “Are Justice and Harmony Mutually Exclusive? A Response to Professor Nader.” Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 10: 65.
Klein, K. (2005). “A Judicial Mediator's Perspective: The Impact of Gender on Dispute Resolution: Mediation as a Different Voice.” North Dakota Law Review 81: 771.
Kolb, D. M. (1991). “Women's Work: Peacemaking Behind the Organizational Scene,” in The Dialectics of Disputing: New Perspectives in Organization Conflict (Kolb, D. and Bartunek, J., eds.). Newbury Park, CA, Sage, pp. 64–93.
Kolb, D. M. (1993). “Her Place at the Table: Gender and Negotiation,” in Negotiation: Strategies for Mutual Gain (Hall, L., ed.). Newbury Park, London, Sage, pp. 138–51.
Kolb, D. M. (2000). “More Than Just a Footnote: Constructing a Theoretical Framework for Teaching about Gender in Negotiation.” Negotiation Journal 16(4): 347.
Kolb, D. M. (2003). Negotiation Overview. Reader in Gender, Work and Organization (Ely, R. J., Foldy, E. G., and Scully, M. A., eds.). Maldon, MA, Blackwell Publishing, pp. 101–7.
Kolb, D. M. and Coolidge, G. G. (1988). “Her Place at the Table: A Consideration of Gender Issues in Negotiation,” in The Program on Negotiation Working Paper Series 88-5. Boston, Harvard Law School.
Kolb, D. M. and Putnam, L. L. (1997). “Through the Looking Glass: Negotiation Theory Refracted through the Lens of Gender,” in Workplace Dispute Resolution: Directions for the Twenty-First Century (Gleason, S. E., ed.). East Lansing, Michigan State University Press, pp. 231–47.
Kolb, D. M. and Williams, J. (2000). The Shadow Negotiation: How Women Can Master the Hidden Agendas That Determine Bargaining Success. New York, Simon & Schuster.
Kolb, D. M. and Williams, J. (2003). Everyday Negotiation: Navigating the Hidden Agendas in Bargaining. San Francisco, CA, Jossey-Bass.
Kolb, D., Williams, J. and Frohlinger, C. (2004). Her Place at the Table: A Woman's Guide to Negotiating Five Key Challenges to Leadership Success. San Francisco, CA, Jossey-Bass.
Korobkin, R. and Guthrie, C. (1997). “Psychology, Economics and Settlement: A New Look at the Role of the Lawyer.” Texas Law Review 76: 77.
Kovach, K. (1997). “Good Faith in Mediation: Requested, Recommended or Required: A New Ethic.” South Texas Law Review 38: 575.
Kovach, K. (2001). “New Wine Requires New Wineskins: Transforming Lawyer Ethics for Effective Representation in a Non-Adversarial Approach to Problem Solving: Mediation.” Fordham Urban Law Journal 28(April): 935.
Kovach, K. (2003). “Lawyer Ethics Must Keep Pace with Practice: Plurality in Lawyering Roles Demands Diverse and Innovative Ethical Standards.” Idaho Law Review 39: 399.
Kovach, K. and Love, L. (1998). “Mapping Mediation: The Risks of Riskin's Grid.” Harvard Negotiation Law Review 3: 71.
Kritzer, H. (1984). “The Dimensions of Lawyer-Client Relations: Notes Toward a Theory and a Field Study.” American Bar Foundation Research Journal 9(2, Spring): 409–25.
Kritzer, H. (1990). The Justice Broker: Lawyers and Ordinary Litigation. New York, Oxford University Press.
Kritzer, H. (1998). “Contingent-Fee Lawyers and Their Clients: Settlement Expectations, Settlement Realities, and Issues of Control in the Lawyer-Client Relationship.” Law and Social Inquiry 23: 795.
Lacey, N. (2002). Theoretical Paradigms in Legal Research Lecture Series. London, London School of Economics. Unpublished.
LaFree, G. and Rack, C. (1996). “The Effects of Participants' Ethnicity and Gender on Monetary Outcomes in Mediated and Adjudicated Civil Cases.” Law and Society Review 30: 767.
Lande, J. (1997). “How Will Lawyering and Mediation Practices Transform Each Other?”Florida State University Law Review 24: 839.
Lande, J. (2000). “Toward More Sophisticated Mediation Theory.” Journal of Dispute Resolution 2000: 321.
Lande, J. (2002). “Using Dispute System Design Methods to Promote Good-Faith Participation in Court-Connected Mediation Programs.” UCLA Law Review 50: 69.
Lawrence, J. (2000). “Mediation Advocacy: Partnering with the Mediator.” Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 15: 425.
Lees, D. (1998). “Justice out of Court: With Our Legal System Clogged with Civil Litigants and Costs Spiralling out of Control, Canadian Firms Have Learnt a Lesson from Their U.S. Counterparts: Mediation Really Is the Better Way.” The Financial Post22–34.
Lehman, W. (1978). “The Pursuit of a Client's Interests.” Michigan Law Review 77: 1078.
Lemert, C. and Branaman, A. (eds.) (1997). The Goffman Reader. Malden, Blackwell Publishers.
Levin, M. S. (2001). “The Propriety of Evaluative Mediation: Concerns about the Nature and Quality of an Evaluative Opinion.” Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 16: 267.
Liebman, C. B. (2000). “Mediation as Parallel Seminars: Lessons from the Student Takeover of Columbia University's Hamilton Hall.” Negotiation Journal 16: 157.
Lind, E. A. (1998). “Procedural Justice, Disputing, and Reactions to Legal Authorities,” in Everyday Practices and Trouble Cases (Sarat, A., Constable, M., Engel, D., Hans, V. and Lawrence, S., eds.). Evanston, Northwestern University Press, pp. 177–98.
Lind, E. A., Lissak, R. I. and Conlon, D. E. (1983). “Decision Control and Process Control Effects on Procedural Fairness Judgments”Journal of Applied Social Psychology 13: 338.
Lind, E. A., MacCoun, R., Ebener, P. A., Felstiner, W. L. F., Hensler, D. R., Resnik, J. and Tyler, T. (1989). The Perception of Justice: Tort Litigants' Views of Trial, Court-Annexed Arbitration, and Judicial Settlement Conferences. Santa Monica, Rand Institute for Civil Justice.
Lind, E. A., Maccoun, R. J., Ebener, P. A., Felstiner, W. L. F., Hensler, D. R., Resnik, J. and Tyler, T. R. (1990). “In the Eye Of The Beholder: Tort Litigants' Evaluations of Their Experiences in the Civil Justice System.” Law and Society Review 24: 953.
Lind, E. A., Kray, L. and Thompson, L. (1998). “The Social Construction of Injustice: Fairness Judgments in Response to Own and Others' Unfair Treatment by Authorities.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 75: 1–22.
Lind, E. A. and Tyler, T. (1988). The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. London, Plenum Press.
Love, L. P. and Boskey, J. B. (1997). “Should Mediators Evaluate? A Debate between Lela P. Love and James B. Boskey.” Cardozo Online Journal of Conflict Resolution 1: 96.
Love, L. P. and Kovach, K. K. (2000). “ADR: An Eclectic Array of Processes, Rather Than One Eclectic Process.” Journal of Dispute Resolution 2000(2): 295.
Lowry, L. R. (2000). “Training Mediators for the 21st Century: To Evaluate or Not: That Is Not the Question!”Family and Conciliation Courts Review 38: 48.
Lowry, M. (1983). “Law School Socialization and the Perversion of Mediation in the United States.” Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice 3: 245.
Macaulay, S. (1979). “Lawyers and Consumer Protection Laws.” Law and Society Review 14: 115.
Macfarlane, J. (November 1995). Court-Based Mediation of Civil Cases: An Evaluation of the Ontario Court (General Division) ADR Centre. Toronto, Queen's Printer for Ontario.
Macfarlane, J. (2001). “What Does the Changing Culture of Legal Practice Mean for Legal Education?”Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice 20: 191.
Macfarlane, J. (2002). “Culture Change? A Tale of Two Cities and Mandatory Court-Connected Mediation.” Journal of Dispute Resolution 2002(2): 241.
Macfarlane, J. and Keet, M. (2004–5). “Civil Justice Reform and Mandatory Civil Mediation in Saskatchewan: Lessons from a Maturing Program.” Alberta Law Review 42: 677.
MacKinnon, C. (1987). Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law. Cambridge, MA, London, Harvard University Press.
Macleod, L. H., Fleischmann, E. H. and Demelo, A. (1998). “The Future of Alternative Dispute Resolution in Ontario: Mechanics of the Mandatory Mediation Programs.” Advocates' Quarterly 20: 389.
Maiman, R. J., Mather, L. and McEwen, C. A. (1992). “Gender and Specialization in the Practice of Divorce Law.” Maine Law Review 44: 39.
Manning, P. (1992). Erving Goffman and Modern Sociology. New York, Polity Press.
Margulies, P. (1990). “‘ Who Are You to Tell Me That?’: Attorney-Client Deliberation Regarding Nonlegal Issues and the Interests of Nonclients.” North Carolina Law Review 68: 213.
Maslow Cohen, J. (1990). “Feminism and Adaptive Heroinism: The Paradigm of Portia as a Means of Introduction.” Tulsa Law Journal 25: 657.
Mather, L. and Yngvesson, B. (1980–81). “Language, Audience, and the Transformation of Disputes.” Law and Society Review 15(3–4): 775.
Mather, L. M., McEwen, C. A. and Maiman, R. J. (2001). Divorce Lawyers at Work: Varieties of Professionalism in Practice. New York, Oxford University Press.
Maute, J. (1987). “Sporting Theory of Justice: Taming Adversarial Zeal with a Logical Sanctions Doctrine.” Connecticut Law Review 20: 7.
Maute, J. (2002). “Lady Lawyers: Not an Oxymoron.” Tulsa Law Review 38(Fall): 159.
McAdoo, B. (2002). “A Report to the Minnesota Supreme Court: The Impact of Rule 114 on Civil Litigation Practice in Minnesota.” Hamline Law Review 25: 401.
McAdoo, B. (2007). “All Rise, the Court Is in Session: What Judges Say about Court-Connected Mediation.” Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 22: 377.
McAdoo, B. and Hinshaw, A. (2002). “The Challenge of Institutionalizing Alternative Dispute Resolution: Attorney Perspectives on the Effect of Rule 17 on Civil Litigation in Missouri.” Missouri Law Review 67(Summer): 473.
McCabe, K. (2001). “A Forum for Women's Voices: Mediation through a Feminist Jurisprudential Lens.” Northern Illinois University Law Review 21: 459.
McDermott, E. P. and Obar, R. (2004). “‘What's Going on’ in Mediation: An Empirical Analysis of the Influence of a Mediator's Style on Party Satisfaction and Monetary Benefit.” Harvard Negotiation Law Review 9(Spring): 75.
McEwen, C. (1995). “Bring in the Lawyers: Challenging the Dominant Approaches to Ensuring Fairness in Divorce Mediation.” Minnesota Law Review 79: 1317.
McEwen, C., Mather, L. and Maiman, R. (1994). “Lawyers, Mediation, and the Management of Divorce Practice.” Law and Society Review 28: 149.
McEwen, C., Rogers, N. and Maiman, R. (1995). “Bring in the Lawyers: Challenging the Dominant Approaches to Ensuring Fairness in Divorce Mediation.” Minnesota Law Review 79: 1317.
McEwen, C. A. and Wissler, R. L. (2002). “Finding Out If It Is True: Comparing Mediation and Negotiation through Research.” Journal of Dispute Resolution 2002: 131.
McGillis, D. (1997). Community Mediation Programs: Developments and Challenges, National Institute of Justice. U.S. Department of Justice. www.ncjrs.org/txtfiles/165698.txt (last viewed February 25, 2005).
Menkel-Meadow, C. (1984). “Toward Another View of Legal Negotiation: The Structure of Problem Solving.” UCLA Law Review 31: 754.
Menkel-Meadow, C. (1985). “Portia in a Different Voice: Speculations on a Women's Lawyering Process.” Berkeley Women's Law Journal 1: 39.
Menkel-Meadow, C. (1987). “Excluded Voices: New Voices in the Legal Profession Making New Voices in the Law.” University of Miami Law Review 42: 29.
Menkel-Meadow, C. (1989). “Exploring a Research Agenda of the Feminization of the Legal Profession: Theories of Gender and Social Change.” Law and Social Inquiry 14: 289.
Menkel-Meadow, C. (1991). “Pursuing Settlement in an Adversary Culture: A Tale of Innovation Co-Opted or the Law of ADR'.” Florida State University Law Review 19(Summer): 1.
Menkel-Meadow, C. (1994a). “Portia Redux: Another Look at Gender, Feminism, and Legal Ethics.” Virginia Journal of Social Policy and the Law 2(Fall): 75.
Menkel-Meadow, C. (1994b). “The Future of the Legal Profession: Culture Clash in the Quality of Life in the Law: Changes in the Economics, Diversification and Organization of Lawyering.” Case Western Reserve Law Review 44: 621.
Menkel-Meadow, C. (1995a). “Ethics and the Settlements of Mass Torts: When the Rules Meet the Road.” Cornell Law Review 80: 1159.
Menkel-Meadow, C. (1995b). “Whose Dispute Is It Anyway?: A Philosophical and Democratic Defense of Settlement (in Some Cases).” Georgetown Law Journal 83: 2663.
Menkel-Meadow, C. (1995c). “Book Review: The Many Ways of Mediation: The Transformation of Traditions, Ideologies, Paradigms, and Practices.” Negotiation Journal 11(3, July): 217–42.
Menkel-Meadow, C. (1996a). “Is Mediation the Practice of Law?”Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation 14(5): 60.
Menkel-Meadow, C. (1996b). “The Trouble with the Adversary System in a Postmodern, Multicultural World.” William & Mary Law Review 38(October): 5.
Menkel-Meadow, C. (1997a). “Ethics in Alternative Dispute Resolution: New Issues. No Answers from the Adversary Conception of Lawyers' Responsibilities.” South Texas Law Review 38: 407.
Menkel-Meadow, C. (1997b). “What Trina Taught Me: Reflections on Mediation, Inequality, Teaching and Life.” Minnesota Law Review 81(June): 1413.
Menkel-Meadow, C. (1999). “New Roles: Problem Solving the Lawyer as Problem Solver and Third-Party Neutral: Creativity and Non-Partisanship in Lawyering.” Temple Law Review 72(Winter): 785.
Menkel-Meadow, C. (2000a). “Teaching about Gender and Negotiation: Sex, Truths and Videotape.” Negotiation Journal 16: 357.
Menkel-Meadow, C. (2000b). “Mothers and Fathers of Invention: The Intellectual Founders of ADR.” Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 16: 1.
Menkel-Meadow, C. (2001). “Negotiating with Lawyers, Men and Things: The Contextual Approach Still Matters.” Negotiation Journal 17(3): 257–93.
Menkel-Meadow, C. (2002a). “Ethics Issues in Arbitration and Related Dispute Resolution Processes: What's Happening and What's Not.” University of Miami Law Review 56: 949.
Menkel-Meadow, C. (2002b). “The Lawyer as Consensus Builder: Ethics for a New Practice.” Tennessee Law Review 70(Fall): 63–119.
Menkel-Meadow, C. (2004). “From Legal Disputes to Conflict Resolution and Human Problem Solving: Legal Dispute Resolution in a Multidisciplinary Context.” Journal of Legal Education 54(March): 7.
Menkel-Meadow, C. (November 17, 2006). Comments on manuscript by Carrie Menkel-Meadow to author. On file with author.
Menkel-Meadow, C., Love, L. P. and Schneider, A. K. (2006). Mediation: Practice, Policy and Ethics. New York, Aspen Publishers.
Merriam, S. and Caffarella, R. (1991). Learning in Adulthood: A Comprehensive Guide. San Francisco, CA, Jossey-Bass.
Merry, S. (1990a). “The Discourses of Mediation and the Power of Naming.” Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities 2: 1.
Merry, S. (1990b). Getting Justice and Getting Even: Legal Consciousness among Working-Class Americans. Chicago and London, University of Chicago Press.
Merry, S. (1992). “Culture, Power, and the Discourse of Law.” The New York Law School Law Review 37: 209.
Merry, S. and Milner, N. (eds.) (1993). The Possibility of Popular Justice: A Case Study of Community Mediation in the United States. Ann Arbor, MI, University of Michigan Press.
Merry, S. and Silbey, S. (1984). “What Do Plaintiffs Want? Reexamining the Concept of Dispute.” The Justice System Journal 9(2): 151.
Meschievitz, C. (1990). Mediating Medical Malpractice Claims in Wisconsin: A Preliminary Report. Madison, University of Wisconsin – Madison Law School.
Meschievitz, C. (1991). “Mediation and Medical Malpractice: Problems with Definition and Implementation.” Law and Contemporary Problems 54(1): 195.
Meschievitz, C. S. (1994). “Efficacious or Precarious? Comments on the Processing and Resolution of Medical Malpractice Claims in the United States.” Annals of Health Law 3: 123.
Metzloff, T., Peeples, R. and Harris, C. (1997). “Empirical Perspectives on Mediation and Malpractice.” Law and Contemporary Problems 60(1): 107.
,Ministry-of-the-Attorney-General (1999). Code of Conduct: Ontario Mandatory Mediation Program. Ministry of the Attorney General. http://www.attorneygeneral.jus.gov.on.ca/english/courts/manmed/codeofconduct.asp (last viewed August 8, 2008).
Mnookin, R., Peppet, S. and Tulumello, A. (2000). Beyond Winning: Negotiating to Create Value in Deals and Disputes. Cambridge, MA, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Mnookin, R. H. and Kornhauser, L. (1979). “Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: The Case of Divorce.” Yale Law Journal 88: 950.
Moore, C. W. (2003). The Mediation Process: Practical Strategies for Resolving Conflict. San Francisco, CA, Jossey-Bass.
Morris, C. (1999). “The Moulding of Lawyers: ADR and Legal Education.” Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice 17: 271.
Morton, L. and Einesman, F. (2001). “The Effects of Mediation in a Juvenile Incarceration Facility: Reduction of Violence Through Transformation.” Cleveland State Law Review 49: 255.
Mouzelis, N. (1991). Back to Sociological Theory: The Construction of Social Orders. London, Macmillan Press Ltd.
Mulcahy, L. (1999). Mediating Medical Negligence Claims – An Option for the Future. Socio-Legal Studies Association Annual Conference, Loughborough, England.
Mulcahy, L., Selwood, M., Summerfield, L. and Netten, A. (2000). Mediating Medical Negligence Claims: An Option for the Future?London, Stationery Office.
Nader, L. (1993). “Controlling Processes in the Practice of Law: Hierarchy and Pacification in the Movement to Re-Form Dispute Ideology.” Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 9: 1.
Nader, L. (2002). The Life of the Law. Berkeley, CA, University of California Press.
,NCC (1995). Seeking Civil Justice: A Survey of People's Needs and Experiences. London, HMSO.
Nelken, M. (1996). “Negotiation and Psychoanalysis: If I'd Wanted to Learn about Feelings, I Wouldn't Have Gone to Law School.” Journal of Legal Education 46: 420.
Neumann, R. (2000). “Women in Legal Education: What the Statistics Show.” Journal of Legal Education 50: 313.
Nisselle, P. (1999). “Editorial: Angered Patients and the Medical Profession.” Medical Journal of Australia 170: 576.
Nolan-Haley, J. (1996). “Court Mediation and the Search for Justice through Law.” Washington University Law Quarterly 74(January): 47.
Nolan-Haley, J. (1998). “Lawyers, Clients, and Mediation.” Notre Dame Law Review 73: 1369.
Nolan-Haley, J. (2002). “Lawyers, Non-Lawyers and Mediation: Rethinking the Professional Monopoly from a Problem-Solving Perspective.” Harvard Negotiation Law Review 7(Spring): 235.
Noonan, J. (1993). “Persons and Masks of the Law (1976),” in The Responsible Judge: Readings in Judicial Ethics. Westport, CT, Praeger, pp. 22–34.
O'Barr, W. M. and Conley, J. M. (1990). “Litigant Satisfaction versus Legal Adequacy in Small Claims Court Narratives,” in Language in the Judicial Process (Levi, D. N. and Walker, A. G., eds.), Vol. 97. New York, Plenum.
O'Hara, E. A. and Yarn, D. (2002). “On Apology and Consilience.” Washington Law Review 77: 1121.
,Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General (1999). Ontario Mandatory Mediation Program: Fact Sheet on the Mandatory Mediation Program. Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General. http://www.attorneygeneral.jus.gov.on.ca/english/courts/manmed/factsheet.asp (last viewed August 8, 2008)
Palmer, M. (1987). “The Revival of Mediation in the People's Republic of China: (1) Extra-Judicial Mediation,” in Yearbook on Socialist Legal Systems (Butler, W. E., ed.). Dobbs Ferry, New York, Transnational Publishers, pp. 219–77.
Palmer, M. (1989). “The Revival of Mediation in the People's Republic of China: (2) Extra-Judicial Mediation,” in Yearbook on Socialist Legal Systems (Butler, W. E., ed.). Dobbs Ferry, New York, Transnational Publishers, pp. 145–71.
Palmer, M. and Roberts, S. (1998). Dispute Processes: ADR and the Primary Forms of Decision Making. London, Butterworths.
Patterson, D. (1992). “Postmodernism/Feminism/Law.” Cornell Law Review 77: 254.
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Newbury Park, London, Sage Publications.
Pavlick, D. L. (2003). “Apology and Mediation: The Horse and Carriage of the Twenty-First Century.” Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 18: 829.
Payne, K. (2001). Different but Equal: Communication between the Sexes. Westport, CT, Praeger.
Pearson, J. and Thoennes, N. (1988). “Divorce Mediation Research Results,” in Divorce Mediation: Theory and Practice (Folberg, J. and Milne, A., eds.). New York, Guildford Press, p. 429.
Pennebaker, J. (ed.) (1995). “Emotion, Disclosure and Health: An Overview” in Emotion, Disclosure and Health. Washington, DC, American Psychological Association, pp. 3–10.
Pepper, R. A. (1998). “Mandatory Mediation: Ontario's Unfortunate Experience in Court-Annexed ADR.” Advocates Quarterly 20(4): 403.
Pepper, S. (1995). “Counseling at the Limits of the Law: An Exercise in the Jurisprudence and Ethics of Lawyering.” Yale Law Journal 104: 1545.
Phillips, R. A. (1992). “Mediation of Medical Malpractice Disputes.” North Carolina Medical Journal 53(11): 582.
Polywka, S. (1997). “Mediation of Clinical Negligence Claims: A Pilot Scheme Endorsed by the NHS Executive in the Anglia and Oxford Region.” Clinical Risk 3(3): 80.
Price, K. H., Hall, T. W., Bos, K. V. D., Hunton, J. E., Lovett, S. and Tippett, M. J. (2001). “Features of the Value Function for Voice and Their Consistency across Participants from Four Countries: Great Britain, Mexico, the Netherlands, and the United States.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 84: 95.
Rabinow, P. (ed.) (1986). The Foucault Reader/Michel Foucault. Harmondsworth, Penguin Books.
Rack, C. (1999). “Negotiated Justice: Gender & Ethnic Minority Bargaining Patterns in the Metro Court Study.” Hamline Journal of Public Law and Policy 20: 211.
Raz, J. (2004). Legal Philosophy Seminar Series. New York, Columbia University.
Reeves, J. W. (1994). “ADR Relieves Pain of Health Care Disputes.” Dispute Resolution Journal 49(3): 14.
Reich, J. B. (2001). “A Call for Intellectual Honesty: A Response to the Uniform Mediation Act's Privilege against Disclosure.” Journal of Dispute Resolution 2001: 197.
Reich, J. B. (2002). “Attorney V. Client: Creating a Mechanism to Address Competing Process Interests in Lawyer-Driven Mediation.” Southern Illinois University Law Journal 26(Winter): 183.
Relis, T. (2002). “Civil Litigation from Litigants' Perspectives: What We Know and What We Don't Know about the Litigation Experience of Individual Litigants,” in Studies in Law, Politics, and Society (Sarat, A. and Ewick, P., eds.), Vol. 25. London, New York, Oxford, Elsevier Science, p. 151.
Relis, T. (2004). “Lawyers and Clients: Disparate Conceptions of Dispute Resolution in Litigation-Linked Mediation,” in Sociology of Law. Japan, Japan Association of the Sociology of Law (JASL), University of Tokyo, pp. 24–41.
Relis, T. (2007a). ‘It's Not about the Money!’: A Theory on Misconceptions of Plaintiffs' Litigation Aims.” University of Pittsburgh Law Review 68(2): 701–46.
Relis, T. (2007b). “Consequences of Power.” Harvard Negotiation Law Review 12: 445–501.
Rhode, D. (1994). “Gender and Professional Roles.” Fordham Law Review 63: 39.
Ricci, I. (1985). “Mediator's Notebook: Reflections on Promoting Equal Empowerment and Entitlement for Women,” in Divorce Mediation: Perspectives on the Field (Everett, C., ed.). New York, Haworth Press, pp. 49–62.
Rifkin, J. (1984). “Mediation from a Feminist Perspective: Promises and Problems.” Law and Inequality 2: 21.
Riley, H. and McGinn, K. L. (2002). When Does Gender Matter in Negotiation? KSG Faculty Research Working Paper Series. Cambridge, MA, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.
Riskin, L. (1982). “Mediation and Lawyers.” Ohio State Law Journal 43: 29.
Riskin, L. (1996). “Understanding Mediators' Orientations, Strategies and Techniques: A Grid for the Perplexed.” Harvard Negotiation Law Review 1: 7.
Riskin, L. (2002). “The Contemplative Lawyer: On the Potential Contributions of Mindfulness Meditation to Law Students, Lawyers, and Their Clients.” Harvard Negotiation Law Review 7(Spring): 1.
Riskin, L. (2003). “Decisionmaking in Mediation: The New Old Grid and the New Grid System.” Notre Dame Law Review 79: 1.
Riskin, L. and Westbrook, J. (1997). Dispute Resolution and Lawyers. St. Paul, MN, West Publishing.
Riskin, L. L. (1985). “The Special Place of Mediation in Alternative Dispute Processing.” Florida Law Review 37: 19.
Robbennolt, J. (2003). “Apologies and Legal Settlement: An Empirical Examination.” Michigan Law Review 102: 460.
Roberts, M. (1997). Mediation in Family Disputes: Principles of Practice. Aldershot, Arena Ashgate.
Roberts, S. (1993). “ADR and Civil Justice: An Unresolved Relationship.” Modern Law Review 56: 450.
Roberts, S. (2000). “Settlement as Civil Justice.” Modern Law Review 63(5): 739.
Roberts, S. (2002). “Institutionalized Settlement in England: A Contemporary Panorama.” Willamette Journal of International Law and Dispute Resolution 10: 17.
Rosenberg, J. (1991). “In Defense of Mediation.” Arizona Law Review 33: 467.
Rosenberg, J. D. (2004). “Interpersonal Dynamics: Helping Lawyers Learn the Skills, and the Importance, of Human Relationships in the Practice of Law.” University of Miami Law Review 58: 1225.
Rosenthal, D. (1974). Lawyer and Client: Who's In Charge?New York, Russell Sage Foundation.
Rubinson, R. (2004). “Client Counseling, Mediation, and Alternative Narratives of Dispute Resolution.” Clinical Law Review 10(Spring): 833.
Sally, D. (2003). “Yearn for Paradise, Live in Limbo: Optimal Frustration for ADR.” Penn State Law Review 108(Summer): 89.
Sander, F. and Mnookin, R. (2000). “A Worthy Challenge: The Teaching of Problem Solving in Law Schools.” American Bar Association Dispute Resolution Magazine (Summer): 21.
Sander, F. E. A. (1976). Varieties of Dispute Processing. National Conference on the Causes of Popular Dissatisfaction with the Administration of Justice, F. R. D.
Santos, B. D. S. (1977). “The Law of the Oppressed: The Construction and Reproduction of Legality in Pasargada.” Law and Society Review 12(1): 5.
Sarat, A. (1976). “Alternatives in Dispute Processing: Litigation in a Small Claims Court.” Law and Society Review 10: 339.
Sarat, A. and Felstiner, W. (1986). “Law and Strategy in the Divorce Lawyer's Office.” Law and Society Review 20: 93.
Sarat, A. and Felstiner, W. (1988). “Law and Social Relations: Vocabularies of Motive in Lawyer/Client Interaction.” Law and Society Review 22(4): 737.
Sarat, A. and Felstiner, W. (1989). “Lawyers and Legal Consciousness: Law Talk in the Divorce Lawyer's Office.” Yale Law Journal 98: 1663.
Sarat, A. and Felstiner, W. (1990). “Legal Realism in Lawyer–Client Communication,” in Language in the Judicial Process (Levi, J. and Walker, A., eds.). London, Plenum Press, pp. 133–54.
Sarat, A. and Felstiner, W. (1995a). Divorce Lawyers and Their Clients. New York, Oxford University Press.
Sarat, A. and Felstiner, W. (1995b). “Law and Social Relations: Vocabularies of Motive in Lawyer/Client Interaction,” in The Law & Society Reader (Abel, R., ed.). New York, New York University Press, pp. 403–30.
Saravia, A. (1999). “Notes and Comments: Overview of Alternative Dispute Resolution in Healthcare Disputes.” Journal of Health and Hospital Law 32(1): 139.
Schutz, A. (1967). The Phenomenology of the Social World. Evanston, Northwestern University Press.
Schutz, A. (1982). “The Problem of Social Reality,” in Collected Papers I. The Problem of Social Reality (Natanson, M. A. and Breda, H. L., eds.). The Hague, Boston, Martinus Nijhoff.
Scott, L. W. (2006). “The Law of Mediation in Texas.” St. Mary's Law Journal 37: 325.
Shack, J. E. (2003). Bibliographic Summary of Cost, Pace, and Satisfaction Studies of Court-Related Mediation Programs. Chicago, IL, Center for Conflict, Center for Analysis of Alternative Dispute Resolution Systems (CAADRS) Publication.
Shalleck, A. (1992). “The Feminist Transformation of Lawyering: A Response to Naomi Cahn.” Hastings Law Journal 43: 1071.
Shalleck, A. (1993). “Constructions of the Client within Legal Education.” Stanford Law Review 45(6, July): 1731–53.
Shapiro, M. (1981). Courts: A Comparative and Political Analysis. Chicago, London, University of Chicago Press.
Sherwin, R. (1992a). “Lawyering Theory: An Overview What We Talk about When We Talk about Law.” The New York Law School Law Review 37: 9.
Sherwin, R. (1992b). “Preface: Comment.” The New York Law School Law Review 37: 1.
Shestowsky, D. (2004). “Procedural Preferences in Alternative Dispute Resolution: A Closer, Modern Look at an Old Idea.” Psychology, Public Policy and Law 10(September): 211.
Shuman, D. (2000). “Role of Apology in Tort Law.” Judicature 83(4): 180.
Silbey, S. (2002). “The Emperor's New Clothes: Mediation Mythology and Markets.” Journal of Dispute Resolution 2002: 171.
Silbey, S. and Merry, S. (1986). “Mediator Settlement Strategies.” Law and Policy 8: 7.
Silbey, S. and Sarat, A. (1989). “Dispute Processing in Law and Legal Scholarship.” Denver University Law Review 66: 437.
Silver, M. (1999). “Emotional Intelligence and Legal Education.” Psychology Public Policy and Law 5: 1173.
Simanowitz, A. (1998). “Mediation in Medical Negligence.” Clinical Risk 4(2): 63.
Stamato, L. (1992). “Voice, Place, and Process: Research on Gender, Negotiation, and Conflict Resolution”Mediation Quarterly 9: 375.
Stempel, J. (1997). “Beyond Formalism and False Dichotomies: The Need for Institutionalizing a Flexible Concept of the Mediator's Role.” Florida State University Law Review 24: 949.
Stempel, J. (2000a). “Identifying Real Dichotomies Underlying the False Dichotomy: Twenty-First Century Mediation in an Eclectic Regime.” Journal of Dispute Resolution 2000: 371.
Stempel, J. W. (2000b). “The Inevitability of the Eclectic: Liberating ADR from Ideology.” Journal of Dispute Resolution 2000: 247.
Stempel, J. W. (2002–3). “Forgetfulness, Fuzziness, Functionality, Fairness, and Freedom in Dispute Resolution: Serving Dispute Resolution through Adjudication.” Nevada Law Journal 3(Winter): 305.
Sternlight, J. (1999). “Lawyers' Representation of Clients in Mediation: Using Economics and Psychology to Structure Advocacy in a Nonadversarial Setting.” Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 14: 269.
Sternlight, J. (2003). “ADR Is Here: Preliminary Reflections on Where It Fits in a System of Justice.” Nevada Law Journal 3: 289.
Stitt, A., Feld, L. and Houston, H. (1999). The ADR Spectrum. Stitt Feld Handy Houston. www.adr.ca/news/adrspect.asp (last viewed August 17, 1999).
Stolle, D., Wexler, D. and Winick, B. (1997). “Integrating Preventive Law and Therapeutic Jurisprudence: A Law and Psychology Based Approach to Lawyering.” California Western Law Review 34: 15.
Strang, H. and Sherman, L. W. (2003). “Repairing the Harm: Victims and Restorative Justice.” Utah Law Review 2003(1): 15.
Strong, G. (1998). “The Lawyer's Left Hand: Nonanalytical Thought in the Practice of Law.” University of Colorado Law Review 69: 759.
Stuhlmacher, A. F. and Walters, A. E. (1999). “Gender Differences in Negotiation Outcome A Meta-Analysis.” Personnel Psychology 52: 653.
Stulberg, J. (1997). “Facilitative versus Evaluative Mediator Orientations: Piercing the ‘Grid’ Lock.” Florida State University Law Review 24: 985.
Subrin, S. (2003). “A Traditionalist Looks at Mediation: It's Here to Stay and Much Better Than I Thought.” Nevada Law Journal 3: 196.
Taber, J., Grant, M., Huser, M., Rise, N., Sutton, J. and Wong, C. (1988). “Project, Gender, Legal Education, and the Legal Profession: An Empirical Study of Stanford Law Students and Graduates.” Stanford Law Review 40: 1209.
Tamanaha, B. (1993). Understanding Law in Micronesia: An Interpretive Approach to Transplanted Law. New York, E. J. Brill.
Tanick, M. H. and Ayling, T. J. (1996). “Alternative Dispute Resolution by Apology: Settlement by Saying ‘I'm Sorry’.” Hennepin Law 22(July–August): 112.
Tannen, D. (1990). You Just Don't Understand: Women and Men in Conversation. New York, Ballantine Books.
Tannen, D. (1994). Talking from 9 to 5. New York, William Morrow.
Teff, H. (1994). Reasonable Care: Legal Perspectives on the Doctor-Patient Relationship. Oxford, Clarendon Press.
Thibaut, J. and Walker, L. (1975). Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis. Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Thibaut, J. and Walker, L. (1978). “A Theory of Procedure.” California Law Review 86: 386.
Thoennes, N., Pearson, J. and , J. Bell (1991). Evaluation of the Use of Mandatory Divorce Mediation. Denver, Center for Policy Research.
Thornton, M. (1989). “Equivocations of Conciliation: The Resolution of Discrimination Complaints in Australia.” Modern Law Review 52(6): 733.
Turner, V. (1974). Dramas, Fields and Metaphors: Symbolic Action in Human Society. Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press.
Twining, W. (1993). “Alternative to What? Theories of Litigation, Procedure and Dispute Settlement in Anglo-American Jurisprudence: Some Neglected Classics.” Modern Law Review 56(3): 380.
Tyler, T. (1987). “The Psychology of Disputant Concerns in Mediation.” Negotiation Journal 3(4): 367.
Tyler, T. (1988). “What Is Procedural Justice?: Criteria Used by Citizens to Assess the Fairness of Legal Procedures.” Law and Society Review 22(1): 103.
Tyler, T. (1997). “Citizen Discontent with Legal Procedures: A Social Science Perspective on Civil Procedure Reform.” American Journal of Comparative Law 45(Fall): 871.
Tyler, , , T. R., Casper, J. D. and Fisher, B. (1989). “Maintaining Allegiance toward Political Authorities: The Role of Prior Attitudes and the Use of Fair Procedures.” American Journal of Political Science 33: 629–52.
Tyler, T. R., Rasinski, K. A. and Spodick, N. (1985). “Influence of Voice on Satisfaction With Leaders: Exploring the Meaning of Process Control.” American Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 48(1): 72.
Ury, W. (1988). Getting Disputes Resolved: Designing Systems to Cut the Cost of Conflict. San Francisco, CA, Jossey-Bass.
Vallance, R. (1990). “Preliminary Legal Steps for the Patient,” in Medical Negligence (Powers, M. and Harris, N., eds.). London and Edinburgh, Butterworths, pp. 101–30.
Vidmar, N. (1984). “The Small Claims Court: A Reconceptualization of Disputes and an Empirical Investigation.” Law and Society Review 18(4): 515.
Vincent, C., Young, M. and Phillips, A. (1994). “Why Do People Sue Doctors? A Study of Patients and Relatives Taking Legal Action.” The Lancet 343(8913): 1609.
Vogelstein, R. (2003). “Confidentiality vs. Care: Re-Evaluating the Duty to Self, Client, and Others.” Georgetown Law Journal 92: 153.
Waldman, E. (1998). “The Evaluative-Facilitative Debate in Mediation: Applying the Lens of Therapeutic Jurisprudence.” Marquette Law Review 82: 155.
Walters, A. E., Stuhlmacher, A. F. and Meyer, L. L. (1998). “Gender and Negotiator Competitiveness: A Meta-Analysis.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 76: 1.
Watson, C. (1994a). “Gender Differences in Negotiating Behavior and Outcomes: Fact or Artifact,” in Conflict and Gender (Taylor, A. and Miller, J. B., eds.). Cresskill, NJ, Hampton Press, pp. 191–201.
Watson, C. (1994b). “In Theory: Gender Versus Power as a Predictor of Negotiation Behaviors and Outcomes.” Negotiation Journal 10: 117.
Weber, M. (1922). Wirtschaft Und Gesellschaft (English translation by Henderson, A. and Parsons, T., 1957). Tübingen, J.C.B. Mohr (P. Siebeck).
Weckstein, D. (1997). “In Praise of Party Empowerment-and of Mediator Activism.” Willamette Law Review 33: 501.
Welsh, N. (2001a). “Making Deals in Court-Connected Mediation: What's Justice Got to Do with It?”Washington University Law Quarterly 79(Fall): 787.
Welsh, N. (2001b). “The Thinning Vision of Self-Determination in Court-Connected Mediation: The Inevitable Price of Institutionalization?”Harvard Negotiation Law Review 6(Spring): 1.
Welsh, N. (2004a). “Stepping Back through the Looking Glass: Real Conversations with Real Disputants about Institutionalized Mediation and Its Value.” Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 38: 573.
Welsh, N. A. (2004b). “The Place of Court-Connected Mediation in a Democratic Justice System.” Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution 5(Spring): 117.
White, J. (1990). Justice as Translation: An Essay in Cultural and Legal Criticism. Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press.
Williams, J. (1989). “Deconstructing Gender.” Michigan Law Review 87(February): 797.
Williams, W. (1982). “The Equality Crisis: Some Reflections on Culture, Courts, and Feminism.” Women's Rights Law Report 7: 175.
Winick, B. (1997). “The Jurisprudence of Therapeutic Jurisprudence.” Psychology, Public Policy and Law 3: 184.
Wise, R. K. (2006). “Mediation in Texas: Can the Judge Really Make Me Do That?”South Texas Law Review 47: 849.
Wissler, R. (1997). “The Effects of Mandatory Mediation: Empirical Research on the Experience of Small Claims and Common Pleas Courts.” Willamette Law Review 33: 565.
Wissler, R. (1998). “Study Finds Mediators' Style Can Have an Impact on Outcome of Dispute Resolution.” Dispute Resolution Magazine 4(4): 28.
Wissler, R. (2000). “‘Attorneys’ Use of ADR Is Crucial to Their Willingness to Recommend It to Their Clients.” Dispute Resolution Magazine 2000(Spring): 36.
Wissler, R. (2002). “Court-Connected Mediation in General Civil Cases: What We Know from Empirical Research.” Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 17: 641.
Wissler, R. L. (2001). “To Evaluate or Facilitate?”Dispute Resolution Magazine 2001(Winter): 35.
