Skip to main content Accessibility help
  • Print publication year: 2013
  • Online publication date: April 2013

Chapter 9 - Aging, DNA damage, and reproductive outcome


1. KühnertB, NieschlagE. Reproductive functions of the ageing male. Hum Reprod Update. 2004;10(4):327–39.
2. JohnsonL, PettyCS, NeavesWB. Influence of age on sperm production and testicular weights in men. J Reprod Fertil. 1984;70:211–18.
3. HandelsmanDJ, StarajS. Testicular size: the effects of aging, malnutrition, and illness. J Androl. 1985;6:144–51.
4. MahmoudAM, GoemaereS, El-GaremYet al. Testicular volume in relation to hormonal indices of gonadal function in community-dwelling elderly men. J Clin Endocrinol Metabol. 2003;88(1):179–84.
5. OlsenJ. Subfecundity according to the age of the mother and the father. Danish Med Bull. 1990;37:281–2.
6. MironeV, RicciE, GentileVet al. Determinants of erectile dysfunction risk in a large series of Italian men attending andrology clinics. Eur Urol. 2004;45(1):87–91.
7. DunsonDB, ColomboB, BairdDD. Changes with age in the level and duration of fertility in the menstrual cycle. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(5):1399–403.
8. WilcoxA. Fertility and Pregnancy. An Epidemiologic Perspective. 1st edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010.
9. de la RochebrochardE, ThonneauP. Paternal age and maternal age are risk factors for miscarriage; results of a multicentre European study. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(6):1649–56.
10. JamesWH. The human sex ratio. Part 1: A review of the literature. Hum Biol. 1987;59:721–52.
11. MatsuoK, UshiodaN, UdoffLC. Parental aging synergistically decreases offspring sex ratio. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2009;35(1):164–8.
12. JacobsenR, MollerH, MouritsenA. Natural variation in the human sex ratio. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(12):3120–5.
13. SinghNP, MullerCH, BergerRE. Effects of age on DNA double-strand breaks and apoptosis in human sperm. Fertil Steril. 2003;80(6):1420–30.
14. SchmidTE, EskenaziB, BaumgartnerAet al. The effects of male age on sperm DNA damage in healthy non-smokers. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(1):180–7.
15. SpanoM, KolstadAH, LarsenSBet al. The applicability of the flow cytometric sperm chromatin structure assay as diagnostic and prognostic tool in the human fertility clinic. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:2495–505.
16. WyrobekAJ, EskenaziB, YoungSet al. Advancing age has differential effects on DNA damage, chromatin integrity, gene mutations, and aneuploidies in sperm. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103(25):9601–6.
17. DutySM, SinghNP, SilvaMJet al. The relationship between environmental exposures to phthalates and DNA damage in human sperm using the neutral Comet assay. Environ Health Perspect. 2003;111(9):1164–9.
18. PrestonCR, FloresC, EngelsWR. Age-dependent usage of double-strand-break repair pathways. Curr Biol. 2006;16(20):2009–15.
19. BakshiRP, GalandeS, BaliPet al. Developmental and hormonal regulation of type II DNA topoisomerase in rat testis. J Mol Endocrinol. 2001;26(3):193–206.
20. WuFC, TajarA, PyeSRet al. Hypothalamic-pituitary-testicular axis disruptions in older men are differentially linked to age and modifiable risk factors: the European Male Aging Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93(7):2737–45.
21. CocuzzaM, AthaydeKS, AgarwalAet al. Age-related increase of reactive oxygen species in neat semen in healthy fertile men. Urology. 2008;71(3):490–4.
22. TuncO, BakosHW, TremellenK. Impact of body mass index on seminal oxidative stress. Andrologia. 2011;43(2):121–8.
23. CrowJF. The origins, patterns and implications of human spontaneous mutation. Nat Rev Genet. 2000;1(1):40–7.
24. KetterlingRP, VielhaberE, LiXet al. Germline origins in the human F9 gene: Frequent G:C→A:T mosaicism and increased mutations with advanced maternal age. Hum Genet. 1999;105(6):629–40.
25. GlaserRL, BromanKW, SchulmanRLet al. The paternal-age effect in Apert syndrome is due, in part, to the increased frequency of mutations in sperm. American J Hum Genet. 2003;73(4):939–47.
26. YoonSR, QinJ, GlaserRLet al. The ups and downs of mutation frequencies during aging can account for the Apert syndrome paternal age effect. PLoS Genet. 2009;5(7):e1000558.
27. EllegrenH. Microsatellite mutations in the germline: implications for evolutionary inference. Trends Genet. 2000;16(12):551–8.
28. GriffinDK, AbruzzoMA, MillieEAet al. Non-disjunction in human sperm: evidence for an effect of increasing paternal age. Hum Mol Genet. 1995;4(12):2227–32.
29. SartoriusGA, NieschlagE. Paternal age and reproduction. Hum Reprod Update. 2010;16(1):65–79.
30. LanfrancoF, KamischkeA, ZitzmannMet al. Klinefelter’s syndrome. Lancet. 2004;364(9430):273–83.
31. TiidoT, Rignell-HydbomA, JönssonBet al. Exposure to persistent organohalogen pollutants associates with human sperm Y:X chromosome ratio. Hum Reprod. 2005;20(7):1903–9.
32. ErenpreissJ, ElzanatyS, GiwercmanA. Sperm DNA damage in men from infertile couples. Asian J Androl. 2008;10(5):786–90.
33. EvensonDP, JostLK, MarshallDet al. Utility of the sperm chromatin structure assay as a diagnostic and prognostic tool in the human fertility clinic. Hum Reprod. 1999;14 1039–49.
34. SpanoM, BondeJP, HjollundHIet al. Sperm chromatin damage impairs human fertility. The Danish first pregnancy planner study team. Fertil Steril. 2000;73(1):43–50.
35. GiwercmanA, LindstedtL, LarssonMet al. Sperm chromatin structure assay as an independent predictor of fertility in vivo: a case-control study. Int J Androl. 2010;33(1):e221–7.
36. SimonL, LuttonD, McManusJet al. Sperm DNA damage measured by the alkaline Comet assay as an independent predictor of male infertility and in vitro fertilization success. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(2):652–7.
37. SharmaRK, SabaneghE, MahfouzRet al. Tunel as a test for sperm DNA damage in the evaluation of male infertility. Urology. 2010;76(6):1380–6.
38. BungumM, HumaidanP, AxmonAet al. Sperm DNA integrity assessment in prediction of assisted reproduction technology outcome. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(1):174–9.
39. ThomsonLK, ZieschangJA, ClarkAM. Oxidative deoxyribonucleic acid damage in sperm has a negative impact on clinical pregnancy rate in intrauterine insemination but not intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. Fertil Steril. 2011;96(4):843–7.
40. ZiniA. Are sperm chromatin and DNA defects relevant in the clinic?Systems Biol Reprod Med. 2011;57(1–2):78–85.
41. AhmadiA, N gSC. Fertilizing capacity of DNA damaged spermatozoa. J Exp Zool. 1999;286:696–704.
42. SunJG, JurisicovaA, CasperRF. Detection of deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation in human sperm: correlation with fertilization in vitro. Biol Reprod. 1997;56:602–7.
43. AitkenRJ, BakerMA. Oxidative stress and male reproductive biology. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2004;16(5):581–8.
44. Larson-CookKL, BrannianJD, HansenKAet al. Relationship between the outcomes of assisted reproductive techniques and sperm DNA fragmentation as measured by the sperm chromatin structure assay. Fertil Steril. 2003;80(4):895–902.
45. SpanoM, SeliE, BizzaroDet al. The significance of sperm nuclear DNA strand breaks on reproductive outcome. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2005;17(3):255–60.
46. SeliE, GardnerDK, SchoolcraftWBet al. Extent of nuclear DNA damage in ejaculated spermatozoa impacts on blastocyst development after in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2004;82(2):378–83.
47. BungumM, BungumL, LynchKFet al. Spermatozoa DNA damage measured by sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA) and birth characteristics in children conceived by IVF and ICSI. Asian J Androl. 2011;13:68–75.
48. TempestHG, KoE, ChanPet al. Sperm aneuploidy frequencies analysed before and after chemotherapy in testicular cancer and Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients. Hum Reprod. 2008;23(2):251–8.
49. MarchettiF, LoweX, BishopJet al. Absence of selection against aneuploid mouse sperm at fertilization. Biol Reprod. 1999;61(4):948–54.
50. RomeriusP, StahlO, MoellCet al. Sperm DNA integrity in men treated for childhood cancer. Clin Cancer Res.;16(15):3843–50.
51. StahlO, EberhardJ, JepsonKet al. Sperm DNA integrity in testicular cancer patients. Hum Reprod. 2006;21(12): 3199–3205.
52. OlshanA, FaustmanEM. Male-mediated developmental toxicity. Reprod Toxicol. 1993;7:191–202.
53. CordierS. Evidence for a role of paternal exposures in developmental toxicity. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2008;102(2):176–81.
54. LogmanJF, de VriesLE, HemelsMEet al. Paternal organic solvent exposure and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a meta-analysis. Am J Industr Med. 2005;47(1):37–44.
55. ColtJS, BlairA. Parental occupational exposures and risk of childhood cancer. Environ Health Perspect. 1998;106(Suppl. 3):909–25.
56. GreenLM, DoddsL, MillerABet al. Risk of congenital anomalies in children of parents occupationally exposed to low level ionising radiation. Occup Environ Med. 1997;54(9):629–35.
57. DoyleP, MaconochieN, RomanEet al. Fetal death and congenital malformation in babies born to nuclear industry employees: report from the nuclear industry family study. Lancet. 2000;356(9238):1293–9.
58. SorahanT, McKinneyPA, MannJRet al. Childhood cancer and parental use of tobacco: findings from the inter-regional epidemiological study of childhood cancer (IRESCC). Br J Cancer. 2001;84(1):141–6.
59. RupaDS, ReddyPP, ReddiOS. Reproductive performance in population exposed to pesticides in cotton fields in India. Environ Res. 1991;55(2):123–8.
60. LindbohmML, HemminkiK, BonhommeMGet al. Effects of paternal occupational exposure on spontaneous abortions. Am J Public Health. 1991;81(8):1029–33.
61. VennersSA, WangX, ChenCet al. Paternal smoking and pregnancy loss: a prospective study using a biomarker of pregnancy. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;159(10):993–1001.
62. Blanco-MunozJ, Torres-SanchezL, Lopez-CarrilloL. Exposure to maternal and paternal tobacco consumption and risk of spontaneous abortion. Public Health Rep. 2009;124(2):317–22.
63. SavitzDA, SchwinglPJ, KeelsMA. Influence of paternal age, smoking, and alcohol consumption on congenital anomalies. Teratology. 1991;44(4):429–40.
64. ZhangJ, SavitzDA, SchwinglPJet al. A case-control study of paternal smoking and birth defects. Int J Epidemiol. 1992;21(2):273–8.
65. ZwinkN, JenetzkyE, BrennerH. Parental risk factors and anorectal malformations: systematic review and meta-analysis. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2011;6:25.
66. DeMariniDM. Genotoxicity of tobacco smoke and tobacco smoke condensate: a review. Mutation Res. 2004;567(2–3):447–74.
67. KrapelsIP, Raijmakers-EichhornJ, PetersWHet al. The I,105V polymorphism in glutathione S-transferase P1, parental smoking and the risk for nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate. Eur J Hum Gen. 2008;16(3):358–66.
68. CresciM, FoffaI, Ait-AliLet al. Maternal and paternal environmental risk factors, metabolizing GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms, and congenital heart disease. Am J Cardiol. 2011;108(11):1625–31.