Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 17
  • Print publication year: 2012
  • Online publication date: April 2012

Chapter 1 - Acquaintance and the mind–body problem

References

Balog, K. 1999. “Conceivability, Possibility, and the Mind–Body Problem,” Philosophical Review 108: 497–528; reprinted in P. Grim, K. Baynes, P. Ludlow, and G. Mar, eds., The Philosopher’s Annual, vol. XXIII, Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
Balog, K. 2002. “The A Priori Entailment Thesis”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62: 645–52. [An article on Frank Jackson’s From Metaphysics to Ethics.]
Balog, K. 2006. “Ontological Novelty, Emergence, and the Mind–Body Problem”, in G. Abel, ed., in Kreativität, Meiner Verlag, pp. 26–45.
Balog, K. 2002. “In Defense of the Phenomenal Concept Strategy”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 84(1).
Bealer, G. 1994. “Mental Properties,” Journal of Philosophy 91: 185–208.
Block, N. 1987. “Functional Role and Truth Conditions,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 61: 157–81.
Block, N. 2002. “The Harder Problem of Consciousness,” Journal of Philosophy 99: 391–425.
Block, N. 2003. “Mental Paint,” in M. Hahn and B. Ranberg, eds., Reflections and Replies: Essays on the Philosophy of Tyler Burge, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Block, N. 2006. “Max Black’s Objection to Mind–Body Identity,” in D. Zimmerman, ed., Oxford Studies in Metaphysics, II, Oxford University Press, pp. 3–78.
Block, N., and Stalnaker, R. 1999. “Conceptual Analysis, Dualism, and the Explanatory Gap,” Philosophical Review 108: 1–46.
Burge, T. 1988. “Individualism and Self-Knowledge,” Journal of Philosophy 85: 649–63.
Chalmers, D. 1996. The Conscious Mind, New York: Oxford University Press.
Chalmers, D. 2002. “Does Conceivability Entail Possibility?” in T. Gendler and J. Hawthorne, eds., Conceivability and Possibility, Oxford University Press, pp. 145–200.
Chalmers, D. 2003. “The Content and Epistemology of Phenomenal Belief,” in Q. Smith and A. Jokic, eds., Consciousness: New Philosophical Perspectives, Oxford University Press, pp. 220–73.
Chalmers, D. 2004. “The Foundation of Two-Dimensional Semantics”, in M. Garcia-Carpintero and J. Macià, eds., in Two-Dimensional Semantics: Foundations and Applications, Oxford University Press, pp. 55–141.
Chalmers, D. 2007. “Phenomenal Concepts and the Explanatory Gap,” in T. Alter and S. Walter, eds., Phenomenal Concepts and Phenomenal Knowledge: New Essays on Consciousness and Physicalism, Oxford University Press, pp. 167–95.
Chalmers, D. 2009. “The Two-Dimensional Argument against Materialism,” in B. McLaughlin, ed., The Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of Mind, Oxford University Press, pp. 313–39.
Chalmers, D., and Jackson, F. 2001. “Conceptual Analysis and Reductive Explanation,” Philosophical Review 110: 315–61.
Dretske, F. 1988. Explaining Behavior: Reasons in a World of Causes, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Fodor, J. 1990. A Theory of Content and Other Essays, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Harman, G. 1987. “(Non-Solipsistic) Conceptual Role Semantics,” in E. Lepore, ed., New Directions in Semantics, London: Academic Press, pp. 55–81.
Harman, G. 1990. “The Intrinsic Quality of Experience,” Philosophical Perspectives 4, Action Theory and Philosophy of Mind: 31–52.
Jackson, F. 1982. “Epiphenomenal Qualia,” Philosophical Quarterly 32: 127–36.
Jackson, F. 1993. “Armchair Metaphysics,” in M. Michael and John O’Leary-Hawthorne, eds., Philosophy in Mind, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 23–42.
Jackson, F. 2003. “Mind and Illusion,” in A. O’Hear, ed., Minds and Persons, Cambridge University Press, pp. 251–71.
Jackson, F. 2004. “Representation and Experience,” in H. Clapin, P. Slezack, and P. Staines, eds., Representation in Mind: New Approaches to Mental Representation, New York: Elsevier, pp. 18–39.
Kirk, R. 2005. Zombies and Consciousness, Oxford University Press.
Kripke, S. 1972. Naming and Necessity, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Levine, J. 2001. Purple Haze, Oxford University Press.
Levine, J. 2007. “Phenomenal Concepts and the Materialist Constraint,” in T. Alter and S. Walter, eds., Phenomenal Concepts and Phenomenal Knowledge: New Essays on Consciousness and Physicalism, Oxford University Press, pp. 145–67.
Lewis, D. 1966. “An argument for the Identity Theory,” Journal of Philosophy 63(1): 17–25.
Lewis, D. 1983. “New Work for a Theory of Universals,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61: 343–77.
Loar, B. 1990. “Phenomenal States,” Philosophical Perspectives 4, Action Theory and Philosophy of Mind: 81–108.
Loar, B. 1997. “Phenomenal States,” in N. Block, O. Flanagan, and G. Güzeldere, eds., The Nature of Consciousness, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 597–616 (revised version of Loar 1990).
Loar, B. 2003. “Transparent Experience and the Availability of Qualia,” in Q. Smith and A. Jokic, eds., Consciousness: New Philosophical Perspectives, Oxford University Press, pp. 77–97.
Loewer, B. 1995. “An Argument for Strong Supervenience,” in E. Savellos and U. Yalcin, eds., Supervenience: New Essays, Cambridge University Press, pp. 218–25.
Loewer, B. 2001. “From Physics to Physicalism,” in K. Gillett and B. Loewer, eds., Physicalism and its Discontents, Cambridge University Press, pp. 37–57.
Martin, M. G. F. 2002. “The Transparency of Experience,” Mind and Language 17: 376–425.
McDowell, J. 1994. “The Content of Perceptual Experience,” Philosophical Quarterly 44: 190–206.
Melnyk, A. 2003. A Physicalist Manifesto: Thoroughly Modern Materialism, Cambridge University Press.
Millikan, R. 1989. “Biosemantics,” Journal of Philosophy 86: 281–97.
Nagel, T. 1974. “What Is It Like to Be a Bat?Philosophical Review 83: 435–50.
Nida-Rümelin, M. 2007. “Grasping Phenomenal Properties,” in T. Alter and S. Walter, eds., Phenomenal Concepts and Phenomenal Knowledge: New Essays on Consciousness and Physicalism, Oxford University Press, pp. 307–39.
Papineau, D. 1993a. “Physicalism, Consciousness, and the Antipathetic Fallacy,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 71: 169–83.
Papineau, D. 1993b. Philosophical Naturalism, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Papineau, D. 1995. “Arguments for Supervenience and Physical Realization,” in E. Savellos and U. Yalcin, eds., Supervenience: New Essays, Cambridge University Press, pp. 226–42.
Papineau, D. 2002. Thinking about Consciousness, Oxford University Press.
Papineau, D. 2007. “Phenomenal and Perceptual Concepts,” in T. Alter and S. Walter, eds., Phenomenal Concepts and Phenomenal Knowledge: New Essays on Consciousness and Physicalism, Oxford University Press, pp. 111–45.
Robinson, H. 1993. “The Anti-Materialist Strategy and the Knowledge Argument,” in Howard Robinson, ed., Objections to Physicalism, Oxford University Press, pp. 159–83.
Schwitzgebel, E. 2008. “The Unreliability of Naive Introspection,” Philosophical Review 117: 245–73.
Soames, S. 2005.Reference and Description: The Case against Two-Dimensionalism, Princeton University Press.
Stoljar, D. 2001. “Two Conceptions of the Physical,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62: 253–81.
Stoljar, D. 2004. “The Argument from Diaphanousness,” in M. Escurdia, R. Stanton, and C. Viger, eds., Language, Mind and World: Special Issue of the Canadian Journal of Philosophy, University of Calgary Press, pp. 341–90.
Stoljar, D. 2005. “Physicalism and Phenomenal Concepts,” Mind and Language 20: 469–95.
Sturgeon, S. 1994. “The Epistemic View of Subjectivity,” Journal of Philosophy 91: 221–36.
Tye, M. 2000. “Representationalism: The Theory and Its Motivations,” in Consciousness, Color, and Content, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 45–68.
Tye, M. 2009. Consciousness Revisited: Materialism without Phenomenal Concepts, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
White, S. 2007. “The Argument for the Semantic Premise,” in T. Alter and S. Walter, eds., Phenomenal Concepts and Phenomenal Knowledge: New Essays on Consciousness and Physicalism, Oxford University Press, pp. 210–49.
Yablo, S. 1993. “Is Conceivability a Guide to Possibility?Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53: 1–42.
Yablo, S. 2002. “Coulda, Woulda, Shoulda,” in T. S. Gendler and J. Hawthorne, eds., Conceivability and Possibility, Oxford University Press, pp. 441–92.