Abernethy, W. J. and Clark, K. B. (1985) Innovation: mapping the winds of creative destruction. Research Policy 14, 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Agrawal, A. and Henderson, R. (2002) Putting patents in context: exploring knowledge transfer from MIT. Management Science 8, 44–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aldrich, H. E. and Pfeffer, J. (1976) Environments of organizations. Annual Review of Sociology 2, 79–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aldrich, H. E. and Zimmer, C. (1986) Entrepreneurship through science networks. In Sexton, D. L. and Smilor, R. W. (eds.), The Art and Science of Entrepreneurship. Ballinger Publishing.Google Scholar

Anderson, P. (1999) Complexity theory and organization science. Organization Science 10, 216–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, P., Mayer, A., Eisenhardt, K., Carley, K. and Pettigrew, A. (1999) Introduction to the special issue: applications of complexity theory to organization science. Organization Science 10, 233–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Antonelli, C. (1999) The evolution of the industrial organization of the production of knowledge. Cambridge Journal of Economics 23, 243–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Argyres, S. N. and Liebeskind, J. P. (1998) Privatizing the intellectual commons: universities and the commercialization of biotechnology research. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 35, 427–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Argyres, N. S. and Liebeskind, J. P. (2002) Governance inseparability and the evolution of US biotechnology industry. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 47, 197–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ariao, A. and Torre, J. (1998) Learning from failure: towards an evolutionary model of collaborative ventures. Organization Science 9(3), Special issue: Managing partnerships and strategic alliances, 306–325.Google Scholar

Arora, A. and Gambardella, A. (1990) Complementary and external packages linkages: the strategy of the firms in biotechnology. Journal of Industrial Economics 38, 361–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arora, A. and Gambardella, A. (1994) The changing technology of technological change: general and abstract knowledge and the division of innovative labour. Research Policy 23(5) (September), 523–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arundel, A. (2001) The relative effectiveness of patents and secrecy for appropriation. Research Policy 30, 611–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arrow, K. (1962) Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In Nelson, R. R. (ed.), The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors. National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar

Bains, W. (1998) Genes to proteins in context. Trends in Biotechnology 16, 2–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Barley, S. R., Freeman, J. and Hybels, R. C. (1992) Strategic alliances in commercial biotechnology. In Nohria, N. and Eccles, R. (eds.), Networks and Organizations. Harvard Business School.Google Scholar

Barrett, F. J. and Cooperrider, D. L. (1980) Generative metaphor intervention: a new behavioral approach for working with systems divided by conflicts and caught in defensive perception. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 26, 219–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baum, J. A. C. and Singh, J. V. (1994) Organizational niches and the dynamics of organizational mortality. American Journal of Sociology 100, 346–380.Google Scholar

Beckman, C. and Haunschild, P. R. (2002) Network learning: the effects of partners’ heterogeneity of experience on corporate acquisitions. Administrative Science Quarterly 47, 92–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ben David, J. (1971) The Scientist's Role in Society: A Comparative Study. Prentice-Hall, Inc.Google Scholar

Bengtsson, M. and Kock, S. (2000) “Coopetition” in business networks – to cooperate and compete simultaneously. Industrial Marketing Management 29, 411–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berg, P. (1997) Interview conducted by Sally Smith Hughes, Regional Oral History Office, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley.

Bergmann Lichtenstein, B. (2000) Self organized transitions: a pattern amid the chaos of transformative change. Academy of Management Executive 14, 128–141.Google Scholar

Bok, D. (1981) President's report: business and the academy. Harvard Magazine May–June, 23–35.Google Scholar

Boyer, P. (1997) Interview by Sally Smith Hughes, Regional Oral History Office, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley.

Brandenburger, A. M. and Nalebuff, B. J. (1996) Co-opetition. Doubleday.Google Scholar

Bozeman, B., Laredo, P. and Mangematin, V. (2007) Introduction: understanding the emergence and deployment of “nano” S&T. Research Policy 36, 807–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bourdieu, P. and Wacquant, L. (1992) Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Bradach, J. and Eccles, R. (1989) Price, authority, and trust: from ideal types to plural forms. Annual Review of Sociology 15, 97–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Broekstra, G. (1996) The triune-brain metaphor: the evolution of the living linear. In Grant, D. and Oswick, C. (eds.), Metaphors and Organizations. Sage.Google Scholar

Burrill, S. G. and Lee, K. B. (1989) Biotech 89: Commercialization. Ernst & Young.Google Scholar

Burt, R. S. (2005) Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Callon, M. (1998a) Introduction: the embeddedness of economic markets in economics. In Callon, M. (ed.), The Laws of the Markets. Blackwell Publishers/Sociological Review.Google Scholar

Callon, M. (1998b) An essay on framing and overflowing: economic externalities revisited by sociology. In Callon, M. (ed.), The Laws of the Markets. Blackwell Publishers/Sociological Review.Google Scholar

Cambrosio, A. and Keating, P. (1995) Exquisite Specificity: The Monoclonal Antibody Revolution. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cardinal, L. B., Alessandri, T. M. and Turner, S. F. (2001) Knowledge codifiability, resource, and science-based innovation. Journal of Knowledge Management 5, 195–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carroll, G. (1984) Organizational ecology. In Turner, R. H. and Short, J. F. (eds.), Annual Review of Sociology. Annual Review, Inc.Google Scholar

Casper, S. and Kettler, H. (2001) National institutional frameworks and the hybridization of entrepreneurial business models: the German and UK biotechnology sectors. Industry and Innovation 8, 5–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Casper, S. and Whitley, R. (2004) Managing competences in entrepreneurial technology firms: a comparative institutional analysis of Germany, Sweden and the UK. Research Policy 33, 89–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Casper, S., Lehrer, M. and Soskice, D. (1999) Can high-technology industries prosper in Germany? Institutional frameworks and the evolution of the German software and biotechnology industries. Industry and Innovation 6, 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chandler, A. (1962) Strategy and Culture. MIT Press.Google Scholar

Child, J. and Faulkner, D. (1998) Strategies of Co-operation: Managing Alliances, Networks, and Joint Ventures. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Clarke-Hill, C., Li, H. and Davies, B. (2003) The paradox of co-operation and competition in strategic alliances: towards a multi-paradigm approach. Management Research News 26, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clegg, S. R. and Gray, J. T. (1996) Metaphors in organizational research: of embedded embryos, paradigms and powerful people. In Grant, D. and Oswick, C. (eds.), Metaphors and Organizations. Sage.Google Scholar

Coase, R. (1960) The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics 3, 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, S. N., Chang, A. C. Y., Boyer, H. W. and Helling, R. B. (1973) Construction of biologically functional bacterial plasmids in vitro. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 70, 3240–3244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cohen, W. M. and Levinthal, D. A. (1990) Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35, 128–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R. and Walsh, J. P. (2000) Protecting their intellectual assets: appropriability conditions and why US manufacturing firms patent (or not). National Bureau of Economic Research, working chapter #7552.

Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R. and Walsh, J. P. (2002) Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science 48, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coleman, J. S. (1988) Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology 94, S95–S121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coleman, J. S. (1990) Foundations of Social Theory. Belknap Press of Harvard.Google Scholar

Colyvas, J., Crow, M., Gelijns, A., Mazzoleni, R., Nelson, R. R., Rosenberg, N. and Sampat, B. M. (2002) How do university inventions get into practice?Management Science 48, 61–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cooke, P., Kaufmann, D., Levin, C. and Wilson, R. (2006) The biosciences knowledge value chain and comparative incubation models. Journal of Technology Transfer 31, 115–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coriat, B. and Orsi, F. (2002) Establishing a new intellectual property rights regime in the United States: origins, content and problems. Research Policy 31, 1491–1507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Corolleur, C. D. F., Carrere, M. and Mangematin, V. (2004) Turning scientific and technological human capital into economic capital: the experience of biotech start-ups in France. Research Policy 33, 631–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crane, D. (1968) Social structure in a group of scientists: a test of the “invisible college” hypothesis. American Sociological Review 34, 335–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crane, D. (1972) Invisible Colleges – Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Danzon, P. M., Epstein, A. and Nicholson, S. (2004) Mergers and acquisitions in the pharmaceutical and biotech industries. NBER Working Paper Series, Working Paper 10536, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA. (Available at: www.nber.org/papers/w10536).Google Scholar

Darby, M. R. and Zucker, L. G. (2002) Going public when you can in biotechnology. NBER Working Paper Series, Working Paper W8954.CrossRef

Das, P. S., Sen, P. and Beal, D. B. (1998) Impact of strategic alliances on firm valuation. Academy of Management Journal 41, 27–41.Google Scholar

Das, T. K. and Teng, B. S. (2000) Instabilities of strategic alliances: an internal tensions perspective. Organization Science 11, 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dasgupta, P. (1988) Trust as a commodity. In Gambetta, D. (ed.), Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations. Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Dasgupta, P. and David, P. A. (1987) Information disclosure and the economics of science and technology. In Feiwel, G. (ed.), Arrow and the Ascent of Modern Economic Theory. MacMillan Press.Google Scholar

David, P. A. (1992) Path-dependence in economic processes: implications for policy analysis in dynamical systems contexts. Discussion paper, Center for Economic Policy Research, Stanford University.

David, P. A., Mowery, D. and Steinmueller, W. E. (1992) Analysing the economic payoffs from basic research. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 2, 73–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeCenzo, and Robbins, (1996) Human Resource Management. John Wiley & Sons.

Deutschman, A. (1994) The managing wisdom of hightech superstars. Fortune, October 17, 197–205.Google Scholar

Djerassi, C. (1993) Policy forum – basic research: the gray zone. Science 261, 972–973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dodgson, M. (1993) Organizational learning: a review of some literatures. Organization Studies 14, 375–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doving, E. (1996) In the image of man: organizational action, competence and learning. In Grant, D. and Oswick, C. (eds.), Metaphors and Organizations. Sage.Google Scholar

Eisenberg, R. (1987) Proprietary rights and the norms of science in biotechnology research. Yale Law Journal 97, 177–231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Eisenberg, R. (1996) Public research and private development: patents and technology transfer in government-sponsored research. Virginia Law 82, 1663–1727.Google Scholar

Eisenberg, R. and Nelson, R. R. (2002) Public vs. proprietary science: a fruitful tension?Daedalus 131, 89–102.Google Scholar

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review 14, 532–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eisenhardt, K. M. and Shoonhoven, C. B. (1996) Resource based view of strategic alliance formation: strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms. Organization Science 10, 136–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Etzkowitz, H. (1998) The norms of entrepreneurial science: cognitive effects of the new university–industry linkages. Research Policy 27, 823–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Etzkowitz, H. (1999) Bridging the gap: the evolution of industry–university links in the United States. In Branscomb, L. and Kodama, F. (eds.), Industrialized Knowledge: University–Industry Linkages in Japan and in the United States. MIT Press.Google Scholar

Etzkowitz, H. (2002) MIT and the Rise of Entrepreneurial Science. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Etzkowitz, H. (2003) Triple Helix: A Manifesto to Innovation, Incubation and Growth. SNS Press.Google Scholar

Etzkowitz, H. and Leydesdorff, L. (2000) The dynamic of innovation: from national systems and “Mode 2” to a triple helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy 29, 109–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Etzkowitz, H. and Webster, A. (1998) Entrepreneurial science: the second academic revolution. In Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A. and Healey, P. (eds.). Capitalizing Knowledge: New Intersections of Industry and Academia. SUNY Series, Frontiers in Education.Google Scholar

Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A. and Healey, P. (eds.) (1998) Capitalizing Knowledge: New Intersections of Industry and Academia. SUNY Series, Frontiers in Education.Google Scholar

Etzkowitz, H. A., Webster, C., Gebhardt, B. and Terra, R. C. (2000) The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy 29, 313–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feldman, M. (2003) The locational dynamics of the US biotech industry: knowledge externalities and the anchor hypothesis. Industry and Innovation 10, 311–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feldman, M. P. and Francis, J. K. (2004) Homegrown solutions: fostering cluster formation. Economic Development Quarterly 18, 127–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fligstein, N. (1985) The spread of the multidivisional form among large firms, 1919–1979. American Sociological Review 50, 377–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Foschi, M. (1991) Gender and double standards for competence. In Ridgeway, C. (ed.), Gender, Interaction and Inequality. Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Friedkin, N. E. (1978) University social structure and social networks among scientists. American Journal of Sociology 83, 1444–1465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friedman, J. and Silberman, J. (2003) University technology transfer: do incentives, management, and location matter?Journal of Technology Transfer 28, 81–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fukuyama, F. (1995) Trust. Free Press.Google Scholar

Galambos, L. and Sturchio, J. L. (1998) Pharmaceutical firms and the transition to biotechnology: a study in strategic innovation. Business History Review 72, 250–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gambetta, D. (1988) Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations. Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Gilseng, V. and Nooteboom, B. (2005) Density and strength of ties in innovation networks: an analysis of multimedia and biotechnology. European Management Review 3, 179–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gittelman, M. and Kogut, B. (2003) Does good science lead to valuable knowledge? Biotechnology firms and the evolutionary logic of citation patterns. Management Science 49, 366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gnyawali, D. R. and Madhavan, R. (2001) Cooperative networks and competitive dynamics: a structural embeddedness perspective. Academy of Management Review 26, 431–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Granovetter, M. (1985) Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology 91, 481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grant, D. and Oswick, C. (1996) Introduction: Getting the Measure of Metaphors. In Grant, D. and Oswick, C. (eds.), Metaphors and Organizations. Sage.Google Scholar

Grant, M. (1996) Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 17, special issue “Knowledge and the Firm.”CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grant, R. M. and Baden-Fuller, C. (2004) A knowledge accessing theory of strategic alliances. Journal of Management Studies 41, 61–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gulati, R. (1995) Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. Academy of Management Journal 38, 85–112.Google Scholar

Gulati, R. (1998) Alliances and networks. Strategic Management Journal 19, 293–317.3.0.CO;2-M>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gulati, R. and Higgins, M. C. (2003) Which ties matter when? The contingent effects of interorganizational partnerships on IPO success. Strategic Management Journal 24, 127–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gulati, R., Khanna, T. and Nohria, N. (1994) Unilateral commitments and the importance of process in alliances. Sloan Management Review 35, 61–70.Google Scholar

Gulbrandsen, M. and Smeby, J.-C. (2005) Industry funding and university professors’ research performance. Research Policy 34, 932–950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hackett, E. J. (1990) Science as a vocation in 1990: the changing organizational culture of academic science. Journal of Higher Education 61, 241–279.Google Scholar

Hagedoorn, J. (1993) Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: interorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences. In Grabher, G. (ed.), The Embedded Firm: On the Socioeconomics of Industrial Networks. Routledge.Google Scholar

Hagedoorn, J. (2002) Inter-firm R&D partnerships: an overview of major trends and patterns since 1960. Research Policy 31, 477–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hagedoorn, J. (2006) Understanding the cross-level embeddedness of interfirm partnership formation. Academy of Management Review 31, 670–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hagedoorn, J. and Duysters, G. (2003) Learning in dynamic inter-firm networks: the efficacy of multiple contacts. Organization Studies 23, 525–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hagedoorn, J., Crayannis, E. and Alexander, J. (2001) Strange bedfellows in the personal computer industry: technology alliances between IBM and Apple. Research Policy 30, 837–849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hamel, G. (1991) Competition for competence and inter-partner learning within international strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal 12, 83–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hamel, G., Doz, Y. L. and Prahalad, C. K. (1989) Collaborate with your competitors and win. Harvard Business Review 67, 133–139.Google Scholar

Hannan, M. T. and Carroll, G. R. (1992) Dynamics of Organizational Populations Density, Legitimation, and Competition. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hannan, M. T. and Freeman, J. (1977) The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology 82, 929–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hannan, M. T. and Freeman, J. (1984) Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review 49, 149–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hannan, M. T. and Freeman, J. (1989) Organizational Ecology. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Hardy, C. and Phillips, N. (1999) No joking matter: discursive struggle in the Canadian refugee system. Organization Studies 20, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hardy, C., Phillips, N. and Lawrence, T. B. (2003) Resources, knowledge and influence: the organizational effects of interorganizational collaboration. Journal of Management Studies 40, 321–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harmon, B., Ardichvili, A. and Cardozo, R. N. (1997) Mapping the university technology transfer process. Journal of Business Venturing 12, 423–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hart, O. (1995). Firms, Contracts, and Financial Structures. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heller, A. M. and Eisenberg, R. (1998) Can patents deter innovation? The anticommons in biomedical research. Science 280/5364, 698–702.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Henderson, R. and Mitchell, W. (1997) The interaction of organizational and competitive influences on strategy and performance. Strategic Management Journal 18 (Summer special issue), 5–14.3.3.CO;2-9>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Henderson, R., Jaffe, A. and Trajtenberg, M. (1994) Numbers up, quality down? trends in university patenting 1965–2002. Unpublished manuscript, Harvard University.

Henderson, R., Jaffe, A. and Trajtenberg, M. (1998) Universities as a source of commercial technology: a detailed analysis of university patenting 1965–1988. Review of Economics and Statistics 80, 119–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hendry, C., Brown, J. and Defillippi, R. (2000) Regional clustering of high technology-based firms: opto-electronics in three countries. Regional Studies 34, 129–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hicks, D. and Katz, J. S. (1997) The Changing Shape of the British Industrial Research System. Steep Special Report 6, University of Sussex.Google Scholar

Hoang, H. and Rothaermel, F. T. (2006) Internal and external capabilities transfer: time to market in new product development. Academy of Management Best Conference Paper, BPS: R1.

Höyssä, M., Bruun, H. and Hukkinen, J. (2004) The co-evolution of social and physical infrastructure for biotechnology innovation in Turku, Finland. Research Policy 33, 769–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hughes, S. S. (2001) Making dollars out of DNA. Isis 92, 541–575.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Huxham, C. (1996) Creating Collaborative Advantage. Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Huygens, C., Baden-Fuller, F., Bosch, A. J. and Volberda, H. W. (2001) Co-evolution of firm capabilities and industry competition: investigating the music industry, 1877–1997. Organization Studies 22, 971–1011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hybels, R. C. and Popielarz, P. A. (1989) The iron law revisited: the formation of an interorganizational oligarchy through joint ventures. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Annual Meeting, Cincinnati, August 1996.

Inkpen, A. and Tsang, E. (2005) Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer. Academy of Management Review 30, 146–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackson, S. E. and Schuler, R. S. (1995) Understanding human resource management in the context of organizations and their environments. Annual Review of Psychology 46, 237–264.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kaghan, W. (1997) Contracts and the structuring of deals in university/industry technology transfer. Manuscript, University of Washington School of Business Administration.

Kaplan, S., Murray, F. and Henderson, R. (2003) Discontinuities and senior management: assessing the role of recognition in pharmaceutical firm response to biotechnology. Industrial and Corporate Change 12, 203–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kenney, M. (1986) Biotechnology: The University–Industrial Complex. Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Khanna, T., Gulati, R. and Nohria, N. (1998) The dynamics of learning alliances: competition, cooperation and scope. Strategic Management Journal 19, 193–210.3.0.CO;2-C>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Khodyakov, D. (2007) Trust as a process: a three-dimensional approach. Sociology 41, 115–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirby, D. A. (2006) Creating entrepreneurial universities in the UK: applying entrepreneurship theory to practice. Journal of Technology Transfer 31, 599–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kleinman, D. L. (1998) Untangling context: understanding a university laboratory in the commercial world. Science Technology and Human Values 23(3), 285–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kogut, B. (1998) Joint ventures: theoretical and empirical perspectives. Strategic Management Journal 9, 319–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kogut, B. (2000) The network as knowledge: generative rules and the emergence of structure. Strategic Management Journal 21, 405–425.3.0.CO;2-5>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kogut, B., Shan, W. and Walker, G. (1992) The make-or-cooperate decision in the context of an industry network. In Nohria, N. and Eccles, R. (eds.), Networks and Organizations. Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar

Kohler, G. and Milstein, C. (1975) Continuous cultures of fused cells secreting antibody of defined specificity. Nature (Lond.) 256, 495–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koput, K. W. (1997) A chaotic model of innovative search: some answers, many questions. Organization Science 8, 528–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koput, K. W. and Powell, W. W. (2002) Science and strategy: organizational evolution in a knowledge-intensive field. Working paper, University of Arizona.

Kornberg, A. (1995) The Golden Helix, University Science Books.Google Scholar

Kramer, R. M., Brewer, M. B. and Hanna, B. (1996) Collective trust and collective action in organizations: the decision to trust as a social decision. In Kramer, R. M. and Tyler, T. R. (eds.), Trust in Organizations. Sage.Google Scholar

Kreiner, K. and Schultz, M. (1993) Informal collaborations in R&D: the formation of networks across organizations. Organization Studies 14, 189–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kristiansen, E. G. (1998) R&D in the presence of network externalities: timing and compatibility. RAND Journal of Economics 29, 531–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1980) Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Lampel, J. and Shapira, Z. (2001) Judgmental errors, interactive norms, and the difficulty of detecting strategic surprises. Organization Science 2, 599–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lane, J. P. and Lubatkin, M. (1998) Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal 19, 461–477.3.0.CO;2-L>CrossRef

Larsson, R., Bengtsson, L., Henriksson, K. and Sparks, J. (1998) The interorganizational learning dilemma: collective knowledge development in strategic alliances. Organization Science 9, 285–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Latour, B. and Woolgar, S. (1979) Laboratory Life. Sage.Google Scholar

Latour, B. and Woolgar, S. (1986) Laboratory Life – The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Ledford, G. E. and Lawler, E. E. (1994) Research on employee participation: beating a dead horse?Academy of Management Review 19, 633–636.Google Scholar

Lee, Y. S. (1996) Technology transfer and the research university: a search for boundaries of university–industry collaborations. Research Policy 25, 843–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lee, Y. S. (1998) University–industry collaboration on technology transfer: views from the ivory tower. Policy Studies Journal 26, 69–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lee, Jr., K. B. and Burrill, G. S. (1995) Biotech 95: Reform, Restructure, Renewal. Ernst & Young.Google Scholar

Lehrer, M. and Asakawa, K. (2004) Rethinking the public sector: idiosyncrasies of biotechnology commercialization as motors of national R&D reform in Germany and Japan. Research Policy 33, 921–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewin, A. Y. (1999) Application of complexity theory to organization science. Organization Science 10, 215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewin, A. Y., Long, C. P. and Carroll, T. N. (1999) The coevolution of new organizational forms. Organization Science 10, 535–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewis, W. M. (2000) Exploring paradox: toward a more comprehensive guide. Academy of Management Review 25, 760–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Liebeskind, J. D. (2000) Ownership, governance and incentives in new biotechnology firms. In Blair, M. and Kochan, T. (eds.), The New Relationship: Human Capital in The American Corporation, MIT Press.Google Scholar

Liebeskind, J. P. (2000) Internal capital markets: benefits, costs, and organizational arrangements. Organization Science 11, 58–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Liebeskind, J. P. (2001) Risky business: university and intellectual property. Academe 87, 49–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Liebeskind, J. P. and Oliver, A. L. (1998) From handshake to contract: trust, intellectual property and the social structure of academic research. In Lane, C. and Bachmann, R. (eds.), Trust Within and Between Organizations. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Liebeskind, J. A., Oliver, A. L., Zucker, L. and Brewer, M. (1996) Social networks, learning, and flexibility: sourcing scientific knowledge in new biotechnology firms. Organization Science 7, 428–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luhman, N. (1988) Familiarity, confidence, and trust. In Gambetta, D. (ed.), Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations. Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

McKelvey, B. and Aldrich, H. (1983) Populations, natural selection, and applied organizational science. Administrative Science Quarterly 28, 101–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McKelvey, M., Alm, H. and Riccaboni, M. (2003) Does co-location matter for formal knowledge collaboration in the Swedish biotechnology–pharmaceutical sector?Research Policy 32, 483–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McKelvey, W. (1982) Organizational Systematics: Taxonomy, Evolution, Classification. University of California Press.Google Scholar

McKelvey, W. (1997) Quasi-natural organization science. Organization Science 8, 352–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Malerba, F. and Orsenigo, L. (2002) Innovation and market structure in the dynamics of the pharmaceutical industry and biotechnology: towards a history-friendly model. Industrial and Corporate Change 11, 667–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

March, J. (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science 2, 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

March, G. J. and Simon, H. H. (1958) Organizations. New York.Google Scholar

Martineau, B. (2001) First Fruit: The Creation of the Flvr Savr Tomato and the Birth of Genetically Engineered Food. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Maurer, I. and Ebers, M. (2006) Dynamics of social capital and their performance implications: lessons from biotechnology startups. Administrative Science Quarterly 51, 262–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H. and Schoorman, F. D. (1995) An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review 20, 709–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mazzolini, R. and Nelson, R. R. (1998a) Economic theories about the benefits and costs of patents. Journal of Economic Issues 32, 1031–1052.Google Scholar

Mazzolini, R. and Nelson, R. R. (1998b) The benefits and costs of strong patent protection: a contribution to the current debate. Research Policy 27, 273–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Merges, R. P., Menell, P. S., Lemley, M. A. and Jorde, T. M. (1997) Intellectual Property in the New Technological Age. Aspen Publishers Inc.Google Scholar

Merton, R. K. (1968) The Matthew effect in science. Science 159, 56–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Merton, R. K. (1973) The normative structure of science. In Merton, R. K. (ed.), The Sociology of Science. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Merton, R. K. (1977) The sociology of science: an episodic memoir. In Merton, R. K. and Jerry, G. J. (eds.), The Sociology of Science in Europe. Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar

Meyer, D. A., Tsui, A. S. and Hinings, R. C. (1993) Configurational approach to organizational analysis. Academy of Management Journal 36, 1175–1195.Google Scholar

Meyer, J. and Scott, W. R. (1983) Organisational Environments: Ritual and Rationality. Sage.Google Scholar

Meyer, W. J. and Rowan, B. (1977) Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology 83, 340–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meyer-Krahmer, F. and Schmoch, U. (1998) Science-based technologies: university–industry interactions in four fields. Research Policy 27, 835–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mian, S. A. (1996) Assessing value-added contribution of university technology business incubators to tenant firms. Research Policy 25, 325–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miles, G. R., Miles, R. E., Perrone, V. and Edvinsson, L. (1998) Some conceptual and research barriers to the utilization of knowledge. California Management Review 40, 281–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Milstein, C. (2000) With the benefit of hindsight. Immunology Today 21, 359–364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Miner, A. S. (1994) Seeking adaptive advantage: evolutionary theory and managerial action. In Baum, J. A. C. and Singh, J. V. (eds.), Evolutional Dynamics of Organizations. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mitsuhashi, H. (2002) Uncertainty in selecting alliance partners: the three reduction mechanisms and alliance formation processes. International Journal of Organizational Analysis 10, 109–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morgan, G. (1980) Paradigms, metaphors and puzzle solving in organizational theory. Administrative Science Quarterly 25 605–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morgan, G. (1983) More on metaphor: why we cannot control tropes in administrative science. Administrative Science Quarterly 28, 601–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morgan, G. (1986) Images of Organization. Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Morrow, J. F., Cohen, S. N., Chang, A. C. Y., Boyer, H. W., Goodman, H. M. and Helling, R. B. (1974) Replication and transcription of eukaryotic DNA in esherichia coli. PNAS 71, 1743–1747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mowery, D. C., Oxley, J. E. and Silverman, B. S. (1996) Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer. Strategic Management Journal 17 (Winter special issue), 77–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mowery, D. C., Sampat, B. N. and Ziedonis, A. A. (2002) Learning to patent: institutional experience, learning, and the characteristics of US university patents after the Bayh–Dole Act, 1981–1992. Management Science 48, 73–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mowery, D. C., Nelson, R. R., Sampat, B. N. and Ziedonis, A. A. (2001) The growth of patenting and licensing by US universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh–Dole act of 1980. Research Policy 30, 99–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nahapiet, J. and Goshal, S. (1998) Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review 23, 242–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nault, B. R. and Tyagi, R. K. (2001) Implementable mechanisms to coordinate horizontal alliances. Management Science 47, 787–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nee, V. (1998) Norms and networks in economic and organizational performance. American Economic Association Papers and Proceedings May, 85–89.Google Scholar

Nelkin, D. (1984) Science as Intellectual Property: Who Controls Scientific Research?Macmillan.Google Scholar

Nelkin, D., Nelson, R. R. and Kiernan, C. (1987) University–industry alliances – commentary. Science, Technology & Human Values 12, 65–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nelson, L. (1998) The rise of intellectual property protection in the American university. Science 279(5356), 1460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nelson, R. R. (1990) Capitalism as an engine of progress. Research Policy 19, 193–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nelson, R. R. (2002) The market economy of the republic of science. Working paper, Columbia University.

Nelson, R. R. (2004) The market economy and the scientific commons. Research Policy 33, 455–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nesta, L. and Mangematin, V. (2002) Industry life cycle, knowledge generation and technological networks. In Mothe, J. and Link, A. E. (eds.), Networks, Alliances and Partnerships in the Innovation Process. Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar

Nicolaou, N. and Birley, S. (2003) Academic networks in a trichotomous categorization of university spinouts. Journal of Business Venturing 18, 333–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Niosi, J. (2003) Alliances are not enough explaining rapid growth in biotechnology firms. Research Policy 32, 737–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Niosi, J. and Bas, T. G. (2001) The competencies of regions – Canada's clusters in biotechnology. Small Business Economics 17, 31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nonaka, I. (1994) A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science 5, 14–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nonaka, I. and Hirotaka, H. (1995) The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Nonaka, I. and Konno, N. (1998) The concept of “Ba:” building a foundation for knowledge creation. California Management Review 40, 40–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nooteboom, B. (1999a) The dynamic efficiency of networks. In Grandori, A. (ed.), Interfirm Networks: Organization and Industrial Competitiveness. Routledge.Google Scholar

Nooteboom, B. (1999b). Inter-Firm Alliances: Analysis and Design. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nooteboom, B. (2002) Trust: Forms, Foundations, Functions, Failures and Figures. Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oliver, A. L. (1993) New biotechnology firms: a multilevel analysis of interorganizational relations in an emerging industry. Bringing process into structure. Unpublished dissertation, UCLA.

Oliver, A. L. (1997) On the nexus of organizations and professions: networking through trust. Sociological Inquiry 67, 227–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oliver, A. L. (2001) Strategic alliances and the learning life-cycle of biotechnology firms. Organization Studies 22, 467–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oliver, A. L. (2004) Biotechnology entrepreneurial scientists and their collaborations. Research Policy 33, 583–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oliver, A. L. (2007). University–industry collaborations in the Israeli biotechnology industry. Work in progress, Department of Sociology and Anthropology, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

Oliver, A. L. and Liebeskind, J. P. (1998) Three levels of networking for sourcing intellectual capital in biotechnology: implications for studying interorganizational networks. International Studies of Management & Organization 27, 76–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oliver, A. L. and Liebeskind, J. P. (2003) Public research and intellectual property rights: a tale of two inventions. Working paper, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

Oliver, A. L. and Montgomery, K. (2000) Creating a hybrid organizational form from parental blueprints: the emergence and evolution of knowledge firms. Human Relations 53, 33–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oliver, A. L. and Montgomery, K. (2001) Cybernetics and the theory of trust development. Human Relations 54, 1045–1065.Google Scholar

Oliver, A. L. and Ramati, A. (2003) Historical accounts of scientific entrepreneurship. Unpublished working paper, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

Orsenigo, L. (1989) The Emergence of Biotechnology: Institutions and Markes in Industrial Innovation. Pinter Publishers.Google Scholar

Orsenigo, L. (2001) The (failed) development of a biotechnology cluster: the case of Lombardy. Small Business Economics 17, 77–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Osborn, R. and Hagedoorn, J. (1997) The institutionalization and evolutionary dynamics of interorganizational alliances and networks. Academy of Management Journal 40, 261–278.Google Scholar

Ouchi, G. W. (1980) Markets, bureaucracies and clans. Administrative Science Quarterly 28, 129–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ouchi, W. and Jaeger, A. (1978) Type Z organization: stability in the midst of mobility. Academy of Management Review 3, 305–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oviatt, B. M. and McDougall, P. P. (1995) Global start-ups: entrepreneurs on a worldwide stage. Academy of Management Executive 9, 30–44.Google Scholar

Owen-Smith, J. (2003) From separate systems to a hybrid order: accumulative advantage across public and private science at research one universities. Research Policy 32, 1081–1104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Owen-Smith, J. and Powell, W. W. (2001a) To patent or not: faculty decisions and institutional success at technology transfer. Journal of Technology Transfer 26, 99–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Owen-Smith, J. and Powell, W. W. (2001b) Careers and contradictions: faculty responses to the transformation of knowledge and its uses in the life sciences. Research in Sociology or Work 10, 109–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Owen-Smith, J. and Powell, W. W. (2003) The expanding role of university patenting in the life sciences: assessing the importance of experience and connectivity. Research Policy 32, 1695–1711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Owen-Smith, J. and Powell, W. W. (2005) Accounting for emergence and novelty in Boston and Bay area biotechnology. In Braunerhjelm, P. and Feldman, M. (eds.), Cluster Genesis: The Emergence of Technology Cluster and their Implication for Government Policies. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Owen-Smith, J., Riccaboni, M., Pammolli, F. and Powell, W. W. (2002) A comparison of US and European university–industry relations in the life sciences. Management Science 48, 24–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pace, G. (2001) The role of development agencies for the entrepreneurial promotion: Israeli case studies. (Available at: http://econwpa.wustl.edu:8089/eps/urb/papers/0311/03111003.pdf).

Packer, K. and Webster, A. (1996) Patenting culture in science: reinventing the scientific wheel of credibility, science technology. Science, Technology, and Human Values 21, 427–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Park, S. O. and Ungson, G. R. (2001) Interfirm rivalry and managerial complexity: a conceptual framework of alliance failure. Organization Science 12, 37–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Petersa, L., Groenewegenb, P. and Fiebelkornb, N. (1998) A comparison of networks between industry and public sector research in materials technology and biotechnology. Research Policy 27, 255–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pigliucci, I. (2000) Skeptic. Altadena 8, 62–71.Google Scholar

Pigou, A. C. (1932) The Economics of Welfare, 4th ed. Macmillan.Google Scholar

Pirnay, F., Surlemont, N. and Nlemvo, F. (2003) Toward a typology of university spin-offs. Small Business Economics 21, 355–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pisano, G. P. (1990) The R&D boundaries of the firm: an empirical analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly 35, 153–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pisano, G. P. (1991) The governance of innovation: vertical integration and collaborative arrangements in the biotechnology industry. Research Policy 20, 237–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pisano, G. P. (1994) Knowledge, integration, and the locus of learning: an empirical analysis of process development. Strategic Management Journal 15, 85–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pisano, G. P. (1996) Learning-before-doing in the development of new process technology. Research Policy 25, 1097–1111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pisano, G. P. (2002) The economics and technology of pharmaceutical R&D in the age of molecular biology. Working paper, Harvard Business School.

Podolny, J. M. and Page, K. L. (1998) Network forms of organization. Annual Review of Sociology 24, 57–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Porter, K., Whittington, B. and Powell, W. W. (2005) The institutional embeddedness of high-tech regions: relational foundations of the Boston biotechnology community. In Breschi, S. and Malerba, F. (eds.), Clusters, Networks, and Innovation. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Powell, W. W. (1990) Neither market nor hierarchy: network form of organization. Research in Organization Behavior 12, 295–336.Google Scholar

Powell, W. W. (1998) Learning from collaboration. California Management Review 40, 228–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Powell, W. W. and Brantley, P. (1992) Competitive cooperation in biotechnology – learning through networks? In Nohria, N. and Eccles, R. (eds.), Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form and Action. Harvard Business School.Google Scholar

Powell, W. W. and Owen-Smith, J. (1998) Universities and the market for intellectual property in the life sciences. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 17, special issue “The Commercialism Dilemma of the Nonprofit Sector.”3.0.CO;2-G>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W. and Smith-Doerr, L. (1996) Interoganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly 41, 116–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., Smith-Doerr, L. and Owen-Smith, J. (1999) Network position and firm performance: organizational returns to collaboration in the biotechnology industry. In Andrew, S. and Knock, D. (eds.), Research in the Sociology of Organizations. JAI Press.Google Scholar

Powell, W. W., White, D. R., Koput, K. W. and Owen-Smith, J. (2005) Network dynamics and field evolution: the growth of interorganizational collaboration in the life sciences. American Journal of Sociology 110, 1132–1205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Prigogine, I. and Stengers, I. (1984) Order Out of Chaos. Bantam Books.Google Scholar

Quinn, J. B. (1986) Innovation and corporate strategy: managed chaos. In Horwitch, M. (ed.), Technology in the Modern Corporation: A Strategic Perspective. Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Rabinow, P. (1996) Making PCR. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Ramer, S., Hwee Ang, S. and Baden-Fuller, C. (2001) Dealing with uncertainties in the biotechnology industry: the use of real options reasoning. Journal of Commercial Biotechnology 8, 95–105.Google Scholar

Reimers, N. (1997) Stanford's office of technology licensing and the Cohen/Boyer cloning patents. Oral History, by Sally Smith Hughes, Regional Oral History Office, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley.

Rhoades, G. and Slaughter, S. (1991) Professors, administrators, and patents: the negotiation of technology transfer. Sociology of Education 64, 65–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ring, P. S. (1997) Processes facilitating reliance on trust in inter-organizational networks. In Ebers, M. (ed.), The Formation of Inter-Organizational Networks. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ring, P. S. (1999) The Costs of Networked Organization. In Grandori, A. (ed.), Interfirm Networks: Organizational and Industrial Competitiveness. Routledge.Google Scholar

Ring, P. and Ven, A. (1992) Structuring cooperative relations between organizations. Strategic Management Journal 13, 483–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ring, P. S. and Ven, A. H. (1994) Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relations. Academy of Management Review 19, 90–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robbins-Roth, C. (2000) From Alchemy to IPO: The Business of Biotechnology. Perseus Publishing.Google Scholar

Rond, M. and Bouchikhi, H. (2004) On the dialectics of strategic alliances. Organization Science 15, 56–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Romanelli, E. (1991) The evolution of new organizational forms. Annual Review of Sociology 17, 79–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rothaermel, F. T. (2001) Complementary assets, strategic alliances, and the incumbent's advantage: an empirical study of industry and firm effects in the biopharmaceutical industry. Research Policy 30, 1235–1251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rothaermel, F. T. and Thursby, M. (2007) The nanotech versus the biotech revolution: sources of productivity in incumbent firm research. Research Policy 36, 832–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rothaermel, F. T., Agung, S. and Jiang, L. (2007) University entrepreneurship: a taxonomy of the literature. Industrial and Corporate Change 16, 691–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sakakibara, K. (1993) R&D cooperation among competitors: a case study of the VLSI semiconductor research project in Japan. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 10, 393–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Saxenian, A. (1985) Silicon Valley and Route 128: regional prototypes or historic exceptions? In Castells, M. (ed.), High Technology, Space, and Society. Sage.Google Scholar

Saxenian, A. (1994) Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Schilling, M. A. and Phelps, C. C. (2007) Inter-firm collaboration networks: the impact of large-scale network structure on firm innovation. Management Science 53, 1113–1126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schulz, M. (2001) The uncertain relevance of newness: organizational learning and knowledge flows. Academy of Management Journal 44, 661–682.Google Scholar

Schumpeter, J. A. (1934/1975) The Theory of Economic Development, trans. Opie, R.Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Scott, W. R. (1995) Institutions and Organizations: Theory and Research. Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Seitzer, D. (1999) Technology transfer – a flexible link between research, university and industry. European Journal of Engineering Education 24, 139–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Selznick, P. (1957) Leadership in Administration: A Sociological Interpretation. University of California Press.Google Scholar

Senker, J. and Faulkner, W. (1992) Industrial use of public sector research in advanced technologies: a comparison of biotechnology and ceramics. R&D Management 22, 157–175.Google Scholar

Shan, W. (1990) An empirical analysis of organizational strategies by entrepreneurial high technology firms. Strategic Management Journal 11, 129–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shane, S. and Stuart, T. E. (2002) Organizational endowments and the performance of university start-ups. Management Science 48, 154–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Silverman, D. (1970) The Theory of Organisations: A Sociological Framework. Heinemann.Google Scholar

Simon, A. H. (1976) Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision Making Behavior in Administrative Organizations. Free Press.Google Scholar

Sorensen, J. B. and Stuart, T. E. (2000) Ageing, obsolescence, and organizational innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 45, 81–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sorensen, O., Rivkin, W. and Fleming, L. (2006) Complexity, networks and knowledge flow. Research Policy 25, 994–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stark, D. (2001) Ambiguous assets for uncertain environments: heterarchy in postsocialist firms. In DiMaggio, P. (ed.). The Twenty-First-Century Firm: Changing Economic Organization in International Perspective. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Stinchcombe, A. L. (1965) Social structure and organizations. In March, J. G. (ed.), Handbook of Organizations. Rand McNally.Google Scholar

Stuart, T. E. (1998) Network positions and propensities to collaborate: an investigation of strategic alliance formation in a high-technology industry. Administrative Science Quarterly 43, 668–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stuart, T. E. and Podolny, J. M. (1996) Local search and the evolution of technological capabilities. Strategic Management Journal 17 (Summer special issue), 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Subramaniam, M. and Youndt, M. A. (2005) The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. Academy of Management Journal 48, 450–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sydow, J. (1997) Understanding the constitution of interorganizational trust. In Lane, C. and Bachmann, R. (eds.), Trust Within and Between Organizations. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Tansey, E. M. and Catterall, P. P. (eds.) (1995) Technology transfer in Britain: the case of monoclonal antibodies. Wellcome witnesses to twentieth century medicine. Contemporary Record 9, 409–444.CrossRef

Teece, D. J. (1986) Profiting from technological innovation. Research Policy 15, 285–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Teece, D. J. (1992) Strategies for capturing the financial benefits from technological innovation. In Rosenberg, N., Landau, R. and Mowery, D. C. (eds.), Technology and the Wealth of Nations. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Teece, D. J. (1998) Capturing value from knowledge assets: the new economy, markets for know-how, and intangible assets. California Management Review 40, 55–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Teece, D. J. and Pisano, G. (1994) The dynamic capabilities of firms: an introduction. Industrial and Corporate Change 3, 537–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Todeva, E. and Knoke, D. (2005) Strategic alliances and models of collaboration. Management Decision 43, 123–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Torero, M., Darby, M. R. and Zucker, L. G. (2001) The importance of intellectual human capital in the birth of the semiconductor industry. Working paper, University of California.

Tsai, W. (1991) Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Academy of Management Journal 44, 996–1004.Google Scholar

Tushman, M. L. and Anderson, P. (1986) Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Administrative Science Quarterly 31, 439–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Uzzi, B. (1996) The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: the network effect. American Sociological Review 61, 674–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Uzzi, B. (1997) Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: the paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly 42, 35–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Uzzi, B. (1999) Embeddedness in the making of financial capital: how social relations and networks benefit firms seeking financing. American Sociological Review 64, 481–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ven, A. H., Venkatraman, S., Polley, D. and Garud, R. (1989) Processes of new business creation in different organizational settings. In Ven, A. H., Angle, H. and Poole, M. S. (eds.), Research on the Management of Innovation. Ballinger Press.Google Scholar

Vohora, A., Wright, M. and Lockett, A. (2004) Critical junctures in the development of university high-tech spinout companies. Research Policy 33, 147–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hippel, E. (1998) Economics of product development by users: the impact of “sticky” local information. Management Science 44, 629–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Walker, G., Kogut, B. and Shan, W. (1997) Social capital, structural holes and the formation of an industry network. Organization Science 8, 109–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wasserman, S. and Faust, K. (1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Watzman, H. and Avitzour, S. P. (2001) Israel's great expectations. Nature Biotechnology 19, 518–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Weick, K. E. (1976) The Social Physiology of Organizing (2nd edition). Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Werth, B. (1995) The Billion Dollar Molecule. Simon Schuster/Touchstone.Google Scholar

Wiggins, J. and Gibson, D. V. (2003) Overview of US incubators and the case of the Austin technology incubator. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management 3, 56–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilkins, A. L. and Ouchi, W. G. (1983) Efficient cultures. Exploring the relationships between culture and organizational performance. Administrative Science Quarterly 28, 468–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williamson, O. (1981) The economics of organization: the transaction cost approach. American Journal of Sociology 87, 548–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williamson, O. E. (1975) Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. Free Press.Google Scholar

Williamson, O. E. (1985) The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. Free Press.Google Scholar

Williamson, O. E. (1991) Comparative economic organization: the analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly 36, 269–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Woolley, J. L. (2006) The origins of organizational communities: nanotechnology in the United States. Working paper, The Paul Merage School of Business, University of California, Irvine.

Woolley, Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review 14, 532–550.Google Scholar

Wright, M., Birley, S. and Mosey, S. (2004) Entrepreneurship and university technology transfer. Journal of Technology Transfer 29, 235–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yin, R. (1984) Case Study Research. Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Youndt, M., Snell, S., Dean, J. and Lepak, D. (1996) Human resource management, manufacturing strategy, and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal 39, 836–866.Google Scholar

Yuchtman, E. and Seashore, S. E. (1967) A system resource approach to organizational effectiveness. American Sociological Review, 891–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zollo, M. J., Reuer, J. and Singh, H. (2002) Interorganizational routines and performance in strategic alliances. Organization Science 13, 701–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zollo, M. and Winter, S. G. (2002) Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science 13, 339–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zucker, L. G. (1986) Production of trust: institutional sources of economic structure 1840 to 1920. Research in Organizational Behavior 8, 53–111.Google Scholar

Zucker, L. G. and Darby, M. R. (1996) Star scientists and institutional transformation: patterns of invention and innovation in the formation of the biotechnology industry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 93 (12), 709–12, 916.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Zucker, L. G. and Darby, M. R. (1997) Individual action and the demand for institution. American Behavioral Scientist 4, 502–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zucker, L. G. and Darby, M. R. (1997) Present at the biotechnological revolution: transformation of technological identity for a large incumbent pharmaceutical firm. Research Policy 26, 429–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zucker, L. G. and Darby, M. (2001) Capturing technical opportunity via Japan's star scientists: evidence from Japanese firms’ biotech patents and products. Journal of Technology Transfer 26, 37–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zucker, L. G. and Darby, M. R. (2003) Grilichesian breakthroughs: inventions of methods of inventing and firm entry in nanotechnology. NBER Working paper, No. 9825.

Zucker, L. G., Darby, M. R. and Armstrong, J. (1998) Geographically localized knowledge: spillover or markets, Economic Inquiry 36(1), 65–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zucker, L. G., Darby, M. R. and Armstrong, J. (2002) Commercializing knowledge: university science, knowledge capture, and firm performance in biotechnology. Management Science 48, 138–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zucker, L. G., Darby, M. R. and Brewer, M. B. (1998) Intellectual human capital and the birth of US biotechnology enterprises. American Economic Review 88, 290–306.Google Scholar

Zucker, L. G., Darby, M. R. and Torero, M. (2002) Labor mobility from academe to commerce. Journal of Labor Economics 20, 629–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zucker, L. G., Brewer, M. B., Oliver, L. G. and Liebeskind, J. (1993) Basic science as intellectual capital in firms: information dilemmas in rDNA biotechnology research. Working paper, Institute for Social Science Research, Los Angeles.

Zucker, L. G., Brewer, M., Darby, M. and Peng, Y. (1996) Collaboration structure and information dilemmas in biotechnology: organizational boundaries as trust production. In Kramer, R. and Tyler, T. (eds.), Trust in Organizations. Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Zucker, L. G., Darby, M. R., Furner, J., Liu, R. C. and Ma, H. (2007) Minerva unbound: knowledge stocks, knowledge flows, and new knowledge production. Research Policy 36, 850–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar