Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  • Cited by 55
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
March 2012
Print publication year:
2012
Online ISBN:
9780511794346

Book description

Morphology is particularly challenging, because it is pervaded by irregularity and idiosyncrasy. This book is a study of word structure using a specific theoretical framework known as 'Network Morphology'. It describes the systems of rules which determine the structure of words by construing irregularity as a matter of degree, using examples from a diverse range of languages and phenomena to illustrate. Many languages share common word building strategies and many diverge in interesting ways. These strategies can be understood by distinguishing different notions of 'default'. The Network Morphology philosophy promotes the use of computational implementation to check theories. The accompanying website provides the computer coded version of the Network Morphology model of word structure for readers to test, customize and develop. This book will be a valuable contribution to the fields of linguistic typology and morphology and will be welcomed by researchers and graduate students in these areas.

Reviews

‘… goes a long way towards clarifying many of the outstanding issues in linguistic morphology today.'

Mark Aronoff - Trustees Distinguished Professor, Stony Brook University

‘… covers not only inflections and paradigm structure but also derivational relatedness … an invaluable survey.’

Andrew Spencer - University of Essex

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

Contents

References

Ackema, Peter. 1995. Syntax below zero. PhD dissertation, Utrecht University.
Ackema, Peter and Ad Neeleman. 2004. Beyond morphology: interface conditions on word formation. Oxford University Press.
Ackema, Peter and Ad Neeleman. 2007. Morphology ≠ syntax. In Gillian Ramchand and Charles Reiss (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces, 325–52. Oxford University Press.
Ackerman, Farrell and Gregory T. Stump. 2004. Paradigms and periphrastic expression: a study in realization-based lexicalism. In Louisa Sadler and Andrew Spencer (eds.), Projecting morphology, 111–57. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Ackerman, Farrell, James P. Blevins and Robert Malouf. 2009. Parts and wholes: implicative patterns in inflectional paradigms. In James P. Blevins and Juliette Blevins (eds.), Analogy in grammar: form and acquisition, 54–82. Oxford University Press.
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and R. M. W. Dixon. 1998. Dependencies between grammatical systems. Language 74, 56–80.
Albright, Adam. 2002. Islands of reliability for regular morphology: evidence from Italian. Language 78, 684–709.
Anderson, Stephen R. 1985. Typological distinctions in word formation. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, vol. III: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 30–56. Cambridge University Press.
Anderson, Stephen R. , 1992. A-morphous morphology. Cambridge University Press.
Anderson, Stephen R., 2005. Aspects of the theory of clitics. Oxford University Press.
Anderson, Stephen R., Lea Brown, Alice Gaby and Jacqueline Lecarme. 2006. Life on the edge: there’s morphology there after all! Lingue e linguaggio 5, 33–48.
Arlotto, Anthony. 1972. Introduction to historical linguistics. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Aronoff, Mark. 1976. Word formation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Aronoff, Mark. , 1992a. Noun classes in Arapesh. In Geert Booij and Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1991, 21–32. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Aronoff, Mark., 1992b. Stems in Latin verbal morphology. In Mark Aronoff (ed.), Morphology now, 5–32. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Aronoff, Mark., 1994. Morphology by itself: stems and inflectional classes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Asher, R. E. 1985. Tamil. London: Croom Helm.
Baerman, Matthew. 2002. Kashmiri. The Surrey Syncretism Database. www.smg.surrey.ac.uk/Syncretism/examples/Kashmiri/nounpro2.pdf. Last accessed 5 May 2010.
Baerman, Matthew., 2006a. Chukchi. The Cross-linguistic Database for Deponency. www.smg.surrey.ac.uk/deponency/WALS/Chukchi.htm. Last accessed 5 May 2010.
Baerman, Matthew., 2006b. Latin. The Typological Database for Deponency. www.smg.surrey.ac.uk/deponency/Examples/Latin.htm. Last accessed 5 May 2010.
Baerman, Matthew., 2006c. Archi. The Typological Database for Deponency. www.smg.surrey.ac.uk/deponency/Examples/Archi.htm. Last accessed 5 May 2010.
Baerman, Matthew., 2007a. Morphological reversals. Journal of Linguistics 43.1, 33–61.
Baerman, Matthew., 2007b. Morphological typology of deponency. In Baerman et al. (eds.), 1–19.
Baerman, Matthew., 2008. Historical observations on defectiveness: the first singular non-past. Russian Linguistics 37 (1), 81–97.
Baerman, Matthew, Dunstan Brown and Greville G. Corbett. 2002. The Surrey Syncretism Database. www.smg.surrey.ac.uk/syncretism/index.aspx. Last accessed 5 May 2010.
Baerman, Matthew, Dunstan Brown and Greville G. Corbett. 2005. The syntax–morphology interface: a study of syncretism. Cambridge University Press.
Baerman, Matthew and Greville G. Corbett. 2010. Introduction. In Baerman, Corbett and Brown (eds.), 1–18.
Baerman, Matthew, Greville G. Corbett, Dunstan Brown and Andrew Hippisley (eds.). 2007. Deponency and morphological mismatches. Oxford University Press.
Baerman, Matthew, Greville G. Corbett and Dunstan Brown (eds.). 2010. Defective paradigms: missing forms and what they tell us. Oxford: British Academy and Oxford University Press.
Baker, Mark. 1985. The mirror principle and morphosyntactic explanation. Linguistic Inquiry 16, 373–416.
Baker, Mark. 1988. Incorporation: a theory of grammatical function changing. University of Chicago Press.
Baldi, Philip. 1976. Remarks on the Latin r-form. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Sprachforschung 90, 222–57.
Baltin, Mark and Chris Collins (eds.). 2007. The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
Barnetová, V. et al. 1979. Russkaja grammatika, vol. I. Prague: Academia Praha.
Bauer, Laurie. 1990. Be-heading the word. Journal of Linguistics 26, 1–31.
Bauer, Laurie. 2001. Morphological productivity. Cambridge University Press.
Bauer, Laurie., 2005. Productivity: theories. In Štekauer and Lieber (eds.), 315–34.
Bauer, Laurie., 2009. Typology of compounds. In Rochelle Lieber and Pavol Štekauer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding, 343–56. Oxford University Press.
Beard, Robert. 1995. Lexeme-morpheme base morphology: a general theory of inflection and word formation. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Beard, Robert. , 1998. Derivation. In Andrew Spencer and Arnold Zwicky (eds.), Handbook of morphology, 44–65. Oxford: Blackwell.
Bleiching, Doris, Guido Drexel and Dafydd Gibbon. 1996. Ein Synkretismusmodell für die deutsche Morphologie. In Dafydd Gibbon (ed.), Natural language processing and speech technology: results of the third KONVENS conference, Bielefeld, 237–48. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Blevins, James P. 2006. Word-based morphology. Journal of Linguistics 42, 531–73.
Bobaljik, Jonathan David. 2002. Syncretism without paradigms: remarks on Williams. 1981. In Geert Booij and Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 2001, 53–85. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Bonami, Olivier and Gilles Boyé. 2006. Deriving inflectional irregularity. In Stefan Müller (ed.), Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on HPSG, Varna, 24–27 July 2006, 360–81. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Bonnet, Max. 1968. Le Latin de Grégoire de Tours. 2nd edn. Hildesheim: Georg Olms.
Booij, Geert. 1977. Dutch morphology. a study of word formation in generative grammar. Dordrecht: Foris.
Booij, Geert. 1996. Inherent versus contextual inflection and the split morphology hypothesis. In Geert Booij and Jaap Van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology, 1–16. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Booij, Geert E., 2002. The morphology of Dutch. Oxford University Press.
Booij, Geert E., 2005. Compounding and derivation: evidence for construction morphology. In Wolfgang Dressler, Dieter Kastovsky, Oskar Pfeiffer and Franz Rainer (eds.), Morphology and its demarcations: selected papers from the 11th Morphology Meeting, Vienna, February 2004, 109–32. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Booij, Geert E., 2009. Compounding and Construction Morphology. In Rochelle Lieber and Pavol Štekauer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding, 201–16. Oxford University Press.
Boyé, Gilles and Patricia Cabredo Hofherr. 2010. Defectiveness in French and Spanish verbs. In Baerman, Corbett and Brown (eds.), 35–52.
Bredenkamp, Andrew, Louisa Sadler and Andrew Spencer. 1998. Investigating argument structure: the Russian nominalization database. In John Nerbonne (ed.), Linguistic Databases, 137–60. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Brown, Dunstan. 1998a. Defining ‘subgender’: virile and devirilized nouns in Polish. Lingua 104, 187–233.
Brown, Dunstan. 1998b. From the general to the exceptional: a network morphology account of Russian nominal inflection. PhD dissertation, University of Surrey.
Brown, Dunstan., 1998c. Stem indexing and morphonological selection in the Russian verb. In Ray Fabri, Albert Ortmann and Teresa Parodi (eds.), Models of inflection, 196–221. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Brown, Dunstan., 2001. Constructing a typological database for inflectional morphology: the SMG database for syncretism. In Steven Bird, Peter Buneman and Mark Liberman (eds.), Proceedings of the IRCS workshop on linguistic databases, Institute for Research in Cognitive Science, University of Pennsylvania, December 11–13, 2001, 56–64.
Brown, Dunstan., 2007. Peripheral functions and overdifferentiation: the Russian second locative. Russian Linguistics 31, 61–76.
Brown, Dunstan and Andrew Hippisley. 1994. Conflict in Russian genitive plural assignment: a solution represented in DATR. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 34, 48–76.
Brown, Dunstan, Greville G. Corbett, Norman M. Fraser, Andrew Hippisley and Alan Timberlake. 1996. Russian noun stress and Network Morphology. Linguistics 34, 53–107.
Brown, Dunstan, Carole Tiberius and Greville G. Corbett. 2004. Inflectional syncretism and corpora. Paper presented at the Fifth International Workshop on Linguistically Interpreted Corpora (LINC-04). Twentieth International Conference on Computational Linguistics. Geneva, Switzerland. 29 August 2004. Paper available at www.coli.uni-sb.de/linc04/brown.pdf.
Brown, Dunstan, Carole Tiberius and Greville G. Corbett. , 2007. The alignment of form and function: corpus-based evidence from Russian. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 12.4, 511–34.
Brown, Dunstan, Carole Tiberius, Marina Chumakina, Greville Corbett and Alexander Krasovitsky. 2009. Databases designed for investigating specific phenomena. In Marin Everaert, Simon Musgrave and Alexis Dimitriadis (eds.), The use of databases in cross-linguistic studies, 117–54. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Browne, Wayles. 1993. Serbo-Croat. In Bernard Comrie and Greville G. Corbett (eds.), The Slavonic languages, 306–87. London and New York: Routledge.
Bybee, Joan. 1985. Morphology: a study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins and William Pagliuca. 1994. The evolution of grammar. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
Cahill, Lynne and Gerald Gazdar. 1997. The inflectional phonology of German adjectives, determiners, and pronouns. Linguistics 35, 211–45.
Cahill, Lynne and Gerald Gazdar. 1999. German noun inflection. Journal of Linguistics 35, 1–42.
Carnie, Andrew. 2007. Syntax: a generative introduction. 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.
Carstairs, Andrew. 1983. Paradigm economy. Journal of Linguistics 19, 115–28.
Carstairs, Andrew. 1984. Outlines of a constraint on syncretism. Folia Linguistica 18, 73–85.
Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew. 1992. Current morphology. London: Routledge.
Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew. 1994. Inflection classes, gender, and the principle of contrast. Language 70, 737–88.
Cattell, R. 1976. Constraints on movement rules. Language 52, 18–50.
Černyx, P. Ja. 1953. Jazyk Uloženija 1649 Goda: voprosy orfografii, fonetiki i morfologii v svjazi s istoriej Uložennoj knigi. Moscow: Izdatel´stvo Akademii nauk SSSR.
Chierchia, Gennaro and Sally McConnell-Ginet. 2000. Meaning and grammar: an introduction to semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chumakina, Marina, Andrew Hippisley and Greville Corbett. 2004. Istoričeskie izmenenija v russkoj leksike: slučaj čeredujuščegosja suppletivizma [Historical changes in the Russian lexicon: alternating suppletion]. Russian Linguistics 28, 281–315.
Comrie, Bernard. 1991. Form and function in identifying cases. In Frans Plank (ed.), Paradigms: the economy of inflection, 41–55. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Corbett, Greville G. 1980. Animacy in Russian and other Slavonic languages: where syntax and semantics fail to match. In Catherine V. Chvany and Richard D. Brecht (eds.), Morphosyntax in Slavic, 43–61. Columbus, OH: Slavica.
Corbett, Greville G. 1982. Gender in Russian: an account of gender specification and its relationship to declension. Russian Linguistics 6, 197–232.
Corbett, Greville G., 1991. Gender. Cambridge University Press.
Corbett, Greville G., 2000. Number. Cambridge University Press.
Corbett, Greville G., 2006. Agreement. Cambridge University Press.
Corbett, Greville G., 2007. Deponency, syncretism and what lies between. In Baerman et al. (eds.), 21–44.
Corbett, Greville G., 2009. Canonical inflection classes. In Fabio F. Montermini, Gilles Boyé and Jesse Tseng (eds.), Selected proceedings of the Sixth Decembrettes: morphology in Bordeaux, 1–11. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Corbett, Greville G., Forthcoming. Canonical morphosyntactic features. In Dunstan Brown, Greville G. Corbett and Marina Chumakina (eds.), Canonical morphology and syntax. Oxford University Press.
Corbett, Greville G. and Matthew Baerman. 2006. Prolegomena to a typology of morphological features. Morphology 16, 231–46.
Corbett, Greville G. and Norman Fraser. 1993. Network Morphology: a DATR account of Russian nominal inflection. Journal of Linguistics 29, 113–42.
Corbett, Greville G. and Norman Fraser. 1997. Vyčislitel/naja lingvistika i tipologija [Computational linguistics meets typology]. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Serija 9. Filologija, 122–40.
Corbin, Danielle. 1987. Morphologie dérivationelle et structuration du lexique (2 vols.). Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Cubberley, Paul. 1994. Handbook of Russian affixes. Columbus, OH: Slavica.
Daelemans, W., K. de Smedt and G. Gazdar. 1992. Inheritance in natural language processing. Computational Linguistics 18, 205–18.
Dal´, Vladimir. 1880. Tolkovyj slovar´ velikorusskago jazyka, vol I. Moscow and St Petersburg: M. O. Vol´f.
Deo, Ashwini. 2007. Derivational morphology in inheritance-based lexica: insights from Pāṇini. Lingua 117, 175–201.
Dixon, R. M. W. 1994. Ergativity. Cambridge University Press.
Dodyxudoeva, Lelja R. 1988. Šugnanskij glagol v istoričeskom osveščenii. Dušanbe: Akademija Nauk Tadžiskoj SSR.
Donohue, Mark. 2001. Animacy, class and gender in Burmeso. In Andrew Pawley, Malcolm Ross and Darrell Tryon (eds.), The boy from Bundaberg: studies in Melanesian linguistics in honour of Tom Dutton, 97–115. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
Doroszewski, Witold. 1962. O kulturę słowa: Poradnik językowy. Warsaw: PIW.
Dressler, Wolfgang U., Marianne Kilani-Schoch, Natalia Gagarina, Lina Pestal and Markus Pöchtrager. 2006. On the typology of inflection class systems. Folia Linguistica 40, 1–2, 51–74.
Embick, David and Alec Marantz. 2008. Architecture and blocking. Linguistic Inquiry 39.1, 1–53.
Embick, David and Rolf Noyer. 2001. Movement operations after syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 32.4, 555–95.
Embick, David and Rolf Noyer.2007. Distributed morphology and the syntax–morphology interface. In Gillian Ramchand and Charles Reiss (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces, 289–324. Oxford University Press.
Ernout, Alfred. 1945. Morphologie historique du Latin. Paris: Klincksiek.
Ernout, Alfred and François Thomas. 1953. Syntaxe Latine. 2nd edn. Paris: Klincksieck.
Evans, Nicholas. 1997. Head classes and agreement classes in the Mayali dialect chain. In Mark Harvey and Nicholas Reid (eds.), Nominal classification in aboriginal Australia, 105–46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Evans, Nicholas. 2004. Bininj Gun-wok: a pan-dialectal grammar of Mayali, Kunwinjku and Kune. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
Evans, Nicholas, Dunstan Brown and Greville G. Corbett. 1998. Emu divorce: a unified account of gender and noun class assignment in Mayali. In M. C. Gruber, D. Higgins, K. Olson and T. Wysocki (eds.), Proceedings of the 34th annual meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 127–42 . Chicago: CLS.
Evans, Nicholas. 2001. Dalabon pronominal prefixes and the typology of syncretism: a Network Morphology analysis. In Geert Booij and Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 2000, 187–232. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Evans, Nicholas, Dunstan Brown and Greville G. Corbett, 2002. The semantics of gender in Mayali: partially parallel systems and formal implementation. Language 78, 111–55.
Evans, Nicholas, Janet Fletcher and Belinda Ross. 2008. Big words, small phrases: mismatches between pause units and the polysynthetic word in Dalabon. Linguistics 46, 89–129.
Evans, Roger and Gerald Gazdar. 1996. DATR: a language for lexical knowledge representation. Computational Linguistics 22.2, 167–216.
Evans, Roger, Gerald Gazdar and Lionel Moser. 1993. Prioritised multiple inheritance in DATR. In Ted Briscoe, Ann Copestake and Valeria de Paiva (eds.), Inheritance, defaults and the lexicon, 38–46. Cambridge University Press.
Fedjanina, Nina A. 1976. Udarenie v sovremennom russkom jazyke. Moscow: Russkij jazyk.
Finkel, Raphael and Gregory Stump. 2007. Principal parts and morphological typology. Morphology 17, 39–75.
Fischer, Wolfdietrich. 1997. Classical Arabic. In Robert Hetzron (ed.), The Semitic languages, 187–219. London: Routledge.
Flickinger, Daniel. 1987. Lexical rules in the hierarchical lexicon. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.
Flobert, Pierre. 1975. Les verbes déponents Latins des origines à Charlemagne. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
Fortson, Benjamin W. 2004. Indo-European language and culture: an introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
Fortune, Reo F. 1942. Arapesh. (Publications of the American Ethnological Society 19.) New York: J. J. Augustin.
Frank, Wright Jay. 1999. Nuer noun morphology. MA thesis, State University of New York, Buffalo.
Fraser, Norman M. and Greville G. Corbett. 1995. Gender, animacy and declensional class assignment: a unified account for Russian. In Geert Booij and Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1994, 123–50. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Fraser, Norman M. and Greville G. Corbett. 1997. Defaults in Arapesh. Lingua 103, 25–57.
Gabka, K. 1975. Die russische Sprache der Gegenwart, vol. II. Düsseldorf: Brücken-Verlag.
Garde, P. 1980. Grammaire russe. Paris: Institut détudes slaves. (Collection de grammaires de l’Institut d’études slaves, VII, I.)
Gazdar, Gerald, Ewan Klein, Geoffrey Pullum and Ivan Sag. 1985. Generalized phrase structure grammar. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Gerdts, Donna B. 1998. Incorporation. In Arnold Zwicky and Andrew Spencer (eds.), The handbook of morphology, 84–100. Oxford: Blackwell.
Goldberg, Adele. 2006. Constructions at work: the nature of generalization in language. Oxford University Press.
Goldsmith, John and Jeremy OBrien. 2006. Learning inflectional classes. Language Learning and Development 2, 219–50.
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1963. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of language, 73–113. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gvozdev, A. N. 1961. Sovremennij russkij jazyk. Moscow: Prosveščenie.
Haegeman, Liliane. 2005. Verdubbeling van subjectpronomina in de Zuide-Nederlandse dialecten: een reactie uit Lapscheure. Taal en Tongval 56, 119–59.
Halle, Morris. 1970. A note on the accentual patterns of the Russian nominal declension. In Roman Jakobson and Shigeo Kawamoto (eds.), Studies in general and oriental linguistics, 167–74. Tokyo: TEC.
Halle, Morris. 1990. An approach to morphology. NELS, BLSA Twentieth Annual Meeting, 151–84. University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Halle, Morris and Alec Marantz. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In K. Hale and S. J. Keyser (eds.), The view from Building 20: essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, 111–76. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hansson, Gunnar O. 2007. Productive syncretism in Saami inflectional morphology. In Ida Toivonen and Diane Nelson (eds.), Saami linguistics, 91–135. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Harley, Heidi. 1994. Hug a tree: deriving the morphosyntactic feature hierarchy. In Andrew Carnie and Heidi Harley (eds.), MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 21, 275–80. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Harley, Heidi and Rolf Noyer. 1999. Distributed morphology. Glot International 4.4, 3–9.
Harris, Alice and Lyle Campbell. 1995. Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge University Press.
Harris, Roy (trans.). 1983. Course in general linguistics. [Cours de linguistique générale by F. de Saussure.] London: Duckworth.
Haspelmath, Martin. 1993. More on the typology of inchoative/causative verb alternations. In Bernard Comrie and Maria Polinsky (eds.), Causatives and Transitivity, 87–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Haspelmath, Martin. 2002. Understanding morphology. London: Arnold.
Heath, Jeffrey. 1991. Pragmatic disguise in pronominal-affix paradigms. In Frans Plank (ed.), Paradigms: the economy of inflection, 75–89. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Heath, Jeffrey. 1998. Pragmatic skewing in 1 <-> 2 pronominal combinations in Native American languages. International Journal of American Linguistics 64, 83–104.
Hippisley, Andrew. 1996. Russian expressive derivation: a Network Morphology account. Slavonic and East European Review 74.2, 201–22.
Hippisley, Andrew. 1997. Declarative derivation. PhD dissertation, University of Surrey.
Hippisley, Andrew. 1998. Indexed stems and Russian word formation: a Network Morphology account of Russian personal nouns. Linguistics 36, 1039–124.
Hippisley, Andrew., 2001. Word formation rules in a default inheritance framework: a network account of Russian personal nouns. In Geert Booij and Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1999, 221–61. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Hippisley, Andrew., 2007. Declarative deponency: a Network Morphology account of morphological mismatches. In Baerman et al. (eds.), 145–74.
Hippisley, Andrew., 2009. Towards a declarative definition of derivational relatedness: an orthogonal multiple inheritance approach to word-formation typology. Paper read at Universals and Typology in Word-Formation, Šafárik University, Košice, Slovakia, August 2009.
Hippisley, Andrew., 2010a. Paradigmatic realignment and morphological change: diachronic deponency in Network Morphology. In Franz Rainer et al. (eds.), Variation and change in morphology, 107–27. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hippisley, Andrew., 2010b. A declarative approach to language change: regularization as realignment. In Max Bane, Juan José Bueno Holle, Thomas Grano, April Lynn Grotberg and Yaron McNabb (eds.), Proceedings of the 44th annual meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 261–75. Chicago: CLS.
Hippisley, Andrew and Gerald Gazdar. 1999. Inheritance hierarchies and historical reconstruction: towards a history of Slavonic colour terms. In Sabrina Billings, John Boyle and Aaron Griffith (eds.), Proceedings of the 35th annual of the Chicago Linguistic Society, vol. I, 125–40. Chicago: CLS.
Hippisley, Andrew, Marina Chumakina, Greville G. Corbett and Dunstan Brown. 2004. Suppletion: frequency, categories and distribution of stems. Studies in Language 28.2, 389–421.
Hjelmslev, Louis. 1943. Omkring sprogteoriens grundlœggelse. Copenhagen: Ejnar Munksgaard.
Hjelmslev, Louis. , 1961. Prolegomena to a theory of language. Trans. of Hjelmslev 1943. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
Hock, Hans Henrich. 1986. Principles of historical linguistics. The Hague: Mouton.
Hualde, Jose Ignacio and Jon Ortiz de Urbina (eds.). 2003. A grammar of Basque. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Huang, Cheng-Teh J. 1982. Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Huddleston, Rodney and Pullum, Geoffrey K. et al. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge University Press.
Huntley, David. 1980. The evolution of genitive-accusative animate and personal nouns in Slavic dialects. In Jacek Fisiak (ed.), Historical morphology, 189–212. The Hague, Paris and New York: Mouton.
Ilola, Eeva and Arto Mustajoki. 1989. Report on Russian morphology as it appears in Zaliznyak’s grammatical dictionary. (Slavica Helsingiensia 7.) Department of Slavonic Languages, University of Helsinki.
Isačenko, A. V. 1968. Die russische Sprache der Gegenwart, vol. I. Halle: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
Jackendoff, Ray. 1975. Morphological and semantic regularities in the lexicon. Language 51, 639–71.
Jackendoff, Ray. 1990. Semantic structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Jakobi, Angelika. 1990. A Fur grammar: phonology, morphophonology, and morphology. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.
Karcevskij, S. 1932. Sur la structure du substantif russe. Charisteria Guilelmo Mathesio quinquagenario: a discipulis et circuli linguistici pragensis sodalibus oblata, 65–73. Prague: Cercle linguistique de Prague.
Kastovsky, Dieter. 2005. Hans Marchand and the Marchandeans. In Štekauer and Lieber (eds.), 99–124.
Kay, Paul. 1997. Construction Grammar. In Paul Kay (ed.), Words and the grammar of context, 123–32. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Kemmer, Suzanne. 1993. The middle voice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kennedy, Benjamin. 1962. Revised Latin primer. Harlow: Longman.
Kibrik, Aleksandr E. 1977a. Opyt strukturnogo opisanija Arčinskogo jazyka, vol. II: Taksonomičeskaja grammatika. (Publikacii otdelenija strukturnoj i prikladnoj lingvistiki 12.) Moscow: Izdatel´stvo Moskovskogo Universiteta.
Kibrik, Aleksandr E. 1977b. Arčinskij jazyk: teksty i slovar´. Moscow: Izdatel´stvo Moskovskogo Universiteta.
Kiparsky, Paul. 1982. Lexical morphology and phonology. In In-Seok Yang (ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm: selected papers from SICOL-1981, 3–91. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing.
Kiparsky, Paul. 1983. Word formation and the lexicon. In Frances Ingemann (ed.), Proceedings of the 1982 Mid-American Linguistics Conference, 3–29. University of Kansas.
Kiparsky, Paul., 2005. Blocking and periphrasis in inflectional paradigms. In Geert Booij and Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 2004, 113–35. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Kiparsky, Valentin. 1967. Russische historische Grammatik, vol. II: Die Entwicklung des Formensystems. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.
Klavans, Judith. 1985. The independence of syntax and phonology in cliticization. Language 61, 94–120.
Klenin, Emily. 1983. Animacy in Russian: a new interpretation. Columbus, OH: Slavica.
Kotyczka, Josef. 1980. Kurze polnische Sprachlehre. Berlin: Volk und Wissen.
Krieger, Hans Ulrich and John Nerbonne. 1993. Feature-based inheritance networks for computational lexicons. In Ted Briscoe, Ann Copestake and Valeria de Paiva (eds.), Inheritance, defaults and the lexicon, 90–136. Cambridge University Press.
Kuhn, Jonas. 2007. Interfaces in constraint-based theories of grammar. In Gillian Ramchand and Charles Reiss (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces, 613–50. Oxford University Press.
Kühner, Raphael. 1955. Ausführliche Grammatik der Lateinischen Sprache (revised by Andreas Thierfelder). Hamburg: Hahn.
Ladd, D. Robert, Bert Remijsen and Caguor Adong Manyang. 2009. On the distinction between regular and irregular inflectional morphology: evidence from Dinka. Language 85, 659–70.
Lavidas, Nikolaos and Dimitra Papangeli. 2007. Deponency in the diachrony of Greek. In Baerman et al. (eds.), 97–26.
LeTourneau, Mark S. 2003. Interpretability, feature strength, and impoverished agreement in Arabic. In Dilworth B. Parkinson and Samira Farwaneh (eds.), Perspectives on Arabic linguistics XV, 85–134. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Lieber, Rochelle. 1992. Deconstructing morphology. University of Chicago Press.
Lieber, Rochelle. 2000. Internal structure of words. In G. Booij, C. Lehmann and J. Mugdan (eds.), Morphology: an international handbook on inflection and word formation, 404–16. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Lieber, Rochelle., 2004. Morphology and lexical semantics. Cambridge University Press.
Lieber, Rochelle., 2007. The category of roots and the roots of categories: what we learn from selection in derivation. Morphology 16, 247–72.
Lieber, Rochelle., 2009. A lexical semantic approach to compounding. In Rochelle Lieber and Pavol Štekauer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding, 78–104.Oxford University Press.
Lodge, Gonzalez. 1901–33. Lexicon Plautinum, vols. I-II. Leipzig. Reprinted 1962, Hildesheim: Olms.
Luís, Ana and Spencer, Andrew. 2005. A paradigm function account of ‘mesoclisis’ in European Portuguese. In Geert Booij and Jaap Van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 2004, 177–228. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Maiden, Martin. 2002. Sound change, morphemic structure and the rise of suppletion in the Romance verb. Paper presented at the Surrey Linguistics Circle, University of Surrey.
Maiden, Martin. 2004. When lexemes become allomorphs: on the genesis of suppletion. Folia Linguistica 38, 227–56.
Maiden, Martin and Paul ONeill. 2010. On morphomic defectiveness: evidence from the Romance languages of the Iberian peninsula. In Baerman, Corbett and Brown (eds.), 103–24.
Mańczak, Witold. 1956. Ile jest rodzajów w polskim? Język Polski 36.2, 116–21.
Marchand, Hans. 1960. The categories and types of present-day English word-formation. Wiesbaden: Harassowitz.
Matthews, Peter H. 1972. Inflectional morphology. Cambridge University Press.
Matthews, Peter H. 2007. How safe are our analyses? In Baerman et al. (eds.), 297–316.
Matthews, William Kleesmann. 1960. Russian historical grammar. University of London, Athlone Press.
McMahon, April. 1994. Understanding language change. Cambridge University Press.
Melčuk, Igor. 2006. Aspects of the theory of morphology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Meyer, Peter. 1994. Grammatical categories and the methodology of linguistics. Review of W. Andries van Helden, Concept formation between morphology and syntax. Russian Linguistics 18, 341–77.
Miller, Philip H. 1992. Clitics and constituents in phrase structure grammar. New York: Garland.
Mithun, Marianne. 1984. The evolution of noun incorporation. Language 60, 847–94.
Mithun, Marianne and Greville G. Corbett. 1999. The effect of noun incorporation on argument structure. In Lunella Mereu (ed.), Boundaries of morphology and syntax, 49–71. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Mofu, Suriel Semuel. 2008. Biak morphosyntax. PhD dissertation, Oxford University.
Müller, Gereon. 2004. On decomposing inflection class features: syncretism in Russian noun inflection. In Gereon Müller, Lutz Gunkel and Gisela Zifonun (eds.), Explorations in nominal inflection, 189–227. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Müller, Gereon. 2008. Review of Matthew Baerman, Dunstan Brown and Greville G. Corbett, The syntax–morphology interface: a study of syncretism. Word Structure 1, 199–232.
Nixon, Paul. 1924. Plautus (5 vols.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Noyer, Rolf. 1997. Features, positions and affixes in autonomous morphological structure. New York: Garland.
Noyer, Rolf. 1998. Impoverishment theory and morphosyntactic markedness. In Steven G. Lapointe, Diane K. Brentari and Patrick M. Farrell (eds.), Morphology and its relation to phonology and syntax, 264–85. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Palmer, Bill. 2009. Kokota grammar: Oceanic Linguistics Special Publication. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.
Palmer, Bill and Dunstan Brown. 2007. Heads in Oceanic indirect possession. Oceanic Linguistics 46, 199–209.
Payne, John. 1980. The decay of ergativity in Pamir languages. Lingua 51, 147–86.
Perlmutter, David M. and Janez Orešnik. 1973. Language-particular rules and explanation in syntax. In Stephen R. Anderson and Paul Kiparsky (eds.), A festschrift for Morris Halle, 419–59. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Plag, Ingo. 2002. The role of selectional restrictions, phonotactics, and parsing in constraining suffix ordering in English. In Geert Booij and Jaap Van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 2001, 285–314. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Plag, Ingo. 2003. Word-formation in English. Cambridge University Press.
Plag, Ingo and Harald Baayen. 2009. Suffix ordering and morphological processing. Language 85, 109–52.
Plank, Frans. 1994. Inflection and derivation. In R. Asher (ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, vol. III., 1671–8. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Plank, Frans and Wolfgang Schellinger. 1997. The uneven distribution of genders over numbers: Greenberg’s Nos. 37 and 45. Linguistic Typology 1, 53–101.
Priestly, T. M. S. 1993. Slovene. In Bernard Comrie and Greville G. Corbett (eds.), The Slavonic languages, 388–454. London: Routledge.
Przepiórkowski, Adam. 2003. A hierarchy of Polish genders. In Piotr Bański and Adam Przepiórkowski (eds.), Generative linguistics in Poland: morphosyntactic investigations, 109–22. Warsaw: Instytut Podstaw Informatyki PAN.
Rainer, Franz. 2005. Constraints on productivity. In Štekauer and Lieber (eds.), 335–52.
Rappaport, Gilbert C. 2010. The grammaticalization of the category masculine personal in West Slavic. In Björn Hansen and Jasmina Grković (eds.), Diachronic Slavic syntax: gradual changes in focus, Wiener Slawistischer Almanach Sonderband 74, 169–80. Munich, Berlin and Vienna: Verlag Otto Sagner.
Redkin, V. A. 1971. Akcentologija sovremennogo russkogo literaturnogo jazyka: posobie dlja učitelej. Moscow: Prosveščenie.
Reformatskij, A. A. 1975. Fonemy jot i ‘i’ v russkom jazyke. In A. Reformatskij (ed.), Fonologičeskie ètjudy, 74–96. Moscow: Nauka.
Riehemann, Suzanne. 1998. Type-based derivational morphology. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 2, 49–77.
Roberts, Ian. 2007. Head movement. In Baltin and Collins (eds.), 113–47.
Ross, Malcolm. 2005. Pronouns as a preliminary diagnostic for grouping Papuan languages. In Andrew Pawley, Robert Attenborough, Robin Hide and Jack Golson (eds.), Papuan pasts: cultural, linguistic and biological histories of Papuan-speaking peoples, 15–66. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
Sag, Ivan A., Thomas Wasow and Emily M. Bender (eds.). 2003. Syntactic theory: a formal introduction. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Saloni, Zygmunt. 1988. O tzw. formach nieosobowych męskoosobowych we współczesnej polszczyźnie. Biuletyn Polskiego towarzystwa jezykoznawczego 41, 155–66.
Samvelian, Pollet. 2007. A (phrasal) affix analysis of the Persian ezafe. Journal of Linguistics 43, 605–45.
Šanskij, N. M. 1975. Russkij jazyk. Leksika. Slovoobrazovanie. Moscow: Prosveščenie.
Sapir, Edward. 1911. The problem of incorporation in American languages. American Anthropologist 13, 250–82.
Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1915. Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot.
Scalise, Sergio and Emiliano Guevara. 2005. The lexicalist approach to word-formation and the notion of the lexicon. In Štekauer and Lieber (eds.), 147–88.
Scalise, Sergio and Antonietta Bisetto. 2009. The classification of compounds. In Rochelle Lieber and Pavol Štekauer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding, 34–53. Oxford University Press.
Schmitz, Leonhard. 2004. Grammar of the Latin language. New York: Hippocrene. First published 1851 by Lea & Blanchard.
Selkirk, Elizabeth. 1982. The syntax of words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Siegel, Dorothy. 1977. The adjacency constraint and the theory of morphology. In M. J. Stein (ed.), Proceedings of the 8th Annual Meeting of the North-Eastern Linguistics Society, 189–97. Amherst: University of Massachusetts.
Skorik, Pjotr Ja. 1977. Grammatika čukotskogo jazyka (Čast’ 2: Glagol, Narečie, Služebnie Slova). Leningrad: Nauka.
Smith-Stark, T. Cedric. 1974. The plurality split. In M. W. L. Galy, R. A. Fox and A. Brucks (eds.), Proceedings of the 10th annual meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 657–71. Chicago: CLS.
Sowa, John F. 2000. Knowledge representation: logical, philosophical, and computational foundations. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks Cole Publishing Co.
Spencer, Andrew. 1991. Morphological theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
Spencer, Andrew. 1993. Review of Rochelle Lieber, Deconstructing morphology. Language 69, 580–7.
Spencer, Andrew., 2000a. Agreement morphology in Chukotkan. In Wolfgang U. Dressler, Oskar E. Pfeiffer, Markus Pöchtrager and John R. Rennison (eds.), Morphological Analysis in Comparison, 191–222. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Spencer, Andrew., 2000b. Morphology and syntax. In Geert Booij, Christian Lehmann and Joachim Mugdan (eds.), Morphology: an international handbook on inflection and word formation, 312–35. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Spencer, Andrew., 2002. Gender as an inflectional category. Journal of Linguistics 38, 279–312.
Spencer, Andrew., 2004. Morphology – an overview of central concepts. In Louisa Sadler and Andrew Spencer (eds.), Projecting Morphology, 67–110. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Spencer, Andrew., 2005. Towards a typology of ‘mixed categories’. In C. Orhan Orgun and Peter Sells (eds.), Morphology and the web of grammar: essays in memory of Steven G. Lapointe, 95–138. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Sridhar, S. N. 1990. Kannada. London and New York: Routledge.
Stang, Christian S. 1952. La langue du livre ‘Učenie i xitrost′ ratnago stroenija pexotnyx″ ljudej’ 1647. Oslo: Norske Videnskaps-Akademi.
Stankiewicz, Edward. 1978. The inflection of Serbo-Croatian substantives and their genitive plural endings. In H. Birnbaum (ed.), American contributions to the Eighth International Congress of Slavists, vol I: Linguistics and Poetics, 666–81. Columbus, OH: Slavicas.
Steinhauer, Hein. 1985. Number in Biak; counterevidence to two alleged language universals. Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde 141, 462–85.
Štekauer, Pavol and Rochelle Lieber (eds.). 2005. Handbook of word-formation. Dordrecht: Springer.
Stewart, Thomas and Gregory Stump. 2007. Paradigm function morphology and the morphology–syntax interface. In Gillian Ramchand and Charles Reiss (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces, 383–421. Oxford University Press.
Stolz, Thomas. 2008. Kymrische Ausnahmen order walisische Regeln? Was die substantivische Pluralvariation uns lehrt. In Cornelia Stroh and Aina Urdze (eds.), Morphologische Irregularität: neue Ansätze, Sichtweisen und Daten, 111–50. Bochum: Universitätsverlag Dr. N. Brockmeyer.
Strecker, Karl. 1929. Einführung in das Mittellatein. Berlin: Weodmann.
Stump, Gregory T. 1990. Breton inflection and the split morphology hypothesis. In R. Hendrick (ed.), The syntax of the modern Celtic languages, 97–119. San Diego: Academic Press.
Stump, Gregory T. 1991. A paradigm-based theory of morphosemantic mismatches. Language 67, 675–725.
Stump, Gregory T., 1993. Review of Rochelle Lieber, Deconstructing morphology. Journal of Linguistics 29, 485–90.
Stump, Gregory T., 1998. Inflection. In Andrew Spencer and Arnold Zwicky (eds.), The handbook of morphology, 13–43. Oxford: Blackwell.
Stump, Gregory T., 2001. Inflectional morphology: a theory of paradigm structure. Cambridge University Press.
Stump, Gregory T., 2002. Morphological and syntactic paradigms: arguments for a theory of paradigm linkage. In Geert Booij and Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 2001, 147–80. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Stump, Gregory T., 2005a. Rules about paradigms. In C. Orhan Orgun and Peter Sells (eds.), Morphology and the web of grammar: essays in memory of Steven G. Lapointe, 49–82. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Stump, Gregory T., 2005b. Word-formation and inflectional morphology. In Štekauer and Lieber (eds.), 49–72.
Stump, Gregory T., 2006. Heteroclisis and paradigm linkage. Language 82, 279–322.
Stump, Gregory T., 2010. Morphology. In Patrick Hogan (ed.), The Cambridge encyclopedia of the language sciences, 515–19. Cambridge University Press.
Švedova, N. Ju (ed.). 1984. Slovar’ russkogo jazyka S.I. Ožegova. Moscow: Russkij Jazyk.
Švedova, N. Ju., N. D. Artunjunova, A. V. Bondarko, Val. Vas. Ivanov, V. V. Lopatin, I. S. Uluxanov and F. P. Filin. 1980. Russkaja grammatika, vol. I. Moscow: AN SSSR.
Szymanek, Bogdan. 1988. Categories and categorization in morphology. Lublin: Catholic University Press.
Thorndahl, W. 1974. Genetivens og lokativens -у/-ю-endelser i Russiske middelaldertekster. (med Tysk resumé). Copenhagen: Rosenkilde og Baggers Forlag.
Thornton, Anna. 2011. Overabundance (multiple forms realizing the same cell): a non-canonical phenomenon in Italian verb morphology. In Maria Goldbach, Marc-Olivier Hinzelin, Martin Maiden and John Charles Smith (eds.), Morphological autonomy: Perspectives from Romance inflectional morphology. Oxford University Press.
Timberlake, Alan. 1993. Russian. In Bernard Comrie and Greville G. Corbett (eds.), The Slavonic languages, 827–86. London: Routledge.
Timberlake, Alan. 2004. A reference grammar of Russian. Cambridge University Press.
Tixonov, A. N. 1985. Slovoobrazovatel´nyj slovar´ russkogo jazyka. Moscow: Russkij Jazyk.
Tokarski, Jan. 1993. Schematyczny indeks a tergo polskich form wyrazowych. Opracowanie i redakcja: Zygmunt Saloni. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Tosco, Mauro. 2001. The Dhaasanac language. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.
Touretzky, D. 1986. The mathematics of inheritance systems. London: Pitman.
Townsend, Charles. 1975. Russian word-formation. Columbus, OH: Slavica.
Trask, Robert Lawrence. 1997. A student’s dictionary of language and linguistics. London: Arnold.
Tseng, Jesse. 2003. Phrasal affixes and French morphosyntax. In Gerald Penn, Gerhard Jäger, Paola Monachesi and Shuly Wintner (eds.), Proceedings of Formal Grammar 2003, 177–88. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Uluxanov, I. C. 1979. Slovoobrazovatel´nye otnošenija meždu častjami reči. Voprosy jazykoznanija 28.4, 101–10.
Unbegaun, B. O. 1935. La langue russe au XVIe siècle (1500–1550), vol. I: La flexion des noms. Paris.
Unbegaun, B. O. 1969. Les anciens russes vus par eux-memes. Selected papers on Russian and Slavonic Philology, 272–86. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Uspensky, Boris A. 1965. Strukturnaja tipologija jazykov. Moscow: Nauka.
van den Heuvel, Wilco. 2006. Biak: description of an Austronesian language of Papua. Utrecht: LOT.
van Helden, W. Andries. 1993. Case and gender: concept formation between morphology and syntax (2 vols.). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
van Marle, Jaap. 1985. On the paradigmatic dimension of morphological productivity. Dordrecht: Foris.
Vasmer, Maks. 1986. Ètimologičeskij slovar´ russkogo jazyka, ed. and trans. O. N. Trubačev. 2nd edn. Moscow: Progress.
Vinogradov, V. V 1960. Grammatika russkogo jazyka, vol 1: Fonetika i morfologija. Moscow: Nauka.
Vinogradov, V. V(ed.). 1954. Slovar´ jazyka Puškina. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel′stvo inostrannyx i nastsional′nyx slovarej.
Vinogradov, V. V., Istrina, E. S. and S. G. Barxudarov (eds.). 1953. Grammatika russkogo jazyka, vol. L: Fonetika i morfologija. Moscow: AN SSSR.
Walker, G. S. M. (ed.). 1957. Sancti Columbani opera. Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies.
Wertz, C. A. 1977. The number of genders in Polish. Canadian Slavonic Papers 19, 50–63.
Williams, Edwin. 1981. On the notions ‘lexically related’ and ‘head of word’. Linguistic Inquiry 12, 245–74.
Williams, Edwin., 2007. Dumping lexicalism. In Gillian Ramchand and Charles Reiss (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces, 353–81. Oxford University Press.
Worth, Dean S. 1966. On the stem/ending boundary in Slavic indeclinables. Zbornik za Filologiju i Lingvistiku 9, 11–16.
Wunderlich, Dieter. 2001. A correspondence-theoretic analysis of Dalabon transitive paradigms. In Geert Booij and Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 2000, 233–52. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Wunderlich, Dieter and Ray Fabri. 1995. Minimalist morphology: an approach to inflection. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 14, 236–94.
Wurzel, Wolfgang U. 1984. Flexionsmorphologie und Natürlichkeit. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.
Xu, Zheng, Mark Aronoff and Frank Anshen. 2007. Deponency in Latin. In Baerman et al. (eds.), 127–44.
Yonge, C. D. (trans.). 1856. The Orations of Marcus Tullius Cicero. London: Henry G. Bohn.
Zaliznjak, Andrej A. 1967. Russkoe imennoe slovoizmenenie. Moscow: Nauka.
Zaliznjak, Andrej A. 1973. O ponimanii termina ‘padež’ v lingvističeskix opisanijax. In Andrej A. Zaliznjak (ed.), Problemy grammatičeskogo modelirovanija, 53–87. Moscow: Nauka.
Zaliznjak, Andrej A., 1977. Grammatičeskij slovar′ russkogo jazyka. Moscow: Russkij jazyk.
Zieniukowa, Jadwiga. 1981. Rodzaj męski osobowy we współczesnych językach zachodniosłowiańskich. Wrocław: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich, Wydawnictwo Polskiej Akademii Nauk.
Žukova, Alevtina N. 1972. Grammatika korjakskogo jazyka: fonetika, morfologija. Leningrad: Nauka.
Zwicky, Arnold. 1985a. Heads. Journal of Linguistics 21, 1–29.
Zwicky, Arnold. 1985b. How to describe inflection. In Mary Niepokuj, Mary Van Clay, Vassiliki Nikiforidou and Deborah Feder (eds.), Proceedings of the eleventh annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 372–86. Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Zwicky, Arnold., 1992. Some choices in the theory of morphology. In R. D. Levine (ed.), Formal grammar: theory and implementation, 327–71. Oxford University Press.
Zwicky, Arnold., 1993. Heads, bases and functors. In Norman Fraser and Greville G. Corbett (eds.), Heads in grammatical theory, 292–315. Cambridge University Press.
Zwicky, Arnold., 1996. Syntax and phonology. In K. Brown and J. Miller (eds.), Concise encyclopedia of syntactic theories, 300–5. Oxford: Elsevier Science.

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.