Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2011
  • Online publication date: December 2011

15 - Regulatory Responses to Nanotechnology Uncertainties

Summary

Governments in leading industrialized countries are currently relying on existing regulatory frameworks for environmental, health, and safety regulation to cover nanotechnology risks. European Union (EU) and U.S. regulators generally have concluded that any risks posed by nanomaterials can be addressed using existing frameworks, but minor adjustments to specific regulations and their implementation are currently being made in order to close any potential gaps or eliminate uncertainties. Identifying the appropriate response to uncertain risks is a difficult task for policy makers and regulatory agencies. They are faced with a high degree of scientific uncertainty and need to balance the costs and benefits of regulation as well as seeking a durable compromise between the often conflicting interests of scientific freedom, technological innovation, consumer safety, and environmental protection.

This article discusses how regulators in the United States and EU have addressed key uncertainties inherent to nanomaterial regulation in the context of chemical, food, and cosmetic regulation. We first discuss the key areas of uncertainty that plague efforts to regulate nanotechnologies and nanomaterials. We then consider how regulators on both sides of the Atlantic have responded to these uncertainties and identify common regulatory responses. We conclude by considering how regulatory responses have reduced uncertainty and suggesting further steps to effectively reduce uncertainty.

Breggin, LindaFalkner, RobertJaspers, NicoPendergrass, JohnPorter, ReadSecuring the Promise of Nanotechnologies: Towards Transatlantic Regulatory CooperationLondon, UKChatham House 2009
Roco, M. C. 2004 Nanoscale Science and Engineering: Unifying and Transforming ToolsAIChE Journal 50 890
EPA 2007 http://www.epa.gov/OSA/pdfs/nanotech/epa-nanotechnology-whitepaper-0207.pdf
Davies, J.C. 2009 http://www.nanotechproject.org/process/assets/files/7316/pen-18.pdf
Rodemeyer, M. 2009 New Life, Old Bottles: Regulating First-Generation Products of Synthetic BiologyWashington, DCSynthetic Biology Project, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars
Choi, J. 2009 The Impact of Toxicity Testing Costs on Nanomaterial RegulationEnvironmental Science and Technology 43 3030
Roco, M.C.Bainbridge, W.S. 2001 Societal Implications of Nanoscience and NanotechnologyDordrecht, NetherlandsKluwer
Lux Research 2010 http://www.luxresearchinc.com/blog/2010/02/the-recessions-impact-on-nanotechnology/
Berger, Michael 2007 http://www.nanowerk.com/spotlight/spotid=1792.php
Klein, J. 2007 Probing the interactions of proteins and nanoparticlesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104 2029
Lane, N.Kalil, T. 2005 http://www.issues.org/21.4/lane
Chen, H. 2008 Trends in Nanotechnology PatentsNature Nanotechnology 3 123
National Nanotechnology Initiative 2011 http://www.nano.gov/sites/default/files/pub_resource/nni_2012_budget_supplement.pdf
European Commission 2007 http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/cooperation/nanotechnology_en.html
Klein, J. 2007 Probing the Interactions of Proteins and NanoparticlesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104 2029
Service, R.F. 2008 Nanotechnology: Can High-Speed Tests Sort Out Which Nanomaterials Are SafeScience 321 1036
ICON 2008 7
SCENIHR 2009 http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_risk/committees/04_scenihr/docs/scenihr_o_023.pdf
Service, R.F. 2008 Nanotechnology: Can High-Speed Tests Sort Out Which Nanomaterials Are SafeScience 321 1036
Maynard, A.D. 2008 Nanotechnology: The Next Big Thing, or Much Ado about NothingThe Annals of Occupational Hygiene 51
Youtie, J. 2008 Assessing the Nature of Nanotechnology: Can We Uncover an Emerging General Purpose TechnologyJournal of Technology Transfer 33 315
Davies, J.C. 2006 Managing the Effects of NanotechnologyWashington, DCProject on Emerging Nanotechnologies, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholarshttp://www.wilsoncenter.org/events/docs/Effectsnanotechfinal.pdf
Environmental Defense Fund 2006 http://www.edf.org/documents/5421_EnDefNanoBriefing.pdf
Taylor, M. R. 2006 Regulating the Products of Nanotechnology: Does FDA Have the Tools it NeedsWashington, DCProject on Emerging Nanotechnologieshttp://www.nanotechproject.org/process/assets/files/2705/110_pen5_fda.pdf
FDA 2007 http://www.fda.gov/nanotechnology/taskforce/report2007.pdf
European Commission 2008 http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2008:0366:FIN:EN:PDF
Farber, D.A. 2008 http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1301306
FDA 2006 http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/2006/ucm108707.htm
Marchant, G. 2007 Hodge, G.Bowman, D.Ludlow, K.New Global Frontiers of Regulation: The Age of NanotechnologyCheltenham, UKEdward Elgar Publishing
Marchant, G. 2007 Hodge, G.Bowman, D.Ludlow, K.New Global Frontiers of Regulation: The Age of NanotechnologyCheltenham, UKEdward Elgar Publishing
National Nanotechnology Initiative 2009 http://www.nano.gov/html/about/home_about.html
National Nanotechnology Initiative 2008 http://www.nano.gov/NNI_EHS_Research_Strategy.pdf
EFSA 2009 Scientific Opinion: The Potential Risks Arising from Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies on Food and Feed SafetyThe EFSA Journal 958 1
European Medicines Agency 2006 http://www.emea.europa.eu/pdfs/human/genetherapy/7976906en.pdf
EPA 2008 http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-TOX/2008/January/Day-28/t1411.htm
Health Canada 2010 http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/sr-sr/alt_formats/pdf/consult/_2010/nanomater/draft-ebauche-eng.pdf
Denison, R.A. 2009 http://blogs.edf.org/nanotechnology/2009/01/
Denison, R.A. 2008 http://blogs.edf.org/nanotechnology/2008/10/31/yes-virginia-inhaled-carbon-nanotubes-do-cause-lung-granulomas
Taylor, M. R. 2006 Regulating the Products of Nanotechnology: Does FDA Have the Tools it NeedsWashington, DCProject on Emerging Nanotechnologies, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholarshttp://www.nanotechproject.org/process/assets/files/2705/110_pen5_fda.pdf
GAO 2009 http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d09271.pdf
2006
FDA 2007
Denison, R.A. 2007 http://www.edf.org/documents/6149_NotThatInnocent_Fullreport.pdf
EFSA 2008 Scientific Statement of the Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to FoodThe EFSA Journal 884 1
Falkner, R.Breggin, L.Jaspers, N.Pendergrass, J.Porter, R.D. 2009 Consumer Labelling of Nanomaterials in the EU and US: Convergence or Divergence?London, UKChatham House
European Council 2011 http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/lsa/120351.pdf
EFSA 2008 Scientific Statement of the Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to FoodThe EFSA Journal 884 1
Maynard, A.Rejeski, D. 2009 Too Small to OverlookNature 460
NNI 2010 http://strategy.nano.gov/wp/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/DraftEHSstrategy-17Dec2010-to-post.pdf
Davies, J.C. 2009 http://www.nanotechproject.org/process/assets/files/7316/pen-18.pdf
Rodemeyer, M. 2009 New Life, Old Bottles: Regulating First-Generation Products of Synthetic BiologyLondon, UKSynthetic Biology Project, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars