Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2011
  • Online publication date: July 2011

Chapter 5 - Electrocardiography

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

References

1. Drew BJ, Califf RM, Funk M, et al. Practice standards for electrocardiographic monitoring in hospital settings. An American Heart Association Scientific Statement from the councils on cardiovascular nursing, clinical cardiology, and cardiovascular disease in the young. Circulation 2004;110: 2721–46.
2. Fleisher LA, Beckman JA, Brown KA, et al. ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and care for noncardiac surgery: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery). Anesth Analg 2008;106:685–712.
3. Kligfield P, Okin PM. Prevalence and clinical implications of improper filter settings in routine electrocardiography. Am J Cardiol 2007;99:711–3.
4. Kligfield P, Gettes LS, Bailey JJ, et al. Recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram. Part I: the electrocardiogram and its technology, a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:1109–27.
5. Mason JW, Hancock EW, Gettes LS. Recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram. Part II: electrocardiography diagnostic statement list, a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society Endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:1128–35.
6. Patel SI, Souter MJ. Equipment-related electrocardiographic artifacts: causes, characteristics, consequences, and correction. Anesthesiology 2008;109:138–48.
7. McGrath B, Columb M. Renal replacement therapy causing ECG artefact mimicking atrial flutter. Br J Intensive Care 2004;14:49–52.
8. Marples IL. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS): An unusual source of electrocardiogram artefact. Anaesthesia 2000;55:719–20.
9. Khambatta HJ, Stone JG, Wald A, Mongero LB. Electrocardiographic artifacts during cardiopulmonary bypass. Anesth Analg 1990;71:88–91.
10. Toyoyama H, Kariya N, Toyoda Y. Electrocardiographic artifacts during shoulder arthroscopy using a pressure-controlled irrigation pump. Anesth Analg 2000;90:856–7.
11. Marsh R. ECG artifact in the OR. Health Devices 1991;20: 140–141.
12. Kossman CE. Unipolar electrocardiography of Wilson: a half century later. Am Heart J 1985;110:901–4.
13. Kligfield P, Gettes LS, Bailey JJ, et al. Recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram. Part II: the electrocardiogram and its technology, a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:1109–27.
14. Frank E. Theoretic analysis of the influence of heart-dipole eccentricity on limb leads, Wilson central-terminal voltage and the frontal-plane vectocardiogram. Circ Res 1953;1:380–8.
15. Wehr G, Peters RJ, Khalife K, et al. A vector-based, 5-electrode, 12-lead monitoring ECG (EASI) is equivalent to conventional 12-lead ECG for diagnosis of acute coronary syndromes. J Electrocardiol 2006;39:22–28.
16. Chantad D, Krittayaphong R, Komoltri C. Derived 12-lead electrocardiogram in the assessment of ST-segment deviation and cardiac rhythm. J Electrocardiol 2006;39:7–12.
17. Sejersten M, Wagner GS, Pahlm O, et al. Detection of acute ischemia from the EASI-derived 12-lead electrocardiogram and from the 12-lead electrocardiogram acquired in clinical practice. J Electrocardiol 2007;40:120–6.
18. Welinder A, Field DQ, Liebman J, et al. Diagnostic conclusions from the EASI-derived 12-lead electrocardiogram as compared with the standard 12-lead electrocardiogram in children. Am Heart J 2006;151:1059–64.
19. Dower GE, Yakush A, Nazzal SB, et al. Deriving the 12-lead electrocardiogram from four (EASI) electrodes. J Electrocardiol 1988:21 Suppl:S182–7.
20. Sundqvist K, Jogestrand T, Nowak J. The effect of digoxin on the electrocardiogram of healthy middle-aged and elderly patients at rest and during exercise–a comparison with the ECG reaction induced by myocardial ischemia. J Electrocardiol 2002;35: 213–21.
21. Mooss AN, Prevedel JA, Mohiuddin SM, et al. Effect of digoxin on ST-segment changes detected by ambulatory electrocardiographic monitotring in healthy subjects. Am J Cardiol 1991;68:1503–6.
22. Croft CH, Woodward W, Nicod P, et al. Clinical implications of anterior S‑T segment depression in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1982;50:428–36.
23. Mirvis DM. Physiologic bases for anterior ST segment depression in patients with acute inferior wall myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 1988;116:1308–22.
24. Rahman MA, Gedevanishvili A, Birnbaum Y, et al. High-frequency QRS electrocardiogram predicts perfusion defects during myocardial perfusion imaging. J Electrocardiol 2006;39:73–81.
25. Abboud S, Berenfeld O, Sadeh D. Simulation of high-resolution QRS complex using a ventricular model with a fractal conduction system. Effects of ischemia on high-frequency QRS potentials. Circ Res 1991;68:1751–60.
26. Pettersson J, Carro E, Edenbrandt L, et al. Spatial, individual, and temporal variation of the high-frequency QRS amplitudes in the 12-lead standard electrocardiographic leads. Am Heart J 2000;139:352–8.
27. Aversano T, Rudicoff B, Washington A, et al. High-frequency QRS electrocardiography in the detection of reperfusion following thrombolytic therapy. Clin Cardiol 1994;17:175–82.
28. Pettersson J, Pahlm O, Carro E, et al. Changes in high-frequency QRS components are more sensitive than ST-segment deviation for detecting acute coronary artery occlusion. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:1827–34.
29. Spackman TN, Abel MD, Schlegel TT. Twelve-lead high frequency QRS electrocardiography during anesthesia in healthy subjects. Anesth Analg 2005;100:1043–7.
30. Lindenauer PK, Pekow P, Wang K, et al. Perioperative beta-blocker therapy and mortality after major noncardiac surgery. N Engl J Med 2005;353:349–361.
31. Mangano DT, Browner WS, Hollenberg M, et al. Association of perioperative myocardial ischemia with cardiac morbidity and mortality in men undergoing noncardiac surgery. The Study of Perioperative Ischemia Research Group. N Engl J Med 1990;323:1781–8.
32. London MJ. Perioperative myocardial ischemia in patients undergoing myocardial revascularization. Curr Opin Anesthesiol 1993;6:98–105.
33. McFalls EO, Ward HB, Moritz TE, et al. Predictors and outcomes of a perioperative myocardial infarction following elective vascular surgery in patients with documented coronary artery disease: results of the CARP trial. Eur Heart J 2008;29:394–401.
34. Karpati PC, Rossignol M, Pirot M, et al. High incidence of myocardial ischemia during postpartum hemorrhage. Anesthesiology 2004;100:30–36.
35. Blackburn H, Katigbak R. What electrocardiographic leads to take after exercise? Am Heart J 1964;67:184–5.
36. Mason RE, Likar I. A new system of multiple-lead exercise electrocardiography. Am Heart J 1966;71:196–205.
37. Mason RE, Likar I, Biern RO, et al. Multiple-lead exercise electrocardiography: Experience in 107 normal subjects and 67 patients with angina pectoris, and comparison with coronary cinearteriography in 84 patients. Circulation 1967;36:517–25.
38. Tubau JF, Chaitman BR, Bourassa MG, et al. Detection of multivessel coronary disease after myocardial infarction using exercise stress testing and multiple ECG lead systems. Circulation 1980;61:44–52.
39. Koppes G, McKiernan T, Bassan M, et al. Treadmill exercise testing (part I). Curr Prob Cardiol 1977;7:1–44.
40. Chaitman BR, Bourassa MG, Wagniart P, et al. Improved efficiency of treadmill exercise testing using a multiple-lead ECG system and basic hemodynamic exercise response. Circulation 1978;57:71–79.
41. Miller TD, Desser KB, Lawson M. How many electrocardiographic leads are required for exercise treadmill tests? J Electrocardiol 1987;20:131–7.
42. Lam J, Chaitman BR. Exercise lead systems and newer electrocardiographic parameters. J Cardiac Rehabil 1984;4:507–16.
43. Chaitman BR. The changing role of the exercise electrocardiogram as a diagnostic and prognostic test for chronic ischemic heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 1986;8:1195–1210.
44. Chaitman BR, Hanson JS. Comparative sensitivity and specificity of exercise electrocardiographic lead systems. Am J Cardiol 1981;47:1335–49.
45. Horacek BM, Wagner GS. Electrocardiographic ST-segment changes during acute myocardial ischemia. Card Electrophysiol Rev 2002;6:196–203.
46. Carley SD. Beyond the 12 lead: review of the use of additional leads for the early electrocardiographic diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. Emerg Med (Fremantle) 2003;15:143–54.
47. Drew BJ, Krucoff MW. Multilead ST-segment monitoring in patients with acute coronary syndromes: a consensus statement for healthcare professionals. ST- Segment Monitoring Practice Guideline International Working Group. Am J Crit Care 1999;8:372–86.
48. London MJ, Hollenberg M, Wong MG, et al. Intraoperative myocardial ischemia: localization by continuous 12-lead electrocardiography. Anesthesiology 1988;69:232–41.
49. Landesberg G, Mosseri M, Wolf Y, et al. Perioperative myocardial ischemia and infarction: identification by continuous 12-lead electrocardiogram with online ST-segment monitoring. Anesthesiology 2002;96:264–70.
50. Drew BJ, Krucoff MW. Multilead ST-segment monitoring in patients with acute coronary syndromes: a consensus statement for healthcare professionals. ST- Segment Monitoring Practice Guideline International Working Group. Am J Crit Care 1999;8:372–86.
51. London MJ. Multilead precordial ST-segment monitoring: “the next generation”? Anesthesiology 2002;96:259–61.
52. Martinez EA, Kim LJ, Faraday N, et al. Sensitivity of routine intensive care unit surveillance for detecting myocardial ischemia. Crit Care Med 2003;31:2302–8.
53. Balaji S, Ellenby M, McNames J, et al. Update on intensive care ECG and cardiac event monitoring. Card Electrophysiol Rev 2002;6:190–5.