Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T23:47:52.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Competing Directions at Midcentury

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 July 2009

Get access

Summary

People reproach us architects for a lack of inventiveness – too harshly, as nowhere has a new idea of universal historical importance, pursued with force and consciousness, become evident.

Gottfried Semper (1869)

The British Style Debate 1840–1860

The lively debate about style among German architects in the 1820s, 1830s, and 1840s parallels a growing sense of disquiet evident among British architects during the same years. The debate in England, however, formed along somewhat different and generally less philosophical lines. Here institutions such as the Royal Academy and the Institute of British Architects (founded in 1834) represented the status quo and therefore became objects of attack, both from new institutions (London's Architectural Association and Henry Cole's Department of Practical Art) and from powerful individuals (Augustus Welby Pugin and John Ruskin). And the backdrop to the debate was of course Britain's advanced industrialization, which in 1851 resulted in the first international exhibition devoted to art and technology.

The Cambridge Camden Society, along with its polemical organ, The Ecclesiologist, was another of these institutional voices. The society had been founded in 1839 with thirty-eight members, but by 1843 it counted over seven hundred enthusiasts, including many leaders of the Anglican Church. The Ecclesiologist became a strident voice championing liturgical and architectural “truth.” It unequivocally opposed all competing styles for churches, once noting that the introduction “of a new style, whether Romanesque, Byzantine, or Eclectic, is to be earnestly deprecated,” as “Gothic architecture is, in the highest sense, the only Christian Architecture.”

Type
Chapter
Information
Modern Architectural Theory
A Historical Survey, 1673–1968
, pp. 114 - 139
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×