Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2010
  • Online publication date: July 2011

19 - A model biological neural network: the cephalopod vestibular system

from Part IV - Methodological issues in the use of simple feedforward networks

Summary

19.1 Introduction

Artificial neural networks (ANNs), inspired by the processing systems present in simple nervous systems, are now widely used for the extraction of patterns or meaning from complicated or imprecise data sets (Arbib, 2003; Enquist & Ghirlanda, 2005). Although modern ANNs have progressed considerably from the early, basic feedforward models to systems of significant sophistication, some with varying levels of feedback, modulation, adaptation, learning, etc. (Minsky & Papert, 1969; Gurney, 1997; Vogels et al., 2005), they rarely contain the full processing capabilities or adaptive power of real assemblies of nerve cells. Part of the problem in modelling such capabilities is that the detailed mechanisms underlying the operation of biological neural networks are not themselves fully identified or well understood, for there is a dearth of good biological model systems that possess a wide range of processing mechanisms but whose physiological processes and cellular interconnections can be fully investigated and characterised. One of the best biological model systems available is the vertebrate visual system, but even here the full range of cellular connections and interactions have not yet been characterised and hence cannot be developed into equivalent models (van Hemmen et al., 2001; Wassle, 2004).

References
Arbib, M. A. 2003. Handbook of Brain Theory and Neural Networks. Bradford Book, 2nd Edn. MIT Press.
Auerbach, B. & Budelmann, B. U. 1986. Evidence for acetylcholine as a neurotransmitter in the statocyst of Octopus vulgaris. Cell Tissue Res 243, 429–436.
Barber, V. C. 1966. The fine structure of the statocysts ofOctopus vulgaris. Z Zellforsch Mikroskop Anat 70, 91–107.
Bell, C. C. 2001. Memory-based expectations in electrosensory systems. Curr Opin Neurobiol 11, 481–487.
Brichta, A. M. & Goldberg, J. M. 2000. Responses to efferent activation and excitatory response-intensity relations of turtle posterior-crista afferents. J Neurophysiol 83, 1224–1242.
Budelmann, B. U. 1977. Structure and function of the angular acceleration receptor systems in the statocysts of cephalopods. Symp Zoo Soc Lond 38, 309–324.
Budelmann, B. U. & Bonn, U, 1982. Histochemical evidence for catecholamines as neurotransmitters in the statocyst ofOctopus vulgaris. Cell Tissue Res 227, 475–483.
Budelmann, B. U., Sache, M. & Staudigl, M. 1987a. The angular acceleration receptor system of the statocyst of Octopus vulgaris: morphometry, ultrastructure, and neuronal and synaptic organization. Phil Trans R Soc B 315, 305–343.
Budelmann, B. U., Williamson, R. & Auerbach, B. 1987b. Structure and function of the angular acceleration receptor system of the statocyst of octopus with special reference to its efferent innervation. In The Vestibular System: Neurophysiologic and Clinical Research (ed. Graham, M. D. & Kemmink, J. L.), pp. 165–168. Raven Press.
Chanson, M., Mollard, P., Meda, P., Suter, S. & Jongsma, H. J. 1999. Modulation of pancreatic acinar cell to cell coupling during ACh-evoked changes in cytosolic Ca2+. J Biol Chem 274, 282–287.
Chrachri, A. & Williamson, R. 1993. Electrical coupling between primary hair cells in the statocyst of the squid, Alloteuthis subulata. Neurosci Lett 161, 227–231.
Chrachri, A. & Williamson, R. 1998. Synaptic interactions between crista hair cells in the statocyst of the squidAlloteuthis subulata. J Neurophysiol 80, 656–666.
Chrachri, A. & Williamson, R. 2001. cAMP modulates electrical coupling between sensory hair cells in the squid statocyst. J Physiol Lond 536S, 133–134.
Chrachri, A. & Williamson, R. 2004. Cholinergic modulation of L-type calcium current in isolated sensory hair cells of the statocyst of octopus, Eledone cirrhosa. Neurosci Lett 360, 90–94.
Colmers, W. F. 1982. The central afferent and efferent organization of the gravity receptor system of the statocyst of Octopus vulgaris. Neuroscience 7, 461–476.
Demb, J. B., Sterling, P. & Freed, M. A. 2004. How retinal ganglion cells prevent synaptic noise from reaching the spike output. J Neurophysiol 92, 2510–2519.
Eatock, R. A., Fay, R. & Popper, A. (Ed.) 2005. Vertebrate Hair Cells. Springer Handbook of Auditory Research, Vol. 27. Springer.
Enquist, M. & Ghirlanda, S. 2005. Neural Networks and Animal Behavior. Princeton University Press.
Fettiplace, R. 1999. Mechanisms of hair cell tuning. Ann Rev Physiol 61, 809–834.
Goldberg, J. M. & Fernandez, C. 1980. Efferent vestibular system in the squirrel monkey: anatomical location and influence on afferent activity. J Neurophysiol 43, 986–1025.
Gurney, K. 1997. An Introduction to Neural Networks. UCL Press.
Hanlon, R. T. & Messenger, J. B. (Ed.) 1996. Cephalopod Behaviour. Cambridge University Press.
Häusser, M., Spruston, N. & Stuart, G. J. 2000. Diversity and dynamics of dendritic signaling. Science 290, 739–744.
Highstein, S. M., Fay, R. & Popper, A. N. (Ed.) 2004. The Vestibular System. Springer Handbook of Auditory Research, Vol. 19. Springer.
Hodgkin, A. L. & Huxley, A. F. 1952. A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve. J Physiol Lond 117, 500–544.
Hu, E. H. & Bloomfield, S. A. 2003. Gap junctional coupling underlies the short-latency spike synchrony of retinal ganglion cells. J Neurosci 23, 6768–6777.
Llinas, R. R.The Squid Giant Synapse: A Model for Chemical Transmission. Oxford University Press.
McMahon, D. G. & Mattson, M. P. 1996. Horizontal cell electrical coupling in the giant danio: synaptic modulation by dopamine and synaptic maintenance by calcium. Brain Res 718, 89–96.
Maddock, L & Young, J. Z. 1984. Some dimensions of the angular-acceleration receptor systems of cephalopods. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 64, 55–79.
Minsky, M. & Papert, S. 1969. Perceptrons: An Introduction to Computational Geometry. MIT Press.
O'Reilly, R. C. & Busby, R. S. 2001. Generalizable relational binding from coarse-coded distributed representations. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. (ed. S. Becker), pp. 75–82 MIT Press.
Packard, A. 1972. Cephalopods and fish: the limits of convergence. Biol Rev 46, 241–307.
Plän, T. 1987. Functional Neuroanatomy of Sensory-motor Lobes of the Brain of Octopus Vulgaris. PhD Thesis, University of Regensburg.
Rorig, B. & Sutor, B. 1996. Regulation of gap junction coupling in the developing neocortex. Mol Neurobiol 12, 225–249.
Roy, J. E. & Cullen, K. E. 2004. Dissociating self-generated from passively applied head motion: neural mechanisms in the vestibular nuclei. J Neurosci 24, 2102–2111.
Smith, R. G. 2002. Retina. In The Handbook of Brain Theory and Neural Networks (ed. Arbib, M. A.). MIT Press.
Tu, Y. J. & Budelmann, B. U. 1994. The effect of L-glutamate on the afferent resting activity in the cephalopod statocyst. Brain Res 642, 47–58.
Tu, Y. J. & Budelmann, B. U. 1999. Effects of L-arginine on the afferent resting activity in the cephalopod statocyst. Brain Res 845, 35–49.
Tu, Y. J. & Budelmann, B. U. 2000a. Inhibitory effect of cyclic guanosine 3′, 5′-monophosphate (cGMP) on the afferent resting activity in the cephalopod statocyst. Brain Res 880, 65–69.
Tu, Y. J. & Budelmann, B. U. 2000b. Effects of nitric oxide donors on the afferent resting activity in the cephalopod statocyst. Brain Res 865, 211–220.
Usrey, W. M. & Reid, R. C. 1999. Synchronous activity in the visual system. Ann Rev Physiol 61, 435–456.
Hemmen, L. J., Cowan, J. D. & Domany, E. (ed.) 2001. Models of Neural Networks, Vol. IV. Early Vision and Attention. Springer Verlag.
Velte, T. J. & Masland, R. H. 1999. Action potentials in the dendrites of retinal ganglion cells. J Neurophysiol 81, 1412–1417.
Vogels, T. P, Rajan, K. & Abbott, L. F. 2005. Neural network dynamics. Ann Rev Neurosci 28, 357–376.
Wassle, H. 2004. Parallel processing in the mammalian retina. Nature Rev Neurosci 5, 747–757.
Williamson, R. 1985. Efferent influences on the afferent activity from the octopus angular acceleration receptor system. J Exp Biol 119, 251–264.
Williamson, R. 1986. Efferent activity in the octopus statocyst nerves. J Comp Physiol A 158, 125–132.
Williamson, R. 1989a. Electrical coupling between secondary hair cells in the statocyst of the squidAlloteuthis subulata. Brain Res 486, 67–72.
Williamson, R. 1989b. Secondary hair cells and afferent neurones in the squid statocyst receive both inhibitory and excitatory efferent inputs. J Comp Physiol A 165, 847–860.
Williamson, R. 1989c. Electrophysiological evidence for cholinergic and catecholaminergic efferent transmitters in the statocyst of octopus. Comp Biochem Physiol 93C, 23–27.
Williamson, R. 1991. The responses of primary and secondary sensory hair cells in the squid statocyst to mechanical stimulation. J Comp Physiol A 167, 655–664.
Williamson, R. 1995. Ionic currents in secondary sensory hair cells isolated from the statocysts of squid and cuttlefish. J Comp Physiol A 177, 261–271.
Williamson, R. & Budelmann, B. U. 1985. The responses of the octopus angular acceleration receptor system to sinusoidal stimulation. J Comp Physiol A 156, 403–412.
Williamson, R, & Chrachri, A. 1994. The efferent system in cephalopod statocysts. Biomed Res 15, 51–56.
Williamson, R. & Chrachri, A. 2004. Cephalopod neural networks. Neurosignals 13, 87–98.
Young, J. Z. 1960. The statocyst ofOctopus vulgaris. Proc R Soc B 152, 3–29.
Young, J. Z. 1989. The angular-acceleration receptor system of diverse cephalopods. Phil Trans RSoc Lond 325B, 189–238.