1993. Hidden preferences and the evolution of signals. Phil Trans R. SocB 265, 1059–1064. &
2007. The key mimetic features of hoverflies through avian eyes. Proc R Soc B 274, 1949–1954., , , &
1995. Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition. Oxford University Press.
2007. Correlation versus gradient type motion detectors: the pros and cons. Phil Trans R Soc B 362, 369–374.
1940. Adaptive Coloration in Animals. Methuen.
2005. Disruptive coloration and background pattern matching. Nature 434, 72–74., , et al.
2000. Neural Network Toolbox for Use with Matlab, Version 4. The MathWorks Inc. &
2009. Concealed by conspicuousness: distractive prey markings and backgrounds. Proc R Soc B 276, 1905–1910., , &
1993. Imperfect mimicry: a pigeon's perspective. Proc R Soc B 251, 195–200., , , &
1998. Constraints on information processing and their effects on behavior. In Cognitive Ecology: the Evolutionary Ecology of Information Processing and Decision Making (ed. ), pp. 89–128. University of Chicago Press.
1974. Defence in Animals. Longman.
1978. A predator's view of animal color patterns. Evol Biol 11, 319–364.
1984. Progressive background matching in moths, and a quantitative measure of crypsis. Biol J Linn Soc 22, 187–231.
1992. Signals, signal conditions and the direction of evolution. Am Nat 139, S125–S153.
1993. Selection of exaggerated male traits by female aesthetic senses. Nature 361, 446–448. &
1994. Symmetry, beauty and evolution. Nature 372, 169–172. &
1998. Neural representation and the evolution of signal form. In Cognitive Ecology: The Evolutionary Ecology of Information Processing and Decision making (ed. ), pp. 21–87. University of Chicago Press. &
2002. Spectacular phenomena and limits to rationality in genetic and cultural evolution. Phil Trans R SocB 357, 1585–1594., , &
1980. Visual search through color displays: effects of target-background similarity and background uniformity. Percept Psychophys 27, 267–272. &
2007. Empirical tests of the role of disruptive coloration in reducing detectability. Proc R SocB 274, 1325–1331., , &
1986. Searching for cryptic prey: evidence for optimal search rates and the formation of search images in quail. Anim Behav 34, 898–912.
1983. Searching for cryptic prey: the effect of search rate. Am Nat 121, 172–186. &
1998. Artificial neural networks as models of stimulus control. Anim Behav 56, 1383–1389. &
1992. Predator psychology and the evolution of prey coloration. In Natural Enemies: The Population Biology of Predators, Parasites and Diseases (ed. ), pp. 377–394. Blackwell.
1968. Interactions between items in visual search. J Exp Psychol 76, 248–355.
1999. Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation. 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall.
1999. Dynamics of mimicry evolution. Biol J Linn Soc 66, 145–158. &
2007. Animal camouflage: compromise or specialize in a 2 patch-type environment. Behav Ecol 18, 769–775., &
2004. Spots and stripes: the evolution of repetition in visual signal form. J Theor Biol 230, 407–419., , &
2001. Strong antiapostatic selection against novel rare aposematic prey. Proc Natl Acad SciUSA 98, 9181–9184., , &
1998. Crypsis through disruptive coloration in an isopod. Proc R SocB 265, 1059–1064.
2003. Visual background complexity facilitates the evolution of camouflage. Evolution 57, 1248–1254.
2005. Background-matching and disruptive coloration, and the evolution of cryptic coloration. Proc R SocB 272, 665–670. &
2001. Selection for cryptic coloration in a visually heterogeneous habitat. Proc R SocB 268, 1925–1929., &
2007. Aposematic signals and the relationship between conspicuousness and distinctiveness. J Theor Biol 245, 268–277. &
2005. Constrained camouflage facilitates the evolution of conspicuous warning coloration. Evolution 59, 38–45. &
1999. Optimisation of cryptic coloration in heterogeneous habitats. Biol J Linn Soc 67, 151–161., &
1996. An Introduction to Genetic Algorithms. MIT Press.
2004. Simulation as experiment: a philosophical reassessment for biological modeling. Trends Ecol Evol 19, 530–534.
2007a. Countershading enhances cryptic protection: an experiment with wild birds and artificial prey. Anim Behav 74, 1249–1258., , et al.
2007b. Co-mimics have a mutualistic relationship despite unequal defence levels. Nature 448, 64–66., , , &
2004. Avoiding Attack: The Evolutionary Ecology of Crypsis, Warning Signals and Mimicry. Oxford University Press., &
2003. The evolution of warning signals as reliable indicators of prey defense. Am Nat 162, 377–389. &
2005. Tasting the difference: do multiple defence chemicals interact in Müllerian mimicry?Proc R SocB 272, 339–345. &
2007. Predator perception and the interrelation between different forms of protective coloration. Proc R Soc B 274, 1457–1464.
2006. Disruptive coloration, crypsis and edge detection in early visual processing. Proc R SocB 273, 2141–2147. &
2008. Conspicuousness, not eye mimicry, makes “eyespots” effective antipredator signals. Behav Ecol 19, 525–531., &
2009. Defining disruptive coloration and distinguishing its functions. Phil Trans R Soc B364, 423–427. &
2007. Individuals from different-looking animal species may group together to confuse shared predators: simulations with artificial neural networks. Proc R Soc B 274, 827–832., &
1909 Concealing Coloration in the Animal Kingdom. Macmillan.
1999. Pattern Recognition. Academic Press. &
1997. Fuzzy and Neural Approaches in Engineering. Wiley. &
2005. Aposematic and crypsis combined as a result of distance dependence: functional versatility of the colour pattern in the swallowtail butterfly larva. Proc R SocB 272, 1315–1321., &
2005. Prey survival by predator intimidation: an experimental study of peacock butterfly defence against blue tits. Proc R SocB 272, 1203–1207., , &
1889. Darwinism. Macmillan.
1985. Butterfly wing markings are more advantageous during handling than during initial strike of an avian predator. Evolution 39, 845–851. &