Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 5
  • Print publication year: 2011
  • Online publication date: September 2011

Chapter Five - Intoxication as a sentencing factor

Summary

The criminogenic effect of alcohol is well known; in a significant proportion of offences, particularly those involving violence, the accused was intoxicated at the time of the offence. Should the fact that he or she was drunk be taken into account and, if so, how? There are three possible positions: intoxication could either mitigate or aggravate the ‘deserved’ penalty, or the offender’s lack of sobriety might be immaterial to sentencing.

CHAPTER OVERVIEW

This chapter explores this common circumstance which has such important consequences for sentencing across offences and jurisdictions. In the conclusion of his book Alcohol and Crime (2006), Dingwall writes:

Given the large number of defendants who raise intoxication as a mitigating factor at the sentencing stage, the paucity both of a guiding approach and of academic attention to the issue is alarming. (p. 170)

References
Ashworth, A. 2010 Sentencing and Criminal JusticeCambridge University Press
Ashworth, A. 2010 Sentencing Guidelines and the Sentencing CouncilCriminal Law Review389
Bache, J.Fassenfelt, J. 2010 Committed in DrinkMagistrate 66 10
Cabinet Office 2010 http://programmeforgovernment.hmg.gov.uk/justice/
Dhami, M.Souza, K. 2009 The Study of Sentencing and its Outcomes: A Pilot ReportLondonMinistry of Justice
Dingwall, G. 2006 Alcohol and CrimeCullomptonWillan Publishing
Dingwall, G.Koffman, L. 2008 Determining the Impact of Intoxication in a Desert-Based Sentencing FrameworkCriminology and Criminal Justice 8 335
Fowles, T.Wilson, D. 2010 The National Probation Service’s Work with Alcohol-Misusing OffendersHoward Journal 49 182
Gelsthorpe, L.Morgan, R. 2007 Handbook of ProbationCullomptonWillan
Harrell, W. A. 1980 Alcohol Misuse and Prior Alcohol-Related Convictions as Predictors of Probation Officer Perceptions and SentencingSubstance Use and Abuse 15 1271
Harrell, W. A. 1981 Effects of alcohol use and offenders’ remorsefulness on sentencing decisionsJournal of Applied Social Psychology 11 83
HM Chief Inspector of Prisons for England and Wales 2010 Alcohol Services in Prisons: An Unmet NeedLondonHMIP
Jacobson, J.Hough, M. 2007 Mitigation: The Role of Personal Factors in SentencingLondonPrison Reform Trust
Law Commission of England and Wales 2009 Intoxication and Criminal LiabilityLondonParliament
McKenna, K. 2007 Evaluation of the North Liverpool Community Justice CentreLondonMinistry of Justice
McSweeney, T.Webster, R.Turnbull, P.Duffy, M. 2009
Maruna, S. 2011 Re-entry as a Rite of PassagePunishment and Society 13 3
Prison Reform Trust 2004 Alcohol and Reoffending: Who Cares?LondonPrison Reform Trust
Roberts, J. 2008 Aggravating and Mitigating Factors at Sentencing: Towards Greater Consistency of ApplicationCriminal Law Review264
Roberts, J.Hough, M.Jacobson, J.Moon, N. 2009 Public Attitudes to Sentencing Purposes and Sentencing Factors: An Empirical AnalysisCriminal Law Review771
Rumgay, J. 1998 Crime, Punishment and the Drinking OffenderBasingstokeMacmillan
Sentencing Guidelines Council 2004 www.sentencing.council.co.uk
Shapland, J. 1981 Between Conviction and Sentence: The Process of MitigationLondonRoutledge
Thomas, D. A. 2010 Current Sentencing PracticeLondonSweet & Maxwell
von Hirsch, A. 1993 Censure and SanctionsOxfordClarendon Press
Walker, N. 1999 Aggravation, Mitigation and Mercy in English Criminal JusticeLondonBlackstone
Ward, M. 2010 www.alcoholconcern.org.uk
Table of Cases
2010
2009
2008
1980
2010
2010
2003
2010
2010
2010
2008
1975
1988
1977
2010
2008
2006
2010
2010
2009