Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2006
  • Online publication date: June 2012

1 - Thinking about migration law and national borders: An aspirational benchmark?

Summary

A framework for evaluating migration law and policy

An ideal world would be one in which all people would find roughly equal levels of resources in the places where they are born but where everybody would enjoy the right to search for better opportunities elsewhere without being impeded by the circumstances of his or her origins.

Migration and refugee law is inherently controversial. That is an underlying theme in the textbook, Migration and Refugee Law: Principles and Practice in Australia, which accompanies this case and commentary book. In the textbook, we advanced a new theoretical framework for refugee law and set out an alternative definition for a ‘refugee’.

As you read through the cases and materials in this book, you should do so with acritical and analytical mind regarding the rationale for Australian migration law and policy as a whole.

Migration law is complex and technical. Given this, most practitioners and students in this area fail to get beyond the minutiae contained in the hundreds of visa categories and the criteria within these categories. The technical nature of migration law dissuades a search for an overarching rationale for Australia's approach to immigration issues.

In this book, we discuss a large number of visa classes. Most of them do not have an obvious link with each other. Yet, given the importance of immigration to the well-being of potential immigrants and the Australian community, it would be striking if there was not an underlying unity (or at least an attempt to ground an underlying coherency) to this area of the law.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO