Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2016
  • Online publication date: July 2016

3 - Techno-economic analysis

from Part I - Motivation

Summary

Introduction

This chapter discusses key concepts and evaluation metrics used to describe and quantify the value proposition of a local area power and energy system (LAPES). Often the engineer is asked to evaluate multiple options and create a justification for a recommendation. Concepts of techno-economic analysis explored in this chapter are useful to compare the LAPES to a traditional system as well as to explore the cost-benefit tradeoff of various LAPES designs, configurations, and operating modes. Higher power quality, energy availability, and reliability of small-scale and distributed power systems are often touted as significant advantages over a conventional utility electrical system. While LAPES may indeed offer technological advantages, in order for it to be a practical engineering solution a comprehensive economic valuation of these benefits must occur in order to build the business case for a LAPES system. That is, higher availability and reliability may come at a cost that is unaffordable for a given application. Thus, this chapter explores tools and techniques to perform a techno-economic analysis that considers both the technological merits and the economic costs.

A LAPES is expected to provide decades of service with comparable or better availability than a commercial, large-scale, wide-area electrical utility. The downside of a decentralized, distributed system is that propagating intelligence and control to the edge of the grid tends to increase the number of components required and creates new failure modes. Consider a solid-state transformer (SST) compared to a traditional line-frequency transformer (LFT). Certainly the SST can perform more functions than the LFT, including real and reactive power control and volt-var control, harmonic current compensation, among others. Juxtapose this enhanced feature set against the fact that the LFT routinely provides decades of service life with minimal if any operation and maintenance costs (O&M) and that the purchase price of the SST far exceeds the price of the LFT. Techno-economic analysis provides a data-driven, fact-based way to evaluate the cost-benefit of these competing engineering solutions. Further, consider that the SST is comprised of a large plurality of individual electrical components, each with associated failure and wear-out modes.

[1] California Energy Commission, http://www.energy.ca.gov/distgen/economics/decision.html.
[2] Drennen, T. E. and Andruski, J., “Power Systems Life Cycle Analysis Tool (Power LCAT),” U.S. National Energy Technology Lab, DOE/NETL–2012/1566, May 2012.
[3] Kjaer, S. B., Pedersen, J. K., and Blaabjerg, F., “A Review of Single-Phase Grid-Connected Inverters for Photovoltaic Modules,” IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 1292–1306.
[4] Quan, L. and Wolfs, P., “A Review of the Single Phase Photovoltaic Module Integrated Converter Topologies With Three Different DC Link Configurations,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 1320–1333.
[5] Bower, W., “The AC PV Building Block-Ultimate Plug-n-Play That Brings Photovoltaics Directly to the Customer,” presented at National Center for Photovoltaics (NCPV) and Solar Program Review Meeting
[6] Myrzik, J. M. A. and Calais, M., “String and Module Integrated Inverters for Single-Phase Grid Connected Photovoltaic Systems – A Review,” IEEE Bologna Power Tech Conference Proceedings, vol. 2, p. 8, June 23–26, 2003.
[7] Brooks, B. and Whitaker, C., “CEC Guideline for the Use of the Performance Test Protocol for Evaluating Inverters Used in Grid-Connected Photovoltaic Systems (draft for immediate use),” February 2005.
[8] Parker, T. P., “Reliability in PV Inverter Design: Black Art or Science-Based Discipline?,” SolarBridge Technologies White Paper Rev. 1.0, May 16, 2011.
[9] Bazzi, A. M., Kim, K. A., Johnson, B. B., Krein, P. T., and Dominguez-García, A., “Fault Impacts on Solar Power Unit Reliability,” IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference, Fort Worth, TX, March 8–11, 2011.
[10] Wang, H., Che, Y., and Zhao, L., “Research and Development of Photovoltaic Grid-Connected Inverter Based on DSP,” 4th International Conference on Power Electronics Systems and Applications (PESA), 8–10, 2011, pp. 1–5.
[11] Castillo, S. J., Balog, R. S., Enjeti, P., “Predicting Capacitor Reliability in a Module-Integrated Photovoltaic Inverter Using Stress Factors from an Environmental Usage Model,” North American Power Symposium (NAPS), September 26–28, 2010, pp. 1–6.
[12] Dhople, S. V., and Dominguez-Garcia, A. D., “Estimation of Photovoltaic System Reliability and Performance Metrics,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 554–563.
[13] Carrasco, J. M., Franquelo, L. G., Bialasiewicz, J. T., Galvan, E., Guisado, R. C. P., Prats, M. A. M., Leon, J. I., and Moreno-Alfonso, N., “Power-Electronic Systems for the Grid Integration of Renewable Energy Sources: A Survey,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 1002–1016.
[14] Dunlop, E. D., Halton, D., and Ossenbrink, H. A., “20 Years of Life and More: Where Is the End of Life of a PV Module?,” Conference Record of the Thirty-first IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, January 3–7, 2005, pp. 1593–1596.
[15] Yan-Fei, L., Meyer, E., and Xiaodong, L., “Recent Developments in Digital Control Strategies for DC/DC Switching Power Converters,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 2567–2577.
[16] Balog, R. S., Yingying, Kuai, Uhrhan, G., “A Photovoltaic Module Thermal Model Using Observed Insolation and Meteorological Data to Support a Long Life, Highly Reliable Module-Integrated Inverter Design by Predicting Expected Operating Temperature,” IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition, ECCE, September 20–24, 2009, pp. 3343–3349.
[17] Skoplaki, E. and Palyvos, J. A., “Operating Temperature of Photovoltaic Modules: A Survey of Pertinent Correlations,” Renewable Energy, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 23–29.
[18] United States Department of Defense, Military Handbook MIL-HDBK-217 F, Reliability Prediction of Electronic Equipment. Washington, DC, 1991.
[19] Gow, J. A. and Manning, C. D., “Development of a Photovoltaic Array Model for Use in Power-Electronics Simulation Studies,” IEE Proceedings – Electric Power Applications vol. 146, no. 2, pp. 193–200.