Abbot, Michael, and Forceville, Charles J. (2011). LOSS OF CONTROL IS LOSS OF HANDS in Azumanga Daioh volume 4. Language and Literature, 20(2), 91–112.Google Scholar

Abreu, Ana Maria, Macaluso, Emiliano, Azevedo, Ruben, Cesari, Paola, Urgesi, Cosimo, and Aglioti, Salvatore Maria (2012). Action anticipation beyond the action observation network: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study in expert basketball players. European Journal of Neuroscience, 35(10), 1646–1654.Google Scholar

Adam, Hajo, and Galinsky, Adam (2012). Enclothed cognition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(4), 918–925.Google Scholar

Ahissar, Edud, Vaadia, Eilon, Ahissar, Merav, Bergman, Hagai, Arieli, Amos, and Abeles, Moshe (1992). Dependence of cortical plasticity on correlated activity of single neurons and on behavioral context. Science, 257, 1412–1415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Alibali, Martha W., Boncoddo, Rebecca, and Hostetter, Autumn (2014). Gesture in reasoning: An embodied perspective. In Shapiro (ed.), 150–159.Google Scholar

Allbritton, David W., McKoon, Gail, and Gerrig, Richard (1995). Metaphor-based schemas and text representations: Making connections through conceptual metaphors. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 21(3), 612–625.Google Scholar

Allen, Chris, Vassilev, Ivaylo, Kennedy, Anne, and Rogers, Anne (2016). Long-term condition self-management support in online communities: A meta-synthesis of qualitative papers. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(3), e61.Google Scholar

Alsmith, Adrian, and de Vignemont, Frédérique (2012). Embodying the mind and representing the body. Review of Philosophy and Psychology. Special Issue, 3(1), 1–13.Google Scholar

Alverson, Hoyt (1994). Semantics and Experience: Universal Metaphors of Time in English, Mandarin, Hindi, and Sesotho. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Anderson, John (2010). Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications. New York: Worth Publishers.Google Scholar

Anderson, Michael C., Bjork, Elizabeth L., and Bjork, Robert A. (2000). Retrieval-induced forgetting: Evidence for a recall-specific mechanism. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7(3), 522–530.Google Scholar

Andrén, Mats (2010). Children’s Gestures from 18 to 30 Months. Lund: Centre for Languages and Literatures.Google Scholar

Arend, Isabel, Henik, Avishai, and Okon-Singer, Hadas (2015). Dissociating emotion and attention functions in the pulvinar nucleus of the thalamus. Neuropsychology, 29(2), 191–196.Google Scholar

Armstrong, Natalie, Koteyko, Nelya, and Powell, John (2012). Oh dear, should I really be saying that on here? Issues of identity and authority in an online diabetes community. Health, 16(4), 347–365.Google Scholar

Arnheim, Rudolf (1969). Visual Thinking. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Attardo, Salvatore (1994). Linguistic Theories of Humor. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Attardo, Salvatore (2000). Irony as relevant inappropriateness. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(6), 793–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bak, Per (1997). How Nature Works: The Science of Self-Organized Criticality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bal, Mieke (2009). Narratology (3rd edn.). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar

Barcelona, Antonio (ed.) (2000a). Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads: A Cognitive Perspective. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Barcelona, Antonio (2000b). On the plausibility of claiming a metonymic motivation for conceptual metaphor. In Barcelona (ed.), 31–58.Google Scholar

Barcelona, Antonio (2009). Motivation of construction meaning and form: The roles of metonymy and inference. In Panther, Thornburg & Barcelona (eds.), 363–401.Google Scholar

Bargh, John A., Chen, Mark, and Burrows, Lara (1996). Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 230–244.Google Scholar

Barsalou, Lawrence W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577–609.Google Scholar

Barsalou, Lawrence W. (2008a). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645.Google Scholar

Barsalou, Lawrence W. (2008b). Grounding symbolic operations in the brain’s modal systems. In Semin & Smith (eds.), 9–42.Google Scholar

Barsalou, Lawrence W., Simmons, Kyle, Barbey, Aron K., and Wilson, Christine D. (2003). Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(2), 84–91.Google Scholar

Barsalou, Lawrence W., and Wiemer-Hastings, Katja (2005). Situating abstract concepts. In Pecher & Zwaan (eds.), 129–163.Google Scholar

Barton, David (2007). Literacy: An Introduction to the Ecology of Written Language (2nd edn.). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Bavelas, Janet, Chovil, Nicole, Coates, Linda, and Roe, Lori (1995). Gestures specialized for dialogue. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(4), 394–340.Google Scholar

Bednar, James A., and Wilson, Stuart P. (2015). Cortical maps. The Neuroscientist, 1–14, 10.1177/1073858415597645 [e-pub ahead of print]. Print edn. 2016, 22(6), 604–617.Google Scholar

Bergen, Benjamin K. (2012). Louder than Words: The New Science of How the Mind Makes Meaning. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Bergen, Benjamin K. (2015). Embodiment. In Dabrowska, Ewa and Divjak, Dagmar (eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 10–30). Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Bernárdez, Enrique (2013). Evidentiality and the epistemic use of the Icelandic verbs sjá and heyra: A cultural linguistic view. In Gaz, Adam, Danaher, David, and Łozowski, Przemysław (eds.), The Linguistic Worldview: Ethnolinguistics, Cognition, and Culture (pp. 415–442). London: Versita.Google Scholar

Bierwiaczonek, Boguslaw (2013). Metonymy in Language, Thought and Brain. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar

Bird, Chris M., Bisby, James A., and Burgess, Neil (2012). The hippocampus and spatial constraints on mental imagery. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6(142), 1–12. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00142.Google Scholar

Bishop, Bill (2008). The Big Sort: Why Clustering of Like-Minded America is Tearing Us Apart. New York: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar

Black, Max [1979] (1993). More about metaphor. In Ortony (ed.), 19–41.Google Scholar

Blanke, Olaf (2012). Multisensory brain mechanisms of bodily self-consciousness. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 13(8), 556–571.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Boers, Frank (1999). When a bodily source domain becomes prominent. In Gibbs, Jr. & Steen (eds.), 47–56.Google Scholar

Boers, Frank, and Littlemore, Jeannette (2000). Cognitive style variables in participants’ explanations of conceptual metaphors. Metaphor and Symbol, 15(3), 177–187.Google Scholar

Boers, Frank, and Littlemore, Jeannette (eds.) (2003). Cross-Cultural Differences in Conceptual Metaphor: Applied Linguistics Perspectives. Special issue of Metaphor and Symbol, 18(4).Google Scholar

Bonnier, Pierre (1905). L’Aschématie. Revue Neurologique (Paris), 13, 605–609.Google Scholar

Boot, Inge, and Pecher, Diane (2010). Similarity is closeness: Metaphorical mapping in a conceptual task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(5), 942–954.Google Scholar

Bordwell, David (1985). Narration in the Fiction Film. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bordwell, David, and Thompson, Kirstin (2008). Film Art: An Introduction (8th edn.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Borkent, Mike, Dancygier, Barbara, and Hinnell, Jennifer (2013). Language and the Creative Mind. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar

Boroditsky, Lera (2000). Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition, 75(1), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Boroditsky, Lera (2001). Does language shape thought? English and Mandarin speakers’ conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology, 43(1), 1–22.Google Scholar

Boroditsky, Lera, and Ramscar, Michael (2002). The roles of body and mind in abstract thought. Psychological Science, 13(2), 185–188.Google Scholar

Boulenger, Véronique, Hauk, Olaf, and Pulvermüller, Friedemann (2009). Grasping ideas with the motor system: Semantic somototopy in idiom comprehension. Cerebral Cortex, 19(8), 1905–1914.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bowdle, Brian F., and Gentner, Dedre (2005). The career of metaphor. Psychological Review, 112(1), 193–216.Google Scholar

Bowes, Andrea, and Katz, Albert N. (2015). Metaphor creates intimacy and enhances one’s ability to infer the internal states of others. Memory & Cognition, 43(6), 953–963.Google Scholar

Breaux, Brooke O., and Feist, Michele I. (2008). The color of similarity. In Love, B. C., McRae, K., and Sloutsky, V. M. (eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 253–258). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Conference.Google Scholar

Calbris, Geneviève (2011). Elements of Meaning in Gesture. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Cameron, Lynne (1999). Identifying and describing metaphors in spoken discourse data. In Cameron, Lynne and Low, Graham (eds.), Researching and Applying Metaphor (pp. 105–132). Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cameron, Lynne (2003). Deliberate and Conventional Metaphors in Educational Discourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Cameron, Lynne (2007a). Confrontation or complementarity? Metaphor in language use and cognitive metaphor theory. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 5(1), 107–135.Google Scholar

Cameron, Lynne (2007b). Patterns of metaphor use in reconciliation talk. Discourse & Society, 18(2), 197–222.Google Scholar

Cameron, Lynne (2008a). Metaphor and talk. In Gibbs, Jr. (ed.), 197–211.Google Scholar

Cameron, Lynne (2008b). Metaphor shifting in the dynamics of talk. In Zanotto, Cameron & Cavalcanti (eds.), 45–62.Google Scholar

Cameron, Lynne (2010a). The affective discourse dynamics of metaphor clustering. Ilha do Desterro: A Journal of English Language, Literatures in English and Cultural Studies, 41–62.Google Scholar

Cameron, Lynne (2010b). The discourse dynamics framework for metaphor. In Cameron & Maslen (eds.), 77–94.Google Scholar

Cameron, Lynne (2010c). Metaphors and discourse activity. In Cameron & Maslen (eds.), 77–94.Google Scholar

Cameron, Lynne (2010d). What is metaphor and why does it matter? In Cameron & Maslen (eds.), 3–25.Google Scholar

Cameron, Lynne (2011). Metaphor and Reconciliation: The Discourse Dynamics of Empathy in Post-Conflict Conversations. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Cameron, Lynne (2016). Mixed metaphor from a discourse dynamics perspective: A non-issue? In Gibbs, Raymond W. Jr. (ed.), Mixing Metaphor (pp. 17–30). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Cameron, Lynne, and Deignan, Alice (2003). Combining large and small corpora to investigate tuning devices around metaphor in spoken discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 18(3), 149–160.Google Scholar

Cameron, Lynne, and Deignan, Alice (2006). The emergence of metaphor in discourse Applied Linguistics, 27(4), 671–690.Google Scholar

Cameron, Lynne, and Maslen, Robert (eds.) (2010). Metaphor Analysis: Research Practice in Applied Linguistics, Social Sciences and the Humanities. London: Equinox.Google Scholar

Cameron, Lynne, Maslen, Robert, and Low, Graham (2010). Finding systematicity in metaphor use. In Cameron & Maslen (eds.), 116–146.Google Scholar

Cameron, Lynne, Maslen, Robert, Todd, Zazie, Maule, John, Stratton, Peter, and Stanley, Neil (2009). The discourse dynamics approach to metaphor and metaphor-led discourse analysis. Metaphor and Symbol, 24(2), 63–89.Google Scholar

Cang, Jianhua, and Feldheim, David A. (2013). Developmental mechanisms of topographic map formation and alignment. Annual Reviews in Neuroscience, 36, 51–77.Google Scholar

Carroll, Noël (1996). A note on film metaphor. In Carroll, Noël, Theorizing the Moving Image (pp. 212–223). Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Caruana, Fausto, and Cuccio, Valentina (2015). Types of abduction in tool behavior. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Science. doi:10.1007/s11097-015-9450-y.Google Scholar

Casasanto, Daniel (2008a). Similarity and proximity: When does close in space mean close in mind? Memory & Cognition, 36(6), 1047–1056.Google Scholar

Casasanto, Daniel (2008b). Who’s afraid of the Big Bad Whorf? Cross-linguistic differences in temporal language and thought. Language Learning, 58(177), 63–79.Google Scholar

Casasanto, Daniel (2009a). Embodiment of abstract concepts: Good and bad in right- and left-handers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(3), 351–367.Google Scholar

Casasanto, Daniel (2009b). When is a linguistic metaphor a conceptual metaphor? In Evans, Vyvyan and Pourcel, Stéphanie (eds.), New Directions in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 127–146). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Casasanto, Daniel (2010). Space for thinking. In Evans, Vyvyan and Chilton, Paul (eds.), Language, Cognition and Space: State of the Art and New Directions (pp. 453–478). London: Equinox Publishing.Google Scholar

Casasanto, Daniel (2011). Different bodies, different minds: The body-specificity of language and thought. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(6), 378–383.Google Scholar

Casasanto, Daniel (2013). Development of metaphorical thinking: The role of language. In Borkent, Dancygier & Hinnell (eds.), 3–18.Google Scholar

Casasanto, Daniel (2014a). Bodily Relativity. In Shapiro (ed.), 108–117.Google Scholar

Casasanto, Daniel (2014b). Experiential origins of mental metaphors: Language, culture, and the body. In Landau, Robinson & Meier (eds.), 249–268.Google Scholar

Casasanto, Daniel, and Boroditsky, Lera (2008). Time in the mind: Using space to think about time. Cognition, 106(2), 579–593.Google Scholar

Casasanto, Daniel, and Bottini, Roberto (2014a). Mirror reading can reverse the flow of time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 473–479.Google Scholar

Casasanto, Daniel, and Bottini, Roberto (2014b). Spatial language and abstract concepts. WIREs Cognitive Science, 5(2), 139–149.Google Scholar

Casasanto, Daniel, and Chrysikou, Evangelia G. (2011). When left is “right”: Motor fluency shapes abstract concepts. Psychological Science, 22(4), 419–422.Google Scholar

Casasanto, Daniel, and Gijssels, Tom (2015). What makes a metaphor an embodied metaphor? Linguistics Vanguard, 1(1), 327–337.Google Scholar

Casasanto, Daniel, and Henetz, Tania (2012). Handedness shapes children’s abstract concepts. Cognitive Science, 36(2), 359–372.Google Scholar

Casasanto, Daniel, and Jasmin, Kyle (2010). Good and bad in the hands of politicians: Spontaneous gestures during positive and negative speech. Public Library of Science ONE, 5(7), e11805.Google Scholar

Chafe, Wallace (1994). Discourse, Consciousness, and Time: The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Chapple, Alison, and Ziebland, Sue (2004). The role of humor for men with testicular cancer. Qualitative Health Research, 14(8), 1123–1139.Google Scholar

Chemero, Anthony (2011). Radical Embodied Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chen, Jenn-Yeu (2007). Do Chinese and English speakers think about time differently? Failure of replicating Boroditsky (2001). Cognition 104(2), 427–436.Google Scholar

Chiappe, Dan, Kennedy, John, and Smykowski, Tim (2003). Reversibility, aptness and the conventionality of metaphors and similes. Metaphor and Symbol, 18(2), 85–106.Google Scholar

Ching, Marvin K. L. (1993). Games and play: Pervasive metaphors in American life. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 8(1), 43–65.Google Scholar

Chklovskii, Dmitri B., and Koulakov, Alexei A. (2004). Maps in the brain: What can we learn from them? Annual Reviews in Neuroscience, 27, 369–392.Google Scholar

Christakis, Nicholas A., and Fowler, James H. (2009). Connected: The Surprising Power of Our Social Networks and How They Shape Our Lives. New York: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar

Chui, Kawai (2011). Conceptual metaphors in gesture. Cognitive Linguistics, 22(3), 437–458.Google Scholar

Cienki, Alan (1998). Metaphoric gestures and some of their relations to verbal metaphoric expressions. In Koenig, Jean-Pierre (ed.), Discourse and Cognition (pp. 189–204). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar

Cienki, Alan (2005). Image schemas and gesture. In Hampe (ed.), 421–442.Google Scholar

Cienki, Alan (2010). Multimodal metaphor analysis. In Cameron & Maslen (eds.), 195–216.Google Scholar

Cienki, Alan (2013a). Cognitive Linguistics: Spoken language and gesture as expressions of conceptualization. In Müller, Cienki, Fricke, Ladewig, McNeill & Tessendorf (eds.), 182–201.Google Scholar

Cienki, Alan (2013b). Mimetic schemas and image schemas in cognitive linguistics and gesture studies. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 11(2), 417–432.Google Scholar

Cienki, Alan, and Müller, Cornelia (eds.) (2008a). Metaphor and Gesture. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Cienki, Alan, and Müller, Cornelia (2008b). Metaphor, gesture, and thought. In Gibbs, Jr. (ed.), 483–501.Google Scholar

Citron, Francesca, and Goldberg, Adele E. (2014). Social context modulates the effect of physical warmth on perceived interpersonal kindness: A study of embodied metaphors. Language and Cognition, 6(1), 1–11.Google Scholar

Claridge, Claudia (2011). Hyperbole in English: A Corpus-Based Study of Exaggeration. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Clark, Andy (2008). Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, Andrew, and Chalmers, David (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58(1), 7–19.Google Scholar

Clark, Herbert H. (1973). Space, time, semantics and the child. In Moore, Timothy E. (ed.), Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language (pp. 27–63). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Clark, Herbert H., and Gerrig, Richard J. (1984). On the pretense theory of irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113(1), 121–126.Google Scholar

Coates, Jennifer (2007). Talk in a play frame: More on laughter and intimacy. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(1), 29–49.Google Scholar

Coëgnarts, Martin, and Kravanja, Peter (2012). Embodied visual meaning: Image schemas in film. Projections, 6(2), 84–101.Google Scholar

Cole, Jonathan (1995). Pride and a Daily Marathon. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Cole, Jonathan, and Paillard, Jacques (1995). Living without touch and information about body position and movement: Studies on deafferented subjects. In Bermudez, José, Marcel, Anthony, and Eilan, Naomi (eds.), The Body and the Self (pp. 245–266). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Connor, Kathleen, and Kogan, Nathan (1980). Topic−vehicle relations in metaphor: The issue of asymmetry. In Honeck, R. P. and Hoffman, R. R. (eds.), Cognition and Figurative Language (pp. 283–310). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Cook, Susan W., Duffy, Ryan G., and Fenn, Kimberly M. (2013). Consolidation and transfer of learning after observing hand gesture. Child Development, 84(6), 1863–1871.Google Scholar

Corts, Daniel, and Meyers, Kristina (2002). Conceptual clusters in figurative language production. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31(4), 391–408.Google Scholar

Corts, Daniel, and Pollio, Howard (1999). Spontaneous production of figurative language and gesture in college lectures. Metaphor and Symbol, 14(2), 81–100.Google Scholar

Costantini, Marcello, Galati, Gaspare, Ferretti, Antonio, Caulo, Massimo, Tartaro, Armando, Romani, Gian Luca, et al. (2005). Neural systems underlying observation of humanly impossible movements: An FMRI study. Cerebral Cortex, 15(11), 1761–1767.Google Scholar

Coulson, Seana (2001). Semantic Leaps: Frame-Shifting and Conceptual Blending in Meaning Construction. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cowley, Stephen J., and Vallée-Tourangeau, Frédéric (eds.) (2013). Cognition beyond the Brain: Computation, Interactivity and Human Artifice. London: Springer.Google Scholar

Croft, William (1993). The role of domains in the interpretation of metaphors and metonymies. Cognitive Linguistics, 4(4), 335–370.Google Scholar

Croft, William, and Cruse, Alan (2004). Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cuccio, Valentina (2014). The notion of representation and the brain. Phenomenology and Mind, 7, 247–258.Google Scholar

Cuccio, Valentina (2015). Embodied Simulation and metaphors: Towards a direct role of the body in language comprehension. Epistemologia, 37, 97–112.Google Scholar

Cuffari, Elena, and Jensen, Thomas W. (2014). Living bodies: Co-enacting experience. In Müller, Cienki, Fricke, Ladewig, McNeill & Bressem (eds.), 2016–2025.Google Scholar

Cutting, James, Proffitt, Denis, and Kozlowski, Lynn (1978). A biochemical invariant for gait perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4(3), 357–372.Google Scholar

Dale, Rick (2015). An Integrative Research Strategy for Exploring Synergies in Natural Language Performance. Ecological Psychology, 27(3), 190–201.Google Scholar

Dale, Rick, Fusaroli, Ricardo, Duran, Nicholas, and Richardson, Daniel C. (2013). The self-organization of human interaction. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 59, 43–95.Google Scholar

Dancygier, Barbara, and Sweetser, Eve E. (2014). Figurative Language. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dawson, Michael (2014). Embedded and situated cognition. In Shapiro (ed.), 59–68.Google Scholar

de Hevia, Maria D., Izard, Veronique, Coubart, Aurélie, Spelke, Elizabeth S., and Streri, Arlette (2014). Representations of space, time, and number in neonates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(13), 4809–4813.Google Scholar

de Vignemont, Frédérique (2010). The body-schema and the body-image: Pros and cons. Neuropsychologia, 48(3), 669–680.Google Scholar

Deane, Paul D. (1992). Grammar in Mind and Brain: Explorations in Cognitive Syntax. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Deignan, Alice (2003). Metaphorical expressions and culture: An indirect link. Metaphor and Symbol, 18(4), 255–271.Google Scholar

Deignan, Alice (2006a). The grammar of linguistic metaphors. In Stefanowitsch & Th. Gries (eds.), 106–122.Google Scholar

Deignan, Alice (2006b). Metaphor in Corpus Linguistics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Deignan, Alice (2008a). Corpus linguistic data and conceptual metaphor theory. In Zanotto, Cameron & Cavalcanti (eds.), 149–162.Google Scholar

Deignan, Alice (2008b). Corpus linguistics and metaphor. In Gibbs, Jr. (ed.), 280–294.Google Scholar

Deignan, Alice, Littlemore, Jeannette, and Semino, Elena (2013). Figurative Language, Genre and Register. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Deignan, Alice, and Semino, Elena (2010). Corpus techniques for metaphor analysis. In Cameron & Maslen (eds.), 161–179.Google Scholar

Demjén, Zsófia (2016). Laughing at cancer: Humour, empowerment, solidarity and coping online. Journal of Pragmatics, 101, 18–30.Google Scholar

Dennet, Daniel (1969). Content and Consciousness. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Denny-Brown, Derek, Meyer, John, and Horenstein, Simon (1952). The significance of perceptual rivalry resulting from from parietal lesion. Brain, 75(4), 433–471.Google Scholar

Desai, Rutvik H., Binder, Jeffrey R., Conant, Lisa L., Mano, Quintino R., and Seidenberg, Mark S. (2011). The neural career of sensorimotor metaphors. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(9), 2376–2386.Google Scholar

di Pellegrino, Guiseppe, Fadiga, Luciano, Fogassi, Leonardo, Gallese, Vittorio, and Rizzolatti, Giacomo (1992). Understanding motor events: A neurophysiological study. Experimental Brain Research, 91(1), 176–180.Google Scholar

Dijkerman, H. Chris, and de Haan, Edward H. F. (2007). Somatosensory processes subserving perception and action. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 30(2), 189–201.Google Scholar

Dirven, René, and Pörings, Ralf (eds.) (2002). Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Dodge, Ellen, and Lakoff, George (2005). Image schemas: From linguistic analysis to neural grounding. In Hampe (ed.), 57–91.Google Scholar

Dolscheid, Sarah, Hunnius, Sabine, Casasanto, Daniel, and Majid, Asifa (2014). Prelinguistic infants are sensitive to space-pitch associations found across cultures. Psychological Science, 25(6), 1256–1261.Google Scholar

Dolscheid, Sarah, Shayan, Shakila, Majid, Asifa, and Casasanto, Daniel (2013). The thickness of musical pitch: Psychophysical evidence for linguistic relativity. Psychological Science, 24(5), 613–621.Google Scholar

Dynel, Marta (2009). Creative metaphor is a birthday cake: Metaphor as the source of humour. metaphorik.de, 17, 27–48.Google Scholar

Dynel, Marta (2011a). Joker in the pack: Towards determining the status of humorous framing in conversations. In Dynel, Marta (ed.), The Pragmatics of Humour across Discourse Domains (pp. 217–242). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Dynel, Marta (2011b). Pragmatics and Linguistic research into Humour. In Dynel, Marta (ed.), The Pragmatics of Humour across Discourse Domains (pp. 1–12). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Eggertsson, Gunnar T., and Forceville, Charles J. (2009). Multimodal expressions of the HUMAN VICTIM IS ANIMAL metaphor in horror films. In Forceville & Urios-Aparisi (eds.), 429–449.Google Scholar

Eitan, Zohar, and Timmers, Renee (2010). Beethoven’s last piano sonata and those who follow crocodiles: Cross-domain mappings of auditory pitch in a musical context. Cognition, 114(3), 405–422.Google Scholar

El Refaie, Elisabeth (2009a). Metaphor in political cartoons: Exploring audience responses. In Forceville & Urios-Aparisi (eds.), 173–196.Google Scholar

El Refaie, Elisabeth (2009b). Multiliteracies: How readers interpret political cartoons. Visual Communication, 8, 181–205.Google Scholar

El Refaie, Elisabeth (2014). Appearances and dis/dys-appearances: A dynamic view of embodiment in Conceptual Metaphor Theory. Metaphor and the Social World, 4(1), 109–125.Google Scholar

El Refaie, Elisabeth (2017). Multi-modal metaphors. In Semino & Demjén (eds.), 148–161.Google Scholar

Evans, Nicholas, and Wilkins, David (2000). In the mind’s ear: The semantic extensions of perception verbs in Australian languages. Language, 76(3), 546–592.Google Scholar

Evans, Vyvyan, and Green, Melanie (2006). Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Fahlenbrach, Kathrin (ed.) (2015). Embodied Metaphors in Film, Television, and Video Games: Cognitive Approaches. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Fauconnier, Gilles, and Turner, Mark (2002). The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexity. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Fauconnier, Gilles, and Turner, Mark (2008). Rethinking metaphor. In Gibbs, Jr. (ed.), 53–66.Google Scholar

Feldman, Jerome, and Narayanan, Srini (2004). Embodied meaning in a neural theory of language. Brain and Language, 89(2), 385–392.Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles J. (1977). Scenes-and-frames semantics. In Zampolli, Antonio (ed.), Linguistic Structures Processing 4 (pp. 55–81). Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles (1982). Frame semantics. In Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.), Linguistics in the Morning Calm (pp. 111–137). Seoul: Hanshin.Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles (1985). Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quarderni di Semantica, 6(2), 222–255.Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles J., and Baker, Collin F. (2009). A frames approach to semantic analysis. In Heine, Bernd and Narrog, Heiko (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis (pp. 313–340). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Fischer, Martin H., Dewulf, Nele, and Hill, Robin L. (2005). Designing bar graphs: Orientation matters. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19(7), 953–962.Google Scholar

Fodor, Jerry A. (1975). The Language of Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Forceville, Charles J. (1996). Pictorial Metaphor in Advertising. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Forceville, Charles J. (2002). The identification of target and source in pictorial metaphors. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Forceville, Charles J. (2006a). Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: Agendas for research. In Kristiansen, Gitte, Achard, Michel, Dirven, René, and Ruiz de Mendoza Ibañez, Francisco (eds.), Cognitive Linguistics: Current Applications and Future Perspectives (pp. 379–402). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Forceville, Charles J. (2006b). The source-path-goal schema in the autobiographical journey documentary: McElwee, Van der Keuken, Cole. New Review of Film and Television Studies, 4(3), 241–261.Google Scholar

Forceville, Charles J. (2008). Metaphor in pictures and multimodal representations. In Gibbs, Jr. (ed.), 462–482.Google Scholar

Forceville, Charles J. (2009a). Metonymy in visual and audiovisual discourse. In Ventola, Eija and Guijarro, Arsenio Jésus Moya (eds.), The World Told and the World Shown: Issues in Multisemiotics (pp. 56–74). Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar

Forceville, Charles J. (2009b). The role of non-verbal sound and music in multimodal metaphor. In Forceville & Urios-Aparisi (eds.), 383–402.Google Scholar

Forceville, Charles J. (2011). The source-path-goal schema in Agnès Varda’s Les Glaneurs et la Glaneuse and Deux Ans Après. In Fludernik, Monika (ed.), Beyond Cognitive Metaphor Theory: Perspectives on Literary Metaphor (pp. 281–297). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Forceville, Charles J. (2013). Metaphor and symbol: SEARCHING FOR ONE’S IDENTITY IS LOOKING FOR A HOME in animation film. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 11(2), 250–268.Google Scholar

Forceville, Charles J. (2014). Relevance Theory as model for analysing multimodal communication. In Machin, David (ed.), Visual Communication (pp. 51–70). Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Forceville, Charles J. (2016). The force and balance schemas in journey metaphor animations. In Fernandes, Carla (ed.), Multimodality and Performance (pp. 8–22). Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholar Press.Google Scholar

Forceville, Charles J., and Jeulink, Marloes (2011). The flesh and blood of embodied understanding: The source-path-goal schema in animation film. Pragmatics & Cognition, 19(1), 37–59.Google Scholar

Forceville, Charles J., and Renckens, Thijs (2013). The GOOD IS LIGHT and BAD IS DARK metaphors in feature films. Metaphor and the Social Word, 3(2), 160–179.Google Scholar

Forceville, Charles J., and Urios-Aparisi, Eduardo (eds.) (2009). Multimodal Metaphor. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Frisson, Steven, and Pickering, Martin (1999). The processing of metonymy: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(6), 1366–1383.Google Scholar

Fuhrman, Orly, and Boroditsky, Lera (2010). Cross-cultural differences in mental representations of time: Evidence from an implicit non-linguistic task. Cognitive Science, 34(8), 1430–1451.Google Scholar

Fusaroli, Ricardo, Rączaszek-Leonardi, Joanna, and Tylén, Kristian (2014). Dialog as interpersonal synergy. New Ideas in Psychology, 32, 147–157.Google Scholar

Gallagher, Shaun (1986). Body image and body schema: A conceptual clarification. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 7, 541–554.Google Scholar

Gallagher, Shaun (2005). How the Body Shapes the Mind. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gallagher, Shaun, and Cole, Jonathan (1995). Body image and body schema in a deafferented subject. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 16(4), 369–389.Google Scholar

Gallagher, Shaun, and Zahavi, Dan (2008). The Phenomenological Mind (2nd edn.). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Gallese, Vittorio (2008). Mirror neurons and the social nature of language: The neural exploitation hypothesis. Social Neuroscience, 3(3–4), 317–333.Google Scholar

Gallese, Vittorio (2009). Mirror neurons and the neural exploitation hypothesis: From embodied simulation to social cognition. In Pineda, Jaime A. (ed.), Mirror Neuron Systems (pp. 163–190). New York: Humana Press.Google Scholar

Gallese, Vittorio, and Cuccio, Valentina (2016). The paradigmatic body: Embodied simulation, intersubjectivity, the bodily self and language. In Metzinger, Thomas and Windt, Jennifer (eds.), Open MIND. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Gallese, Vittorio, and Lakoff, George (2005). The Brain’s concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22(3), 455–479.Google Scholar

Gallese, Vittorio, and Sinigaglia, Corrado (2011). What is so special about embodied simulation? Trends in Cognitive Science, 15(11), 512–519.Google Scholar

Geeraerts, Dirk, and Cuyckens, Hubert (eds.) (2007). The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Geng, Joy J., and Vossel, Simone (2013). Re-evaluating the role of TPJ in attentional control: Contextual updating? Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 37(10–2), 2608–2620.Google Scholar

Gentner, Dedre, and Bowdle, Brian F. (2008). Metaphor as structure mapping. In Gibbs, Jr. (ed.), 3–13.Google Scholar

Gentner, Dedre, Imai, Mutsumi, and Boroditsky, Lera (2002). As time goes by: Evidence for two systems in processing space → time metaphors. Language and Cognitive Processes, 17(5), 537–565.Google Scholar

Gernsbacher, Morton A., Keysar, Boaz, Robertson, Rachel R. W., and Werner, Necia K. (2001). The role of suppression in understanding metaphors. Journal of Memory and Language, 45(3), 433–450.Google Scholar

Gerrig, Richard J. (1993). Experiencing Narrative Worlds: On the Psychological Activities of Reading. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Gibbs, Raymond W. Jr. (1991). Semantic analyzability in children’s understanding of idioms. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34(3), 613–620.Google Scholar

Gibbs, Raymond W. (1992). What do idioms really mean? Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 485–506.Google Scholar

Gibbs, Raymond W. (1994). The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gibbs, Raymond W. (1999). Taking metaphor out of our heads and putting it into the cultural world. In Gibbs, Jr. & Steen (eds.), pp. 145–166.Google Scholar

Gibbs, Raymond W. (2003). Embodied experience and linguistic meaning. Brain and Language, 84(1), 1–15.Google Scholar

Gibbs, Raymond W. (2005a). Embodiment in Metaphorical Imagination. In Pecher & Zwaan (eds.), 65–92.Google Scholar

Gibbs, Raymond W. (2005b). The psychological status of image schemas. In Hampe (ed.), 113–135.Google Scholar

Gibbs, Raymond W. (2006a). Embodiment and Cognitive Science. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gibbs, Raymond W. (2006b). Metaphor interpretation as embodied simulation. Mind & Language, 21(3), 434–458.Google Scholar

Gibbs, Raymond W. (2007a). Idioms and formulaic language. In Geeraerts & Guyckens (eds.), 697–725.Google Scholar

Gibbs, Raymond W. (2007b). Why cognitive linguists should care more about empirical methods. In Gonzalez-Marquez, Mittelberg, Coulson & Spivey (eds.), 2–18.Google Scholar

Gibbs, Raymond W.(ed.) (2008). The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gibbs, Raymond W. (2011a). The allegorical impulse. Metaphor and Symbol, 26(2), 121–130.Google Scholar

Gibbs, Raymond W. (2011b). Are “deliberate” metaphors really deliberate? A question of human consciousness and action. Metaphor and the Social World, 1(1), 26–52.Google Scholar

Gibbs, Raymond W. (2011c). Evaluating Conceptual Metaphor Theory. Discourse Processes, 48(8), 529–562.Google Scholar

Gibbs, Raymond W. (2012). Metaphors, snowflakes, and termite nests: How nature creates such beautiful things. In MacArthur, Oncins-Martínez, Sanchez-García & Piquer-Píriz (eds.), 347–371.Google Scholar

Gibbs, Raymond W. (2013a). Metaphoric cognition as social activity: Dissolving the divide between metaphor in thought and communication. Metaphor and the Social World, 3(1), 54–76.Google Scholar

Gibbs, Raymond W. (2013b). Walking the walk while thinking about the talk: Embodied interpretation of metaphorical narratives. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 42(4), 363–378.Google Scholar

Gibbs, Raymond W. (2014a). Conceptual metaphor in thought and social action. In Landau, Robinson & Meier (eds.), 17–40.Google Scholar

Gibbs, Raymond W. (2014b). Embodied metaphor. In Littlemore & Taylor (eds.), 167–184.Google Scholar

Gibbs, Raymond W. (2015a). The allegorical character of political metaphors in discourse. Metaphor and the Social World, 5(2), 264–282.Google Scholar

Gibbs, Raymond W. (2015b). Do pragmatic signals affect conventional metaphor understanding? A failed test of Deliberate Metaphor Theory. Journal of Pragmatics, 90, 77–87.Google Scholar

Gibbs, Raymond W. (2015c). Does deliberate metaphor theory have a future? Journal of Pragmatics, 90, 73–76.Google Scholar

Gibbs, Raymond W. (2015d). Metaphor. In Dabrowska, Ewa and Divjak, Dagmar (eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 167–189). Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Gibbs, Raymond W. (2017a). Metaphor Wars: Conceptual Metaphor in Human Life. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gibbs, Raymond W. (2017b). Metaphor, language and dynamical systems. In Semino & Demjén (eds.), 56–69.Google Scholar

Gibbs, Raymond W. Jr., Bogdanovich, Josephine M., Sykes, Jeffrey R., and Barr, Dale J. (1997). Metaphor in idiom comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 37(2), 141–154.Google Scholar

Gibbs, Raymond W. Jr., and Bogdonovich, Jody (1999). Mental imagery in interpreting poetic metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 14(1), 37–44.Google Scholar

Gibbs, Raymond W. Jr., and Cameron, Lynne (2008). The social-cognitive dynamics of metaphor performance. Journal of Cognitive Systems Research, 9(1–2), 64–75.Google Scholar

Gibbs, Raymond W. Jr., and Colston, Herbert L. (2012). Interpreting Figurative Meaning. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gibbs, Raymond W. Jr., Gould, Jessica, and Andric, Michael (2006). Imagining metaphorical actions: Embodied simulations make the impossible plausible. Imagination, Cognition, & Personality, 25(3), 221–238.Google Scholar

Gibbs, Raymond W. Jr., Lima, Paula L. C., and Francuzo, Edson (2004). Metaphor is grounded in embodied experience. Journal of Pragmatics, 36(7), 1189–1210.Google Scholar

Gibbs, Raymond W. Jr., and Lonergan, Julia E. (2009). Studying metaphor in discourse: Some lessons, challenges and new data. In Musolff & Zinken (eds.), 251–261.Google Scholar

Gibbs, Raymond W. Jr., and Matlock, Teenie (2008). Metaphor, imagination, and simulation: Psycholinguistic evidence. In Gibbs, Jr. (ed.), 161–176.Google Scholar

Gibbs, Raymond W. Jr., and O’Brien, Jennifer (1990). Idioms and mental imagery: The metaphorical motivation for idiomatic meaning. Cognition, 36(1), 35–68.Google Scholar

Gibbs, Raymond W. Jr., and Santa Cruz, Malaika J. (2012). Temporal unfolding of conceptual metaphor experience. Metaphor and Symbol, 27(4), 299–311.Google Scholar

Gibbs, Raymond W. Jr., and Steen, Gerard J. (eds.) (1999). Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Gibbs, Raymond W. Jr., and Tendahl, Markus (2008). Complementary perspectives on metaphor: Cognitive linguistics and relevance theory. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(11), 1823–1864.Google Scholar

Gibbs, Raymond W. Jr., and Van Orden, Guy (2012). Pragmatic choice in conversation. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4(1), 7–20.Google Scholar

Gibson, James J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Giora, Rachel (1997). Understanding figurative and literal language: The graded salience hypothesis. Cognitive Linguistics, 8(3), 183–206.Google Scholar

Giora, Rachel (2003). On Our Mind: Salience, Context, and Figurative Language. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Giora, Rachel (2008). Is metaphor unique? In Gibbs, Jr. (ed.), 143–160.Google Scholar

Glenberg, Arthur M. (1999). Why mental models need to be embodied. In Rickheit, Gert and Habel, Christopher (eds.), Mental Models in Discourse Processing (pp. 77–90). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Glenberg, Arthur M., and Robertson, David (2000). Symbol grounding and meaning: A comparison of high dimensional and embodied theories of meaning. Journal of Memory and Language, 43(3), 379–401.Google Scholar

Glucksberg, Sam (2001). Understanding Figurative Language: From Metaphors to Idioms. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Glucksberg, Sam (2008). How metaphors create categories – quickly. In Gibbs (ed.), 67–83.Google Scholar

Glucksberg, Sam, Brown, Mary, and McGlone, Matthew S. (1993). Conceptual metaphors are not automatically accessed during idiom comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 21(5), 711–719.Google Scholar

Glucksberg, Sam, Gildea, Patricia, and Bookin, Howard B. (1982). On understanding nonliteral speech: Can people ignore metaphors? Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21(1), 85–98.Google Scholar

Glucksberg, Sam, and Keysar, Boaz (1990). Understanding metaphorical comparisons: Beyond similarity. Psychological Review, 97, 3–18.Google Scholar

Glucksberg, Sam, Keysar, Boaz, and McGlone, Matthew S. (1992). Metaphor understanding and accessing conceptual schema: Reply to Gibbs (1992). Psychological Review, 99(3), 578–581.Google Scholar

Glucksberg, Sam, McGlone, Matthew S., and Manfredi, Deanna (1997). Property attribution in metaphor comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 36(1), 50–67.Google Scholar

Goatly, Andrew (1997). The Language of Metaphors. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele E. (1995). Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Gong, Shu-Ping, and Ahrens, Kathleen (2007). Processing conceptual metaphors in ongoing discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(4), 313–330.Google Scholar

Gonzalez-Marquez, Monica, Mittelberg, Irene, Coulson, Seana, and Spivey, Michael J. (eds.) (2007). Methods in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Goodman, Nelson [1955] (1983). Fact, Fiction, and Forecast. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Goodwin, Charles (1981). Conversational Organization: Interaction between Speakers and Hearers. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Goodwin, Charles (2011a). Building action in public environments with diverse semiotic resources. Versus: quaderni di studi semiotici (112–113), 169–182. Special issue: The External Mind: Perspectives on Semiosis, Distribution and Situation in Cognition, ed. Riccardo Fusaroli, Tommaso Granelli & Claudio Paolucci.Google Scholar

Goodwin, Charles (2011b). Contextures of action. In Streeck, Jürgen, Goodwin, Charles, and LeBaron, Curtis (eds.), Embodied Interaction: Language and Body in the Material World (pp. 182–193). Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Goossens, Louis (1990). Metaphtonymy: The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic actions. Cognitive Linguistics, 1(3), 323–340.Google Scholar

Grady, Joseph E. (1997a). Foundations of meaning: Primary metaphors and primary scenes. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Linguistics, University of California at Berkeley.Google Scholar

Grady, Joseph E. (1997b). THEORIES ARE BUILDINGS re-visited. Cognitive Linguistics, 8(4), 267–290.Google Scholar

Grady, Joseph E. (1998). The “Conduit Metaphor” revisited: A reassessment of metaphors for communication. In Koenig, Jean-Pierre (ed.), Discourse and Cognition: Bridging the Gap (pp. 205–218). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar

Grady, Joseph E. (1999). A typology of motivation for conceptual metaphor: Correlation vs. resemblance. In Gibbs, Jr. & Steen (eds.), 79–100.Google Scholar

Grady, Joseph E. (2005a). Image schemas and perception: Refining a definition. In Hampe (ed.), 35–56.Google Scholar

Grady, Joseph E. (2005b). Primary metaphors as inputs to conceptual integration. Journal of Pragmatics, 37(10), 1595–1614.Google Scholar

Grady, Joseph E. (2008). “Superschemas” and the grammar of metaphorical mappings. In Tyler, Andrea, Kim, Yiyoung, and Takada, Mari (eds.), Language in the Context of Use: Discourse and Cognitive Approaches to Language (pp. 339–360). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Grady, Joseph E., and Johnson, Christopher (2002). Converging evidence for the notions of “subscene” and “primary scene.” In Dirven & Pörings (eds.), 533–554.Google Scholar

Grady, Joseph E., Oakley, Todd, and Coulson, Seana (1999). Blending and Metaphor. In Gibbs, Jr. & Steen (eds.), 101–124.Google Scholar

Grady, Joseph E., Taub, Sarah, and Morgan, Pamela S. (1996). Primitive and compound metaphors. In Goldberg, Adele E. (ed.), Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language (pp. 17–187). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar

Grandhi, Sukeshini A., Joue, Gina, and Mittelberg, Irene (2011). Understanding naturalness and intuitiveness in gesture production: Insights for touchless gestural interfaces Proceedings of the ACM’s 2011 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), Vancouver, BC (pp. 821–824). New York: ACM Press.Google Scholar

Grandhi, Sukeshini A., Joue, Gina, and Mittelberg, Irene (2012). To move or to remove? A human-centric approach to understanding of gesture interpretation Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS) (pp. 582–591). Newcastle/New York: ACM Press.Google Scholar

Graziano, Michael S., and Aflalo, Tyson N. (2007). Mapping behavioral repertoire onto the cortex. Neuron, 56(2), 239–251.Google Scholar

Green, Melanie C. (2004). Transportation into narrative worlds: The role of prior knowledge and perceived realism. Discourse Processes, 38(2), 247–266.Google Scholar

Guerra, Ernesto, and Knoeferle, Pia (2012). Abstract language comprehension is incrementally modulated by non-referential spatial information: Evidence from eye-tracking. In Carlson, Laura, Hölscher, Christoph, and Shipley, Thomas F. (eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1620–1625). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael A. K. (1985). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar

Hampe, Beate (ed.) (2005a). From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Hampe, Beate (2005b). Image schemas in cognitive linguistics: Introduction. In Hampe (ed.), 1–12.Google Scholar

Hampe, Beate (2005c). On the role of iconic motivation in conceptual metaphor: Has metaphor theory come full circle? In Maeder, Constantino, Fischer, Olga, and Herlofsky, William J. (eds.), Outside-In – Inside-Out (pp. 39–66). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Hampe, Beate (2005d). When down is not bad and up not good enough: A usage-based assessment of the plus-minus parameter in image-schema theory. Cognitive Linguistics, 16(1), 81–112.Google Scholar

Hampes, William P. (1992). Relation between intimacy and humour. Psychological Reports, 71(1), 127–130.Google Scholar

Hanks, Patrick (2006). Metaphoricity is gradable. In Stefanowitsch & Th. Gries (eds.), 17–35.Google Scholar

Hanne, Michael (2015). An introduction to the Warring with Words project. In Hanne, Michael, Crano, William D., and Mio, Jeffery Scott (eds.), Warring with Words: Narrative and Metaphor in Politics (pp. 1–50). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Hartley, Tom, Lever, Colin, Burgess, Neil, and O’Keefe, John (2014). Space in the brain: How the hippocampal formation supports spatial cognition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369(1635), 20120510.Google Scholar

Hartmann, Matthias, Gashaj, Verena, Stahnke, Antje, and Mast, Fred W. (2014). There is more than “more is up”: Hand and foot responses reverse the vertical association of number magnitudes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40(4), 1401.Google Scholar

Haser, Verena (2005). Metaphor, Metonymy, and Experientialist Philosophy: Challenging Cognitive Semantics. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Hauk, Olaf, Johnsrude, Ingrid, and Pulvermüller, Friedemann (2004). Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex. Neuron, 41(2), 301–307.Google Scholar

Heath, Robin, and Blonder, Lee X. (2003). Conversational humour among stroke survivors. Humor – International Journal of Humor Research, 16(1), 91–106.Google Scholar

Hebb, Donald O. (1949). The Organization of Behavior: A Neuropsychological Theory. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Held, Richard, and Hein, Alan (1963). Movement-produced stimulation in the development of visually guided behavior. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 56(5), 872–876.Google Scholar

Holmes, Kevin J., and Lourenco, Stella F. (2011). Horizontal trumps vertical in the spatial organization of numerical magnitude. In Carlson, Laura, Hölscher, Christoph, and Shipley, Thomas F. (eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2276–2281). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar

Hopper, Paul J., and Thompson, Sandra A. (1980). Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language, 56(2), 251–299.Google Scholar

Horst, Dorothea, Boll, Franziska, Schmitt, Christina, and Müller, Cornelia (2014). Gesture as interactive expressive movement: Inter-affectivity in face-to-face communication. In Müller, Cienki, Fricke, Ladewig, McNeill & Bressem (eds.), 2112–2124.Google Scholar

Horton, William S. (2007). Metaphor and readers’ attributions of intimacy. Memory & Cognition, 35(1), 87–94.Google Scholar

Horton, William S. (2013). Character intimacy influences the processing of metaphoric utterances during narrative comprehension. Metaphor and Symbol, 28(3), 148–166.Google Scholar

Hostetter, Autumn, and Alibali, Martha (2008). Visible embodiment: Gestures as simulated action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(3), 495–514.Google Scholar

Hunston, Susan (2013). Corpus Approaches to Evaluation: Phraseology and Evaluative Language. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hutchins, Edwin (1995). Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Hutchins, Edwin (2005). Material anchors for conceptual blends. Journal of Pragmatics, 37(10), 1555–1577.Google Scholar

Hutchins, Edwin (2010). Cognitive ecology. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2(4), 705–715.Google Scholar

Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Iraide (2013). The relationship between conceptual metaphor and culture. Intercultural Pragmatics, 10(2), 315–339.Google Scholar

IJzerman, Hans, and Koole, Sander (2011). From perceptual rags to metaphoric riches: Bodily, social, and cultural constraints on socio-cognitive metaphors. Psychological Bulletin, 137(2), 355–361.Google Scholar

IJzerman, Hans, and Semin, Gün R. (2009). The thermometer of social relations mapping social proximity on temperature. Psychological Science, 20(10), 1214–1220.Google Scholar

Ito, Yashuhiro, and Hatta, Takeshi (2004). Spatial structure of quantitative representation of numbers: Evidence from the SNARC effect. Memory & Cognition, 32(4), 662–673.Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman (1956). Two aspects of language and two types of aphasic disturbances. In Monville-Burston, Monique and Waugh, Linda (eds.), Roman Jakobson: On Language (pp. 115–133). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman (1960). Linguistics and poetics. In Pomorska, Krystyna and Rudy, Stephen (eds.), Roman Jakobson: Language in Literature (pp. 62–94). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Jarvilehto, Timo (2000). Feeling as knowing – Part I: Emotion as reorganization of the organism-environment system. Consciousness & Emotion, 1(2), 245–257.Google Scholar

Jefferson, Gail (2004). Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Jefferson, Gail, Sacks, Harvey, and Schegloff, Emanuel (1987). Notes on laughter in the pursuit of intimacy. In Button, Graham and Lee, John R. E. (eds.), Talk and Social Organisation (pp. 152–205). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Jensen, Thomas W. (2014). New perspectives on language, cognition, and values. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 9(1), 71–78.Google Scholar

Jensen, Thomas W., and Cuffari, Elena (2014). Doubleness in experience: Toward a distributed enactive approach to metaphoricity. Metaphor and Symbol, 29(4), 278–297.Google Scholar

Johnson, Mark (1987). The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Johnson, Mark J (2005). The philosophical significance of image schemas. In Hampe (ed.), 15–33.Google Scholar

Johnson, Mark J (2007). The Meaning of the Body: Aesthetics of Human Understanding. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Jostmann, Nils B., Lakens, Daniel, and Schubert, Thomas W. (2009). Weight as an embodiment of importance. Psychological Science, 20(9), 1169 –1174.Google Scholar

Kanold, Patrick O., Nelken, Israel, and Polley, Daniel B. (2014). Local versus global scales of organization in auditory cortex. Trends in Neuroscience, 37(9), 502–510.Google Scholar

Kappelhoff, Hermann, and Greifenstein, Sarah (2015). Audiovisual metaphors: Embodied meaning and fictionalization. In Fahlenbach, Kathrin (ed.), Embodied Metaphors in Film, Television, and Video Games: Cognitive Approaches (pp. 183–201). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Kappelhoff, Hermann, and Müller, Cornelia (2011). Embodied meaning construction: Multimodal metaphor and expressive movement in speech, gesture, and in feature film. Metaphor and the Social Word, 1(2), 121–153.Google Scholar

Kaschak, Michael P., Jones, John L., Carranza, Julie, and Fox, Melissa R. (2014). Embodiment and language comprehension. In Shapiro (ed.), 118–126.Google Scholar

Katz, Albert N., Cacciari, Cristina, Gibbs, Raymond W. Jr., and Turner, Mark (eds.) (1998). Figurative Language and Thought. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Katz, Albert N., and Taylor, Tamsen E. (2008). The journeys of life: Examining a conceptual metaphor with semantic and episodic memory recall. Metaphor and Symbol, 2(3), 148–173.Google Scholar

Keil, Frank C. (1979). Semantic and Conceptual Development: An Ontological Perspective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Kendon, Adam (2004). Gesture: Visual Action as Utterance. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Keysar, Boaz, Shen, Yeshayahu, Glucksberg, Sam, and Horton, William S. (2000). Conventional language: How metaphorical is it? Journal of Memory and Language, 43(4), 576–593.Google Scholar

Kintsch, Walter (1998). Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kintsch, Walter (2008). How the mind computes the meaning of metaphor: A simulation based on LSA. In Gibbs, Jr. (ed.), 129–142.Google Scholar

Kirkham, Natasha Z., Slemmer, Jonathan A., and Johnson, Scott P. (2002). Visual statistical learning in infancy: Evidence for a domain general learning mechanism. Cognition, 83(2), B35–B42.Google Scholar

Kirsh, David (1995). The intelligent use of space. Artificial Intelligence, 73(1), 31–68.Google Scholar

Kohler, Evelyne, Keysars, Christian, Umilta, M. Alessandra, Forgassi, Leonardo, Gallese, Vittorio, Rizzolatti, Giacomo (2002). Hearing sounds, understanding actions: Action representation in mirror neurons. Science, 297, 846–848.Google Scholar

Koller, Veronika (2008). Brothers in arms: Contradictory metaphors in contemporary marketing discourse. In Zanotto, Cameron & Cavalcanti (eds.), 103–127.Google Scholar

Kolter, Astrid, Ladewig, Silvia H., Summa, Michaela, Koch, Sabine, Müller, Cornelia, and Fuchs, Thomas (2012). Body memory and the emergence of metaphor in movement and speech: An interdisciplinary case study. In Koch, Sabine, Fuchs, Thomas, Summa, Michaela, and Müller, Cornelia (eds.), Body Memory, Metaphor and Movement (pp. 201–226). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Kotthoff, Helga (2006). Pragmatics of performance and the analysis of conversational humor. Humor – International Journal of Humor Research, 19(3), 271–304.Google Scholar

Kounios, John, and Beeman, Mark (2014). The cognitive neuroscience of insight. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 71–93.Google Scholar

Kövecses, Zoltán (2002). Metaphor: A Practical Introduction (2nd edn.). Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kövecses, Zoltán (2005). Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kövecses, Zoltán (2009). Metaphor, culture, and discourse: The pressure of coherence. In Musolff & Zinken (eds.), 11–24.Google Scholar

Kövecses, Zoltán (2010a). Metaphor and culture. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica, 2(2), 197–220.Google Scholar

Kövecses, Zoltán (2010b). Metaphor: A Practical Introduction (2nd edn.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kövecses, Zoltán (2013). The metaphor–metonymy relationship: Correlation metaphors are based on metonymy. Metaphor and Symbol, 28(2), 75–88.Google Scholar

Kövecses, Zoltán (2015). Where Metaphors Come From: Reconsidering Context in Metaphor. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kövecses, Zoltán, and Radden, Günter (1998). Metonymy: Developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics, 9(1), 37–77.Google Scholar

Kromhout, Roelf, and Forceville, Charles (2013). LIFE IS A JOURNEY: The source-path-goal schema in the videogames “Half-Life 2,” “Heavy Rain,” and “Grim Fandango.” Metaphor and the Social World, 3(1), 100–116.Google Scholar

Ladewig, Silvia H. (2011). Putting a recurrent gesture on a cognitive basis. CogniTextes, 6, http://cognitextes.revues.org/406.Google Scholar

Lakoff, George (1987). Woman, Fire, and Dangerous Things. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Lakoff, George (1990). The Invariance Hypothesis: Is abstract reason based on image-schemas? Cognitive Linguistics, 1(1), 39–74.Google Scholar

Lakoff, George (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In Ortony (ed.), 202–251.Google Scholar

Lakoff, George (2008a). The neural theory of metaphor. In Gibbs, Jr. (ed.), 17–38.Google Scholar

Lakoff, George (2008b). The Political Mind. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar

Lakoff, George (2012). Explaining embodied cognition results. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4(1), 1–13.Google Scholar

Lakoff, George (2014). Mapping the brain’s metaphor circuitry: Metaphorical thought in everyday reason. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 1–14.Google Scholar

Lakoff, George, and Johnson, Mark (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Lakoff, George, and Johnson, Mark (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Lakoff, George, and Johnson, Mark (2003). Afterword. In Metaphors We live By (pp. 243–276). Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Lakoff, George, and Núñez, Rafael (2000). Where Mathematics Comes From: How the Embodied Mind Brings Mathematics Into Being. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Lakoff, George, and Turner, Mark (1989). More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Landau, Barbara, and Lakusta, Laura (2009). Spatial representation across species: Geometry, language, and maps. Current Opinions in Neurobiology, 19(1), 12–19.Google Scholar

Landau, Mark J., Meier, Brian P., and Keefer, Lukas A. (2010). A metaphor-enriched social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 136(6), 1045–1067.Google Scholar

Landau, Mark J., Robinson, Michael D., and Meier, Brian P. (2014a). Introduction. In Landau, Robinson & Meier (eds.), 3–16.Google Scholar

Landau, Mark J., Robinson, Michael D., and Meier, Brian P. (eds.) (2014b). The Power of Metaphor: Examining Its Influence on Social Life. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Landauer, Thomas K., and Dumais, Susan T. (1997). A solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104(2), 211–240.Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. I: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. (1991). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. II: Descriptive Application. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. (2000). A dynamic usage-based model. In Barlow, Michael and Kemmer, Suzanne (eds.), Usage-Based Models of Language (pp. 1–63). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. (2008). Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Larsen-Freeman, Diane, and Cameron, Lynne (2008). Complex Systems and Applied Linguistics. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lee, Spike W. S., and Schwarz, Norbert (2012). Bidirectionality, mediation, and moderation of metaphorical effects: The embodiment of social suspicion and fishy smells. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(5), 737–749.Google Scholar

Levin, Magnus (2008). “Hitting the back of the net just before the final whistle”: High-frequency phrase in football reporting. In Lavric, Eva and Pisek, Gerhard (eds.), The Linguistics of Football (pp. 143–155). Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar

Linell, Per (2005). The Written Language Bias in Linguistics: Its Nature, Origins, and Transformations. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Linell, Per (2009). Rethinking Language, Mind, and World Dialogically: Interactional and Contextual Theories of Human Sense-Making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publications.Google Scholar

Littlemore, Jeannette (2015). Metonymy: Hidden Shortcuts in Language, Thought and Communication. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Littlemore, Jeannette, and Taylor, John R. (eds.) (2014), The Bloomsbury Companion to Cognitive Lingustics. London: Blooomsbury.Google Scholar

Loetscher, Tobias, Bockisch, Christopher, Nicholls, Michael E. R., and Brugger, Peter (2010). Eye position predicts what number you have in mind. Current Biology, 20(6), R264–265.Google Scholar

Lourenco, Stella F., and Longo, Matthew R. (2011). Origins and the development of generalized magnitude representation. In Dehaene, Stanislas and Brannon, Elizabeth M. (eds.), Space, Time, and Number in the Brain: Searching for the Foundations of Mathematical Thought (pp. 225–244). London: Academic Press, Elsevier.Google Scholar

Low, Graham, Littlemore, Jeanette, and Koester, Almut (2008). The use of metaphor in three university lectures. Applied Linguistics, 29(3), 428–455.Google Scholar

Lucas, Margery (2007). Semantic priming without association: A meta-analytic review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7(4), 618–630.Google Scholar

Lupyan, Gary (2012). What do words do? Toward a theory of language-augmented thought. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 57, 255–297.Google Scholar

Lupyan, Gary, Rakison, David H., and McClelland, James L. (2007). Language is not just for talking: Redundant labels facilitate learning of novel categories. Psychological Science, 18(2), 1077–1083.Google Scholar

MacArthur, Fiona, and Oncins-Martínez, José Luis (2012). Introduction: Metaphor in use. In MacArthur, Oncins-Martínez, Sanchez-García & Piquer-Píriz (eds.), 1–17.Google Scholar

MacArthur, Fiona, Oncins-Martínez, José Luis, Sanchez-García, Manuel, and Piquer-Píriz, Ana María (eds.) (2012). Metaphor in Use: Context, Culture, and Communication (Vol. 38). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Macnamara, Diana S., and Magliano, Joe (2009). Toward a comprehensive model of comprehension. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 51, 297–384.Google Scholar

Mahlberg, Michaela (2013). Corpus Stylistics and Dickens’s Fiction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Mandler, Jean, and Pagán Cánovas, Cristóbal (2014). On defining image schemas. Language and Cognition, 0, 1–23.Google Scholar

Marghetis, Tyler (2015). Every number in its place: The spatial foundations of calculation and conceptualization. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar

Marghetis, Tyler, and Youngstrom, Kendall (2014). Pierced by the number-line: Integers are associated with back-to-front sagittal space. In Bello, Paul, Guarini, Marcello, McShane, Marjorie, and Scassellati, Brian (eds.), Proceedings of the 36th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 946–951). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar

Martin, Rod A. (2007). The Psychology of Humor: An Integrative Approach. Burlington, MA/London: Elsevier Academic Press.Google Scholar

Martínez, María-Ángelez, Kraljevic Mujic, Blanca, and Hidalgo-Downing, Laura (2013). Multimodal narrativity in TV ads. In Pennock-Speck, Barry and del Saz-Rubio, María M. (eds.), The Multimodal Analysis of Television Commercials (pp. 91–111). València: PUV Universitat de València.Google Scholar

Mashal, Nira, Shen, Yeshayahu, Jospe, Karine, and Gil, David (2014). Language effects on the conceptualization of hybrids. Language and Cognition, 6(2), 217–241.Google Scholar

Maslen, Robert (2017). Systematic metaphors. In Semino & Demjén (eds.), 88–101.Google Scholar

Matlock, Teenie (2004a). The conceptual motivation of fictive motion. In Radden, Günter and Dirven, René (eds.), Motivation in Grammar. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Matlock, Teenie (2004b). Fictive motion as cognitive simulation. Memory & Cognition, 32(8), 1389–1400.Google Scholar

Matlock, Teenie (2010). Abstract motion is no longer abstract. Language and Cognition, 2(2), 243–260.Google Scholar

Matlock, Teenie, Holmes, Kevin J., Srinivasan, Mahesh, and Ramscar, Michael (2011). Even abstract motion influences the understanding of time. Metaphor and Symbol, 26(4), 260–271.Google Scholar

Matlock, Teenie, Ramscar, Michael, and Boroditsky, Lera (2005). The experiential link between spatial and temporal language. Cognitive Science, 29(4), 655–664.Google Scholar

Matthews, Justin L., and Matlock, Teenie (2011). Understanding the link between spatial distance and social distance. Social Psychology, 42(3), 185–192.Google Scholar

McCreaddie, May, and Wiggins, Sally (2008). The purpose and function of humour in health, health care and nursing: A narrative review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 61(6), 584–595.Google Scholar

McGlone, Matthew S. (1996). Conceptual metaphors and figurative language interpretation: Food for thought? Journal of Memory and Language, 35(4), 544–565.Google Scholar

McGlone, Matthew S. (2007). What is the explanatory value of a conceptual metaphor? Language & Communication, 27(2), 109–126.Google Scholar

McGlone, Matthew S., and Harding, Jennifer (1998). Back (or forward?) to the future: The role of perspective in temporal language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24(5), 1211–1223.Google Scholar

McNaughton, Bruce L., Barnes, Carol A., Gerrard, Jason L., Gothard, Katalin, Jung, Min W., Knierim, James J., et al. (1996). Deciphering the hippocampal polyglot: The hippocampus as a path integration system. Journal of Experimental Biology, 199(1), 173–185.Google Scholar

McNeill, David (1992). Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal about Thought. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

McNeill, David (2005). Gesture and Thought. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Meltzoff, Andrew N., and Moore, M. Keith (1977). Imitation of facial and manual gestures by human neonates. Science, 198(4312), 75–78.Google Scholar

Meltzoff, Andrew N., and Moore, M. Keith (1989). Imitation in newborn infants: Exploring the range of gestures imitated and the underlying mechanisms. Developmental Psychology, 25(6), 954–962.Google Scholar

Merlau-Ponty, Maurice (1945). Phénoménologie de la Perception. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Merritt, Dustin J., Casasanto, Daniel, and Brannon, Elizabeth M. (2010). Do monkeys think in metaphors? Representations of space and time in monkeys and humans. Cognition, 117(2), 191–202.Google Scholar

Miall, Chris, and Wolpert, Daniel (1996). Forward models for physiological motor control. Neural Networks, 9, 1265–1279.Google Scholar

Michotte, Albert (1963). The Perception of Causality. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Miller, John H., and Page, Scott E. (2007). Complex Adaptive Systems: An Introduction to Computational Models of Social Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Mitchell, Derek G., and Greening, Steven G. (2012). Conscious perception of emotional stimuli: Brain mechanisms. Neuroscientist, 18(4), 386–398.Google Scholar

Mittelberg, Irene (2006). Metaphor and Metonymy in Language and Gesture: Discourse Evidence for Multimodal Models of Grammar. Ann Arbor, MI: UMI.Google Scholar

Mittelberg, Irene (2008). Peircean semiotics meets conceptual metaphor: Iconic modes in gestural representations of grammar. In Cienki, Alan and Müller, Cornelia (eds.), Metaphor and Gesture (pp. 115–154). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Mittelberg, Irene (2010). Geometric and image-schematic patterns in gesture space. In Evans, Vyvyan and Chilton, Paul (eds.), Language, Cognition and Space: The State of the Art and New Directions (pp. 351–385). London: Equinox.Google Scholar

Mittelberg, Irene (2013a). Balancing acts: Image schemas and force dynamics as experiential essence in pictures by Paul Klee and their gestural enactments. In Borkent, Dancygier & Hinnell (eds.), 325–346.Google Scholar

Mittelberg, Irene (2013b). The exbodied mind: Cognitive-semiotic principles as motivating forces in gesture. In Müller, Cienki, Fricke, Ladewig, McNeill & Tessendorf (eds.), 750–779.Google Scholar

Mittelberg, Irene (2014). Gestures and iconicity. In Müller, Cienki, Fricke, Ladewig, McNeill & Bressem (eds.), 1712–1732.Google Scholar

Mittelberg, Irene (2017). Embodied frames, metonymy and pragmatic inferencing in gesture. Gesture, 16(2).Google Scholar

Mittelberg, Irene, and Waugh, Linda (2009). Metonymy first, metaphor second: A cognitive semiotic approach to multimodal figures of thought in co-speech gesture. In Forceville & Urios-Aparisi (eds.), 330–356.Google Scholar

Mittelberg, Irene, and Waugh, Linda (2014). Gestures and metonymy. In Müller, Cienki, Fricke, Ladewig, McNeill & Bressem (eds.), 1747–1766.Google Scholar

Müller, Cornelia (1998). Redebegleitende Gesten: Kulturgeschichte – Theorie – Sprachvergleich. Berlin: Spitz Verlag.Google Scholar

Müller, Cornelia (2003). Gestik als Lebenszeichen ‘toter Metaphern’: Tote, schlafende und wache Metaphern. Zeitschrift für Semiotik, 1(2), 61–72.Google Scholar

Müller, Cornelia (2004). The Palm-Up-Open-Hand: A case of a gesture family? In Müller, Cornelia and Posner, Roland (eds.), The Semantics and Pragmatics of Everyday Gestures (pp. 233–256). Berlin: Weidler.Google Scholar

Müller, Cornelia (2008a). Metaphors Dead and Alive, Sleeping and Waking: A Dynamic View. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Müller, Cornelia (2008b). What gestures reveal about the nature of metaphor. In Cienki, Alan and Müller, Cornelia (eds.), Metaphor and Gesture (pp. 219–245). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Müller, Cornelia (2010). Wie Gesten bedeuten: Eine kognitiv-linguistische und sequenzanalytische Perspektive. Sprache und Literatur, 41(1), 37–68.Google Scholar

Müller, Cornelia (2011). Are “deliberate” metaphors really deliberate? A question of human consciousness and action. Metaphor in the Social World, 1(1), 61–66.Google Scholar

Müller, Cornelia (2014). Gestures as “deliberate expressive movement.” In Seyfeddinipur, Mandana and Gullberg, Marianne (eds.), From Gesture in Conversation to Visible Action as Utterance (pp. 127–152). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Müller, Cornelia, and Cienki, Alan (2009). Metaphor, gestures, and beyond: Forms of multimodal metaphor in the use of spoken language. In Forceville & Urios-Aparisi (eds.), 293–321.Google Scholar

Müller, Cornelia, and Ladewig, Silvia H. (2013). Metaphors for sensorimotor experiences: Gestures as embodied and dynamic conceptualizations of balance in dance lessons. In Borkent, Dancygier & Hinnell (eds.), 295–324.Google Scholar

Müller, Cornelia, and Schmitt, Christina (2015). Audio-visual metaphors of the financial crisis: Meaning making and the flow of experience. Revista Brasileira de Linguistica Aplicada (RBLA), Belo Horizonte, 15(2), 311–341.Google Scholar

Müller, Cornelia, and Tag, Susanne (2010). The dynamics of metaphor: Foregrounding and activating metaphoricity in conversational interaction. Cognitive Semiotics, 10(6), 85–120.Google Scholar

Müller, Cornelia, Cienki, Alan, Fricke, Ellen, Ladewig, Silvia H., McNeill, David, and Bressem, Jana (eds.) (2014). Handbook: Body – Language – Communication: An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction (Vol. 2). Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Müller, Cornelia, Cienki, Alan, Fricke, Ellen, Ladewig, Silvia H., McNeill, David, and Tessendorf, Sedinha (eds.) (2013). Body – Language – Communication: An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction (Vol. 1). Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Müller, Dana, and Schwarz, Wolf (2007). Is there an internal association of numbers to hands? The task set influences the nature of the SNARC effect. Memory & Cognition, 35(5), 1151–1161.Google Scholar

Murphy, Gregory L. (1996). On metaphoric representation. Cognition, 60(2), 173–204.Google Scholar

Musolff, Andreas (2000). Political imagery of Europe: A house without exit doors? Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 21(3), 216–229.Google Scholar

Musolff, Andreas (2004). Metaphor and Political Discourse: Analogical Reasoning in Debates about Europe. Basingstoke/New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Musolff, Andreas (2006). Metaphor scenarios in public discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 21(1), 23–38.Google Scholar

Musolff, Andreas (2007). Popular science concepts and their use in creative metaphors in media discourse. metaphorik.de, 13, 67–86.Google Scholar

Musolff, Andreas, and Zinken, Jörg (eds.) (2009). Metaphor and Discourse. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Nayak, Nandini, and Gibbs, Raymond W. Jr. (1990). Conceptual knowledge in the interpretation of idioms. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 119(3), 315–330.Google Scholar

Nieder, Andreas (2005). Counting on neurons: The neurobiology of numerical competence. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6(3), 177–190.Google Scholar

Noë, Alva (2004). Action in Perception. Cambridge, MA/London: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Noë, Alva (2009). Out of Our Heads: Why You Are Not Your Brain, and Other Lessons from the Biology of Consciousness. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar

Norrick, Neal R. (2003). Issues in conversational joking. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(9), 1333–1359.Google Scholar

Norrick, Neal R. (2010). Conversational Narrative: Storytelling in Everyday Talk. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Núñez, Rafael, Motz, Benjamin, and Teuscher, Ursina (2006). Time after time: The psychological reality of the ego- and time-reference-point distinction in metaphorical contruals of time. Metaphor and Symbol, 21(3), 133–146.Google Scholar

Ortiz, Maria J. (2011). Primary metaphors and monomodal visual metaphors. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 1568–1580.Google Scholar

Ortony, Andrew (1979). Beyond literal similarity. Psychological Review, 86(3), 161–180.Google Scholar