Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T12:52:23.800Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - The upper atmosphere

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2014

Ian Strangeways
Affiliation:
TerraData
Get access

Summary

At the place where we slept water necessarily boiled, from the diminished pressure of the atmosphere, at a lower temperature than it does in a less lofty country … Hence the potatoes, after remaining for some hours in the boiling water, were nearly as hard as ever. The pot was left on the fire all night, and next morning it was boiled again, but yet the potatoes were not cooked.

Charles Darwin Voyage of the Beagle (high in the Andes).

The variables and their history

For use in numerical weather prediction models, for climate change and pollution studies, to predict radio propagation behaviour, for aviation and for the launch of space vehicles, it is necessary to know how conditions change with altitude, in particular temperature, humidity, pressure and wind.

Upper air measurements started around 1650 when Pascal and Perrier carried barometers up a mountain (see Chapter 6). But because of the lack of suitable platforms to carry instruments aloft, there was no further progress until about 1749 when Alexander Wilson made one of the first attempts using a kite, this being followed in 1784 by a balloon flight over Paris, giving the first observation of temperature lapse rate. Balloons and kites developed alongside into the nineteenth century when Gay-Lussac made a balloon ascent to 23 000 feet while in 1865 Glaisher flew to 11 km in a coal gas balloon, almost dying in the process.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Angevine, W. M. (1994) Improved radio acoustic sounding techniques. J. Atmos. Ocean. Technology., 11, No. 142–9.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, S. & Nerbein, S. von H. (2001) Multi-frequency acoustic sounding of the turbulent boundary-layer properties. Book of Abstracts. Royal Meteorological Society, 2nd National Conference, Manchester, September 2001. p. 111.Google Scholar
Brown, E. H. & Hall, F. F. (1978) Advances in atmospheric acoustics. Rev. Geophys. Space Phys., 16, 47–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dommasch, D. O., Sherby, S. S. & Connolly, T. F. (1958) Aircraft Aerodynamics. Pitman, New York, pp. 560.Google Scholar
Fleming, R. J. & Hills, A. J. (1993) Humidity profiles via commercial aircraft. Proceedings of the Eighth Symposium on Meteorological Observations and Instrumentation. Anaheim, California, September 1993, J125–J129.Google Scholar
Foot, J. (2002) The history of Snoopy. Proceedings of the RMS Specialist Group Meeting, 13 March 2002, Science Museum, London.Google Scholar
Gaffard, C. (2000) Initial evaluation of signal power characteristics of a boundary layer profiler in the UK. Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Technical and Scientific Aspects of MST Radar (Combined with COST76 Final Profiler Workshop). Toulouse, March 2000, pp. 431–3.Google Scholar
Gaffard, C., Caddedu, M. & Nash, J. (2001) Development of operational multi sensor ground-based remote station within UK. Book of Abstracts. Royal Meteorological Society, 2nd National Conference, Manchester, September 2001. p. 111.Google Scholar
Gaynor, J. E. (1990) The International Sodar Intercomparison Experiment. Acoustic Remote Sensing. McGraw Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Gossard, E. E. & Strauch, R. G. (1983) Radar Observations of Clear Air and Clouds. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Hall, M. P. M. (1984) A review of the application of multi-parameter radar measurements of precipitation. Radio Sci., 19, 37–43.Google Scholar
Hall, M. P. M., Cherry, S. M., Goddard, J. W. F. & Kennedy, G. R. (1980) Rain drop size and rainfall rate measured by dual-polarization radar. Nature, 285, 195–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinkley, E. D. (1976) Laser Monitoring of the Atmosphere. Topics in Applied Physics. Springer Verlag, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogan, R. F. & Illingworth, A. J. (1999) Analysis of radar and lidar returns from clouds: implications for the proposed Earth Radiation Mission. CLARE'98 Final Report, ESTEC International Workshop Proceedings WPP-170, ESA/ESTEC. Noordwijk, The Netherlands, Sept. 1999 75–82Google Scholar
Hogg, D. C. (1983) An automatic profiler of temperature, wind and humidity in the troposphere. J. Climate Appl. Meteorol., 22, 807–31.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, G. J., Mc Geer, T. & Youngren, H. (1992) The autonomous aerosonde for economical atmospheric soundings anywhere on the globe. Bull. Am. Met. Soc., 73, 1987–8.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaisti, K. (1995) New low cost GPS solution for upper air windfinding. Ninth AMS Symposium on Meteorological Observations and Instrumentation. Charlotte, N. Carolina, pp. 16–20.Google Scholar
Kilburn, C. D. D., Price, J. D., Hardaker, P. J. & Pilditch, A. (1999) Turbulent clear air boundary observations with Chilbolton radar and a tethered instrumented balloon. Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Radar Meteorology. Montreal, Canada, pp. 476–9.Google Scholar
Kilburn, C. D. D., Chapman, D., Illingworth, A. J. & Hogan, R. J. (2000) Weather observations from the Chilbolton Advanced Meteorological Radar. Weather, 55, 352–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lataitis, R. J. (1992) Signal power from radio acoustic sounding of temperature: the effects of horizontal winds, turbulence and vertical temperature gradients. Radio Sci., 27, 369–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lataitis, R. J. (1993) Theory and application of a radio acoustic sounding system (RASS). NOAA Technical Memo ERL. WPL-230.Google Scholar
Lawson, R. P. & Cooper, W. A. (1990) Performance of some airborne thermometers in clouds. J. Atmos. Ocean Tech., 7, 480–94.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, P. T. (1990) Temperature sounding by RASS with wind profiler radars: a preliminary study. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 28, 19–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nash, J. (1994) Upper wind observing systems used for met. operations. Ann. Geophys., 12, 691–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nash, J., Elms, J. B. & Oakley, T. J. (1995) Relative humidity sensor performance observed in recent international radiosonde comparisons. Ninth AMS Symposium on Meteorological Observations and Instrumentation. Charlotte, N. Carolina, pp. 43–8.Google Scholar
Oakley, T., Smout, R. & Nash, J. (2001) Automation of the upper-air observing network in the UK. Book of Abstracts. Royal Meteorological Society, 2nd National Conference, Manchester, September 2001, p. 108.Google Scholar
Painting, D. (2001) Accuracy of AMDAR measurements. Book of Abstracts. Royal Meteorological Society, 2nd National Conference, Manchester, September 2001, p. 111.Google Scholar
Pearson, G. N. & Collier, C. G. (1999) A compact pulsed coherent CO2 laser radar for boundary layer meteorology. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 125, 2703–21.Google Scholar
Pettifer, R. (2002) The history of radiosondes. Proceedings of the RMS Specialist Group Meeting, 13 March 2002. Science Museum, London.Google Scholar
Plaezek, F. & Teller, E. (1933) The rotational structure of the Raman bands of a polyatomic molecule [Translated by A. J. Gibson from Die Rotationstruktur der Ramanbanden mehratomiger molekule]. F. Phys., 81, 209–58.Google Scholar
Raman, C. V. & Krishnan, K. S. (1928) A new type of Secondary Radiation. Nature, 501, 121.Google Scholar
Sandiford, K. J. & Collier, C. G. (2001) A proposal for the measurement of boundary layer temperature gradients using Doppler lidar. Atmos. Sci. Lett., 1, 1–6.Google Scholar
Smyth, T. J., Blackman, T. M. & Illingworth, A. J. (1999) Observations of oblate hail using dual polarization radar and implications for hail-detection schemes. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 126 (N0 555, Part a), 993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, L. (1991) Lidar probing of the atmosphere. Ind. J. Radio Space Phy., 20, 368–80.Google Scholar
Truscott, B. (2001) EUMETNET AMDAR – The European aircraft data project. Book of Abstracts. Royal Meteorological Society, 2nd National Conference, Manchester, September 2001. p. 111.Google Scholar
Vaughn, G. (2002) The UK MST radar. Weather, 57, 69–73.Google Scholar
Wade, C. G. (1995) Calibration and data reduction problems affecting National Weather Service radiosonde humidity measurements. Ninth AMS Symposium on Meteorological Observation and Instrumentation. Charlotte, N. Carolina, pp. 60–4.Google Scholar
Weber, B. L. & Wuertz, D. B. (1990) Comparison of rawinsonde and wind profiler radar measurements. J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 7, 157–74.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westwater, E. R. (1990) Ground-based radiometric observations of atmospheric emission and attenuation at 20.6, 31.65 and 90.0 GHz: a comparison of measurements and theory. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 38, 1569–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WMO (1985) Meteorological observations using navaid methods [A. A. Lange]. Technical Note No. 185, WMO-No 641. Geneva.
WMO (1987) WMO International radiosonde comparison (UK 1984, USA 1985): final report [J. Nash & F. J. Schmidlin]. Instruments and Observing Methods Report No. 30, WMO/TD-No 195., Geneva.
WMO (1991) WMO International radiosonde comparison – Phase III – Dzhambul, USSR, 1989: Final report [A. Ivanov et al.]. Instruments and Observing Methods Report No 40, WMO/TD-No 451. Geneva.
WMO (1994) A new GPS rawinsonde system [D. B. Call]. Papers presented at the WMO Technical Conference on Instrumentation and Methods of Observation (TECO-94), 28 February–2 March 1994, Instruments and Observing Methods Report No. 57, WMO/TD 588. Geneva, pp. 159–63.
WMO (1996a) Guide to Meteorological Instrumentation and Methods of Observation, sixth edition. WMO No. 8.
WMO (1996b) WMO International radiosonde comparison – Phase IV – Tsukuba, Japan, 1993: Final report [S. Yagi, A. Mita and N. Inoue]. Instruments and Observing Methods Report No. 59, WMO/TD-No 742. Geneva.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • The upper atmosphere
  • Ian Strangeways, TerraData
  • Book: Measuring the Natural Environment
  • Online publication: 05 July 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139087254.016
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • The upper atmosphere
  • Ian Strangeways, TerraData
  • Book: Measuring the Natural Environment
  • Online publication: 05 July 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139087254.016
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • The upper atmosphere
  • Ian Strangeways, TerraData
  • Book: Measuring the Natural Environment
  • Online publication: 05 July 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139087254.016
Available formats
×