Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T15:29:08.099Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Species Conservation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2017

P. Keith Probert
P. Keith Probert
Affiliation:
University of Otago, New Zealand
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Marine Conservation , pp. 86 - 107
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amado-Filho, G.M., Moura, R.L., Bastos, A.C., et al. (2012) Rhodolith beds are major CaCO3 bio-factories in the tropical South West Atlantic. PLoS ONE, 7, e35171.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arrieta, J.M., Arnaud-Haond, S. & Duarte, C.M. (2010). What lies underneath: conserving the oceans’ genetic resources. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 18318–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barclay-Smith, P. (1959). The British contribution to bird protection. Ibis, 101, 115–22.Google Scholar
BIOMAERL Team (2003). Conservation and management of northeast Atlantic and Mediterranean maerl beds. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 13, S65–76.Google Scholar
Bosence, D. & Wilson, J. (2003). Maerl growth, carbonate production rates and accumulation rates in the northeast Atlantic. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 13, S21–31.Google Scholar
Botsford, L.W. & Parma, A.M. (2005). Uncertainty in marine management. In Marine Conservation Biology: The Science of Maintaining the Sea’s Biodiversity, ed. Norse, E.A. & Crowder, L.B., pp. 375–92. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Bottrill, M.C., Joseph, L.N., Carwardine, J., et al. (2008). Is conservation triage just smart decision making? Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 23, 649–54.Google Scholar
Bowman, M., Davies, P. & Redgwell, C. (2010). Lyster’s International Wildlife Law, 2nd edn. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Braeckman, U., Rabaut, M., Vanaverbeke, J., Degraer, S. & Vincx, M. (2014). Protecting the commons: the use of subtidal ecosystem engineers in marine management. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 24, 275–86.Google Scholar
Briggs, J.C. (2007). Marine biogeography and ecology: invasions and introductions. Journal of Biogeography, 34, 193–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brodie, J., Andersen, R.A., Kawachi, M. & Millar, A.J.K. (2009). Endangered algal species and how to protect them. Phycologia, 48, 423–38.Google Scholar
Cardoso, P., Erwin, T.L., Borges, P.A.V. & New, T.R. (2011). The seven impediments in invertebrate conservation and how to overcome them. Biological Conservation, 144, 2647–55.Google Scholar
Carlton, J.T. (1989). Man’s role in changing the face of the ocean: biological invasions and implications for conservation of near-shore environments. Conservation Biology, 3, 265–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlton, J.T (1993). Neoextinctions of marine invertebrates. American Zoologist, 33, 499–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlton, J.T., Geller, J.B., Reaka-Kudla, M.L. & Norse, E.A. (1999). Historical extinctions in the sea. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 30, 515–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlton, J.T., Vermeij, G.J., Lindberg, D.R., Carlton, D.A. & Dudley, E.C. (1991). The first historical extinction of a marine invertebrate in an ocean basin: the demise of the eelgrass limpet Lottia alveus. Biological Bulletin, 180, 72–80.Google Scholar
Ceballos, G., Ehrlich, P.R. & Barnosky, A.D., et al. (2015). Accelerated modern human-induced species losses: entering the sixth mass extinction. Sciences Advances, 1, e1400253.Google Scholar
Claereboudt, M. (1999). Fertilization success in spatially distributed populations of benthic free-spawners: a simulation model. Ecological Modelling, 121, 221–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, K.J., Probert, P.K. & Jeffries, M. (2016). Conservation of aquatic invertebrates: concerns, challenges and conundrums. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 26, 817–37.Google Scholar
Courchamp, F., Angulo, E., Rivalan, P., et al. (2006). Rarity value and species extinction: the anthropogenic Allee effect. PLoS Biology, 4, e415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Courchamp, F., Clutton-Brock, T. & Grenfell, B. (1999). Inverse density dependence and the Allee effect. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 14, 405–10.Google Scholar
Dulvy, N.K., Sadovy, Y. & Reynolds, J.D. (2003). Extinction vulnerability in marine populations. Fish and Fisheries, 4, 25–64.Google Scholar
Durant, S.M. & Harwood, J. (1992). Assessment of monitoring and management strategies for local populations of the Mediterranean monk seal Monachus monachus. Biological Conservation, 61, 81–92.Google Scholar
Estes, J.A., Duggins, D.O. & Rathbun, G.B. (1989). The ecology of extinctions in kelp forest communities. Conservation Biology, 3, 252–64.Google Scholar
Frankham, R., Bradshaw, C.J.A. & Brook, B.W. (2014). Genetics in conservation management: revised recommendations for the 50/500 rules, Red List criteria and population viability analyses. Biological Conservation, 170, 56–63.Google Scholar
Fraser, D.J. (2008). How well can captive breeding programs conserve biodiversity? A review of salmonids. Evolutionary Applications, 1, 535–86.Google Scholar
Gascoigne, J. & Lipcius, R.N. (2004). Allee effects in marine systems. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 269, 49–59.Google Scholar
Guerra, Á., González, Á.F., Pascual, S. & Dawe, E.G. (2011). The giant squid Architeuthis: an emblematic invertebrate that can represent concern for the conservation of marine biodiversity. Biological Conservation, 144, 1989–97.Google Scholar
Hockey, P.A.R. & Branch, G.M. (1994). Conserving marine biodiversity on the African coast: implications of a terrestrial perspective. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 4, 345–62.Google Scholar
IUCN (2001). IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. Gland, Switzerland, and Cambridge, UK: IUCN.Google Scholar
Jamieson, G.S. (1993). Marine invertebrate conservation: evaluation of fisheries over-exploitation concerns. American Zoologist, 33, 551–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keith, D.A., Rodríguez, J.P., Rodríguez-Clark, K.M., et al. (2013). Scientific foundations for an IUCN Red List of Ecosystems. PLoS ONE, 8, e62111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keith, S.A., Kerswell, A.P. & Connolly, S.R. (2014). Global diversity of marine macroalgae: environmental conditions explain less variation in the tropics. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 23, 517–29.Google Scholar
Kellert, S.R. (1993). Values and perceptions of invertebrates. Conservation Biology, 7, 845–55.Google Scholar
Lacy, R.C. (2000). Structure of the VORTEX simulation model for population viability analysis. Ecological Bulletins, 48, 191–203.Google Scholar
Lotze, H.K., Reise, K., Worm, B., et al. (2005). Human transformations of the Wadden Sea ecosystem through time: a synthesis. Helgoland Marine Research, 59, 84–95.Google Scholar
Maclean, I.M.D. & Wilson, R.J. (2011). Recent ecological responses to climate change support predictions of high extinction risk. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 12337–42.Google Scholar
Marshall, B.A. (1996). A new subfamily of the Addisoniidae associated with cephalopod beaks from the tropical southwest Pacific, and a new pseudococculinid associated with chondrichthyan egg cases from New Zealand (Mollusca: Lepetelloidea). Veliger 39, 250–9.Google Scholar
Miller, G. (1996). Ecosystem management: improving the Endangered Species Act. Ecological Applications, 6, 715–17.Google Scholar
Mineur, F., Arenas, F., Assis, J., et al. (2015). European seaweeds under pressure: consequences for communities and ecosystem functioning. Journal of Sea Research, 98, 91–108.Google Scholar
Myers, R.A. & Ottensmeyer, C. A. (2005). Extinction risk in marine species. In Marine Conservation Biology: The Science of Maintaining the Sea’s Biodiversity, ed. Norse, E.A. & Crowder, L.B., pp. 58–79. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, W.A. (2009). Calcified macroalgae – critical to coastal ecosystems and vulnerable to change: a review. Marine and Freshwater Research, 60, 787–801.Google Scholar
New, T.R. (1993). Angels on a pin: dimensions of the crisis in invertebrate conservation. American Zoologist, 33, 623–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norton, T.A., Melkonian, M. & Andersen, R.A. (1996). Algal biodiversity. Phycologia, 35, 308–26.Google Scholar
Penning, M., Reid, G. McG., Koldewey, H., et al. (eds.). (2009). Turning the Tide: A Global Aquarium Strategy for Conservation and Sustainability. Bern, Switzerland: World Association of Zoos and Aquariums.Google Scholar
Phillips, J.A. (1998). Marine conservation initiatives in Australia: their relevance to the conservation of macroalgae. Botanica Marina, 41, 95–103.Google Scholar
Phillips, J.A. (2001). Marine macroalgal biodiversity hotspots: why is there high species richness and endemism in southern Australian marine benthic flora? Biodiversity and Conservation, 10, 1555–77.Google Scholar
Possingham, H.P., Andelman, S.J., Burgman, M.A., et al. (2002). Limits to the use of threatened species lists. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 17, 503–7.Google Scholar
Régnier, C., Achaz, G., Lambert, A., et al. (2015). Mass extinction in poorly known taxa. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112, 7761–6.Google Scholar
Reynolds, J.D., Dulvy, N.K., Goodwin, N.B. & Hutchings, J.A. (2005). Biology of extinction risk in marine fishes. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 272, 2337–44.Google ScholarPubMed
Reznick, D., Bryant, M.J. & Bashey, F. (2002). r- and K-selection revisited: the role of population regulation in life-history evolution. Ecology, 83, 1509–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roff, J. & Zacharias, M. (2011). Marine Conservation Ecology. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Schaffelke, B., Smith, J.E. & Hewitt, C.L. (2006). Introduced macroalgae – a growing concern. Journal of Applied Phycology, 18, 529–41.Google Scholar
Shaffer, M.L. (1981). Minimum population sizes for species conservation. BioScience, 31, 131–4.Google Scholar
Slobodkin, L.B. (1986). On the susceptibility of different species to extinction: elementary instructions for owners of a world. In The Preservation of Species: The Value of Biological Diversity, ed. Norton, B.G., pp. 226–42. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Slooten, E. & Dawson, S.M. (2010). Assessing the effectiveness of conservation management decisions: likely effects of new protection measures for Hector’s dolphin (Cephalorhynchus hectori). Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 20, 334–47.Google Scholar
Slooten, E., Fletcher, D. & Taylor, B.L. (2000). Accounting for uncertainty in risk assessment: case study of Hector’s dolphin mortality due to gillnet entanglement. Conservation Biology, 14, 1264–70.Google Scholar
Stierhoff, K.L., Neuman, M. & Butler, J.L. (2012). On the road to extinction? Population declines of the endangered white abalone, Haliotis sorenseni. Biological Conservation, 152, 46–52.Google Scholar
Strayer, D.L. (2006). Challenges for freshwater invertebrate conservation. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 25, 271–87.Google Scholar
Taylor, M.F.J., Suckling, K.F. & Rachlinski, J.J. (2005). The effectiveness of the Endangered Species Act: a quantitative analysis. BioScience, 55, 360–7.Google Scholar
Tlusty, M.F., Rhyne, A.L., Kaufman, L., et al. (2013). Opportunities for public aquariums to increase the sustainability of the aquatic animal trade. Zoo Biology, 32, 1–12.Google Scholar
Traill, L.W., Brook, B.W., Frankham, R.R. & Bradshaw, C.J.A. (2010). Pragmatic population viability targets in a rapidly changing world. Biological Conservation, 143, 28–34.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G.J. (1986). The biology of human-caused extinctions. In The Preservation of Species: The Value of Biological Diversity, ed. Norton, B.G., pp. 28–49. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G.J. (1993). Biogeography of recently extinct marine species: implications for conservation. Conservation Biology, 7, 391–7.Google Scholar
Vié, J.-C., Hilton-Taylor, C. & Stuart, S.N. (eds.) (2009). Wildlife in a Changing World – an Analysis of the 2008 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.Google Scholar
Walker, D.I. & Kendrick, G.A. (1998). Threats to macroalgal diversity: marine habitat destruction and fragmentation, pollution and introduced species. Botanica Marina, 41, 105–12.Google Scholar
Webb, T.J. & Mindell, B.L. (2015). Global patterns of extinction risk in marine and non-marine systems. Current Biology, 25, 506–11.Google Scholar
Williams, S.L. & Smith, J.E. (2007). A global review of the distribution, taxonomy, and impacts of introduced seaweeds. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 38, 327–59.Google Scholar
World Conservation Monitoring Centre (1992). Global Biodiversity: Status of the Earth’s Living Resources. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Zacharias, M.A. & Roff, J.C. (2001). Use of focal species in marine conservation and management: a review and critique. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 11, 59–76.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Species Conservation
  • P. Keith Probert, University of Otago, New Zealand
  • Book: Marine Conservation
  • Online publication: 13 July 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139043588.005
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Species Conservation
  • P. Keith Probert, University of Otago, New Zealand
  • Book: Marine Conservation
  • Online publication: 13 July 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139043588.005
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Species Conservation
  • P. Keith Probert, University of Otago, New Zealand
  • Book: Marine Conservation
  • Online publication: 13 July 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139043588.005
Available formats
×