Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T12:31:10.885Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Observational and epidemiological research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2010

Sue Eckstein
Affiliation:
King's College London
Get access

Summary

The scope of epidemiology

Epidemiology has been usefully defined as the study of the distribution and determinants of disease in human populations.

Most epidemiologists would regard the randomised controlled trial (RCT) as the ‘gold standard’ of experimental design, which produces the most reliable of results in the pursuit of the aims of epidemiology. Unfortunately, there are many situations in which the RCT is not feasible: either it is too expensive to run, or it is impossible to recruit enough patients, or it is ethically unjustifiable. In such circumstances, observational research methods are needed.

Types of epidemiological study

These can be either descriptive or analytic.

‘Descriptive’ encompasses quantitative studies, e.g. censuses and surveys, and qualitative studies, e.g. focus groups, and supply essential data for many analytic studies.

Analytic studies seek to establish relationships between diseases and their causes, and deal with quantitative data.

There are four main categories of analytic studies:

  1. (i) Cohort

  2. (ii) Case-control

  3. (iii) Cross-sectional

  4. (iv) Ecological

All these types of study are known as observational: that is, they involve observing what is happening, without interfering with the ‘natural’ situation. Randomisation in such a study means the selection of a random sample of the population for observation, and has nothing to do with random allocation of treatment, which is seen in an RCT.

Cohort study

As can be seen from the diagram, the design of the study is prospective – i.e. moves forward in time from identification of the ‘exposure’ (the putative causal factor) to measurement of the occurrence of disease (‘outcome’).

Type
Chapter
Information
Manual for Research Ethics Committees
Centre of Medical Law and Ethics, King's College London
, pp. 34 - 36
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×