Skip to main content Accessibility help
  • Print publication year: 2008
  • Online publication date: May 2010

1 - Introduction


The timing couldn't be better for a book on risk management and international affairs. Risks from weapons of mass destruction (WMD) proliferation, terrorism, energy availability, failed states, and from other sources are growing. The failure to anticipate major risks in the Iraq war has had enormous consequences, to say the least. And the continuing debate about how the intelligence community and the executive branch of government assess risk make it central to any discussion of foreign and defense policy.

For all of these reasons it is an opportune time to focus on how risk is assessed and managed in international affairs. But there is a second reason why the timing is right for a book on this subject. Separate from all of the above considerations is the emergence of risk management as a distinctive field of study which has transformed one discipline after another, in finance, business, engineering, environmental protection, and epidemiology. Today, it would be unthinkable for a company to invest money without first putting it through a risk “screen” to see what could go wrong. Assessment of an epidemic, likewise, entails a thorough-going risk analysis to see where interventions to stop it should be made. And analysis of engineering failures like the Columbia shuttle crash make a lot more sense when looked at from a risk management framework than from the customary practice of finding someone to blame it on.

Giddens, A., “Risk and responsibility,” Modern Law Review, 62, No. 1 (1999), 3.
Beck, U., Risk society: towards a new modernity, trans. by M. Ritter (London: Sage, 1992), p. 26.
Beck, U., Bons, W. and Lau, C., “The theory of reflexive modernization problematic, hypotheses and research programme,” Theory, Culture & Society, Vol. 20(2) (2003), 1–33.
Aradau, C. and Munster, R., “Governing terrorism through risk: taking precautions, (un)knowing the future,” European Journal of International Relations, 13, No. 1 (2007)
Beck, U., “The terrorist threat: world risk society revisited,” Theory, Culture & Society, 19, No. 4 (2002)
Rasmussen, M. V., “Reflexive security: NATO and the international risk society,” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 30, No. 2 (2001)
Spence, K., “World risk society and war against terror,” Political Studies, 53, No. 2 (2005).
Beck, U., “War is peace: on post-national war,” Security Dialogue, 36, No. 1 (2005)
Shaw, M., “Risk-transfer militarism, small massacres and the historic legitimacy of war,” International Relations, 16, No. 3 (2002)
Shaw, M., The new western way of war: risk transfer and its crisis in Iraq (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2005);
Heng, Y.-K., “The ‘transformation of war’ debate: through the looking glass of Ulrich Beck's World risk society,” International Relations, 20, No. 1 (2006)
Coker, C., Waging war without warriors? the changing culture of military conflict, IISS Studies in International Security (London: Lynne Rienner, 2002)
Jabri, V., “War, security and the liberal state,” Security Dialogue, 37, No. 1 (2006).
Coker, C., “NATO as a post-modern alliance,” in Ramet, S. P. and Ingebritsen, C. (eds.) Coming in from the Cold War: changes in US–European interactions since 1980 (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefiend, 2002).
Taleb, N. N., The black swan, the impact of the highly improbable (Random House, 2007)
Tetlock, P. E., Expert political judgment, how good is it? How can we know? (Princeton University Press, 2005).