References
Adam, B. and Groves, C. (2007) Future Matters: Action, Knowledge, Ethics. Boston, MA: Brill.
Adam, B. and Groves, G. (2011) Futures tended: care and future-oriented responsibility. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 31(1): 17–27.
American Meteorological Society (2009) Geoengineering the Climate System: A Policy Statement of the American Meteorological Society. Boston, MA.
Bamberg, M. and Andrews, M. (eds) (2004) Considering Counter-Narratives: Narrating, Resisting, Making Sense. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Barben, D., Fisher, E., Selin, C. and Guston, D. (2008) Anticipatory governance of nanotechnology: foresight, engagement, and integration. In: Hackett, E., Lynch, M. and Wajcman, J. (eds) The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Third edition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 979–1000.
Barbour, R. (2008) Doing Focus Groups. London: Sage.
Beck, U. (1992) The Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.
Bellamy, R. and Lezaun, J. (2015). Crafting a public for geoengineering. Public Understanding of Science 26(4): 402–17.
Bellamy, R., Chilvers, J., Vaughan, N. and Lenton, T. (2012) A review of climate geoengineering appraisals. WIREs Climate Change 3(6): 597–615.
Bickerstaff, K., Lorenzoni, I., Pidgeon, N., Poortinga, W. and Simmons, P. (2008) Reframing nuclear power in the UK energy debate: nuclear power, climate change mitigation and radioactive waste. Public Understanding of Science 17(2): 145–69.
Bipartisan Policy Centre Task Force on Climate Remediation Research (2011) Geoengineering: A National Strategic Plan for Research on the Potential Effectiveness, Feasibility, and Consequences of Climate Remediation Technologies. Washington, DC: Bipartisan Policy Centre.
Boenink, M., Swierstra, T. and Stemerding, D. (2010) Anticipating the interaction between technology and morality: a scenario study of experimenting with humans in bionanotechnology. Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology 4(2), https://doi.org/10.2202/1941-6008.1098. Boltanski, L. and Thévenot, L. (1999) The sociology of critical capacity. European Journal of Social Theory 2(3): 359–77.
Brooks, S., Leach, M., Lucas, H. and Millstone, E. (2009) Silver Bullets, Grand Challenges and the New Philanthropy. STEPS Working Paper 24, STEPS Centre, Brighton. Available at: www.ids.ac.uk/files/dmfile/STEPSWorkingPaper24.pdf (Accessed 25 January 2020). Brown, N. and Michael, M. (2003) A sociology of expectations: retrospecting prospects and prospecting retrospects. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 15(1): 3–18.
Burawoy, M. (2004) For public sociology. American Sociological Review 70(1): 4–28.
Bush, V. (1945) Science – The Endless Frontier. A Report to the President. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office.
Callon, M. and Rabeharisoa, V. (2004) Gino’s lesson on humanity: genetics, mutual entanglements and the sociologist’s role. Economy and Society 33(1): 1–27.
Callon, M., Lascoumes, P. and Barthe, Y. (2009) Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Calvert, J. (2013) Systems biology: big science and grand challenges. BioSocieties 8(4): 466–79.
Chilvers, J. and Kearnes, M. (2016a) Participation in the making. In: Chilvers, J. and Kearnes, M. (eds) Remaking Participation: Science, Environment and Emergent Publics. London: Routledge, pp. 31–64.
Chilvers, J. and Kearnes, M. (eds) (2016b) Remaking Participation: Science, Environment and Emergent Publics. London: Routledge.
Chilvers, J., Pallett, H. and Hargreaves, T. (2015) Rethinking Energy Participation as Relational and Systemic. London: UKERC.
Chilvers, J., Pallett, H. and Hargreaves, T. (2018) Ecologies of participation in socio-technical change: the case of energy system transitions. Energy Research & Social Science 42: 199–210.
Collingridge, D. (1980) The Social Control of Technology. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
Corner, A., Parkhill, K., Pidgeon, N. and Vaughan, N. (2013) Messing with nature? Exploring public perceptions of geoengineering in the UK. Global Environmental Change 23(5): 938–47.
Dacin, M., Goodstein, J. and Scott, W. (2002). Institutional theory and institutional change: introduction to the Special Research Forum. The Academy of Management Journal 45(1): 45–56.
Davies, S., Macnaghten, P. and Kearnes, M. (eds) (2009) Reconfiguring Responsibility: Deepening Debate on Nanotechnology. Durham, UK: Durham University.
de Hoop, E., Pols, A. and Romijn, H. (2016) Limits to responsible innovation. Journal of Responsible Innovation 3(2): 110–34.
de Saille, S. (2015) Innovating innovation policy: the emergence of ‘responsible research and innovation’. Journal of Responsible Innovation 2(2): 152–68.
Delvenne, P. (2017) Responsible research and innovation as a travesty of technology assessment? Journal of Responsible Innovation 4(2): 278–88.
Delvenne, P. and Parotte, C. (2019) Breaking the myth of neutrality: technology assessment has politics, technology assessment as politics. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 139(C): 64–72.
Detienne, M. and Vernant, J.–P. (1978) Cunning Intelligence in Greek Culture and Society (Janet Lloyd, trans). Hassocks, UK: Harvester Press.
DiMaggio, P. and Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review 48(2): 147–60.
Doezema, T., Forsberg, A.-M., Ludwig, D., Macnaghten, P. and Shelley-Egan, C. (2019) Translation, transduction, and transformation: expanding practices of responsibility across borders. Journal of Responsible Innovation 6(3): 323–31.
Douglas, H. (2003) The moral responsibilities of scientists (tensions between autonomy and responsibility). American Philosophical Quarterly 40(1): 59–68.
Dupuy, J.-P. (2010) The narratology of lay ethics. NanoEthics 4(2): 153–70.
Edgerton, D. 2004. The linear model did not exist. In: Grandin, K., Worms, N. and Widmalm, S. (eds) The Science-Industry Nexus: History, Policy, Implications. Sagamore Beach, MA: Science History Publications, pp. 31–57.
Engineering and Physical Science Research Council [EPSRC] (2013) Framework for Responsible Innovation. Available at: www.epsrc.ac.uk/research/framework/ (Accessed 25 January 2020). Entman, R. (1993) Framing: towards clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication 43(4): 51–8.
Etzkowitz, H. and Leydesdorff, L. (2000) The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and ‘mode 2’ to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy 29(2): 109–23.
European Commission (2007) The European Research Area: New Perspectives. Green Paper 04.04.2007. Text with EEA relevance, COM161, EUR 22840 EN. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
Felt, U. and Fochler, M. (2010) Machineries for making publics: inscribing and de-scribing publics in public engagement. Minerva 48(3): 219–38.
Felt, U., Schumann, S., Schwarz, C. and Strassnig, M. (2014) Technology of imagination: a card-based public engagement method for debating emerging technologies. Qualitative Research 14(2): 233–51.
Felt, U., Wynne, B., Callon, M., Gonçalves, M., Jasanoff, S., Jepsen, M., Joly, P.–B., et al. (2007). Taking European Knowledge Seriously. Report of the expert group on science and governance to the science, Economy and Society Directorate, EUR 2 (2700). Directorate-General for Research. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Commission. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/european-knowledge-society_en.pdf (Accessed 25 January 2020). Fisher, E. (2019) Learning from failure. Journal of Responsible Innovation 6(3): 259–62.
Fisher, E., Mahajan, R. and Mitcham, C. (2006) Midstream modulation of technology: governance from within. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 26(6): 485–96.
Fleck, L. (1979) Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Fleming, J. (2010) Fixing the Sky: The Checkered History of Weather and Climate Control. New York: Columbia University Press.
Flink, T. and Kaldewey, D. (2018) The new production of legitimacy: STI policy discourses beyond the contract metaphor. Research Policy 47(1): 14–22.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2001) Making Social Science Matter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Forsberg, E.–M., Shelley-Egan, C., Ladikas, M. and Owen, R. (2018) Implementing responsible research and innovation in research funding and research conducting organisations – what have we learned so far? In: Ferri, F., Dwyer, N., Raicevich, S., Grifoni, P., Altiok, H., Andersen, H. T., Laouris, Y. and Silvestri, C. (eds) Governance and Sustainability of Responsible Research and Innovation. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, pp. 3–11.
Funtowicz, S. and Ravetz, J. (1993) Science for the post-normal age. Futures 25(7): 739–55.
Gadamer, H.–G. (2004) Truth and Method. London: Continuum.
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P. and Trow, M. (1994) The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: Sage.
Gobo, G. (2005) Sampling, representativeness and generalizability. In: Gobo, G., Gubrium, J., Seale, C. and Silverman, D. (eds) Qualitative Research Practice. London: Sage, pp. 65–79.
Godin, B. (2006) The linear model of innovation: the historical construction of an analytical framework. Science, Technology and Human Values 31(6): 639–67.
Gomart, E. and Hajer, M. (2003) Is that politics? For an inquiry into forms in contemporary politics. In: Joerges, B. and Nowotny, H. (eds) Social Studies of Science and Technology: Looking Back, Looking Forward. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic, pp. 33–61.
Goodin, R. and Dryzek, J. (2006) Deliberative impacts: the macro-political uptake of mini-publics. Politics and Society 34(2): 219–24.
Grinbaum, A. and Groves, C. (2013) What is ‘responsible’ about responsible innovation? Understanding the ethical issues. In: Owen, R., Bessant, J. and Heintz, M. (eds) Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society. London: Wiley, pp. 119–42.
Grove-White, R. 1991. The emerging shape of environmental conflict in the 1990. Royal Society of Arts 139: 437–47.
Grove-White, R., Macnaghten, P., Mayer, S. and Wynne, B. (1997) Uncertain World: GMOs, Food and Public Attitudes in Britain. Lancaster, UK: CSEC and Unilever.
Grove-White, R., Macnaghten, P. and Wynne, B. (2000) Wising Up: The Public and New Technologies. Lancaster, UK: CSEC and Unilever.
Guston, D. (2014) Understanding ‘anticipatory governance’. Social Studies of Science 44(2): 218–42.
Guston, D. and Sarewitz, D. (2002) Real-time technology assessment. Technology in Society 24(1–2): 93–109.
Hacking, I. (1992) ‘Style’ for historians and philosophers. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 23(1): 1–20.
Hajer, M. (2003) Policy without polity? Policy analysis and the institutional void. Policy Sciences 36(2): 175–95.
Hartley, S., Pearce, W. and Taylor, A. (2017) Against the tide of depoliticisation: the politics of research governance. Policy & Politics 45(3): 361–77.
Hartley, S., McLeod, C., Clifford, M., Jewitt, S. and Ray, C. (2019) A retrospective analysis of responsible innovation for low-technology innovation in the Global South. Journal of Responsible Innovation 6(2): 143–62.
Hennink, M. (2007) International Focus Group Research: A Handbook for the Health and Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hessels, L. and van Lente, H. (2008) Re-thinking new knowledge production: a literature review and a research agenda. Research Policy 37(4): 740–60.
Horlick-Jones, T., Walls, J., Rowe, G., Pidgeon, N., Poortinga, W., Murdock, G. and O’Riordan, T. (2007) The GM Debate: Risk, Politics and Public Engagement. London: Routledge.
Hulme, M. (2014). Can Science Fix Climate Change? A Case against Climate Engineering. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Irvine, J. and Martin, B. (1984) Foresight in Science: Picking the Winners. London: Pinter.
Irwin, A. (2006) The politics of talk: coming to terms with the ‘new’ scientific governance. Social Studies of Science 36(2): 299–330.
Irwin, A. (2008) STS perspectives on scientific governance. In: Hackett, E., Amsterdamska, O., Lynch, M. and Wajcman, J. (eds) The Handbook of Science and technology Studies, 3rd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 583–607.
Irwin, A., Jensen, T. and Jones, K. (2013) The good, the bad and the perfect: criticizing engagement practice. Social Studies of Science 43(1): 118–35.
Jasanoff, S. (1990) The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Jasanoff, S. (2003) Technologies of humility: citizen participation in governing science. Minerva 41(3): 223–44.
Jasanoff, S. (ed) (2004) States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and the Social Order. New York: Routledge.
Jasanoff, S., Hurlbut, J. and Saha, K. (2015) CRISPR democracy: gene editing and the need for inclusive deliberation. Issues in Science and Technology 32(1): 1–14.
Jasanoff, S. (2016) The Ethics of Invention: Technology and the Human Future. New York: W. W. Norton.
Jasanoff, S. and Simmet, H. (2017) No funeral bells: public reason in a ‘post-truth’ world. Social Studies of Science 47(5): 751–70.
Kearnes, M., Macnaghten, P. and Wilsdon, J. (2006) Governing at the Nanoscale: People, Policies and Emerging Technologies. London: Demos.
Krueger, R. (1998) Moderating Focus Groups: Focus Group Kit 4. London: Sage.
Kuhlmann, S., Edler, J., Ordóñez-Matamoros, G., Randles, S., Walhout, B., Gough, C. and Lindner, R. (2015). Responsibility Navigator. Karlsruhe, Germany: Fraunhofer ISI. Available at: www.responsibility-navigator.eu (Accessed 25 January 2020). Laurent, B. (2011) Technologies of democracy: experiments and demonstrations. Science and Engineering Ethics 17(4): 649–66.
Laurent, B. (2017) Democratic Experiments: Problematizing Nanotechnology and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lezaun, J. and Soneryd, L. (2007) Consulting citizens: technologies of elicitation and the mobility of publics. Public Understanding of Science 16(3): 279–97.
Ludwig, D. and Macnaghten, P. (2020) Traditional ecological knowledge in innovation governance: a framework for responsible and just innovation. Journal of Responsible Innovation 7(1): 26–44.
Ludwig, D., Pols, A. and Macnaghten, P. (2018) Organisational review and outlooks: Wageningen University and Research. In: van der Molen, F., Consoli, L., Ludwig, D., Pols, A. and Macnaghten, P. (eds) Report from National Case Study: The Netherlands. Deliverable 9.1. Responsible Research and Innovation Project. Available at: www.rri-practice.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/RRI-Practice_National_Case_Study_Report_NETHERLANDS.pdf (Accessed 25 January 2020). Ludwig, D., Pols, A. and Macnaghten, P. (2019) Achieving Responsibility at Wageningen University and Research. Wageningen, Netherlands: Communication, Philosophy and Technology. Available at: https://library.wur.nl/WebQuery/wurpubs/fulltext/475712 (Accessed 25 January 2020). Lund Declaration (2009) The Lund Declaration: Europe Must Focus on the Grand Challenges of Our Time. Swedish EU Presidency, 8 July. Lund, Sweden.
Macnaghten, P. (2004) Animals in their nature: a case study of public attitudes on animals, genetic modification and ‘nature’. Sociology 38(3): 533–51.
Macnaghten, P. (2010) Researching technoscientific concerns in the making: narrative structures, public responses and emerging nanotechnologies. Environment & Planning A 42(1): 23–37.
Macnaghten, P. (2016) The Metis of Responsible Innovation: Helping Society to Get Better at the Conversation between Today and Tomorrow. Inaugural lecture, Wageningen University, Wageningen, Netherlands, 12 July. Available at: https://wurtv.wur.nl/P2G/Player/Player.aspx?id=dIIa2u (Accessed 25 January 2020). Macnaghten, P (2017) Focus groups as anticipatory methodology: a contribution from science and technology studies towards socially-resilient governance. In: Barbour, R. and Morgan, D. (eds) A New Era of Focus Group Research. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave, pp. 343–63.
Macnaghten, P. and Carro-Ripalda, S. (eds) (2015) Governing Agricultural Sustainability: Global Lessons from GM Crops. London: Routledge.
Macnaghten, P. and Chilvers, J. (2014) The future of science governance: publics, policies, practices. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 32(3): 530–48.
Macnaghten, P. and Guivant, J. (2011) Converging citizens? Nanotechnology and the political imaginary of public engagement in Brazil and the UK. Public Understanding of Science 20(2): 207–20.
Macnaghten, P. and Habets, M. (2020 online) Breaking the impasse: Towards a forward-looking governance framework for genome editing with plants. Plants, People, Planet. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp3.10107. Macnaghten, P. and Myers, G. (2004) Focus groups: the moderator’s view and the analyst’s view. In: Gobo, G., Gubrium, J., Seale, C. and Silverman, D. (eds) Qualitative Research Practice. London: Sage, pp. 65–79.
Macnaghten, P. and Owen, R. (2011) Good governance for geoengineering. Nature 479: 293.
Macnaghten, P. and Szerszynski, B. (2013) Living the global social experiment: an analysis of public discourse on geoengineering and its implications for governance. Global Environmental Change 23(2): 465–74.
Macnaghten, P. and Urry, J. (1998) Contested Natures. London: Sage.
Macnaghten, P., Davies, S. and Kearnes, M. (2019) Understanding public responses to emerging technologies: a narrative approach. Journal of Environmental Planning and Policy 21(5): 504–18.
Macnaghten, P., Owen, R., Stilgoe, J., Wynne, B., Azevedo, A., de Campos, A., Chilvers, J., et al. (2014) Responsible innovation across borders: tensions, paradoxes and possibilities. Journal of Responsible Innovation 1(2): 191–99.
Marres, N. (2007) The issues deserve more credit: pragmatist contributions to the study of public involvement in controversy. Social Studies of Science 37(5): 759–80.
May, R. (1999) Personal communication to Robin Grove-White. Unpublished manuscript.
McLeish, T. (2016) The search for affirming narratives for the future governance of technology: reflections from a science–theology perspective on GMFuturos. In: Macnaghten, P. and Carro-Ripalda, S. (eds) Governing Agricultural Sustainability: Global Lessons from GM Crops. London: Routledge, pp. 192–97.
Mercer, A., Keith, D. and Sharp, J. (2011) Public understanding of solar radiation management. Environmental Research Letters 6: 044006.
Merton, R. (1973) The normative structure of science. In: Storer, N. (ed) The Sociology of Science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 267–78.
Miller, C. (2004) Climate science and the making of a global social order. In: Jasanoff, S. (ed) States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and the Social Order. New York: Routledge, pp. 247–85.
Morgan, D. (1988) Focus Groups as Qualitative Research. London: Sage.
Mouffe, C. (2005) On the Political. London: Routledge.
Murphy, J., Parry, S. and Walls, J. (2016) The EPSRC’s policy of responsible innovation from a trading zones perspective. Minerva 54(2): 151–74.
Myers, G. (2004). Matters of Opinion: Dynamics of Talk about Public Issues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
National Council on Bioethics (2012) Emerging Biotechnologies: Technology, Choice and the Public Good. London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics.
National Research Council (1983) Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Nordmann, A. (2010) A forensics of wishing: technology assessment in the age of technoscience. Poiesis & Praxis 7(1–2): 5–15.
Nowotny, H., Scott, P. and Gibbons, M. (2001) Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Oliver, C. (2002) The antecedents of deinstitutionalization. Organisational Studies. 13(4): 563–88.
Owen, R. (2013) Techno-visionary science and the governance of intent. Science, Technology and Innovation Studies 9(2): 95–103.
Owen, R. (2014a) The UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council’s commitment to a framework for responsible innovation. Journal of Responsible Innovation 1(1): 113–17.
Owen, R. (2014b) Solar radiation management and the governance of hubris. In: Harrison, R. and Hester, R. (eds) Geoengineering of the Climate System: Issues in Environmental Science and Technology. London: Royal Society of Chemistry, pp. 212–48.
Owen, R. and Pansera, M. (2019) Responsible innovation and responsible research and innovation. In: Simon, D., Kuhlmann, S., Stamm, J. and Canzler, W. (eds) Handbook on Science and Public Policy. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, pp. 26–48.
Owen, R., Macnaghten, P. and Stilgoe, J. (2012) Responsible research and innovation: from science in society to science for society, with society. Science and Public Policy 39(6): 751–60.
Owen, R., Bessant, J. and Heintz, M. (eds) (2013) Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society. London: Wiley.
Owens, S. (2015) Knowledge, Policy, and Expertise: The UK Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution 1970–2011. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Parkhill, K. and Pidgeon, N. (2011) Public engagement on geoengineering research: preliminary report on the SPICE deliberative workshops. Technical report, Understanding Risk Group Working Paper 11-01, Cardiff University School of Psychology. Available at: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/42606893.pdf (Accessed 25 January 2020). Perrow, C. (1984) Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Polanyi, M. (1962) The republic of science: its political and economic theory. Minerva 1(1): 54–73.
Poumadere, M., Bertoldo, R. and Samadi, J. (2011) Public perceptions and governance of controversial technologies to tackle climate change: nuclear, power, carbon capture and storage, wind and geoengineering. WIREs Climate Change 2(5): 712–27.
Puchta, C. and Potter, J. (2004) Focus Group Practice. London: Sage.
Randles, S. and Laash, O. (2016) Theorising the normative business model. Organization & Environment 29(1): 53–73.
Reyes-Galindo, L., Monteiro, M. and Macnaghten, P. (2019) ‘Opening up’ science policy: Engaging with RRI in Brazil. Journal of Responsible Innovation 6(3): 353–60.
Ribeiro, B., Smith, R. and Millar, K. (2017) A mobilising concept? Unpacking academic representations of responsible research and innovation. Science and Engineering Ethics 23(1): 81–103.
Rip, A. (2016) The clothes of the emperor: an essay on RRI in and around Brussels. Journal of Responsible Innovation 3(3): 290–304.
Rip, A., Misa, T. and Schot, J. (eds) (1995) Managing Technology in Society: The Approach of Constructive Technology Assessment. London: Pinter.
Roco, M. and Bainbridge, W. (eds) (2003) Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance: Nanotechnology, Biotechnology, Information Technology and Cognitive Science. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
Rogers, E. M. (1962) Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.
Rogers-Hayden, T. and Pidgeon, N. (2007) Moving engagement ‘upstream’? Nanotechnologies and the Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering inquiry. Public Understanding of Science 16(3): 346–64.
Rommetveit, K., van Dijk, N., Gunnarsdottir, K., O’Riordan, K., Gutwirth, S., Strand, R. and Wynne, B. (2019) Working responsibly across boundaries? Some practical and theoretical lessons. In: von Schomberg, R. and Hankins, J. (eds) International Handbook on Responsible Innovation: A Global Resource. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, pp. 83–100.
Rose, N. (2006) The Politics of Life Itself: Biomedicine, Power, and Subjectivity in the Twenty-First Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Royal Society (1998) Genetically Modified Plants for Food Use. London: The Royal Society.
RRI Tools (2016) Welcome to the RRI Toolkit. Available at: www.rri-tools.eu (Accessed 25 January 2020). Ruiz, J. (2017) Collection production of discourse: an approach based on the qualitative school of Madrid. In: Barbour, R. and Morgan, D. (eds) A New Era in Focus Group Research. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 277–300.
Sarewitz, D. (1996) Frontiers of Illusion: Science, Technology, and the Politics of Progress. Philadelphia PA: Temple University Press.
Sarewitz, D. (2010) Curing climate backlash. Nature 464: 28.
Schuurbiers, D. (2013) What happens in the lab: applying mid-stream modulation to enhance critical reflection in the laboratory. Science and Engineering Ethics 17(4): 769–88.
Scoones, I. (2019). What is Uncertainty and Why Does It Matter? STEPS Working Paper 105, STEPS Centre, Brighton, UK.
Scott, J. (1998) Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Scott, W. (1995) Institutions and Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Selin, C. (2007) Expectations and the emergence of nanotechnology. Science, Technology & Human Values 32(2): 196–220.
Spence, A., Venables, D., Pidgeon, N., Poortinga, W. and Demski, C. (2010) Public Perceptions of Climate Change and Energy Futures in Britain: Summary Findings of a Survey Conducted in January–March 2010. Technical report, Understanding Risk Working Paper 10-01, Cardiff University School of Psychology. Available at: http://doc.ukdataservice.ac.uk/doc/6581/mrdoc/pdf/6581final_report.pdf (Accessed 25 January 2020). Stilgoe, J. (2011) A question of intent. Nature Climate Change 1(7): 325–6.
Stilgoe, J. (2015) Experiment Earth. London: Routledge.
Stilgoe, J., Lock, S. and Wilsdon, J. (2014) Why should we promote public engagement with science? Public Understanding of Science 23(1): 4–15.
Stilgoe, J., Owen, R. and Macnaghten, P. (2013) Developing a framework of responsible innovation. Research Policy 42(9): 1568–80.
Stirling, A. (2008) ‘Opening up’ and ‘closing down’: power, participation, and pluralism in the social appraisal of technology. Science Technology & Human Values 33(2): 262–94.
Stirling, A. (2014) Emancipating Transformations: From Controlling ‘the Transition’ to Culturing Plural Radical Progress. STEPS Working Paper 64, STEPS Centre, Brighton, UK.
Szerszynski, B., Kearnes, M., Macnaghten, P., Owen, R. and Stilgoe, J. (2013) Why SRM geoengineering and democracy won’t mix. Environment and Planning A 45(12): 2809–16.
Thomas, H. and Dagnino, R. (2005) Efectos de transducción: una nueva crítica a la transferencia acrítica de conceptos y modelos institucionales. Ciencia, Docencia y Tecnología 16(31): 9–46.
US Government Accountability Office Technical Report (2011) Climate Engineering: Technical Status, Future Directions, and Potential Responses. GAO-11-71. Available at: www.gao.gov/assets/330/322208.pdf (Accessed 25 January 2020). van den Hoven, J. (2013) Value sensitive design and responsible innovation. In: Owen, R., Heintz, M. and Bessant, J. (eds) Responsible Innovation. Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society. London: John Wiley, pp. 75–84.
van den Hoven, J., Vermaas, P. and van de Poel, I. (eds) (2015) Handbook of Ethics, Values, and Technological Design: Sources, Theory, Values and Application Domains. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
van Bouwel, J. and van Oudheusden, M. (2017) Participation beyond consensus? Technology assessments, consensus conferences and democratic modulation. Social Epistemology 31(6): 497–513.
van Oudheusden, M. (2014) Where are the politics in responsible innovation? European governance, technology assessments, and beyond. Journal of Responsible Innovation 1(1): 67–86.
van Oudheusden, M., Charlier, N., Rosskamp, B. and Delvenne, P. (2015) Broadening, deepening, and governing innovation: Flemish technology assessment in historical and socio-political perspective. Research Policy 44(10): 1877–86.
von Schomberg, R. (2013) A vision of responsible research and innovation. In: Owen, R., Bessant, J. and Heintz, M. (eds) Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society. London: Wiley, pp. 51–74.
von Schomberg, R. (2019) Why responsible innovation. In: von Schomberg, R. and Hankins, J. (eds) International Handbook on Responsible Innovation: A Global Resource. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, pp. 12–32.
Voss, J.–P. and Amelung, N. (2016) Innovating public participation methods: technoscientization and reflexive engagement. Social Studies of Science 46(5): 749–72.
Williams, L., Macnaghten, P., Davies, R. and Curtis, S. (2017) Framing fracking: exploring public responses to hydraulic fracturing in the UK. Public Understanding of Science 26(1): 89–104.
Wilsdon, J. and Willis, B. (2004) See-Through-Science: Why Public Engagement Needs to Move Upstream. London: Demos.
Winner, L. (1980) Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus 109(1): 121–36.
Wynne, B. (1992) Misunderstood misunderstanding: social identities and the public uptake of science. Public Understanding of Science 1(3): 281–304.
Wynne, B. (1996) May the sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expert-lay knowledge divide. In: Lash, S., Szerszynski, B. and Wynne, B. (eds) Risk, Environment and Modernity: Towards a New Ecology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 44–83.
Wynne, B. (2001) Creating public alienation: expert cultures of risk and ethics on GMOs. Science as Culture 2(4): 321–37.
Wynne, B. (2006) Public engagement as a means of restoring public trust in science: hitting the notes, but missing the music? Community Genetics 9(3): 211–20.
Wynne, B. (2007) Dazzled by the mirage of influence? STS-SSK in multivalent registers of relevance. Science, Technology, & Human Values 32(4): 491–503.
Wynne, B. (2016) Ghosts of the machine: publics, meanings and social science in a time of expert dogma and denial. In: Chilvers, J. and Kearnes, M. (eds) Remaking Participation: Science, Environment and Emergent Publics. London: Routledge, pp. 99–120.
Zwart, H., Landeweerd, L. and van Rooij, A. (2014) Adapt or perish? Assessing the recent shift in the European research funding arena from ‘ELSA’ to ‘RRI’. Life Sciences, Society and Policy 10: 11.
