Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-995ml Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T12:20:47.937Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2018

N. J. Enfield
Affiliation:
University of Sydney
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Mainland Southeast Asian Languages
A Concise Typological Introduction
, pp. 237 - 256
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbi, Anvita. 2012. Dictionary of the Great Andamanese Language: English – Great Andamanese – Hindi. Delhi: Ratna Sagar.Google Scholar
Abbi, Anvita. 2013. A Grammar of the Great Andamanese Language: An Ethnolinguistic Study. Leiden: Brill Academic.Google Scholar
Abramson, Arthur S. and Svastikula., K. 1983. Intersections of tone and intonation in Thai. Haskins Laboratories Status Report on Speech Research SR-74/75: 143167. www.haskins.yale.edu/sr/sr074/SR074_10.pdf (accessed 30 May 2018).Google Scholar
Abramson, Arthur S. and L.-Thongkum, Theraphan. 2009. A fuzzy boundary between tone languages and voice-register languages. In Fant, G., Fujisaki, H. and Shen, J. (eds.), Frontiers in Phonetics and Speech Science, 149155. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Adams, Karen L. 1989. Systems of Numeral Classification in the Mon-Khmer, Nicobarese, and Aslian Subfamilies of Austroasiatic. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Adams, Karen L. 1991. The influence of non-Austroasiatic languages on numeral classification in Austroasiatic. Journal of the American Oriental Society 111(1): 6281.Google Scholar
Adelaar, Alexander and Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. (eds.). 2005. The Austronesian Languages of Asia and Madagascar. London: RoutledgeCurzon.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra. 2000. Classifiers: A Typology of Noun Categorization Devices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra. 2006. Serial verbs constructions in a typological perspective. In Aikhenvald, A. Y. and Dixon, R. M. W. (eds.), Serial Verb Constructions: A Cross-Linguistic Typology, 168. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra and Dixon, Robert. 2013. Possession and Ownership: A Cross-Linguistic Typology. Explorations in Linguistic Typology, 6. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra and Dixon, Robert. 2017. The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Typology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Alves, Mark J. 2001. What’s so Chinese about Vietnamese? In Thurgood, Graham W. (ed.), Papers from the Ninth Annual Meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society, 221242. Phoenix, AZ: Arizona State University.Google Scholar
Alves, Mark J. 2006. A Grammar of Pacoh: A Mon-Khmer Language of the Central Highlands of Vietnam (Shorter Grammars). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Alves, Mark J. 2009. Sino-Vietnamese grammatical vocabulary and sociolinguistic conditions for borrowing. Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society 1: 19.Google Scholar
Alves, Mark J. 2015. Morphological functions among Mon-Khmer languages: Beyond the basic. In Enfield, N. J. and Comrie, Bernard (eds.), The Languages of Mainland Southeast Asia: The State of the Art, 532557. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Andvik, Erik. 2003. Tshangla. In Thurgood, Graham andLaPolla, Randy J. (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan Languages, 439455. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ansaldo, Umberto. 1999. Comparative Constructions in Sinitic: Areal Typology and Patterns of Grammaticalisation. PhD dissertation, University of Stockholm.Google Scholar
Ansaldo, Umberto and Matthews, Stephen J.. 2001. Typical Creoles and simple languages: The case of Sinitic. Linguistic Typology 5(2/3): 311324.Google Scholar
Banker, Elizabeth M. 1964. Bahnar affixation. Mon-Khmer Studies 1: 99117.Google Scholar
Barrie, M. 2006. Tone circles and contrast preservation. Linguistic Inquiry 37(1): 131141.Google Scholar
Bauer, Christian. 1982. Morphology and Syntax of Spoken Mon. PhD thesis, School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London.Google Scholar
Bauer, Robert S. 1996. Identifying the Tai substratum in Cantonese. In Pan-Asiatic Linguistics: Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Languages and Linguistics V, 18061844. Bangkok: Mahidol University.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, N. I. 1998. A grammar sketch of Western (Cambodian) Cham. Pacific Linguistics. Series A. Occasional Papers 89: 120.Google Scholar
Baxter, William H. and Sagart, Laurent. 1998. Word formation in Old Chinese. In Packard, Jerome L. (ed.), New Approaches to Chinese Word Formation: Morphology, Phonology, and the Lexicon in Modern and Ancient Chinese. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Becker, Alton L. 1975. A linguistic image of nature: The Burmese numerative classifier system. Linguistics 13(165): 109122.Google Scholar
Bedell, George. 2001. The syntax of deixis in Lai. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 24(2): 157171.Google Scholar
Bellwood, Peter. 1992. Southeast Asia before prehistory. In Tarling, N. (ed.), The Cambridge History of Southeast Asia: From Early Times to C. 1800 (Vol. 1), 55–136. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Geoffrey. 2006. Hervey’s “Kenaboi”: Lost Malayan language or forest-collecting taboo jargon? Manuscript, Singapore.Google Scholar
Bisang, Walter. 1991. Verb serialization, grammaticalization and attractor positions in Chinese, Hmong, Vietnamese, Thai and Khmer. In Seiler, Hansjakob and Premper, Waldfried (eds.), Partizipation: Das sprachliche Erfassen von Sachverhalten, 509562. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Bisang, Walter. 1993. Classifiers, quantifiers and class nouns in Hmong. Studies in Language 17(1): 151.Google Scholar
Bisang, Walter. 1996. Areal typology and grammaticalization: Processes of grammaticalization based on nouns and verbs in East and Mainland South East Asian languages. Studies in Languages 20(3): 519597.Google Scholar
Blench, Roger. 2011. The role of agriculture in the evolution of mainland Southeast Asian language phyla. In Enfield, N. J. (ed.), Dynamics of Human Diversity: The case of Mainland Southeast Asia, 125152. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Blench, Roger. 2015. The origins of nominal classification markers in MSEA languages: Convergence, contact and some African parallels. In Enfield, N. J. and Comrie, Bernard (eds.), The Languages of Mainland Southeast Asia: The State of the Art, 558585. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Blench, Roger and Post, Mark W.. 2013. Re-thinking Sino-Tibetan phylogeny from the perspective of North East Indian languages. In Hill, N. and Owen-Smith, T. (eds.), Trans-Himalayan Linguistics, 71104. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Blood, D. 1967. Phonological units in Cham. Anthropological Linguistics 9(8): 1532.Google Scholar
Blood, D. 1977. Clause and sentence final particles in Cham. In Thomas, David, Lee, Ernest W. and Liem, Nguyen Dang (eds.), Papers in South East Asian Linguistics No. 4: Chamic Studies, Pacific Linguistics Series A, No. 48: 3951.Google Scholar
Blust, Robert. 1994. The Austronesian settlement of mainland Southeast Asia. In Adams, Karen L. and Hudak, Thomas John (eds.), Papers from the Second Annual Meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society, 2583. Tempe, AZ: Arizona State University.Google Scholar
Blust, Robert. 2013a. Southeast Asian islands and Oceania: Austronesian linguistic history. In Ness, I. (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Global Human Migration. doi:10.1002/9781444351071.wbeghm835 (accessed 25 Sep 2018).Google Scholar
Blust, Robert. 2013b. The Austronesian Languages (revised edition). Canberra: Asia-Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Bo, Wenze. 2002. A Study of Mulao. Beijing: The Nationalities Press.Google Scholar
Bodomo, A. 2006. The structure of ideophones in African and Asian languages: The case of Dagaare and Cantonese. In Selected Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference on African Linguistics: African Languages and Linguistics in Broad Perspectives, 203213. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bon, Noëllie. 2014. Une grammaire de la langue stieng, langue en danger du Cambodge et du Vietnam. Dissertation, Université Lumière Lyon 2.Google Scholar
Bradley, David. 1995. Studies in Burmese Languages (Papers in Southeast Asian Linguistics 13). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Bradley, David. 2003. Lisu. In Thurgood, Graham and LaPolla, Randy J. (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan Languages, 222235. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bradley, David. 2007. Language endangerment in China and mainland Southeast Asia. In Brenzinger, Matthias (ed.), Language Diversity Endangered (Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs), 278302. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope and Levinson, Stephen C.. 1978. Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In Goody, Esther N. (ed.), Question and Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brunelle, Marc. 2009. Northern and Southern Vietnamese tone coarticulation: A comparative case study. Journal of Southeast Asian Linguistics 1: 4962.Google Scholar
Brunelle, Marc. 2015. Vietnamese (Tiếng Việt). In Jenny, Mathias and Sidwell, Paul (eds.), The Handbook of Austroasiatic Languages, 909953. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Brunelle, Marc and Kirby, James. 2015. Re-assessing tonal diversity and geographical convergence in mainland Southeast Asia. In Enfield, N. J. and Comrie, Bernard (eds.), The Languages of Mainland Southeast Asia: The State of the Art, 82110. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Brunelle, Marc and Kirby, James. 2016. Tone and phonation in Southeast Asian languages. Language and Linguistics Compass 10(4): 191207.Google Scholar
Brunelle, Marc and Pittayaporn, Pittayawat. 2012. Phonologically-constrained change: The role of the foot in monosyllabization and rhythmic shifts in mainland Southeast Asia. Diachronica 29(4): 411433.Google Scholar
Brunelle, Marc, Hạ, Kiều Phương and Grice, Martine. 2012. Intonation in Northern Vietnamese. The Linguistic Review 29: 336.Google Scholar
Brunelle, Marc, Hạ, Kiều Phương and Grice, Martine. 2016. Inconspicuous coarticulation: A complex path to sound change in the tone system of Hanoi Vietnamese. Journal of Phonetics 59: 2339.Google Scholar
Buakaw, Supakit. 2012. A Phonological Study of Palaung Dialects Spoken in Thailand and Myanmar, with Focuses on Vowels and Final Nasals. PhD dissertation Mahidol University, Bangkok.Google Scholar
Burenhult, Niclas. 2002. A Grammar of Jahai. PhD Dissertation, Lund University.Google Scholar
Burenhult, Niclas. 2003. Attention, accessibility, and the addressee: the case of the Jahai demonstrative ton. Pragmatics 13: 363379.Google Scholar
Burenhult, Niclas. 2005. A Grammar of Jahai. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Burenhult, Niclas. 2006. Body part terms in Jahai. Language Sciences 28. 162180.Google Scholar
Burenhult, Niclas. 2008. Spatial coordinate systems in demonstrative meaning. Linguistic Typology 12: 99142.Google Scholar
Butler, Becky. 2015. Approaching a phonological understanding of the sesquisyllable with phonetic evidence from Khmer and Bunong. In Enfield, N. J. and Comrie, Bernard (eds.), The Languages of Mainland Southeast Asia: The State of the Art, 443499. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cao, J. 2002. Hànyǔ Shēngdiào yǔ Yǔdiào de Guānxī. [The relation between tone and intonation in Chinese]. Studies of the Chinese Language 2002 (3): 195202.Google Scholar
Capell, Arthur. 1979. Further typological studies in Southeast Asian languages. In Liem, Nguyen Dang (ed.), South-East Asian Linguistic Studies (Vol. 3), 142. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CASS). 2012. A Dictionary of Modern Chinese (6th edn.). Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Chao, Yuen Ren. 1930. A system of tone letters. Le Maître Phonétique 45:2427.Google Scholar
Chao, Yuen Ren. 1933. Tone and intonation in Chinese. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica 4: 121–34.Google Scholar
Chao, Yuen Ren. 1968. A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Chappell, Hilary. 2001. Language contact and areal diffusion in Sinitic languages. In Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and Dixon, R. M. W. (eds.), Areal Diffusion and Genetic Inheritance: Problems in Comparative Linguistics, 328357. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chappell, John and Shackleton, N. J.. 1986. Oxygen isotopes and sea level. Nature 324(6093): 137140.Google Scholar
Chen, Guoqing. 2005. Kemieyu yanjiu [A study of Kemie]. Beijing: Minzu Chubanshe.Google Scholar
Chen, M. 1987. The syntax of Xiamen tone sandhi. Phonology Yearbook 4: 109149.Google Scholar
Cheng, Robert L. 1974. Causative constructions in Taiwanese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 2(3): 279324.Google Scholar
Cheung, Y.-S. 1969. ‘Xianggang Yueyu yinping ji biandiao wenti (A study on the upper even tone and tone sandhi in the Cantonese dialect as spoken in Hongkong)’. Journal of the Institute of Chinese Studies in the Chinese University of Hongkong 2(2): 81105.Google Scholar
Clark, Marybeth. 1985. Asking questions in Hmong and other southeast Asian languages. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 8(2): 6067.Google Scholar
Clark, Marybeth. 1989. Hmong and areal South-East Asia. In Bradley, David (ed.), Papers in Southeast Asian Linguistics No.11, Southeast Asian Syntax, 175230. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Clark, Marybeth and Prasithrathsint, Amara. 1985. Synchronic lexical derivation in Southeast Asian languages. In Ratanakul, Suriya and Suwilai, Premsrirat (eds.), Southeast Asian Linguistic Studies Presented to André-G. Haudricourt, 3481. Bangkok: Mahidol University.Google Scholar
Clynes, A. and Deterding, D.. 2011. Standard Malay (Brunei). Journal of the International Phonetic Association 41: 259268.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1985. Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1990. The Major Languages of East and South-East Asia. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 2007. Areal typology of mainland Southeast Asia: what we learn from the WALS maps. In Kullavanijaya, Pranee (ed.), Trends in Thai Linguistics [Manusya Special Issue 13], 1847. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University.Google Scholar
Cooke, Joseph R. 1968. Pronominal Reference in Thai, Burmese and Vietnamese. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, James S. 1966. Halăng verb phrase. In Thomas, David D. (ed.), Papers on Four Vietnamese Languages, 2834. Auckland: Linguistic Society of New Zealand.Google Scholar
Craig, Colette (ed.). 1986. Noun Classes and Categorization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen. 2008. An exercise in “a Posteriori” language sampling. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 61(3): 208220.Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 1986. Toward a history of Tai classifier systems. In Craig, Colette (ed.), Noun Classes and Categorization, 437452. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Denny, Peter J. 1978. Locating the universals in lexical systems for spatial deixis. Papers from the Parasession on the Lexicon, 7184. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
DiCanio, Christian T. 2007. The phonetics of register in Takhian Thong Chong. In UC Berkeley Phonology Lab Annual Report (2007), 459482. http://linguistics.berkeley.edu/phonlab/documents/2007/ChristianDiCanio.pdf (accessed 30 May 2018).Google Scholar
Diffloth, Gérard. 1972. Notes on expressive meaning. In Papers from the 8th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 440447. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Diffloth, Gérard. 2011. Austroasiatic word histories: boat, husked rice and taro. In Enfield, N. J. (ed.), Dynamics of Human Diversity: The Case of Mainland Southeast Asia, 295313. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Diller, Anthony V. N., Edmondson, Jerold A. and Luo, Yongxian. 2008. The Tai-Kadai Languages. London: RoutledgeCurzon.Google Scholar
Dingemanse, M. 2012. Advances in the cross-linguistic study of ideophones. Language and Linguistics Compass 6: 654672.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 2008. Complement clause types and complementation strategies in typological perspective. In Dixon, R. M. W. and Aikhenvald, A. Y. (eds.), Complementation: A Cross-Linguistic Typology, 148. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 2010. Basic Linguistic Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. and Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (eds.). 2002. Word: a Cross-Linguistic Typology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Đỗ, Thế Dũng, Trần, Thiên Hương and Boulakia, Georges. 1998. Intonation in Vietnamese. In Hirst, D. and Cristo, A. D. (eds.), Intonation Systems: A Survey of Twenty Languages, 395416. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Doan, Thien Thuat and Mai, Ngoc Chu. 1992. Tiếng Dao [Yao language] (translated by Meihua Pan into Chinese, 2013, Publishing House of Minority Nationalities, China). Hà Nôi: Xuá̂t Bàn Khoa Học Xã Hội.Google Scholar
Downer, Gordon B. 1967. Tone-change and tone-shift in White Miao. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 30: 589599.Google Scholar
Driem, George van. 2011. Rice and the Austroasiatic and Hmong-Mien homelands. In Enfield, N. J. (ed.), Dynamics of Human Diversity: The Case of Mainland Southeast Asia, 361390. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Driem, George van. 2013. Trans-Himalayan. In Hill, Nathan and Owen-Smith, Tom (eds.), Trans-Himalayan Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 2003. Word order in Sino-Tibetan languages from a typological and geographical perspective. In Thurgood, Graham and LaPolla, Randy J. (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan Languages, 4355. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. and Haspelmath, Martin (eds.). 2013. The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://wals.info (accessed 30 May 2018).Google Scholar
Edmondson, Jerold A. and Gregerson, Kenneth J. (eds.). 1993. Tonality in Austronesian Languages. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
Edmondson, Jerold A. and Gregerson, Kenneth J. (eds.). 2007. The languages of Vietnam: Mosaics and expansions. Language and Linguistics Compass 1(6): 727749.Google Scholar
Ehrman, Madeleine. 1972. Contemporary Cambodian. Washington, DC: Foreign Service Institute.Google Scholar
Enfield, N. J. 2003. Linguistic Epidemiology: Semantics and Grammar of Language Contact in Mainland Southeast Asia. London: Routledge Curzon.Google Scholar
Enfield, N. J. 2005. Areal linguistics and mainland Southeast Asia. Annual Review of Anthropology 34: 181206.Google Scholar
Enfield, N. J. 2006a. Languages as historical documents: The endangered archive in Laos. South East Asia Research 14(3): 471488.Google Scholar
Enfield, N. J. 2006b. Heterosemy and the grammar-lexicon trade-off. In Ameka, F., Dench, A. and Evans, N. (eds.), Catching Language, 297320. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Enfield, N. J. 2007. A Grammar of Lao (Mouton Grammar Library 38). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Enfield, N. J. 2009. Review of the book Serial Verb Constructions: A Cross-Linguistic Typology ed. by Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald and R. M. W. Dixon. Language 85: 445451. doi:10.1353/lan.0.0124.Google Scholar
Enfield, N. J. 2011a. Dynamics of Human Diversity in Mainland Southeast Asia. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Enfield, N. J. 2011b. Linguistic diversity in mainland Southeast Asia. In Enfield, N. J. (ed.), Dynamics of Human Diversity: The Case of Mainland Southeast Asia, 6380. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Enfield, N. J. 2013. Relationship Thinking: Agency, Enchrony, and Human Sociality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Enfield, N. J. 2015. The Utility of Meaning: What Words Mean and Why. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Enfield, N. J. 2017. Linguistic expression of commands in Lao. In Aikhenvald, A. Y. and Dixon, R. M. W. (eds.), Commands: A Cross-Linguistic Typology, 189205. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Enfield, N. J. and Diffloth, Gérard. 2009. Phonology and sketch grammar of Kri, a Vietic language of Laos. Cahiers de Linguistique – Asie Orientale 38(1): 369.Google Scholar
Fedden, S. and Corbett, G. G.. 2017. Gender and classifiers in concurrent systems: Refining the typology of nominal classification. Glossa 2(1): 34.Google Scholar
Ferlus, M. 1992. Essai de phonétique historique du Khmer (Du milieu du premier millénaire de notre ère à l’époque actuelle). Mon-Khmer Studies 21: 5789.Google Scholar
Fix, Alan. 2011. Origin of genetic diversity among Malaysian Orang Asli: An alternative to the demic diffusion model. In Enfield, N. J. (ed.), Dynamics of Human Diversity: The Case of Mainland Southeast Asia, 277291. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Foley, William A. and Olson, Mike. 1985. Clausehood and verb serialization. In Nichols, Johanna (ed.), Grammar Inside and Outside the Clause, 1760. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fuller, Judith Wheaton. 1985. Topic and Comment in Hmong. PhD dissertation, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Gage, William W. 1987. Vietnamese in Mon-Khmer perspective. In Ratanakul, S., Thomas, D. and Suwilai, P. (eds.), Southeast Asian Studies Presented to Andre-G. Haudricourt, 493524. Bangkok: Mahidol University.Google Scholar
Gai, Xingzhi. 2002. A Study of Tanglang. Beijing: The Nationalities Press.Google Scholar
Yongqi, Gao. 2004. Buxing yu yan jiu / 布兴语研究 [A study of the Buxing language]. Beijing: Min zu chu ban she / 民族出版社.Google Scholar
Gedney, W. J. 1989. A checklist for determining tones in Tai dialects. In Bickner, R. J., Hartmann, J., Hudak, T. J. and Peyasantiwong, P. (eds.), Selected Papers on Comparative Tai Studies, 191206. Center for South and Southeast Asian Studies, the University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Giaphong, Suchada. 2004. Plang Grammar as Spoken in Huay Namkhun Village, Chiang Rai Province. MA thesis, Mahidol University, Bangkok.Google Scholar
Gil, David. 2005. Word order without syntactic categories: How Riau Indonesian does it. In Carnie, A., Harley, H. and Dooley, S. A. (eds.), Verb First: On the Syntax of Verb-Initial Languages, 243263. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Gil, David. 2015. The Mekong-Mamberamo linguistic area. In Enfield, N. J. and Comrie, Bernard (eds.), The Languages of Mainland Southeast Asia: The State of the Art, 266355. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Goddard, Cliff. 2005. The Languages of East and Southeast Asia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gomi, Taro. 1989. An Illustrated Dictionary of Japanese Onomatopoeic Expressions (translated by J. Turrent). Tokyo: Japan Times.Google Scholar
Grant, Anthony and Sidwell, Paul. 2005. Chamic and Beyond: Studies in Mainland Austronesian Languages. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Gregerson, Kenneth J. 1976. Tongue-root and register in Mon-Khmer. In Jenner, P. (ed.), Austroasiatic Studies I, 323–66. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i.Google Scholar
Gregerson, Kenneth J. 1979. Predicate and Argument in Rengao Grammar. Dallas, TX: University of Texas at Arlington, SIL.Google Scholar
Gregerson, Kenneth J. and Smith, Kenneth D.. 1973. The development of Tơdrah register. Mon-Khmer Studies 4:143184.Google Scholar
Grinevald, Colette. 2000. A morphosyntactic typology of classifiers. In Senft, Gunter (ed.), Systems of Nominal Classification, 5092. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guion, S. G. and Wayland, R. P.. 2004. Aerodynamic coarticulation in sound change or how onset trills can condition a falling tone. In Agwuele, A., Warren, W. and Park, S.-H. (eds.), Proceedings of the 2003 Texas Linguistic Society Conference, 107115. Sommerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Guo, J. 1993. Hànyǔ Shēngdiào Yǔdiào Chǎnyào yǔ Tànsǔo [The Study and Exploration of Chinese Tone and Intonation]. Beijing: Beijing Language and Culture University Press.Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, Carlos. 2004. The Phonology of Tone and Intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hạ, Kiều Phương. 2010. Prosody of Vietnamese from an interactional perspective: ờ, ừ and vâng in backchannels and requests for information. Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society 3(1): 5676.Google Scholar
Hạ, Kiều Phương. 2012. Prosody in Vietnamese: Intonational Form and Function of Short Utterances in Conversation. Canberra: Asia-Pacific Linguistics (SEAMLES).Google Scholar
Hạ, Kiều Phương. 2013. Prosodic means in repair initiation as an activity in Northern Vietnamese conversation. In Hole, D. and Löbel, E. (eds.), Linguistics of Vietnamese: an International Survey, 3554. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hạ, Kiều Phương and Grice, Martine. 2010. Modelling the interaction of intonation and lexical tone in Vietnamese. Paper presented at Speech Prosody 2010, Chicago, 2010.Google Scholar
Haas, Mary R. 1942. The use of numeral classifiers in Thai. Language 18: 201205.Google Scholar
Haas, Mary R. 1964. Thai–English Student’s Dictionary. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Haas, Mary R. 1969. Sibling terms as used by marriage partners. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 25(3): 228235.Google Scholar
Haiman, John. 1983. Iconic and economic motivation. Language 59: 781819.Google Scholar
Haiman, John. 1985. Natural Syntax: Iconicity and Erosion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hajek, John. 1998. Kenaboi: An extinct unclassified language of the Malay Peninsula. Mon-Khmer Studies 28: 137149.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, R.. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hansson, Inga-Lill. 2003. Akha. In Thurgood, Graham and LaPolla, Randy J. (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan Languages, 236251. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin and Sims, Andrea D.. 2010. Understanding Morphology (2nd edn.). London: Hodder Education.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin, Dryer, Matthew S., Gil, David and Comrie, Bernard (eds.). 2005. The World Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haudricourt, André-Georges. 1954. De l’origine des tones en Vietnamien. Journal Asiatique 242: 6982.Google Scholar
Haudricourt, André-Georges. 1965. Les mutations consonantiques et les occlusives initiales en mon-khmer. Bulletin de la Société Linguistique de Paris 60: 160172.Google Scholar
Hayes, L. V. H. 1984. The register systems of Thavung. Mon-Khmer Studies 12: 91122.Google Scholar
He, Diyong. 1993. Kèjiā Fāngyán Yǔfǎ Yánjiū [A study of Hakka grammar]. Xiamen: Xiamen University Press.Google Scholar
Headley, R. K. 1998. Cham evidence for Khmer sound changes. Pacific Linguistics. Series A. Occasional Papers 89: 2129.Google Scholar
Heimbach, Ernest E. 1979. White Hmong-English Dictionary. Revised edition. (Linguistic Series IV, Data Paper no. 75, Southeast Asia Program, Cornell University). Ithaca, NY: Southeast Asia Program.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 1997. Possession: Cognitive Sources, Forces and Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Henderson, Eugénie. J. A. 1952. The main features of Cambodian pronunciation. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 14: 149174.Google Scholar
Henderson, Eugénie. J. A. 1965. The topography of certain phonetic and morphological characteristics of South East Asian languages. Lingua 15: 400434.Google Scholar
Henderson, Eugénie. J. A. 1967. Grammar and tone in South East Asian languages. Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der Karl-Marx-Universität Leipzig 16(1/2): 171178.Google Scholar
Higham, C. 2002. Early Cultures of Mainland Southeast Asia. Bangkok: River Books.Google Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. and Schultze-Berndt, Eva (eds.). 2005. Secondary Predication and Adverbial Modification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hoang, Tuệ, Văn Lợi, Nguyễn, Văn Phúc, Ðoàn and Phan, Xuân Thành. 1986. Sách Học Tiếng Bru Vân Kiều [A text to study the Bru language]. Hanoi: Ủy Ban Nhân Dân.Google Scholar
Hoàng, Văn Hành. 1998. Từ Láy Đôi trong Tiếng Mường [Reduplication in Muong]. In Từ Láy: Những Vấn Đề Còn Để Ngỏ [Reduplication: Remaining Issues], 165193. Hanoi: Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Hoàng, Văn Ma and Tạ, Văn Thông. 1998. Tiếng Bru Vân Kiêu (The Bru-Van Kieu language). Hanoi: Nhà Xuất Bản Khoa Học Xã Hội.Google Scholar
Hombert, J.-M., Ohala, J. J. and Ewan, W. G.. 1979. Phonetic explanations for the development of tones. Language 55: 3758.Google Scholar
House, David, Karlsson, Anastasia, Svantesson, Jan-Olof and Tayanin, Damrong. 2009. The phrase-final accent in Kammu: effects of tone, focus and engagement. Paper presented to INTERSPEECH, 2009.Google Scholar
Huang, Y. 2010. A Grammar of Jingxi Zhuang. Master’s thesis, Guangxi University, China.Google Scholar
Huffman, Franklin E. 1970. Modern Spoken Cambodian. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, Southeast Asia Program.Google Scholar
Huffman, Franklin E. 1976. The register problem in fifteen Mon-Khmer languages. In Jenner, Philip N., Thompson, Laurence C. and Starosta, Stanley (eds.), Austroasiatic Studies, 575590. Honolulu: The University Press of Hawai’i.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. 2001. Tone systems. In Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher and Wolfgang Raible (eds.), Language Typology and Language Universals: An International Handbook (Vol. 2), 13671380. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. 2006. Word-prosodic typology. Phonology 23: 225257.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. and Monaka, Kemmonye C.. 2011. Tonal and non-tonal intonation in Shekgalagari. In Frota, Sonia, Elordieta, Gorka and Prieto, Pilar (eds.), Prosodic Categories: Production, Perception and Comprehension, 267290. Berlin: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. and VanBik., K. 2004. Directional rule application and output problems in Hakha Lai tone. Language and Linguistics 5(4): 821861.Google Scholar
Hyslop, Gwendolyn. 2009. Kurtöp tone: A tonogenetic case study. Lingua 119, 827845.Google Scholar
Hyslop, Gwendolyn, Morey, Stephen and Post, Mark W. (eds.). 2011. North East Indian Linguistics Vol. 3. New Delhi: Cambridge University Press India.Google Scholar
Hyslop, Gwendolyn, Morey, Stephen and Post, Mark W. (eds.). 2012. North East Indian Linguistics Vol. 4. New Delhi: Cambridge University Press India.Google Scholar
Hyslop, Gwendolyn, Morey, Stephen and Post, Mark W. (eds.). 2013. North East Indian Linguistics Vol. 5. New Delhi: Cambridge University Press India.Google Scholar
Iwasaki, Shoichi and Horie, Preeya Ingkaphirom. 2005. A Reference Grammar of Thai. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jaisser, A. C. 1984. Complementation in Hmong. Unpublished MA thesis, San Diego State University.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1971. Shifters, verbals categories, and the Russian verb. In Jakobson, R. (ed.), Selected Writings II: Word and Language, 41–58. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Jarkey, Nerida. 2006. Complement clause types and complementation strategies in White Hmong. In Dixon, R. M. W. and Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (eds.), Complementation: A Cross-Linguistic Typology, 115–36. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jarkey, Nerida. 2015. Serial Verbs in White Hmong. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Jenny, Mathias. 2015. The far West of Southeast Asia: ‘Give’ and ‘get’ in the languages of Myanmar. In Enfield, Nick J. and Comrie, Bernard (eds.), Languages of Mainland Southeast Asia, 155208. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Jenny, Mathias and Sidwell, Paul (eds.). 2015. Handbook of the Austroasiatic Languages. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Jenny, Mathias, Weber, Tobias and Weymuth, Rachel. 2015. The Austroasiatic Languages: A Typological Overview. In Jenny, Mathias and Sidwell, Paul (eds.), The Handbook of Austroasiatic Languages, 13143. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Jones, Robert B. 1970. Classifier constructions in Southeast Asia. Journal of the American Oriental Society 90(1): 112.Google Scholar
Jonsson, Hjorleifur. 2011. Ethnology and the issue of human diversity in mainland Southeast Asia. In Enfield, N. J. (ed.), Dynamics of Human Diversity: The Case of Mainland Southeast Asia, 109122. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Jonsson, Hjorleifur. 2014. Slow Anthropology: Negotiating Difference with the Iu Mien. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Southeast Asia Program Publications.Google Scholar
Kang, Zhongde. 2009. Judu Gelao Reference Grammar. PhD thesis, Minzu University of China, Beijing.Google Scholar
Karlgren, Bernhard. 1915. Etudes sur la phonologie Chinoise. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Karlsson, Anastasia, House, David, Svantesson, Jan-Olof and Tayanin, Damrong. 2007. Prosodic phrasing in tonal and non-tonal dialects of Kammu. Paper presented to the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 2007.Google Scholar
Karlsson, Anastasia, House, David, Svantesson, Jan-Olof and Tayanin, Damrong. 2010. Influence of lexical tones on intonation in Kammu. Paper presented to the INTERSPEECH, 2010.Google Scholar
Karlsson, Anastasia, House, David and Svantesson, J.-O.. 2012. Intonation adapts to lexical tone: the case of Kammu. Phonetica 69: 2847.Google Scholar
Kato, A. 2003. Pwo Karen. In Thurgood, Graham and LaPolla, Randy J. (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan Languages, 632648. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward L. and Comrie, Bernard. 1977. Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 8(1): 63100.Google Scholar
Keller, Charles. 1976. A Grammatical Sketch of Brao, a Mon-Khmer Language. Grand Forks, ND: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Kerr, A. D. 1972. Lao-English Dictionary. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Kirby, J. P. 2014a. Incipient tonogenesis in Phnom Penh Khmer: Acoustic and perceptual studies. Journal of Phonetics 43: 6985.Google Scholar
Kirby, J. P. 2014b. Incipient tonogenesis in Phnom Penh Khmer: Computational studies. Laboratory Phonology-Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology 5(1): 195230.Google Scholar
Kirby, J. and Brunelle, M.. 2017. Southeast Asian tone in areal perspective. In Hickey, R. (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Areal Linguistics, 703731. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kölver, Ulrike. 1991. Local prepositions and serial verb constructions in Thai. In Seiler, Hansjakob and Premper, Waldfried (eds.), Partizipation: das sprachliche Erfassen von Sachverhalten, 485508. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Kosaka, Ryuichi. 2000. A Descriptive Study of the Lachi Language: Syntactic Description, Historical Reconstruction and Genetic Relation. PhD dissertation, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.Google Scholar
Kratochvíl, Paul. 1968. The Chinese Language Today: Features of an Emerging Standard. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Kruspe, Nicole. 2004. A Grammar of Semelai. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kunyot, Taweesak. 1984. General characteristics of Hmong Njua grammar. MA thesis, Mahidol University.Google Scholar
Kwok, Helen. 1984. Sentence Particles in Cantonese. Hong Kong: Centre of Asian Studies, University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert. 1996. Intonational Phonology (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 79). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
LaPolla, R. J. 1992. Anti-ergative marking in Tibeto-Burman. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 15(1): 19.Google Scholar
LaPolla, R. J. 1994. On the change to verb-medial word order in proto-Chinese: Evidence from Tibeto-Burman. In H. Kitamura, T. Nishida and Y. Nagano (eds.), Current issues in Sino-Tibetan linguistics, 98–104. Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology.Google Scholar
LaPolla, R. J. 1995. Ergative marking in Tibeto-Burman. In Nishi, Yoshio, Matisoff, James A. and Nagano, Yasuhiko (eds.), New Horizons in Tibeto-Burman Morpho-Syntax (Senri Ethnological Studies 41), 189228. Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology.Google Scholar
LaPolla, R. J. 2003. Overview of Sino-Tibetan Syntax. In Thurgood, Graham and LaPolla, Randy J. (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan Languages, 2242. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Larish, Michael D. 2005. Moken and Moklen. In Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. and Adelaar, Alexander (eds.), The Austronesian Languages of Asia and Madagascar, 513533. London: RoutledgeCurzon.Google Scholar
Lee, Ernest Wilson. 1966. Proto-Chamic Phonologic Word and Vocabulary. PhD dissertation, Indiana University.Google Scholar
Lee, Ernest Wilson. 1996. Bipartite negatives in Chamic. Mon-Khmer Studies 26: 291317.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C., Cutfield, S., Dunn, M., Enfield, N. J. and Meira, S. (eds.). 2018. Demonstratives in Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Li, Charles, N. and Thompson, Sandra A.. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Li, Daqin. 2003. A Study of Geman. Beijing: The Nationalities Press.Google Scholar
Li, Daqin. 2004. Sulong Yu Yan Jiu [A Study of Sulong]. Beijing: Minzu Chubanshe.Google Scholar
Li, Jinfang. 2008. Chadong, a newly-discovered Kam-Sui language in northern Guangxi. In Diller, A. V. N, Edmondson, Jerold A. and Luo, Yongxian (eds.), The Tai-Kadai Languages, 509584. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Li, Xuping. 2013. Numeral Classifiers in Chinese: The Syntax-Semantics Interface (Trends in linguistics: Studies and monographs 250). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Li, Y. C. and Yip, M.. 1979. Ba construction and ergativity in Chinese. In Plank, F. (ed.), Ergativity: Towards a Theory of Grammatical Relations, 103114. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Li, Yongsui. 2003. A Study of Sangkong. Beijing: The Nationalities Press.Google Scholar
Lidz, Liberty A. 2010. A Descriptive Grammar of Yongning Na (Mosuo). PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Liem, Nguyen Dang. 1970. Four-Syllable Idiomatic Expressions in Vietnamese. Canberra: Department of Linguistics, Australian National University.Google Scholar
Lin, P. T. 2015. Taiwanese Grammar: A Concise Reference. Greenhorn Media. Ebook: ISBN 978-0-9963982-1-3.Google Scholar
Liu, H. 2016. Yuèběi Rǔyuán Guòshān Miǎnyǔ Yánjiū [A study of Yuebei Ruyuan Guoshan Mien]. Beijing: Culture and Art Publishing House.Google Scholar
Liu, L. 2013. Analysis of ba marker in Chinese. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 3(12): 2227.Google Scholar
Liu, Yulan (Thanyalak Saeliao). 2012. Thailand Mien Reference Grammar. PhD thesis, Minzu University of China, Beijing.Google Scholar
Long, Yaohong and Zheng, Guoqiao. 1998. The Dong Language in Guizhou Province, China. (Publications in Linguistics, 126.) Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics and the University of Texas at Arlington. (Translated from Chinese by D. Norman Geary.)Google Scholar
Lu, Tian Qiao. 2008. A Grammar of Maonan. Boca Raton, FL: Universal Publishers.Google Scholar
Lucey-Weinhold, Meredith. 2011. Serial verb constructions in Sgaw Karen: A comparison of Karenic VP structures. In Brunelle, Marc (ed.), Sgaw Karen Papers: Presented to Nimrod Andrew (Papers written for the course LIN 4370/7911 Field Methods (Fall 2010), Instructor: Marc Brunelle), 7684. Canada: University of Ottawa.Google Scholar
Luke, K. K. 1990. Utterance Particles in Cantonese Conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Luksaneeyanawin, Sudaporn. 1998. Intonation in Thai. In Hirst, D. and Cristo, A. D. (eds.), Intonation Systems, 376–94. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Luo, Yongxian. 2008. Zhuang. In Diller, A. V. N., Edmondson, Jerold A. and Luo, Yongxian (eds.), The Tai-Kadai languages, 317377. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Luong, H. V. 1988. Discursive practices and power structure: Person-referring forms and sociopolitical struggles in colonial Vietnam. American Ethnologist 15(2): 239253.Google Scholar
Luong, H. V. 1990. Discursive Practices and Linguistic Meanings: The Vietnamese System of Person Reference. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Lutz-Hughes, M. 2016. Defining Serial Verb Constructions in Kri. Honours dissertation, The University of Sydney.Google Scholar
Lyman, Thomas Amis. 1974. Dictionary of Mong Njua, a Miao (Meo) Language of Southeast Asia (Janua Linguarum. Series Practica, 123). The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lyman, Thomas Amis. 1979. Grammar of Mong Njua (Green Miao): A Descriptive Linguistic Study. Sattley, CA: Blue Oak Press.Google Scholar
Maddieson, Ian. 2013. Consonant Inventories. In Dryer, Matthew S. and Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://wals.info/chapter/1, accessed 30 May 2018).Google Scholar
Manley, Timothy McLemore. 1972. Outline of Sre Structure (Oceanic Linguistics Special Publication No. 12). Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
Mao, Zongwu and Li, Yunbing. 2002. A Study of Jiongnai. Beijing: Central Nationalities University Press.Google Scholar
Mao, Zongwu and Li, Yunbing. 2007. Younuoyu Yanjiu [A Study of Younuo]. Beijing: Minzu University of China Publishing House.Google Scholar
Maspéro, Henri. 1912. Étude sur la phonétique historique de la langue annamite: les initiales. Bulletin de l’Ecole Française d’Extrême-Orient 12: 1124.Google Scholar
Matisoff, James A. 1973a. The Grammar of Lahu. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Matisoff, James A. 1973b. Tonogenesis in Southeast Asia. In Hyman, Larry M. (ed.), Southern California Occasional Papers in Linguistics, No. 1, 7295. Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California.Google Scholar
Matisoff, James A. 1991a. Areal and universal dimensions of grammatization in Lahu. In Closs Traugott, Elizabeth and Heine, Bernd (eds.), Approaches to Grammaticalization, 383453. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Matisoff, James A. 1991b. Sino-Tibetan linguistics: Present state and future prospects. Annual Review of Anthropology 20: 469504.Google Scholar
Matisoff, James A. 1991c. Endangered languages of mainland Southeast Asia. In Robins, Robert J. and Uhlenbeck, Eugenius M. (eds.), Endangered Languages, 189118. London: Berg.Google Scholar
Matisoff, James A. 1994. Tone, intonation, and sound symbolism in Lahu: Loading the syllable canon. In Hinton, Leanne, Nichols, Johanna and Ohala, John J. (eds.), Sound Symbolism, 115129. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Matisoff, James A. 1998. Tibeto-Burman tonology in an areal context. In Proceedings of the Symposium Crosslinguistic Studies of Tonal Phenomena: Tonogenesis, Japanese Accentology, and Other Topics, 331. Tokyo: Tokyo University of Foreign Studies, Institute for the Study of Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa.Google Scholar
Matisoff, James A. 2000. Tibeto-Burman tonology in an areal context. In The Fifth International Symposium on Languages and Linguistics, 85151. Ho Chi Minh City: Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City University of Social Sciences and Humanities.Google Scholar
Matisoff, James A. 2001. Genetic versus contact relationship: Prosodic diffusability in Southeast Asian languages. In Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and Dixon, R. M. W. (eds.), Areal Diffusion and Genetic Inheritance: Problems in Comparative Linguistics, 291327. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Matisoff, James A. 2003a. Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Matisoff, James A. 2003b. Lahu. In Thurgood, Graham and LaPolla, Randy J. (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan Languages, 208221. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Matisoff, James A. 2015. Re-examining the genetic position of Jingpho: Putting flesh on the bones of the Jingpho/Luish relationship. In Enfield, N. J. and Comrie, Bernard (eds.). The Languages of Mainland Southeast Asia: The State of the Art, 111151. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Matthews, S. and Yip, V. 1994. Cantonese: A Comprehensive Grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mayuree, Thawornpat. 2006. Gong: An Endangered Language of Thailand. PhD dissertation, Mahidol University, Bangkok.Google Scholar
Michaud, Jean (ed.). 2010. Editorial – Zomia and beyond [Special Issue]. Journal of Global History 5(2): 187214.Google Scholar
Milne, Leslie. 1921. An Elementary Palaung Grammar. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Morey, Stephen. 2010. Turung: A Variety of Singpho Language Spoken in Assam. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Morey, Stephen. 2013. The marking of noun phrases: Some observations on the languages of North East India. In Hyslop, G., Morey, S. and Post, M. (eds.), North East Indian Linguistics, Vol. 5, 169191. Delhi: Cambridge University Press, India.Google Scholar
Morey, Stephen and Post, M. W. (eds.). 2008. North East Indian Linguistics (Vol. 1). New Delhi: Cambridge University Press India.Google Scholar
Morey, Stephen and Post, M. W. (eds.). 2010. North East Indian Linguistics (Vol. 2). New Delhi: Cambridge University Press India.Google Scholar
Mortensen, D. 2004. The Development of tone sandhi in Western Hmongic: A New Hypothesis. MS, University of California, Berkeley. www.davidmortensen.org/papers/development_whmongic_tone_sandhi.pdf (accessed 30 May 2018).Google Scholar
Mottin, Jean. 1978. Eléments de grammaire hmong blanc. Bangkok: Don Bosco Press.Google Scholar
Muysken, Pieter (ed.). 2008. From Linguistic Areas to Areal Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Namkung, J. 1996. Phonological Inventories of Tibeto-Burman Languages. Sino-Tibetan Etymological Dictionary and Thesaurus Project, Center for Southeast Asia Studies, University of California.Google Scholar
Neng, Yang. 1987. Hmoob Thaib Teb. Haiv Hmoob 3(2): 3637.Google Scholar
Nguyễn, Hữu Hoành and Nguyễn, Văn Lợi. 1998. Tiếng Katu [The Katu language]. Hanoi: Nhà Xuất Bản Khoa Học Xã Hội.Google Scholar
Nguyễn, Thị Thiên Hương and Boulakia, George. 1999. Another look at Vietnamese intonation. In John J. Ohala, Yoko Hasegawa, Manjari Ohala, Daniel Granville and Ashlee C. Bailey (eds.), Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences: 23992402. ICPhS Archive, www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphs/icphs1999.Google Scholar
Nguyễn, Văn Lợi, Ðoàn, Văn Phúc and Phan, Xuân Thành. 1986. Sách học tiếng Pakôh-Taôih [Text for studying Pakoh-Taoih]. Hà Nội: Ủy Ban Nhân Dân, Tỉnh Bình Trị Thiên (The People’s Committee, Binh Tri Thien Province).Google Scholar
Nguyển, Văn Lợi, Nguyển, Hửu Hoành and Tạ, Văn Thông. 2008. Tiếng Mảng (The Mang Language). Hà Nội: Nhà Xuất Bản Khoa Học Hà Nội.Google Scholar
Nonaka, Angela M. 2004. The forgotten endangered languages: Lessons on the importance of remembering from Thailand’s Ban Khor Sign Language. Language in Society 33(5): 737767.Google Scholar
Norman, Jerry. 1988. Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O’Connor, Richard A. 1995. Agricultural change and ethnic succession in Southeast Asian states: A case for regional anthropology. The Journal of Asian Studies 54(4): 968996.Google Scholar
Okell, John. 1969. A Reference Grammar of Colloquial Burmese. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ostapirat, Weera. 2008. The Hlai language. In Diller, A. V. N., Edmondson, Jerold A. and Luo, Yongxian (eds.), The Tai-Kadai languages, 623652. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ouyang, Jueya and Zheng, Yiqing. 1983. The Huihui speech (Hainan Cham) of Hui nationality in Ya County, Hainan. Minzu Yuwen 1:3040.Google Scholar
Payne, Thomas E. 2017. Morphological typology. In Aikhenvald, Alexandra and Dixon, R. M. W. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Typology, 3977. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pe, H. 1965. A re-examination of Burmese “classifiers”. Lingua 15: 163185.Google Scholar
Perkins, Revere Dale. 1992. Deixis, Grammar and Culture. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Peterson, David A. 2003. Hakha Lai. In Thurgood, Graham and LaPolla, Randy J. (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan Languages, 409426. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Phattharathanit, Srichomthong. 2012. Identity maintenance in Lanna (Northern Thai). Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society 5: 6784.Google Scholar
Phillips, Richard. 1973. A Mnong pedagogical grammar: The verb phrase and constructions with two or more verbs. Mon-Khmer Studies 4: 129138.Google Scholar
Pittayaporn, Pittayawat. 2007. Prosody of final particles in Thai: interaction between lexical tones and boundary tones. Paper presented to the International Workshop on ‘Intonation Phonology: Understudied or Fieldwork Languages’, Saarbrücken, 2007.Google Scholar
Pittayaporn, Pittayawat. 2009a. The Phonology of Proto-Southwestern-Thai. PhD dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Pittayaporn, Pittayawat. 2009b. Proto-Southwestern-Thai: A new reconstruction. Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society 2: 119143.Google Scholar
Pittayaporn, Pittayawat. 2015. Typologizing sesquisyllabicity: The role of structural analysis in the study of linguistic diversity in mainland Southeast Asia. In Enfield, N. J. and Comrie, Bernard (eds.), The Languages of Mainland Southeast Asia: the State of the Art, 500528. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ploykaew, Pornsawan. 2001. Samre Grammar. PhD dissertation, Mahidol University doctoral dissertation, Bangkok.Google Scholar
Post, Mark W. 2008. Adjectives in Thai: Implications for a functionalist typology of word classes. Linguistic Typology 12(3): 339381.Google Scholar
Post, Mark W. 2011. Prosody and typological drift in Austroasiatic and Tibeto-Burman: Against ‘Indosphere’ and ‘Sinosphere’. In Srichampa, S., Sidwell, P. and Gregerson, K. J. (eds.), Austroasiatic Studies: Papers from International Conference on Austroasiatic Linguistics (ICAAL4) [Mon-Khmer Studies Special Issue 3], 198211. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Post, Mark W. 2015. Morphosyntactic reconstruction in an areal-historical context: A pre-historical relationship between North East India and mainland Southeast Asia? In Enfield, N. J. and Comrie, Bernard (eds.), The Languages of Mainland Southeast Asia: the State of the Art, 209265. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Preecha, Sukgasame. 1993. Correlates of the register complex in Kuay. Mon-Khmer Studies 22: 245251.Google Scholar
Pulleyblank, Edwin George. 1970. Late Middle Chinese, Part I. Asia Major 15: 197239.Google Scholar
Pulleyblank, Edwin George. 1971. Late Middle Chinese, Part II. Asia Major 16: 121166.Google Scholar
Pulleyblank, Edwin George. 1984. Middle Chinese: A Study in Historical Phonology. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Pulu, Jatan. 1978. Idu Phrase Book. Shillong: Directorate of Information and Public Relations, Arunachal Pradesh.Google Scholar
Ramsey, S. Robert. 1987. The Languages of China. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ratanakul, Suriya. 1986. Thai-Sgaw Karen Dictionary (2 volumes). Bangkok: Institute of Language and Culture for Rural Development.Google Scholar
Ratanakul, Suriya. 1998. Numeral classifiers in Sgaw Karen. Mon-Khmer Studies 28, 101113.Google Scholar
Ratanakul, Suriya. 2001. Adverbs in Sgaw Karen. The Mon-Khmer Studies Journal 31: 127134.Google Scholar
Ratliff, Martha. 1987. Tone sandhi compounding in White Hmong. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 10(2): 71105.Google Scholar
Ratliff, Martha. 1990. The influence of geographical change on grammar: The case of Hmong spatial deictics. Paper presented at the 23rd International Conference on Sino-Tibetan Languages and Linguistics, University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
Ratliff, Martha. 1992. Meaningful Tone: A Study of Tonal Morphology in Compounds, Form Classes, and Expressive Phrases in White Hmong. Dekalb, IL: Northern Illinois University, Center for Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Ratliff, Martha. 2010. Hmong-Mien Language History (Studies in Language Change 8). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Ratliff, Martha. 2015a. Word-initial prenasalization in Southeast Asia: A historical perspective. In Enfield, N. J. and Comrie, Bernard (eds.), The Languages of Mainland Southeast Asia: The State of the Art, 3150. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ratliff, Martha. 2015b. Tonoexodus, tonogenesis, and tone change. In Patrick Honeybone and Joseph Salmons (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Historical Phonology, 246–261. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Riddle, E. M. 1993. The relative marker uas in Hmong. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Berman Area 16(2): 5768.Google Scholar
Ruey, Yih-fu and Tung-kuei, Kuan. 1962. Chuannan Yaqiao Miao de hun sang lisu [Marriage and mortuary customs of the Magpie Miao, Southern Szechuan, China]. Academia Sinica, the Institute of History and Philology Monographs Series A, no. 23. Taipei: Academis Sinica. (Unpublished translation of introduction to glossary by Jiang Zixin.)Google Scholar
Sadock, Jerrold M. and Zwicky, Arnold M.. 1985. Speech acts distinctions in syntax. In Shopen, Timothy (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description, 155196. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sagart, Laurent. 1999. The Roots of Old Chinese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Sagart, Laurent. 2011. The Austroasiatics: East to west or west to east? In Enfield, N. J. (ed.), Dynamics of Human Diversity: The Case of Mainland Southeast Asia, 345359. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Sagart, Laurent, Blench, Roger and Sanchez-Mazas, A. (eds.). 2005. The Peopling of East Asia: Putting Together Archaeology, Linguistics and Genetics. New York: RoutledgeCurzon.Google Scholar
Samarin, William J. 1952. Intonation in tone languages. African Studies 11(2): 8082.Google Scholar
Samarin, William J. 1970. Inventory and choice in expressive language. Word 26: 153169.Google Scholar
Samarina, Irina. 2011. Jazyki gelao: Materialy k sopostavitel’nomu slovarju kadajskich jazykov [Gael Languages: Materials for a Comparative Dictionary of Kadai Languages]. Moscow: Academia.Google Scholar
Sapir, E. 1921. Language: An Introduction to the Study of Speech. New York: Harcourt Brace & Co.Google Scholar
Saul, J. E. 1964. Classifiers in Núng. Lingua 13: 278–90.Google Scholar
Schendel, Willem van. 2002. Geographies of knowing, geographies of ignorance: jumping scale in Southeast Asia. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 20(6): 647668.Google Scholar
Scott, James C. 2009. The Art of Not Being Governed: An Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Seiler, Hansjakob. 1983. Possession as an Operational Dimension of Language. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Seng Mai, Ma. 2012. A Descriptive Grammar of Wa. MA thesis, Payap University, Chiang Mai.Google Scholar
Shee, Naw Hsar. 2008. A Descriptive Grammar of Geba Karen. MA thesis, Payap University, Chiang Mai.Google Scholar
Shen, X. 1989. Interplay of the four citation tones and intonation in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 17(1): 6174.Google Scholar
Shintani, Tadahiko. 2008. The Palaung Language: The Comparative Lexicon of Its Southern Dialects. Tokyo: Research Institute for Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa (ILCCA).Google Scholar
Shorto, H. L. 1960. Word and syllable pattern in Palaung. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 23(3): 544557.Google Scholar
Shorto, H. L. 2006. A Mon-Khmer Comparative Dictionary (edited by Paul Sidwell). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Sidnell, Jack and Shohet, Merav. 2013. The problem of peers in Vietnamese interaction. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 19(3): 618638.Google Scholar
Sidwell, Paul. 2006. Dating the separation of Acehnese and Chamic by etymological analysis of the Aceh-Chamic lexicon. Mon-Khmer Studies 36: 187206.Google Scholar
Sidwell, Paul. 2008. Issues in the morphological reconstruction of Proto-Mon-Khmer. In Bowern, Claire, Evans, Bethwyn and Miceli, Luisa (eds.), Morphology and Language History: In honour of Harold Koch, 251268. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Sidwell, Paul. 2009. Proto-Mon-Khmer vocalism: Moving on from Shorto’s ‘Alternances’. Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society 1: 205214.Google Scholar
Sidwell, Paul. 2013. Southeast Asian Mainland: Linguistic history. In Bellwood, Peter (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Global Human Migration (Vol. 1: Prehistory), 259268. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sidwell, Paul. 2015a. Austroasiatic classification. In Jenny, Mathias and Sidwell, Paul (eds.), The Handbook of Austroasiatic Languages, 144220. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Sidwell, Paul. 2015b. Local drift and areal convergence in the restructuring of mainland Southeast Asian languages. In Enfield, N. J. and Comrie, Bernard (eds.), The Languages of Mainland Southeast Asia: The State of the Art, 5181. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Sidwell, Paul and Blench, Roger. 2011. The Austroasiatic Urheimat: the southeastern riverine hypothesis. In Enfield, N. J. (ed.), Dynamics of Human Diversity: The Case of Mainland Southeast Asia, 315343. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Simpson, Andrew (ed.). 2007. Language and National Identity in Asia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, K. D. 1979. Sedang Grammar. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
So-Hartmann, H. 2009. A Descriptive Grammar of Daai Chin, STEDT Monograph 7, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Söderberg, Sofia. 2006. The Semantic Domains of Numeral Classifiers in Kammu. PhD Thesis, Lund University, Centre for Languages and Literature.Google Scholar
Solnit, D. 1997. Eastern Kayah Li: Grammar, Texts, Glossary. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
Song, J. J. (ed.). 2011. The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Typology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sophana, Srichampa. 2008. Patterns of polite expressions in Vietnamese. The Mon-Khmer Studies Journal 38: 117147.Google Scholar
Sousa, Hilário de. The Far Southern Sinitic languages as part of mainland Southeast Asia. In Enfield, N. J. and Comrie, Bernard (eds.), The Languages of Mainland Southeast Asia: The State of the Art, 356439. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Srichampa, S. 1997. Serial verb constructions in Vietnamese. Mon-Khmer Studies, 27: 137144.Google Scholar
Srisakorn, Preedaporn. 2008. So (Thavung) Grammar. PhD dissertation, Mahidol University, Bangkok.Google Scholar
Stolz, Thomas. 2002. No Sprachbund beyond this line! On the age-old discussion of how to define a linguistic area. In Ramat, Paulo and Stolz, Thomas (eds.), Mediterranean Languages: Paper from the MEDTYP Workshop, Tirrenia, June 2000, 259281. Bochum: Universtätsverlag Dr. N. Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
Suwilai, Premsrirat. 1987. Khmu, a Minority Language of Thailand. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Premsrirat, Suwilai. 1998. Language maintenance and language shift in minority languages of Thailand. In Matsumura, Kazuto (ed.), Studies in Endangered Languages, 191211. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.Google Scholar
Premsrirat, Suwilai. 1999. So (Thavung)-English-Thai glossary Part II. Mon-Khmer Studies 29: 107132.Google Scholar
Premsrirat, Suwilai. 2007. Endangered languages of Thailand. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 186: 7593.Google Scholar
Premsrirat, Suwilai. 2008. Orthography development: A tool for revitalizing and maintaining ethnic minority languages. Journal of Language and Culture 26: 1834.Google Scholar
Premsrirat, Suwilai. 2011. Pearic, a dying branch of Austroasiatic languages and its struggle for survival. In Srichampa, Sophana and Sidwell, Paul (eds.), Austroasiatic Studies: Papers from ICAAL 4, Mon-Khmer Studies Special Issue No. 2. 138153.Google Scholar
Suwilai, Premsrirat and Rojanakul, Nattamon. 2015. Chong. In Jenny, Mathias and Sidwell, Paul (eds.), The Handbook of Austroasiatic Languages, 601640. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Svantesson, J.-O. 1989. Tonogenetic mechanisms in Northern Mon-Khmer. Phonetica 46: 6079.Google Scholar
Svantesson, J.-O. and Holmer, A.. 2015. Kammu. In Jenny, Mathias and Sidwell, Paul (eds.), The Handbook of Austroasiatic Languages, 9551002. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Tarling, N. 1993. The Cambridge History of Southeast Asia: From Early Times to c. 1800 (Vol. 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thoj, Cawv. 1981. Kev tsim neej tshiab hauv Asmeslivkas. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Thomas, David D. 1971. Chrau grammar. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, David D. 1992. On sesquisyllabic structure. Mon-Khmer Studies 21: 207210.Google Scholar
Thomas, G. 2008. An analysis of the Xiamen tone circle. In Abner, Natasha and Bishop, Jason (eds.), Proceedings of the 27th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 422430. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Thompson, Laurence. 1965. A Vietnamese Grammar. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Laurence. 1987. A Vietnamese Reference Grammar. (Mon-Khmer Studies, 13–14.) Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press. (Reprint of A Vietnamese Grammar, Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1965.)Google Scholar
Thongkum, Theraphan L. 1988. The interaction between pitch and phonation type in Mon: Phonetic implications for a theory of tonogenesis. Mon-Khmer Studies 16–17: 1124.Google Scholar
Thongkum, Theraphan L. 1989. An acoustic study of the register complex in Kui (Suai). Mon-Khmer Studies 15: 119.Google Scholar
Thurgood, Graham. 1998. The development of the Chamic vowel system: The interaction of inheritance and borrowing. In Thomas, David (ed.), Papers in Southeast Asian Linguistics No. 15: Further Chamic Studies, 6190. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Thurgood, Graham. 1999. From Ancient Cham to Modern Dialects: Two Thousand Years of Language Contact and Change. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
Thurgood, Graham. 2002. Vietnamese and tonogenesis: Revising the model and the analysis. Diachronica 19(2): 333363.Google Scholar
Thurgood, Graham. 2005. Phan Rang Cham. In Adelaar, K. A. and Himmelmann, N. (eds.), The Austronesian Languages of Asia and Madagascar, 489512. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Thurgood, Graham. 2010. Hainan Cham, Anong, and Eastern Cham: Three languages, three social contexts, three patterns of change. Journal of Language Contact – VARIA 3: 3961.Google Scholar
Thurgood, Graham and LaPolla, Randy J. (eds.). 2003. The Sino-Tibetan Languages. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Thurgood, Graham and LaPolla, Randy J. (eds.). 2017. The Sino-Tibetan Languages (2nd edn.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Thurgood, Graham, Thurgood, Ela and Li, Fengxiang. 2014. A Grammatical Sketch of Hainan Cham: History, Contact, and Phonology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Tooley, M. J. and Shennan, Ian (eds.). 1987. Sea Level Changes. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Trần, Hương Mai. 1967. Tones and Intonation in South Vietnamese. Series A – Occasional Papers #9, Papers in Southeast Asian Linguistics No.1, ed. by Đ. L. Nguyễn, H. M. Trần and D. Dellinger. Canberra: Linguistics Circle of Canberra.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 2011. Sociolinguistic Typology: Social Determinants of Linguistic Complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tun, S. S. H. 2014. Colloquial Burmese: The Complete Course for Beginners. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Umaporn, Sungkaman. 2007. Backchannel response in Mon conversation. Mon-Khmer Studies 37: 6785.Google Scholar
Vittrant, Alice. 2007. Serial Verb Constructions in Burmese. TUL-trajectoire. www.ddl.cnrs.fr/trajectoire/23us23efd5ps/Presentations/Pres_Vittrant091107.pdf (accessed 30 May 2018).Google Scholar
Vittrant, Alice. 2015. Expressing motion: The contribution of Southeast Asian languages with reference to East Asian languages. In Enfield, N. J. and Comrie, Bernard (eds.), The Languages of Mainland Southeast Asia: the State of the Art, 586632. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Vittrant, Alice and Watkins, Justin (eds.). 2018. The Mainland Southeast Asia Linguistic Area. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Vossen, Frens. 2011. The Jespersen Cycle in South-East Asia, Oceania and Australia. Papers of the Linguistic Society of Belgium, Vol. 6.Google Scholar
Wang, Jun and Zheng, Guoqiao. 1980. Mulauyü chienchih [Luo, Yongxian. Trans. 1993. An outline grammar of Mulao]. Canberra: National Thai Studies Centre, Australian National University.Google Scholar
Watkins, Justin (ed.). 2005. Studies in Burmese Linguistics. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Watkins, Justin (ed.). 2013. A first account of tone in Myebon Sumtu Chin. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 36(2): 97127.Google Scholar
Wayesha, Ahsi James. 2010. A Phonological Description of Leinong Naga. MA thesis, Payap University, Chiang Mai.Google Scholar
Wei, Maofan. 2012. Xia’ao Zhuang Reference Grammar. PhD thesis, Shanghai Normal University.Google Scholar
Weidert, Alfons K. 1987. Tibeto-Burman Tonology: A Comparative Account (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, Vol. 54.) Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
White, Joyce C. 2011. Cultural diversity in mainland Southeast Asia: A view from prehistory. In Enfield, N. J. (ed.), Dynamics of Human Diversity: The Case of Mainland Southeast Asia, 946. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Wright, Richard and Ladefoged, Peter. 1994. A phonetic study of Tsou. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 87: 6789.Google Scholar
Yang, T. and Edmonson, J. A.. 2008. Kam. In Diller, A. V. N., Edmondson, Jerold A. and Luo, Yongxian (eds.), The Tai-Kadai Languages, 509584. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Yip, Moira. 2002. Tone. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Yu, Jinzhi. 2010. Aizhai Miao Reference Grammar. PhD thesis, Minzu University of China, Beijing.Google Scholar
Zee, E. and Xu, L.. 2003. Shanghai. In Thurgood, Graham and LaPolla, Randy J. (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan Languages, 131145. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Zhang, J., Lai, Y. and Turnbull-Sailor, C.. 2006. Wug-Testing the ‘Tone Circle’ in Taiwanese. In Baumer, Donald, Montero, David and Scanlon, Michael (eds.), Proceedings of the 25th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 453461. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Zheng, Yiqing. 1997. Huihui Yu Yanjiu [A Study of Cham]. Shanghai: Shanghai Yuandong Chuban She [Shanghai Far East Publishers].Google Scholar
Zhou, Guoyan. 2000. The origin and development of the “disposal” form in Bouyei language. In Burusphat, Somsonge (ed.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Tai Studies, 443456. Bangkok: Institute of Language and Culture for Rural Development.Google Scholar
Zhou, Zhizhi and Yan, Qixiang 周植志 颜其香. 2006. 佤语简志 Wa yu jianzhi [An Outline of the Wa Language]. Beijing: Min zu chu ban she / 民族出版社.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • N. J. Enfield, University of Sydney
  • Book: Mainland Southeast Asian Languages
  • Online publication: 09 November 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139019552.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • N. J. Enfield, University of Sydney
  • Book: Mainland Southeast Asian Languages
  • Online publication: 09 November 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139019552.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • N. J. Enfield, University of Sydney
  • Book: Mainland Southeast Asian Languages
  • Online publication: 09 November 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139019552.008
Available formats
×