Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T07:00:25.767Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Choice principles in constructive and classical set theories

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 March 2017

Zoé Chatzidakis
Affiliation:
Université de Paris VII (Denis Diderot)
Peter Koepke
Affiliation:
Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn
Wolfram Pohlers
Affiliation:
Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Germany
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Logic Colloquium '02 , pp. 299 - 326
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] P., Aczel, The type theoretic interpretation of constructive set theory Logic Colloquium '77 (A. MacIntyre, L. Pacholski, and J Paris, editors), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1978, pp. 55–66.
[2] P., Aczel, The type theoretic interpretation of constructive set theory: choice principles The L. E. J. Brouwer Centenary Symposium (A. S., Troelstra and D., van Dalen, editors), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1982, pp. 1–40.
[3] P., Aczel, The type theoretic interpretation of constructive set theory: inductive definitions Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, VII (R. B., Marcus et al., editors), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1986, pp. 17–49.
[4] P., Aczel and M., Rathjen, Notes on constructive set theory, Technical Report 40, Institut Mittag-Leffler, The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, 2001, http://www.ml.kva.se/preprints/archive2000-2001.php.
[5] J., Barwise, Admissible Sets and Structures, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1975.
[6] M., Beeson, Continuity in intuitionistic set theories Logic Colloquium '78 (M Boffa, D. van Dalen, and K. McAloon, editors), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1979, pp. 1–52.
[7] E., Bishop and D., Bridges, Constructive Analysis, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1985.
[8] A., Blass, Injectivity, projectivity, and the axiom of choice Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 255 (1979), pp. 31–59.
[9] É, Borel,Œuvres de Émil Borel, Centre National de la recherche Scientifique, Paris, 1972.
[10] R., Diaconescu, Axiom of choice and complementation Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 51 (1975), pp. 176–178.
[11] A., Dodd and R., Jensen, The core model Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 20 (1981), no. 1, pp. 43–75.
[12] H., Friedman, Set theoretic foundations for constructive analysis Annals of Mathematics. Second Series, vol. 105 (1977), no. 1, pp. 1–28.
[13] H., Friedman and S., Ščedrov, The lack of definable witnesses and provably recursive functions in intuitionistic set theories Advances in Mathematics, vol. 57 (1985), no. 1, pp. 1–13.
[14] N., Gambino, Types and Sets: A Study on the Jump to Full Impredicativity, Laurea Dissertation, Department of Pure and Applied Mathematics, University of Padua, 1999.
[15] N., Gambino, Heyting-Valued Interpretations for Constructive SetTheory, Department of Computer Science, Manchester University, 2002.
[16] M., Gitik, All uncountable cardinals can be singular Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol. 35 (1980), no. 1-2, pp. 61–88.
[17] P., Howard and J. E., Rubin, Consequences of the Axiom of Choice, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, vol. 59, American Mathematical Society, Providence, 1998.Google Scholar
[18] T., Jech, The Axiom of Choice, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1973.
[19] R. B., Jensen, Independence of the axiom of dependent choices from the countable axiom of choice (abstract) The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 31 (1966), p. 294.
[20] H., Jervell, From the axiom of choice to choice sequences Nordic Journal of Philosophical Logic, vol. 1 (1996), no. 1, pp. 95–98.
[21] P., Martin-Löf, An intuitionistic theory of types: predicative part Logic Colloquium '73 (H. E., Rose and J., Sheperdson, editors), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1975, pp. 73–118.
[22] P., Martin-Löf, Intuitionistic Type Theory, Bibliopolis, Naples, 1984.
[23] D. C., McCarty, Realizability and Recursive Mathematics, Ph.D. thesis, Oxford University, 1984.
[24] I., Moerdijk and E., Palmgren, Type theories, toposes and constructive set theory: predicative aspects of AST Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 114 (2002), no. 1-3, pp. 155–201.
[25] L., Moss, Power set recursion Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 71 (1995), no. 3, pp. 247–306.
[26] J., Myhill, Constructive set theory The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 40 (1975), no. 3, pp. 347–382.
[27] M., Rathjen, Fragments of Kripke-Platek set theory with infinity Proof Theory (P., Aczel, H., Simmons, and S., Wainer, editors), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1992, pp. 251– 273.
[28] M., Rathjen, The Strength of Some Martin-Lof Type Theories, Department of Mathematics, preprint, Ohio State University, 1993.
[29] M., Rathjen, The realm of ordinal analysis Sets and Proofs (S. B., Cooper and J. K., Truss, editors), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999, pp. 219–279.
[30] M., Rathjen, The disjunction and other properties for constructive Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 70 (December 2005), no. 4, pp. 1233–1254.
[31] M., Rathjen, The disjunction and other properties for constructive Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory with choice principles, in preparation.
[32] M., Rathjen, The formulae-as-classes interpretation of constructive set theory Proof Technology and Computation, IOS Press, Amsterdam, Proceedings of the International Summer School Marktoberdorf 2003, to appear.
[33] M., Rathjen and R., Lubarsky, On the regular extension axiom and its variants Mathematical Logic Quarterly, vol. 49 (2003), no. 5, pp. 511–518.
[34] M., Rathjen and S., Tupailo, Characterizing the interpretation of set theory in Martin-Löf type theory, to appear in Annals of Pure and Applied Logic.
[35] M., Rathjen and A., Weiermann, Proof-theoretic investigations on Kruskal's theorem Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 60 (1993), no. 1, pp. 49–88.
[36] A. S., Troelstra and D., van Dalen, Constructivism in Mathematics. Vol. I, II, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1988.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×