Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T09:23:13.630Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Community–state relations in Africa's economic integration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2011

Richard Frimpong Oppong
Affiliation:
Lancaster University
Get access

Summary

From a legal perspective, and beyond issues on the relationship among the African Economic Community (AEC), African Union (AU) and Africa's Regional Economic Communities (RECs), the approach to economic integration adopted by the AEC raises other important issues, which are yet to be addressed in practice and in the discourse on Africa's integration. These include the legal status of community institutions and law within member states’ legal systems, the effectiveness of community institutions as enforcers of community law, the role of the community courts as arbiters of conflicts between and among the constituent legal systems, and the coordination and harmonization of the laws of member states. These issues form part of the more profound and broader problem that bedevils all economic integration processes: what are, or should be, the legal relations between the economic community and the member states? Economic integration results in a juxtaposition of legal systems. These legal systems include that of the organization responsible for the integration process (community), those of the member states and regional organizations, and the international legal system, which often provides the legal basis for the integration initiative. In addition to issues of management, organization and competition, this juxtaposition of legal systems creates legal problems and raises many questions: What is the relation between community and national legal systems? What is the status of national law in the community legal system and vice versa? What are the rules for resolving conflicts of laws between and among these legal systems? Which institution is responsible for resolving such conflicts?

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×