Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T21:38:11.948Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Imagining Law as Film (Representation without Reference?)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2010

Austin Sarat
Affiliation:
Amherst College, Massachusetts
Matthew Anderson
Affiliation:
University of New England, Maine
Cathrine O. Frank
Affiliation:
University of New England, Maine
Get access

Summary

Today we have law on the books, law in action, and now, law in the image…Law lives in images that today saturate our culture and that have a power all their own.

– Austin Sarat

What has film to do with law? Film can be about law, or ostensibly about law. It can reenact famous cases and controversies, or focus on various features of the legal system. Law films can turn viewers into mock jurors, investigators, and advocates. They can show us how the adversarial process reconstructs historic reality inside the courtroom, and how it enacts a dramatic reality of its own. Films can also use any of these topics as a pretext for launching a different sort of story altogether, a melodrama say, or a mystery, in which law serves as no more than a prop or plotting device. Just as law stories may set a story in motion that ultimately has little to do with law itself, the converse is also true. Films not apparently about law may provide insights into analytical methods, social values, and community aspirations that lie at the heart of the legal mind and culture. The quest for justice, and how it goes astray, the clash between vengeance and mercy or between the formality of rules and the free play of equity, the struggle to solve a mystery amid the infinite complexities of human motivation and the recursive contingencies of time and circumstance – each of these themes has a place in the legal process.

Type
Chapter
Information
Law and the Humanities
An Introduction
, pp. 241 - 268
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Sarat, Austin, “Imagining the Law of the Father: Loss, Dread, and Mourning in the Sweet Hereafter,” Law and Society Review 34 (2000) 3, 9, 39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clover, Carol, “Law and the Order of Popular Culture” in Sarat, Austin and Kearns, T. R., eds., Law in the Domains of Culture (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1998), 99–100Google Scholar
Feigenson, Neal, “Accidents as Melodrama,” New York Law School Law Review 43 [1999–2000]: 741Google Scholar
Amsterdam, Anthony and Hertz, Randy, “An Analysis of Closing Arguments to a Jury,” New York Law School Law Review 37 [1992]: 55Google Scholar
Meyer, Philip, “Desperate for Love: Cinematic Influences Upon a Defendant's Closing Argument to a Jury,” Vermont Law Review 18 [1994]: 721Google Scholar
Sherwin, Richard K., When Law Goes Pop (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000) 106–39Google Scholar
Arijon, Daniel, Grammar of the Film Language (Los Angeles: Silman-James Press, 1976)Google Scholar
Bolter, Jay David and Grusin, Richard, Remediation: Understanding New Media (Cambridge: MIT Press, 2000)Google Scholar
Rodowick, D. N., The Virtual Life of Film (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2007) 186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, Robert A., “Story and Transcription in the Trial of John Brown,” Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities 6 (1994) 37Google Scholar
Amsterdam, Anthony and Bruner, Jerome, Minding the Law (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2000)Google Scholar
Gurley, Jessica and Marcus, David K., “The Effects of Neuroimaging and Brain Injury on Insanity Defenses,” Behavioral Sciences and the Law 26 (2008) 85, 95CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cover, Robert, “Nomos and Narrative,” Harvard Law Review 97 (1983) 4Google Scholar
Handelman, Don, Models and Mirrors: Towards an Anthropology of Public Events (New York Berghahn Books, 1998) xi–xiiGoogle Scholar
Sherwin, Richard K., “The Narrative Construction of Legal Reality,” Vermont Law Review 18 (1994) 681Google Scholar
Brooks, Peter and Gewirtz, Paul, Law's Stories: Narrative and Rhetoric in the Law (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1998)Google Scholar
Galloway, Alexander, Gaming: Essays on Algorithmic Culture (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2006) 87Google Scholar
Ulmer, Gregory, “The Object of Post-Criticism,” The Anti-Aesthetic, Foster, Hal, ed. (New York: The New Press, 1983) 92Google Scholar
Scholem, Gershom, ed., The Correspondence of Walter Benjamin and Gershom Scholem 1932– 1940, Rabinbach, Anson, trans. (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1992) 142
Sherwin, Richard K., “Law's Beatitude,” Cardozo Law Review 24 (2003) 683, 685Google Scholar
Sherwin, Richard K., Feigenson, Neal, and Spiesel, Christina, “Law in the Digital Age: How Visual Communication Technologies are Transforming the Practice, Theory, and Teaching of Law,” Boston University Journal of Science and Technology Law 12 (2006): 245–6Google Scholar
Douzinas, Costas and Nead, Lynda, Law and the Image (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999) 19–67Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, Douglas, Lawrence, and Umphry, Martha, eds., Law on the Screen (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2005) 1
Robben, Janine, “The ‘CSI’ Effect: Popular Culture Finds the Justice System,” Oregon State Bulletin 66 (2005): 8, 9Google Scholar
Tyler, Tom, “Viewing CSI and the Threshold of Guilt: Managing Truth and Justice in Reality and Fiction,” Yale Law Journal 115 (2006): 1050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, Douglas, “A New Constitutional Regime: The Juridico-Entertainment Complex,” in Popular Culture and LawSherwin, Richard K., ed. (Hants: Ashgate, 2006) 253–63Google Scholar
Surrette, Ray, “Predator Criminals as Media Icons,” Media, Process, and the Social Construction of Crime, Barak, Gregg, ed. (London: Routledge, 1994) 131Google Scholar
Schmitt, Bernard, Rogers, David, and Vrotsos, Karen, There's No Business That's Not Show Business: Marketing in an Experience Culture (New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2004)Google Scholar
Rusanow, Gretta, Knowledge Management and the Smarter Lawyer (New York: ALM Publishing, 2003)Google Scholar
Ewen, Stuart, PR! A History of Spin (New York: Basic Books, 1996)Google Scholar
Bergman, Paul and Asimow, Michael, Reel Justice (Kansas City: Andrews and McMeel, 1996) xiGoogle Scholar
Lumet, Sidney, Making Movies (New York: Vintage, 1996)Google Scholar
Babcock, Barbara Allen, and Sassoubre, Ticien Marie, “Deliberation in 12 Angry Men,” Chicago-Kent Law Review 82 (2007) 636Google Scholar
Sherwin, Richard K., “Cape Fear: Law's Inversion and Cathartic Justice,” University of San Francisco Law Review 30 (1996) 1023Google Scholar
Papke, David Ray, “12 Angry Men Is Not An Archetype: Reflections on the Jury in Contemporary Popular Culture,” Chicago-Kent Law Review 82 (2007) 735Google Scholar
Weisselberg, Charles, “Good Film, Bad Jury,” Chicago-Kent Law Review 82 (2007) 723Google Scholar
Nomos and Cinema,” University of California Los Angeles Law Review 48 (2001) 1519
Brooks, Peter, “Lawyers, Law, & the Movies: The Hitchcock Cases,” California Law Review 86 (1998) 211, 232Google Scholar
Machura, Stefan, “An Analysis Scheme for Law Films,” University of Baltimore Law Review 4 (2007): 329, 343Google Scholar
Woo, Margaret Y. K., “Law and Discretion in the Contemporary Chinese Courts,” University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review 25 (2003) 665Google Scholar
Greenfield, Steve, Osborn, Guy, and Robson, Peter, Film and the Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2008) 6–11Google Scholar
Elkins, James, “Reading/Teaching Lawyer Films,” Vermont Law Review 28 (2004): 813Google Scholar
Stachenfeld, Avi and Nicholson, Christopher, “Blurred Boundaries: An Analysis of the Close Relationship Between Popular Culture and the Practice of Law,” University of San Francisco Law Review 30 (1996) 903Google Scholar
Meyer, Philip, “Desperate for Love: Cinematic Influences Upon a Defendant's Closing Argument to a Jury,” Vermont Law Review 18 (1994) 721Google Scholar
Elkins, James, “Popular Culture, Legal Films, and Legal Film Critics,” Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 40 (2007) 745, 782Google Scholar
Osborne, John, “Atticus Finch – The End of Honor,” University of San Francisco Law Review 30 (1996) 1139Google Scholar
Sherwin, Richard K., “What Screen Do You Have in Mind?” Studies in Law, Politics, and Society, Sarat, Austin, ed. (Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2008)Google Scholar
Sherwin, Richard K., “Law, Metaphysics, and the New Iconoclasm,” Law Text Culture Vol. 11, (University of Wollongong, 2007) 70–105Google Scholar
Burke, Kenneth, Language as a Symbolic System: Essays on Life, Literature, and Method (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1966) 449Google Scholar
Yanouch, Gustav, Conversations with Kafka (New York: New Directions, 1971) 88–9Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter, “The Work of Art in the Age of Its Reproducibility,” Walter Benjamin: Collected Writings Volume 3 1935–1938, Eiland, Howard and Jennings, Michael, eds. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2002) 101Google Scholar
Kamir, Orit, “Why ‘Law and Film’ and What Does It Actually Mean?” Continuum: Journal of Media and Cultural Studies 19 (2005) 265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, W. J. T., The Reconfigured Eye (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992) 59Google Scholar
Bruner, Jerome, Beyond the Information Given: Studies in the Psychology of Knowing (New York: W. W. Norton & Co., 1973)Google Scholar
Bruner, Jerome, Acts of Meaning (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1990)Google Scholar
Schank, Roger and Abelson, Robert, Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding: An Inquiry into Human Knowledge Structures (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1977)Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, Gerd, Todd, Peter M. and the ,ABC Research Group, Simple Heuristics that Make Us Smart (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000)Google Scholar
Ross, Richard Nisbett and Lee, Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment (New York: Prentice Hall, 1985)Google Scholar
Donovan, Jeremiah, “Some Off-the-Cuff Remarks about Lawyers as Storytellers,” 18 Vermont Law Review18 [1994] 751, 753Google Scholar
Sherwin, Richard K., “Dialects and Dominance: A Study of Rhetorical Fields in the Law of Confessions,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 136 (1988) 729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Vicki, “Prototypes in the Courtroom: Lay Representations of Legal Concepts,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 61 (1991) 857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ries, Al and Trout, Jack, Positioning: The Battle for Your Mind (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1986)Google Scholar
Amsterdam, Anthony G. and Hertz, Randy, “An Analysis of Closing Arguments to a Jury,” New York Law School Law Review 37 (1992): 55Google Scholar
Feigenson, Neal, Legal Blame: How Jurors Think and Talk About Accidents (Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luntz, Frank, Words That Work: It's Not What You Say, It's What People Hear (New York: Hyperion, 2006)Google Scholar
Stevens, Wallace, “The Man with the Blue Guitar” in The Collected Poetry of Wallace Stevens (New York: Vintage, 1990)Google Scholar
Bergman, Ingmar, “The Snakeskin,” Sight and Sound (August 1, 1965)Google Scholar
Deger, Jennifer, Shimmering Screens: Making Media in an Aboriginal Community (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2006) 19Google Scholar
Dempsey, Charles, The Portrayal of Love: Botticelli's Primavera and Humanist Culture at the Time of Lorenzo the Magnificent (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1992)Google Scholar
Gunning, Tom, “An Aesthetic of Astonishment: Early Film and the (In)Credulous Spectator,” Viewing Positions: Ways of Seeing Film, Williams, Linda, ed. (Rutgers, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1995) 114Google Scholar
Douglas, Kevin S., Lyon, David R., and Ogloff, James R. P., “The Impact of Graphic Photographic Evidence on Mock Jurors' Decisions in a Murder Trial: Probative or Prejudicial?” Law and Human Behavior 21 (1997) 485CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barthes, Roland, Camera Lucida: Reflections on Photography (New York: Hill and Wang, 1982) 39Google Scholar
Mnookin, Jennifer L., The Image of Truth: Photographic Evidence and the Power of Analogy, 10 Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities1 (1998) 1, 16–17Google Scholar
Mnookin, Jennifer L. and West, Nancy, “Theaters of Proof: Visual Evidence and the Law in Call Northside 777,” Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities 13 (2001) 329Google Scholar
Culler, Jonathan, The Pursuit of Signs (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2002) 100–18Google Scholar
Sherwin, Neal Feigenson and Richard, “Thinking beyond the shown: implicit inferences in evidence and argument,” Law, Probability, and Risk 6(1–4) (New York: Oxford University Press, 2007) 295–310Google Scholar
Marks, Laura, The Skin of the Film (Durham: Duke University Press, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sobchack, Vivian, Carnal Thoughts: Embodiment and Moving Image Culture (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002)Google Scholar
Marks, David F., “On the Relationship Between Imagery, Body, and Mind,” Imagery: Current DevelopmentsHampson, P. J., Marks, D. F., and Richardson, J. T. E., eds. (London and New York: Routledge, 1990) 1–38Google Scholar
Fleming, David, “Can Pictures be Arguments?” Argumentation and Advocacy 33 (1996) 11–22Google Scholar
Blair, J. Anthony, “The Rhetoric of Visual Arguments,” in Hill, Charles A. and Helmers, Marguerite, Defining Visual Rhetorics (New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2004) 41Google Scholar
Birdsell, David and Groarke, Leo, “Toward A Theory of Visual Argument,” Argumentation and Advocacy 33 (1996) 1–10Google Scholar
Whelan, Darius, “The Bloody Sunday Tribunal Video Simulation,” Visual Practices Across the University, Elkins, James, ed. (Munich: Wilhelm Fink Verlag, Paderborn, 2007) 100Google Scholar
Joseph, Gregory, “A Simplified Approach to Computer-Generated Evidence and Animations,” New York Law School Law Review 43 (1999–2000) 875Google Scholar
Huddy, Leonie and Gunnthorsdottir, Anna, “The Persuasive Effects of Emotive Visual Imagery: Superficial Manipulation of the Product of Passionate Reason?” Political Psychology 21 (2000) 745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feigenson, Neal and Dunn, Meghan, “New Visual Technologies in Court: Directions for Research,” Law and Human Behavior 27 (2003) 109, 110CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kassin, Saul M. and Dunn, Meghan A., “Computer-Animated Displays and the Jury: Facilitative and Prejudicial Effects,” Law and Human Behavior 21 (1997): 269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lederer, Fredric I., “Courtroom Technology and Its Educational Implications,” Virginia Education & Practice 8 (1998): 3Google Scholar
Carney, Brian & Feigenson, Neal, “Visual Persuasion in the Michael Skakel Trial: Enhancing Advocacy through Interactive Media Presentations,” Criminal Justice 19 (2004) 22, 23Google Scholar
Silbey, Jessica, “Judges as film critics: New approaches to film evidence,” University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform 37 (2004): 499Google Scholar
Sherwin, Richard K., “Visual Literacy in Action: Law in the Age of Images,” Visual Literacy, Elkins, James, ed. (New York and London: Routledge, 2008) 190–2Google Scholar
Hamilton, Annette, “The National Picture: Thai Media and Cultural Identity,” Media Worlds: Anthropology on New Terrain, Ginsburg, F., Abu-Lughod, L., and Larkin, B., eds. (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002) 152–70Google Scholar
Sobchack, Vivian, Carnal Thoughts: Embodiment and Moving Image Culture (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2004) 56, 61Google Scholar
Taussig, Michael, Mimesis and Alterity: A Particular History of the Senses (London: Routledge, 1992) 253Google Scholar
Sherwin, Richard K., “Sublime Jurisprudence: On the Ethical Education of the Legal Imagination in Our Time,” Chicago-Kent Law Review 83 (2008) 1157Google Scholar
Kieslowski, Krzysztof's The Decalogue (Poland: Image Entertainment, 1988–89)Google Scholar
Sherwin, Richard K., “Law's Enchantment: The Cinematic Jurisprudence of Kieslowski,” in Freeman, Michael, Law and Popular Culture (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), 87–108Google Scholar
Brown, John Seely and Duguid, Paul, The Social Life of Information (Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 2002)Google Scholar
Wagner, Ann, Images in Law (London: Ashgate Publishing, 2006)Google Scholar
Benkler, Yochai, The Wealth of Networks (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2006)Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice, The Visible and the Invisible (Chicago: Northwestern University Press, 1964)Google Scholar
“the ornament is an end in itself.” Kracauer, Siegfried, The Mass Ornament (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1995) 76Google Scholar
Dibbell, Julian, My Tiny Life: Crime and Passion in a Virtual World (New York: Henry Holt, 1998)Google Scholar
Balkin, Jack and Noveck, Beth, The State of Play: Law, Games, and Virtual Worlds (New York: NYU Press, 2006)Google Scholar
Shirky, Clay, Here Comes Everybody (New York: Penguin Press, 2008)Google Scholar
Toulmin, Stephen, Cosmopolis: The Hidden Agenda of Modernity (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990)Google Scholar
Hayles, N. Katherine, How We Became Posthuman (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999) 2–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Symposium, Picturing Justice: Images of Law and Lawyers in the Visual Media,” University of San Francisco Law Review 30 (1996) 891–1248
Symposium, Law and Popular Culture,” UCLA Law Review 48 (2001) 1293
Symposium, Law in Film/Film in Law,” Vermont Law Review 28 (2004) 797
Symposium, Law and Film,” Legal Studies Forum 24 (2000) 559
Symposium, Documentaries & the Law,” Fordham Intellectual Property Media & Entertainment Law Journal 16 (2006) 707
Machura, Stefan and Ulbrich, Stefan, “Law in Film: Globalizing the Hollywood Courtroom Drama,” Journal of Law and Society 28 (2001) 1117–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×